[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 39 KB, 600x400, 12341346123412361324.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15261627 No.15261627 [Reply] [Original]

Is it better to be conventionally beautiful or unconventionally beautiful? With everything being based around sexuality being what is deemed cool and the pursuit of the opposite gender to be the ultimate goal of life which one prevails? Which one is it better to lean towards?

>> No.15261631

>>15261627
Depends bruh

>> No.15261640

Unconventional beauty isn't beauty. People with shitty haircuts and ill fitting clothes are ugly and never get anything from the opposite gender unless they have money or fame. If neither of those factors existed the conventionally beautiful would be chosen over the unconventional each time.

>> No.15261669
File: 1.63 MB, 1099x1861, 1589475350841.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15261669

>>15261627
Unconventional, conventional beauty is boring, generic and never transcends time. It mostly depends what purpose is being displayed and to whom.

Beauty itself, in its purest form, can be found if enough attention is given to a certain being.

>>15261640
uhhh I don't think you get the point
> People with shitty haircuts and ill fitting clothes are ugly and never get anything from the opposite gender unless they have money or fame.

We aren't talking about ig shitty "models" who wear oversized shit (i.e Felix spooner and that kind). OP refers to the aesthetic values of beauty itself.

>> No.15261887

>>15261669
lmao this faggot thinks he’s a philosopher