[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 1.43 MB, 3464x3464, 4CDE115B-BAF8-4826-9458-B59274D7E285.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330164 No.15330164 [Reply] [Original]

Low rise jeans are more flattering that high waisted jeans. Change my mind.

>> No.15330169

most women don't look like that though
the average american woman is 5'4 and 170 lbs, there's a reason they wear high waisted pants

>> No.15330170

2020 girls are too fat to wear low rise. they need high rise to hide their gut and convince themselves it looks better in the process

>> No.15330175

>>15330164
You need to be blind to think high waiste jeans aren't more flattering to the female body. Low rise makes for shit proportions.

>> No.15330179

>>15330164
Yep. The whole point of low rise is to show a bit of midriff. It's sexy but not trashy. Literally do women think showing their low esophagus is remotely attractive?

>> No.15330186
File: 378 KB, 1536x2048, 8EF3BC04-0337-493B-A332-40DAC154AFB7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330186

>>15330175
Be quiet fat cunt

>> No.15330192

>>15330164
The baggy legs too help sillouette

>> No.15330201

>>15330175
ah yes, giving yourself a long crotch is sooooo attractive

>> No.15330204

>>15330186
>hurr fattie
Every time. Never anything original. You do know that not everyone who disagrees with you is fat right? That girl would look better in high waisted pants.

>> No.15330215
File: 160 KB, 749x772, post punk man gonna shoot ya.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330215

SILENCE

LOW-WAIST WILL MAKE EVEN THIN GIRLS LOOK LIKE THEY HAVE FAT ROLLS

IT MAKES LEGS SHORTER, MAKES THE HIPS JUT OUT WEIRDLY AND IT'S GAY

>b-b-but fat girls sometimes wear high-waist to flatten their stomach
AND?
FAT GIRLS SHOULD BE KILLED IN THE FIRST PLACE, SO THAT'S A MOOT POINT

>> No.15330225

>>15330215
Absolutely based.

>> No.15330227
File: 244 KB, 1125x1113, original.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330227

>>15330204
Yes you're a fat cunt and nothing can convince me high rise (fat girl pants) look better than low rise. "That girl" is Megan Fox btw, zoomer.
>>15330215
>he doesn't want to see hips on women
Are you sure you're not a faggot? Or an obvious woman?

>> No.15330238

>>15330164
women have become way too comfortable in high waist

literally nothing will ever convince them to wear low waisted again. except the girls that are into that type of fashion and have relatively slim bodies

you'd be better off convincing a dog to speak english than even suggesting they wear low rise

>> No.15330242

>>15330204
>>15330215
high waisted pants do not look good on attractive people. The only reason they are popular is because they hide the bodies of people with bad bodies.

>> No.15330259

>>15330227
>Yes you're a fat cunt
You're an idiot. I'm not defending high waisted pants because I'm a womans who wears them to hide my fat. I'm a man.
>That girl" is Megan Fox btw
I was referring to the one in the post I replied to you absolute dipshit
>ZOOMER
You're a fucking moron and your baseless assumptions prove it. There's really no back pedaling from your stupidity.
t. Millenial

>> No.15330262

>>15330164
Those straight up look trashy
Same reason why sagging pants looks like shit too

>> No.15330263
File: 122 KB, 690x1035, 3654daaacaef706c1074cf1db0d25242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330263

>>15330164
where can i get jeans like those on the right? low rise or low waist or whatever it's called and also baggy and not too tight around the hips. they don't sell them in department stores anymore so i guess thrift/second hand?

another pic with the type of low rise i like

>> No.15330270

>>15330259
TLDR lose weight fatty

>> No.15330276

>>15330175
maybe, but low rise just makes a woman look more hot and sexy vs high rise which imo makes them look like a mom

>> No.15330280

>>15330242
You aren't aware of what looks good

>> No.15330285

>>15330227
WHAT'S THE POINT OF SEEING HIPS IF THE PLACEMENT MAKES THEM LOOK LIKE FAT ROLLS?

>> No.15330287

>>15330263
second hand shops would be your best bet atm. 2021/2022 they're gonna come back in fashion but for now second hand

>> No.15330289

>>15330242

THEY LOOK BETTER ON EVERYONE

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHY THEY ARE POPULAR

>> No.15330290

>>15330169
then the average girl is unattractive and thus has no relevance to fashion
doesn't matter what a 5'4 170 lb girl wears, it'll look like shit

>> No.15330291

>>15330270
>can't read less than 20 seconds worth of text
Cope harder retard.

>> No.15330293

>>15330285
If you're fat this discussion does not apply to you. If you have fat rolls instead of hips go hide your disgusting body with high waisted jeans or lipo it off you lazy fatty

>> No.15330297

>>15330285
>>15330289
>chubby roasties seething and we're not even 30 posts in
kek good thread OP

>> No.15330298

The only reason low waist got popular is because it makes fat girls feel better about themselves by making everyone look fat

>> No.15330307

>>15330297
SILENCE LARD WHALE

YOU WILL NEVER BE PRETTY EVEN IF YOU MAKE THIN GIRLS WEAR UGLY SHIT

>>15330293
EVEN IF TOU DO NOT HAVE FAT ROLLS, LOW WAIST WILL MAKE YOUR THIN HIPS LOOK LIKE FAT ROLLS SPILLING OUT OF YOUR PANTS;

LIKE A LIFEBUOY MADE OUT OF FLESH

>> No.15330314
File: 112 KB, 700x1209, 13E031CE-10F3-43A0-B379-6897A7D99014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330314

i think they're sexy and i'm glad y2k style is returning

>> No.15330316

>>15330314
Your thoughts are a mistake and your emotions are an error

>> No.15330317

>>15330307
>LOW WAIST WILL MAKE YOUR THIN HIPS LOOK LIKE FAT ROLLS SPILLING OUT OF YOUR PANTS;
Nah.

>> No.15330319

>>15330307
>EVEN IF TOU DO NOT HAVE FAT ROLLS, LOW WAIST WILL MAKE YOUR THIN HIPS LOOK LIKE FAT ROLLS SPILLING OUT OF YOUR PANTS;
Not if you buy them in your size and they properly fit your hips you beached whale. Are you on your period? Why are you a cunt because clothes don't look good on you?

>> No.15330325

>>15330316
lol you are literally s e e t h i n g holy shit

>> No.15330328

>>15330317
YES
AS CAN BE SEEN HERE>>15330314
IT LOOKS LIKE THE FLESH OF HER UPPER BODY IS DRIPPING DOWN, POOLING INTO HER PANTS LIKE RAW PASTE INTO A MOLD, AND WILL SOON OVERFLOW

>>15330319
YES EVEN IF YOU BUY THEM YOUR SIZE

YOU ARE AWARE OF THIS, LANDWHALE, FUCK OFF WITH YOUR SOCIAL ENGINEERING BULLSHIT

>> No.15330333

>>15330328
She looks fine and extremely attractive. Her hips look perfect in those pants and there is no fat. You're a schizophrenic landwhale trying to convince people something that looks shit on you also looks like shit on everyone else.

>> No.15330335

>>15330164
If I wear low cut jeans will you guys like me?

>> No.15330338
File: 2.02 MB, 1423x3000, sub-buzz-1867-1502476928-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330338

It was a different time... the good old days.

>> No.15330339

>>15330333

RAW PASTE
POOLING
INTO A MOLD

YOU ARE A SCHIZOPHRENIC LANDWHALE TRYING TO BRING EVERYONE DOWN WITH YOU

>> No.15330343

>>15330335
I will hammer needles under your fingernails

>> No.15330344

>>15330339
>trying to fat shame bella hadid
>trying to convince the thread there's any fat near her hips at all when we have eyes and can clearly see there's nothing there
>ginormous cunt thinks the world is out to get her
Checks out

>> No.15330351

>>15330297
lmao this. funniest thread in a while. although i do think "thicc" girls wouldn't suit low rise.

>> No.15330357

>>15330344
FOR THE FOURTH TIME

EVEN THOUGH SHE IS NOT FAT

HER PANTS MAKE HER LOOK FAT

YOU CAN'T EVEN UNDERSTAND THE WORDS YOU'RE READING

HOW CAN YOU HOPE TO CONVINCE ANYONE THAT YOU ARE A RELIABLE JUDGE OF AESTHETICS?

FOR ALL I KNOW, YOU ARE BLIND, A FAMILY MEMBER IS ROUGHLY SUMMING UP MY POSTS TO YOU AND TYPING THOSE POSTS IN YOUR STEAD

>> No.15330359
File: 260 KB, 768x620, Bella+Hadid+Low+Rise+Jeans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330359

>>15330357
The pants don't make her look fat. You're not funny, or amusing, you're just a miserable fat attention seeking woman.

>> No.15330360

>>15330343
Thank you! In Lithuania, that is considered a marriage proposal!

Thank you for my 6th marriage proposal!! I accept! Please take this deer as a gift from your new Lithuanian bride!

>> No.15330363

High rise jeans look shit on short girls. They only work with long legs.

>> No.15330364

>>15330357
>HER PANTS MAKE HER LOOK FAT
Nah.

>> No.15330366

>>15330359
IN THAT CASE WHY DO I HAVE A DICK?

THE MORE YOU POST, THE MORE YOU LIE

STOP

FOREVER

>> No.15330368

>>15330351
2 retarded sides arguing with no better argument than calling each other fat. If you use the fat argument in this debate you're low IQ.

>> No.15330369

>>15330364
yeah

>> No.15330370
File: 184 KB, 800x1400, 580e3f234bf056e472c343aa334c4fe5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330370

>>15330366
Don't care keep seething

>> No.15330371

>>15330186
>>15330227
Oh my god I'm gonna COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM

>> No.15330372

>>15330368
It's not a matter of IQ, idiot

it's a matter of not being fucking blind

It's basic fucking shape recognition: a horizontal strip of flesh will look wide, fat. A vertical strip of cloth that goes from the ankles to the waist will look tall, thin

>> No.15330376

>>15330370
Big sad post

>> No.15330377
File: 90 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330377

>>15330372
Retard. High waisted jeans don't make you look skinny. They just hide your gut and give you a long crotch.

>> No.15330379

>>15330372
That's why the argument should be made about proportions and not the wearers weight.

>> No.15330388

>>15330377
Thereby, thus, consequently making you look thinner through the very process you are describing


blind retard

>> No.15330392

>High waisted jeans don't make you look skinny they just make you look skinny

>> No.15330401
File: 62 KB, 640x939, c6a184f981c73add5a064fc8d545621b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330401

>>15330388
>>15330392
Hiding your gut and giving you a long crotch does not make you appear skinny. It makes an unflattering stomach and crotch area. It's simply unattractive and unnatural to give the illusion that your "legs" start halfway up your breasts. Do you think people are retarded like you are? They see high waisted jeans on an obviously not skinny person and think "wow that person is skinny" ???

>> No.15330409
File: 434 KB, 2528x1517, meangirls.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330409

post moar nostalgia outfits

>> No.15330410

>>15330186
Those aren't low rise, just normal.

>> No.15330421

>>15330401
IT makes you appear THINNER
skinny is bad anyway, thin is good

>It makes an unflattering stomach and crotch area
exact opposite of the truth

>It's simply unattractive and unnatural to give the illusion that your "legs" start halfway up your breasts
exact opposite of the truth and even if it were unnatural, it would still be more attractive

Do you think people are retarded like you are?
Do you think everyone has shit taste?

>> No.15330440
File: 1.56 MB, 3464x3464, midhighrise.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330440

>>15330421
>it thinks left actually looks better than the right
>it thinks an unflattering long crotch is a good thing
You're a lose cause. You don't actually care about what looks more flattering on non-fat people, you just want to advocate for what looks more flattering to people with fat guts. I think /cg/ is more up your alley rather than /fa/.

>> No.15330446

>>15330227
i want to lick her ass

>> No.15330449
File: 63 KB, 369x610, l8f4br-l-610x610-jeans-tumblr-sexy-tumblr+outfit-blue+jeans-high+waisted+shorts-denim+jacket-denim-denim+shorts-acrylic+nails.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330449

>>15330164
they're way uglier either way
cant change my mind

>> No.15330450
File: 517 KB, 1212x667, 477D8AEB-4ADC-4F46-ADC1-3AF34695F994.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330450

>>15330440
left looks more feminine. right looks like pic related.

>> No.15330458
File: 47 KB, 400x394, tumblr_os89rf1Ivi1ud0cwoo1_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330458

>>15330449
high waisted panties are way better, too

>> No.15330465
File: 105 KB, 1036x1280, 1592248176755.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330465

>tfw you are skinny and have a totally flat stomach but your belly button is very ugly so you can never wear low-rise

>> No.15330467

>>15330164
>came to the teenager board to talk about fashion trends from 20 years ago
I agree with you tho, every fucking chick wears those jeans. It's getting extremely stale. Same with men's jeans. You're literally looked down upon if you don't wear slim fit, even though they make you look like a fag.

>> No.15330470

>>15330465
show belly button

>> No.15330476

>>15330465
I can 100% guarantee it's nowhere near as ugly as you think. Wear low rise if you want to.

>> No.15330478

>>15330179
it actually is extremely trashy

>> No.15330486
File: 171 KB, 936x626, E8289E95-C0E7-4E99-BFAD-32AFC141BD01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330486

>>15330478
Yeah if you're a chubster

>> No.15330491

>>15330465
I had a gf that would immediately do her belly button if she had money for surgery. It was all in her head.

Most likely the same with you

>> No.15330493

>>15330486
>people are actually crying to mega corporations because they are too fat to fit into the clothes
oh no no no

>> No.15330498

TLDR version of this thread:
Skinny girls look good in both low and high rise jeans
Fat bitches look fat in both low and high rise jeans

>> No.15330500
File: 228 KB, 681x1024, 987654.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330500

>>15330470
I'm too shy but it's like this (an outie). It's not the worst thing in the world but I would be way too embarrassed to show it off in public.

>> No.15330512

>>15330498
Logic!? On /fa/ !???

>> No.15330515

>>15330500
outies were almost like a status symbol when i was growing up. all the girls would wear midriff skirts or jeans and half of them would have an outie belly button.
either way, outies don't look bad. it's like you either have one or you don't it doesn't hinder your appearance in any way

>> No.15330518

>>15330440
right looks like she's pulling her pants up too far as a joke. It's not flattering at all, it's silly

>> No.15330521

>>15330498
based

>> No.15330534
File: 646 KB, 1423x3000, 1517263317004-GettyImages-2122726.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330534

>>15330164
>imagine posting pic related and thinking it looks good

I don't like midget legs nor abnormally long torsos

>> No.15330540

>>15330534
look at that delicious tummy
perfect

>> No.15330542

>>15330534
she mogs 99% of contemporary female celebs
what happened?

>> No.15330545

>>15330542
They're all too fat now and can't wear low rise.

>> No.15330546
File: 1.89 MB, 748x528, source.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330546

>>15330542
yeah no lmfao

>> No.15330550

>>15330534
looking like a proper fridge

>> No.15330554

>>15330545
lel this
'thicc' = fat

>> No.15330557

>>15330546
I don't even know who this is, but she looks like a stripper or something.
Keira knightley manages to look both attractive, but also respectable. She's not flaunting tits and ass in everyone's face, but it's obvious that she's beautiful anyway

>> No.15330558
File: 144 KB, 640x1094, keiraknigh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330558

>>15330550
Uh yeah... a fridge... definitely not peak female form... Haha... no way

>> No.15330561

>>15330557
genuinely impressive cope

>> No.15330563

it depends if you have a long torso short legs high rise short torso long legs low rise

>> No.15330571

>>15330558
Nice stainless Whirlpool you got there

>> No.15330583

>>15330534
>midget legs nor abnormally long torsos
That’s literally how I look naked I hate my life

>> No.15330587

>>15330583
then wear high rise. the only time i can think of where high rise would genuinely suit someone (not fat) more than low rise would be if their legs are too short and their torso is too long

>> No.15330593

>>15330583
Can be fixed with high waisted jeans

>> No.15330595

>long legs
>short torso
should i sag my pants like a nigger i look like 2/3 leg

>> No.15330597

>>15330377
>>15330388
nah high wast makes you look bigger, its too much fabric, she looks way better with low rise

>> No.15330599

>>15330421
you appear fatter

>> No.15330603
File: 44 KB, 553x858, A36CB14E-E641-436A-A6BC-1450F61F83AE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330603

>>15330595
yes if you wanna to be truly 2000 core effay

>> No.15330605

>>15330498
yeah but we were originally talking about low rise vs high rise, fat or skinny wedged itself into the discussion and obviously no one likes fat chicks so low rise wins

>> No.15330609

>>15330563
long torso can look good in low rise and its what a prefer, i dont like long legs on a girl it looks too pencily and the short torso look s odd to me

>> No.15330622

>>15330409
rip old Sherway gardens

>> No.15330634

>>15330486
no, it's trashy.

>> No.15330640

>>15330634
okay zoomer

>> No.15330646

>>15330634
what are you 12?

>> No.15330648

>>15330646
>>15330640
why are you still here boomers
shouldnt u have jobs

>> No.15330649

>>15330640
>>15330646
You zoomers don't understand how trashy whale tail is.

>> No.15330666

low rise better for sticc, high rise better for thicc. pretty simple.

>> No.15330674

>>15330649
you don't have to have a whale tail with low rise. just wear lower underwear. wtf lol

>> No.15330718

>>15330603
Is that who I think it is

>> No.15330738

>>15330649
>>15330648
so which one am I? zoomer or boomer? make up your minds high waist freaks

>> No.15330753
File: 123 KB, 625x990, 3A4F7A51-B0F2-4B07-ABD6-C453CDDFB8FC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15330753

>>15330718
if you're thinking jamie dornan, correct. he aged like shit. he used to be a model and dated keira knightley

>> No.15330796

>>15330164
No I won't try to change your mind. I strongly agree with you. Which waist jeans look like a 1980's mom.

>> No.15330801

>>15330164
high

>> No.15330838

>>15330465
Well you have to post it now

>> No.15330850

>>15330587
>>15330593
That’s what I’ve been doing. It helps I guess but it’s hard to dress a body like mine just due to the weird proportions. I’m not even fat I just have a garbage torso to leg ratio and broad shoulders. It’s not fair

>> No.15330858

They look trashy, because the only way to have decent proportions is to wear a crop top and show all the skin below your belly button. It looks low class, even on girls it looks sexy on.

>> No.15330881

>>15330290
This. "Average" means short fat ugly and dumb. Nobody strives to be average

>> No.15330952

Low rise jeans -- much like those boy shorts underwear -- somehow actually diminish the hips. It's likely due to the fact they sit directly at the hip line.

High-waisted jeans, etc. accentuate the hips. However, a lot of fat chicks use high-waisted jeans, etc. to cover their gut. So, that's its main downfall.

>> No.15331036

>>15330164
Have you tried looking at your photo? That's a pretty good argument in high rise jeans' favor

>> No.15331043

>>15330227
She looks trashy

>> No.15331079

>>15330186
Dumb fucking coomers see a thong string and instantly think something looks better

>> No.15331096

>>15330558
>no tits
>no ass
>no hips

>P E A K

She's got a cute face and that's it.

>> No.15331101
File: 70 KB, 474x1068, 4081c2facdfcec453decc39f90428f50.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331101

Whatever these are

>> No.15331145

>>15331101
I think those are actually mid rise

>> No.15331160

>>15330674
someone didn't live through the time when low rise jeans were actually popular

>> No.15331209
File: 623 KB, 160x160, 7B864BB1-8C7A-4E3B-9100-9467E0A4C9FF.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331209

>>15331160
He didn’t see the Degrassi episode

>> No.15331212

>>15331209
both ugly and trashy

>> No.15331214
File: 1.43 MB, 2448x3264, belly button.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331214

>>15330470

>> No.15331217

>>15331214
Is it really shallow or just full of hair? Shave it and take another pic

>> No.15331367
File: 3.63 MB, 295x222, fuckoffcunt_0.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331367

The people who prefer low-waist pants are the same people who prefer boobs over ass. So basically people with no taste and low iq.

>> No.15331392

>>15331367
Ass preferences are lowkey gay.

>> No.15331395

>>15331392
boob preferrers were breastfed into their teens

>> No.15331430

>>15331395
I wasn’t so what now

>> No.15331431

>>15331367
What does that make me, one who prefers low rise to high rise and ass to boobs?

>> No.15331444

>>15331431
A true intellectual

>> No.15331445

>>15331431
I guess it depends on your reasoning. Is it because you want the least amount of fabric near the boobs as possible?

>> No.15331575

>>15331392
How is liking hips/ass even remotely gay? It's like the least gay thing you can do?

>> No.15331611
File: 30 KB, 612x612, FC5619A5-C966-405F-8F7C-F30405F8C340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331611

high rise looks like you're hiding your shitty build no matter how thin you are. also the crotch looks bad like previously mentioned. too much fabric around the stomach going all the way to your ribcage just looks like shit. you have all this fabric at your abdomen then just two legs hanging down. it's weird.

low rise just won't be accepted in current year or any future year either way, because you need a certain type of frame to wear them. they do make a lot of girls look fat because they just don't hold weight around their hips correctly in the first place. if you have a long torso and short legs they can also make your legs look EVEN shorter. i do think they look hot on skinny people and matched with the correct outfit they don't look "trashy", and some of the posts itt are bullshit made by insecure women.

the only true answer is mid rise. don't try to change my mind. mid rise is low enough to still look feminine but high enough to just sit above the hips. you can still go for the y2k look with mid rise anyway; in fact if i remember correctly mid rise were generally worn more than low rise at the time.

anyway this thread sucks because it's full of women passive aggressively moaning. fucking cringe

>> No.15331615

>>15331209
Hot.

>>15330534
>>15330338
Peak performance.

>> No.15331656

>>15330952
I'd rather say it streamlines the hips.

>> No.15331658

>>15330649
Boomer here. Whale tails look hot.

>> No.15331714
File: 85 KB, 611x837, eb5da2b313294eefe79db2aea8e63341.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331714

>>15330170
>>15330201
>>15330242
>>15330238
i don't even know how many times i have to explain this to you cumbrained faggots. High rise has been the norm since the beginning of fashion. Look at every decade since women started to wear pants. 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s. High rise, high rise high rise, high rise. You know why that is? Because this shape makes the most sense on a feminine proportioned human body with a small waist and wide hips. It has always been like that until the 2000s, which were a decade of trashy, cheap looking trends that didn't last because they were just that. Trashy, cheap and tacky.
>>15330238
>women have become way too comfortable in high waist
kek this ones my favourite. Maybe all of you retards should try and turn off your paranoid coomer brain for once and stop pretending that highwaisted pants are some crazy new trend that only exists to favour fat bitches and to spite you, before you post on a "fashion" board.
so basically this: >>15331079

>> No.15331723

>>15331714
>muh history
>muh appeal to tradition
The 2000s were right.

>> No.15331732

>>15330164
low rise jeans fuck with the torso to leg ratio too much.

>> No.15331735
File: 377 KB, 1332x2000, B6EBB35C-3843-4015-A253-F162E4474A1D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331735

>>15331714
wrong. mid rise looks more feminine than postpartum looking high rise mom pants. also looks more feminine than low rise (below the hip/on the hip)

>> No.15331783
File: 19 KB, 278x425, 378489d3ddf2c95336066443c732f39c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331783

>>15331723
this isn't about traditions or history. It's about proportions that stuck because they make sense. Low rise was a gimmicky short lived fashion trend for a reason

>> No.15331813
File: 114 KB, 750x930, madisonbeer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331813

>>15330164
>comparing megan fox to some average thot in a forever21 fit
it doesn't wort like that, anon. You have to chose equals.

>> No.15331849
File: 96 KB, 634x911, DA8409B2-46AE-419D-A3EB-B95F7E201396.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331849

>>15331813
Madison Beer looks better in low rise lol

>> No.15331870
File: 249 KB, 1200x1800, 2e55853710b2db46d504ce06413b12ab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15331870

>>15331849
no

>> No.15331881

>>15331849
>>15331870
christ, lowrise low IQ cumbrains btfo

>> No.15331888

>>15331849
see, even though she's wearing a fendi shirt and chanel bag, this fit looks trashier and cheaper than the other two. The low vs. highrise debate just reveals time and time again who the cumbrains are and who actually has taste and fashion sense

>> No.15331906

>>15331870
>>15331881
>>15331888
Cope. She looks girlier with low rise and you can see her feminine proportions. Her waist is even MORE accentuated with the skin below her belly button and the crop top. Imagine being brainwashed into thinking showing your midriff is trashy but showing off your fucking esophagus is more attractive. Either way she looks good because she is already attractive.

>> No.15331910

>>15331888
lowrise is sleazecore for women

>> No.15331913

>>15330164
they are if you have a short torso since they elongate your waist.
high waisted pants make me feel like a granny. I hate it.

>> No.15331921

>>15331714
Pants in your pic look sort of like high rise but it you think about it, since they're so slim the narrowest part of their waists can easily be cinched rather low, like shortly above the hipbone, which contrasts with the modern cinch just below the ribcage, right? What I'm getting at is that the pants in pic are basically midrise?

>> No.15331991

>>15331906
>reeeee i'm a coomer without fashion sense! Everyone with a sense of aesthetic that isn't clouded by their dick is brainwashed!
Also brainwashed by who exactly? Stop being paranoid.
>>15331921
>modern cinch just below the ribcage, right?
no, they cinch on bellybutton level wich is slightly below the smallest part of the waist, just like the ones in this pic >>15331813

>> No.15332011
File: 63 KB, 550x875, 1346604175171.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332011

>>15330164
Low rise is impractical and looks retarded. Shit taste, fuckface. High rise looks retarded too, but isn't impractical. Also exposed midriff is shit, so the whole argument is also retarded.

>> No.15332022

>>15332011
>Also exposed midriff is shit
You are an alien and your disguise has failed.

>> No.15332023

>>15331870
madison beer really is the zoomer megan fox

>> No.15332027
File: 247 KB, 1200x1800, 85B811BB-3218-4DA9-9358-DAC7AF1BC659.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332027

>>15331991
Brainwashed by your own idiocy obviously. Calm down retard. At the end of the day you can't just change the fact the low rise looks more feminine on people that are built for it. Not everyone is but there sure are girls that suit it. Stop crying, you're starting to sound like a hag.

>> No.15332032
File: 127 KB, 500x709, 1361680284760.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332032

>>15332022
You have shit taste. If I want something tantalizing we have short dresses, skirts, or shorts, and even more so when paired with tall socks.

>> No.15332036

>>15332032
>that
>tantalizing
you are gay. serious

>> No.15332042
File: 378 KB, 574x580, 1521571358000.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332042

>>15332036
It's more arousing to lift up a dress or skirt than it is to pull down pants.

>> No.15332045

>>15332042
no one gives a shit this thread is about jeans

>> No.15332052
File: 231 KB, 1000x800, ass v boobs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332052

>>15331575
Ape-tier

>> No.15332054

>>15332045
Fuck your low-rise jeans thread, faggot.

>> No.15332118
File: 118 KB, 712x714, DC808740-A3F3-4288-89AB-2A4B7CAE23D2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332118

>>15332054
you mad white boy?

>> No.15332134

>>15331096
if youre not looking in to her eyes while fucking her she's not worth it anon.

>> No.15332139

>>15330164
here's a thought stop getting so pissed about women's fashion if you're a guy just using girls as eye candy. Grow the fuck up and let chicks wear whatever the fuck they want. They aren't yours to own, so stop getting your panties in a twist.

>> No.15332227

>>15331783
It was a nice experiment that should come back.

>> No.15332249

>No low rise punk gf
kill me

>> No.15332281

>>15331888
>muh cumbrains
>muh taste and fashion sense
High-rise make girls look like grannies. Also, we'll see if your taste will still stand up after the early 2000s comeback.

>>15332011
That pic is at least 12 years old. She's clearly wearing low-rise. She just isn't exposing her midriff.

>> No.15332294

>>15332118
Keep lowriseposting.

>> No.15332308

>>15332134
fuck off fridge

>> No.15332319

>>15331906
I don't fucking know how to break it to you, king of all retards, but low rise jeans are the fucking male parachute pants equivalent of female fashion. Your fucking response has convinced me that you're both stupendously gay and legally blind. Do you even fucking know the meaning of the words you use, you fucking pile of boiled rat cock?- You schizoid shit-eater, bumbling ape creature and probably an unapologetic Blink182 fan. Fuck you.

>>15332139
shut your fucking dog mouth, you rat making the impression of a man. Stay the fuck out of threads specifically made to discuss female fashion, we all fucking know your mother dresses you.

>> No.15332426

>>15330186
Literal blind shit-taste autist, no one without serious mental issues prefers low-rise unironically. Can guarantee virgin status on this one

>> No.15332431

>>15330370
F-f-f-fine i-i dont even ccare anyway im not crying you are!

>> No.15332438

>>15330169
Even the non-fat girl in the OP has that button ready to blastoff. That can't be good for digestion..

>> No.15332455

>>15331906
Based.

>> No.15332460

>>15332319
Absolute SEETHE here lads. Keep telling yourself low rise doesn't look good when all the women ITT with low rise mog the up to your boobs ultra high rise grannies.

>> No.15332462

>>15330186
This is what the 2020s will be all about.

>> No.15332513
File: 38 KB, 640x640, 18879078_1891802717725230_5622785417997713408_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332513

I kinda wish the OC dip jeans made a bigger splash. They're high enough to sit on hips and cover your ass, but also have an interesting shape and show more stomach in a hot way. Looks really good on someone thin, even if they have wider hips or some fat on them.

>>15330263
Try thrifting men's jeans that are big enough to fit around your hips (i.e. if your hips measure 33", a men's size 33)

>>15330314
This isn't even that low rise

>>15330500
That is a nice belly button, esp on a flat stomach

>>15330534
Will never forget being in middle school, layering tank tops trying to make my torso look as long as possible, or hoarding those awful empire waist tops, Why was this a trend? Everyone was so skinny, there wasn't really anything to hide

>> No.15332573

low rise is inherently ugly and only looks good on supermodels because supermodels could also make a potatosack with holes look good.

>> No.15332576

>>15332573
No, see high-rise.

>> No.15332577

>>15332027
>woman wearing literal mens jeans
>omg so feminine
the reason why this is feminine, is because a half naked woman with a perfect body is wearing it, not the pants.

>> No.15332781

>>15332042
Very true

>> No.15332786

>>15332227
too bad it wont

>> No.15332800

>>15330186
Exposed thongs make me COOOOOOOOOMM!!!

>> No.15332807

>>15332576
high rise looks good on everyone
so?

>> No.15332877

>>15332807
Only tall and skinny people with long torso look okay in high-rise. It doesn't matter it if sits naturally at the waist, cutting the torso in half doesn't look good.

>> No.15332880
File: 112 KB, 610x610, B9022E13-84FD-45EA-9390-B23E67E70591.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332880

>>15332807
>high rise looks good on everyone
False

>> No.15332881

>>15332877
only tall and skinny people look good in low rise
its literally the opposite

>> No.15332884

low rise only looks good when the stomach and almost the vulva is exposed. there's nothing wrong with that but i'm not comfortable with wearing that outside.

>> No.15332885

>>15332877
Yeah see that’s me. Skinny with a really long torso and proportionally short legs so what I do is get high rise in flare or bootcut and wear sneaker wedges so the jeans hide them and it elongates my legs.

>> No.15332947

>>15332786
it's already happening look at fashion zoomers on tiktok

>> No.15332949

>>15332947
they're all wearing high rise bro
you sure u should be looking at teens tho?

>> No.15332953

>>15330175
>Low rise makes for shit proportions.
and makes any woman look fat unless she is size 0 or toned af

>> No.15332954

>>15332949
>you sure u should be looking at teens?
i'm a 20 year old female so i think it's ok

>> No.15332958

>>15332954
yeah you sound like a groomer to me
>im female hehe i cant be a pedo

>> No.15332973

>>15332953
Better hit the gym then.

>> No.15332976
File: 15 KB, 400x600, 4DE7F4EE-0AA1-416F-A22E-E2C2AD03794F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332976

Are these high rise or low rise?

>> No.15332979

>>15332885
Pics?

>> No.15332981

>>15332281
>She just isn't exposing her midriff.
Which was my point.

>> No.15332982

>>15332973
you mean stop eating I assume
thanks for nothing anyway

>> No.15332985

>>15332976
They make my dick rise knawumsayin cuz

>> No.15332999
File: 63 KB, 575x1024, 1591722103542.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15332999

>>15330634
Good.

>> No.15333000
File: 243 KB, 2000x1000, super-low-rise-jeans-1581077096.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15333000

Christina Aguilera is perfection

>> No.15333010

>>15332513
>layering tank tops trying to make my torso look as long as possible
This is giving me war flashbacks. Mine were always halfway between my crotch and my knees.

>> No.15333016

>>15332981
ONE of your point, but you still talked crap about low rise when you posted a girl wearing low rise.

>> No.15333017

>>15330238
My dog speaks Japanese. He says "baca baca" to everyone that walks by.

>> No.15333022

>>15333000
Those were the times.

>>15332976
Mid.

>> No.15333130

depends on how long the torso is

>> No.15333138

>>15330179
But high rise hugs the ass more....like idc what you deem as thrashy or not cus that's a benefit to me lmao

>> No.15333146

>>15330666
No, see
>>15330534

>> No.15333147

>>15333016
>Also exposed midriff is shit, so the whole argument is also retarded.

I'd say it was my primary argument. As far as aesthetics whether they're low or high is irrelevant when the whole look is fucked by exposed midriff. The only other argument is one of practicality which is somewhat irrelevant for a fashion board.

>> No.15333158

Low rise only looks good if you have wide hips

>> No.15333163

Daily reminder that today's pant trends are still low compared to historic standards

>> No.15333174

>>15333146
>proceeded to point out peak lowrise performance
What about it?

>> No.15333185

>>15333138
I prefer cute round butts so tightly squeezed in lowrise it'd spill out. High-rise just gives you the illusion of flat asses that go up to the armpits.

>> No.15333237

>>15332426
bro dont be so mad bro
its okey to be wrong

>> No.15333248

>>15332999
based and high T pilled

>> No.15333272
File: 8 KB, 174x289, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15333272

>>15333185
no they dont tard

>> No.15333281

>>15333272
>long asses
This is superior >>15331209

>> No.15333287

>>15333281
oh yourr a troll boomer
good one bro got me XD go Q!

>> No.15333302

>>15333287
Are you retarded?

>> No.15333310

>>15333302
Worse, he thinks high-rise put more emphasis on the ass because apparently it "hugs more".

>> No.15333311
File: 67 KB, 750x646, c2dcd88384957af4fa6828e228330527.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15333311

>>15333302
u excited for donald trump 2020?!!? haha later bro see you at church

>> No.15333321

>>15333311
Trump has got my vote again

But he's fucking us on the 2nd a little.

Title 1's and braces are current fight got $1200 in parts ready for a build if it's okay'd by doj.

If Trump fucks on on braces then I'm out of a good brace and need to rebuild my t1 to suit cadoj

>> No.15333328

>>15333311
I'm excited for lowrise to come back whether you like it or not. :^)

>> No.15333345

>>15333328
u like unicorns dont u babygirl

>> No.15333631

>>15332947
Got some to recommend?

>> No.15333686

>>15330164
there are two options with clothing
you either reveal your own well proportioned and shaped body
or you use clothes to make visual well proportioned shapes that arent your body's
these shapes need to be clear and finished and not interrupted or in some sort of disarray
this is why high waisted pants are more flattering for both men and women (James Dean anyone?)

low waisted shit elongates the upper and crops the lower, makes a waist where there isnt one and really is just poorly proportioned unless youre showing your lithe body off

>> No.15333715

Low-rise looks disgustingly primitive. It's so in-your-face "LOOK AT ME I'M SEXY".

>> No.15333764

The amount of seething from highrisefags is astounding.

>> No.15333770

>>15333764
this
but low

>> No.15333781

>>15330371
Based

>> No.15334134

>>15333715
High-rise looks disgustingly ugly. It just screams "LOOK AT ME I WEAR A DIAPER".

>> No.15334136

>>15333770
Nice cope.

>> No.15334150

>>15333686
Long torsoes and showing off slim bodies > respecting "proportions and shapes" a.k.a. cutting the torso in half and making it look like you wear a diaper

>> No.15334151

>>15330335
Show pics.

>> No.15334163

>>15330534
>midriff not cut in half
>delicious abs in all their glory
>legs still look long
>plus the flares make the legs look more balanced so they still look long
Barely-18 y/o Keira was a miracle. Also, you can't have low-rise without flared jeans.

>> No.15334166

>>15330858
Showing midriff is effay.

>> No.15334175

>>15334150
tell it to james dean and italy

>> No.15334232
File: 109 KB, 1242x1320, 1564363931568.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334232

>>15332880
ugh

>> No.15334368
File: 617 KB, 828x1031, 4A04CB65-107F-4801-8693-A761B4F58186.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334368

>>15330164
honestly if you can pull them off, low rise jeans are the ultimate flex. they trigger every insecure chick in a 5 mile radius

>> No.15334374
File: 219 KB, 766x959, 7466C569-0E01-4C1B-8C44-9BE18E790DB0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334374

Are these considered low rise? Or just regular?

>> No.15334376
File: 124 KB, 639x837, A62B6A97-947B-4CFF-A607-BB1826ACFB92.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334376

>>15334374
Another pic

>> No.15334378

>>15334374
Low
>>15334376
Mid

>> No.15334387

>>15334376
DAMN
them some fuckin attractive girls with bad taste

>> No.15334400

>>15334376
Their jeans could be longer and more flared out, but I love the rest of their outfits.

>> No.15334411
File: 28 KB, 483x475, imhigh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334411

its like that study they did on lingerie. if they cover up, we have more to the imagination and its also like a pretty bow so we only think its sexier.
bodies are sexy and humans are sexy, not the fetishized idea of whats behind that straining button.

>> No.15334430
File: 40 KB, 480x720, 14-mariahcarey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334430

>>15334411
Suuure.

>> No.15334441
File: 273 KB, 760x1280, Screenshot_20200620-095614_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334441

>>15331813

>> No.15334466

Jeans are ugly both on women and men, also boring as fuck.

>> No.15334476

>>15334387
>everyone who wears this thing has bad taste reeeeeeeee
Are you a faggot? You have been crying about this for days

>> No.15334480

>>15334476
they have been moaning and saying everyone itt with low rise has bad taste when in reality 1) it looks good if you have the body 2) it is feminine 3) low rise is making a huge comeback now it's getting trendy all over again. they're literally an out of touch retard, probably some dumb bitch mad no one is gonna bat an eye at her grandma fits anymore.

>> No.15334483
File: 210 KB, 626x891, 996C7193-8C92-454B-BCB2-BF72C58FE843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334483

>>15334476
>>15334480
Yep all the young skinny bitches are starting to wear them again while the body positive movement fat bitches moan in the corner

>> No.15334488
File: 221 KB, 667x1009, DEDCFD52-CAFC-4D69-B88C-4A98A53EABF6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15334488

>> No.15334501

>>15334476
stupid cunt i wasnt even talking about the fucking waist
you are trash

>> No.15334512

>>15332011
>posts pic of lowrise wearer looking hella /fa/

>> No.15334663

notice there isn't a single shot of low rise from the back? it's because it makes the ass non existent. i know this board is into flat androgeny but it's the truth

>> No.15334728

>>15330227
Megan Fox is literally zoomer's first celeb crush
Zoomers grew up with the shitty transformers movies
Idiot

>> No.15334735

>>15330186
who? please I'm begging

>> No.15334741

>>15330186
name?

>> No.15334779

>>15332052
damn, guess jews and argies really are white then

>> No.15334805

>>15330186
BASED

>> No.15334858

>>15334735
>>15334741
Calm down
https://instagram.com/thetaylorperrin

>> No.15334948

>>15334512
Both look like shit. My point was it's irrelevant when you have exposed midriff; it's only appeal is to dumb cunts and coomers.

>> No.15334963

>>15334948
So your entire point is you don't like midriff? Ok faggot nobody cares

>> No.15334979

>>15334963
The only appeal to low rise seems to be when it's paired with short tops, so it's relevant, cunt.

>> No.15334983

>>15334979
The appeal is that it looks good and fashionable regardless of your faggy midriff wrong opinion

>> No.15334988

>>15334983
It looks fucking retarded, and so are you for thinking otherwise.

>> No.15334990

>>15334988
>i-it looks retarded
You're just too fat to pull it off
>inb4 "i'm not a woman"
You have the brain of one

>> No.15335007
File: 250 KB, 1200x1797, 29833.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15335007

>>15330164
>it's finally coming back
my time has come. i like to pair them with blouses and unbutton from the button until the chest. makes for a casual sweet and sexy look. honestly was kinda sick of seeing girls try to do early 2000s but without the staplepiece(!!!) low rise. we'll definitely start seeing a lot more of it, and more of mid rise too.

>> No.15335008

>>15334990
Everything looks worse on fat people, faggot.

>> No.15335025

>>15331079
yes i do
fight me

>> No.15335156

>>15335007
the only people that know of ow rise were the ones who grew up with it, these zoomers didnt so high rise is all they know

>> No.15335158

>>15335156
we lived through it
and it looked just as trashy then

>> No.15335163

>>15335158
have fun with your grandma pants

>> No.15335169

>>15335163
of course i will, ive never had to make a thread crying about it :)

>> No.15335179

>>15335169
this entire thread is full of crying from people like you you dumb roastie

>> No.15335182

>>15332462
the early 2000s?

>> No.15335184

>>15335179
but whoooo made the thread :)

>> No.15335188

>>15335184
but whoooo is bitching? *))

>> No.15335189

>>15335188
the same people who made the thread

>> No.15335198

>>15330440
The left is the only exposed midriff, and what looks more like a mid rise jean that looks good.

Holy shit –– everything else looks fucking horrible. It's like some late 90s/early 2000s coomer's idea of tantalizing.

>> No.15335200

>>15335189
are you retarded?

>> No.15335203

Is wearing low-rise jeans as a man gay? btw i'm /fit/ with an Adonis belt

>> No.15335204

>>15335200
what angry language :/

>> No.15335206

>>15335198
>you either hate it or you're a coomer
What a horrible post

Mods this thread SUCKS please delete it already.

>> No.15335209

>>15335189
so you made the thread?

>> No.15335210

>>15335198
>it's the same guy from days ago bitching about how only coomers like it and using the word "tantalizing" for no reason
oh no no no
this is really embarrassing (for you)
why are you so obsessed?

>> No.15335214

>>15335204
youre on four channel...go to reddit if you cant take it tubby

>> No.15335220

>>15330164
the virgin high rise vs. the chad low rise

>> No.15335228

>>15335209
yes i made the thread
booo high rise wahhhh

>> No.15335231

>>15335206
That's not what I said.

>>15335210
I was giving it a second thought and looking through the examples posted here. I found an exception, and it occurred to me that maybe it wasn't inherently horrible, but just shit taste by whoever was posting them. By how many and similar shitty ones were posted, I can only assume it was single poster, and probably the OP.

>> No.15335236

You know it actually takes a sense of fashion and style to wear low rise, thats why it scares all these zoomer fatties. 90% of chicks today have no fashion sense. They just slap on a pair of high rise jeans and call it a day. Chicks be wearing high rise jeans, a regular pair of shoes and a slim t shirt and everyone is drooling over them thinking their /fa/, its a clown world we live in

>> No.15335237

>>15332134
>not looking into her browneye instead

>> No.15335241

its a great world we live in

>> No.15335252

>>15335236
BASED

Literally look at all the seething roasties ITT. They think they can convince people to hate low rise, as if people with brains have mob mentality or something.

>> No.15335270

>>15335252
>as if people with brains have mob mentality or something.
they do

>> No.15335285

>>15330164
Right literally looks like a hobo. Uncomfortable shit appearance

>> No.15335291

>>15334150
yup, totally agree, a girl with a good body that wears low rise beats any hot chick in high rise

>> No.15335293

>>15334376
that chick in the middle makes low rise look amazing

>> No.15335302

>>15335236
>>15334990
>u just don't like kuz ur fat
Maximum coping. You got shit taste, bud, but I concede that there are exceptions, but they look more like mid rise.

>> No.15335411

>>15335302
>You got shit taste, bud
cope

>> No.15335420

>>15335182
Yeah, it's coming back.

>> No.15335428

>>15335293
That's because it's mid.

>> No.15335431

>>15335231
Shit taste.

>> No.15335441

>>15335007
>low rise
>AND flared jeans
This is how you do it, folks.

>> No.15335460
File: 620 KB, 1280x1280, thongjeans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15335460

>>15330164
bring back thong jeans

>> No.15335498

>>15335460
>SNES & DC

I'd plow her butthole then challenge her to Mario Kart followed by an ass to mouth sesh then chillax with some Sonic Adventure

>> No.15335548

>>15330634
nothing wrong with looking a little trashy imo

>> No.15335557

>>15332011
gayest post itt

>> No.15335566

>>15332319
>but low rise jeans are the fucking male parachute pants equivalent of female fashion.
brace yourself cause these are coming back too

>> No.15335626

>>15335460
effay

>> No.15335647

Any zoomette IGs in lowrise you'd recommend before the thread gets archived?

>> No.15335735

>>15335498
based butthole surfer

>> No.15335749

>>15330486
It'd be sexy af if thick girls started goin around with unzipped jeans like that B)

>> No.15335795

>>15335749
It was a trend for a very short while in the late 90s.

>> No.15335908

>>15332976
both rise

>> No.15336152

>>15335302
(You)

>> No.15336157

>>15335158
And us boomers made fun of high-rise back then, still do.

>> No.15336161

>>15334663
Lowrise is here to streamline fat nigger asses.

>> No.15336167

>>15336157
if you're over 30 posting here you're just as pathetic as the tripfags

>> No.15336210

>>15336167
>muh zoomer hugbox

>> No.15336281

>>15336210
get a wife

>> No.15336296

>>15336281
Get some lowrise.

>> No.15336304

>>15336296
looks ugly no one wears it for a reason

>> No.15336313

>>15336304
Better get ahead the curve, they're coming back.

>> No.15336320

>>15336313
LOL yea in your dreams

>> No.15336342

>>15336320
I won't have to dream. It's a thing on IG. How is this board so out of touch?

>> No.15336359

>>15336342
you finding one instagram that likes 2000s core does not make it "a thing"

>> No.15336366

>>15336359
That's what I used to think a few years ago. But I turn my back one minute and suddenly things got out of control.

>> No.15336730

Low rise has always looked trashy.

>> No.15336744

>>15336730
Nothing wrong with trashy.

>> No.15336951

>>15336730
Ony early zoomers think that. The younger ones who weren't alive back then are all nostalgic about the early 2000s.