Boot General /boots/

[Anonymous No.15205189]

>discussion thread for boots topics
>comfy boot resources
https://www.findyourboots.com/boots/guide-to-mens-boot-styles
https://www.realmenrealstyle.com/leather-boots-care-guide/
https://www.ties.com/blog/mens-boots-guide
https://www.artofmanliness.com/articles/cowboy-boots/

[Anonymous No.15205219]

>>15205189
I used to be a boot fag. I owned several pairs of Red Wings, 2 pairs of Whites, and others. Spent a load of money on boots, trees, products, etc.
Now I dress full Italian menswear and wear loafers on most days. Funny how one's fashion changes over time

[Anonymous No.15205260]

>>15205189
I screenshotted this a few years ago. Is it accurate?

[Anonymous No.15205268]

>>15205260
If I ever get autistic enough to throw Viberg money at boots I'm going for British

[Anonymous No.15205318]

>>15205260
No not really anon, it's just your run of the mill autistic 4chan sperg-text. Buy the boots you like the look of and that fit well and that are affordable to you. Whether it's Timberland or Docs or Alden

[Anonymous No.15205918]

new to boots and got these on sale as my first pair. what do you guys, think?

[Anonymous No.15206500]

https://www.timberland.com/shop/mens-timberland-pro-boots/mens-timberland-pro-drivetrain-comp-toe-work-shoes-brown-a1z6a214
Does anyone know anything about these boots, or any boots in this style?

[Anonymous No.15206934]

>>15205918
Those are shit.
J/k I like them nice cop

[Anonymous No.15207472]

Reddit General - /soi/

[Anonymous No.15207553]

>>15207472
> brainded faggot

[Anonymous No.15207626]

Just bought these (Allen Edmonds Hearst cap toe)

[Anonymous No.15207655]

>>15207626
these just look off to me, they're too short

[Anonymous No.15207666]

>>15207655

As far as I can tell, they look pretty standard w.r.t. their height for this style of boot - very similar to >>15205918, which I also think look nice. Different taste, I guess. Cheers.

[Anonymous No.15207672]

>>15207626
I have the Higgins Mill

Very good boot, better than memeverine 1000 memes

[Anonymous No.15207681]

>Tfw I didnt care of my chromexcel leather and it turned gray

is it fucked for good or can it be fixed? I used Saphyr leather conditioner and its still fucked

[Anonymous No.15207682]

>>15207626
>>15207672

really like the look of both the higgins mill and hearst -- trying to decide which 2 cop

[Anonymous No.15207684]

>>15207682
I bought mine on sale during the annual nordstrom summer sale for 200 bucks. massive bargain.

[Anonymous No.15207695]

>>15207684
>>15207682
There is a similar deal at Nordstrom Rack right now for the Hearst.

[Anonymous No.15207863]

>>15205219
what do u do for a living. nice boots are the most dressed up I can get away with in my industry. anything for formal looks comically out of place

[Anonymous No.15207919]

>>15205189
>and not a single good pair of boots was posted
>twas the story of manlet general

[Anonymous No.15207976]

>>15207919
post a good boot u manlet

[Anonymous No.15207984]

>>15207976
i'm not a manlet so i don't wear boots
maybe one day they'll put lifts built into your boots so that you can see over the counter once the barista hands you your soi latte

[Anonymous No.15208022]

>>15207984
good one manlet

[Anonymous No.15208062]

>>15208022
>good one manlet, he types as he sits in his booster seat, size 7 red wings sitting alongside his desk
>the boots wonder if they'll ever be used as work boots, but as of the past 6 months, they have only been used for walking to their owners cubicle and for instagram photos tagged #madeinusa

[Anonymous No.15208079]

>>15208062
How much of an effete noodle armed faggot are you to think that these boots even remotely resemble actual contemporary workwear? Earnest question.

[Anonymous No.15208081]

>>15208079
>the manlet seethes. he stands on his tippy toes to only whimper out “these are heritage work boots, they’re not meant for actual working men... that’s why i wear them”
>the manlet avoids posting boots at all costs, as he does not want to reveal how small and docile he is.
>he returns to lurking, only springing up for short periods of time to defend the sanctity of his numale booties and to pretend he is taller than 5’7.

[Anonymous No.15208156]

got these on sale. are they /fa/shionable?

[Anonymous No.15208161]

>>15208156
>crepe sole
>suede
>3 eye
no

[Anonymous No.15208211]

>>15207863
Hospital administration

[Anonymous No.15208237]

Thinking about picking up these funky things. I wear a lot of browns, blues and other colors that would work with he green.

[Anonymous No.15208725]

https://discord.gg/k2c5Ue

[Anonymous No.15208783]

in love with these AEs

[Anonymous No.15208788]

>>15205918
sick, I love em. Anyone know what it's called when the sole is a different color than the shoe?

[Anonymous No.15209001]

Red wing - Are you supposed to put insoles in them?

[Anonymous No.15209016]

>>15209001
you’re supposed to put them in the garbage where they belong and buy white’s instead.

[Anonymous No.15209198]

>>15209016
Do you have whites?

[Anonymous No.15209251]

Find me a good looking moc-toe boot, /fa/

[Anonymous No.15209261]

>>15205189
Bought pic related over the weekend. Retail $130, I paid $10. Leather upper, crepe sole, 3 eyeholes

I think the guy was a youngling who isn't aware of leather conditioner and shoe trees. The boots were in perfect shape. Just minor scuffs, and deep creases on the top from foot flexing

>pic related
After some Kiwi conditioner and shoe trees I grabbed at Walmart

[Anonymous No.15209266]

>>15209261
*They're Clarks

[Anonymous No.15209270]

>>15209261
*they're Clarks, two eyeholes

[Anonymous No.15209353]

Is it possible to wear these kinds of combat boots without looking like some Matrix ass turbo autist? I've never had a pair of boots and don't really have any decent inspo apart from those Shia pics in gen 1 sfbs

[Anonymous No.15209367]

>>15209261
i like the colour

[Anonymous No.15209449]

>>15209261
>crepe soles
>desert boots
>clarks
>kiwi conditioner
so many things wrong. at least you got them for $10 so you will think you got your money’s worth when they inevitably fall apart.

[Anonymous No.15209458]

>>15208237
they look cool, reminds me of a dinosaur

[Anonymous No.15209823]

Do you think a tranny could pull off a pair of Quoddy three hole chukkas in black chromexcel? Found a pair while thrifting yesterday and they're comfy AF.

[Anonymous No.15209874]

i know you folks hate red wing with a passion, but are there any boots from their line that you actually like?

i'm not crazy about their patterns, but something about the flatbox beckmans really does it for me. imo they're the best boot RW has put out to date. i pulled the trigger on a discounted pair last month- the low volume, unstructured toe, and klondike teacore hide really does it for me.

[Anonymous No.15210097]

what are the best paratrooper/milsurp/meme boots for 300 and under?

[Anonymous No.15210107]

>>15205260
where do solovair go

[Anonymous No.15210164]

>>15210107
Shit tier. Hardly different from Docs

[Anonymous No.15210271]

>>15210097
Think McFly, think

[Anonymous No.15210316]

>>15209353
I get compliments wearing my corcorans but it may vary depending on how much of a sperg you are
>>15207984
I dont think you need to be a manlet for boots im 6'5" without them. All you guys replying to each other are all manlets till you post a pic proving otherwise

[Anonymous No.15210370]

>>15208081
I only own boots for work which aren't worth posting, and I'm not inclined to take a thread with RMRS and AoM in the OP seriously. I just think it's amusing that after taking a break from /fa/ for a while you're still haunting this thread.

[Anonymous No.15210424]

>>15210370
he has no life, no other way to explain it

[Anonymous No.15210440]

take the Waxi pill

[Anonymous No.15210486]

Can Cowboy boots ever look good? Or do they look like a costume (I don't work with cattle nor do I live in Texas).

[Anonymous No.15210530]

>>15209353
i've seen these work with techwear but techwear is approaching matrix turbo autist

>>15210097
corcorans or austrian memes

[Anonymous No.15210542]

I instinctively love the aesthetic of these for a casual look. What are your guys thoughts?

[Anonymous No.15210564]

>>15210542
no

[Anonymous No.15210575]

>>15205260
Why Eastland pleb tier they pretty good and I've had them for a 2 years now without breaking

[Anonymous No.15210633]

What are some good summer boots that aren't desert boots. I can't seem to get into them.

[Anonymous No.15210654]

ive got these

[Anonymous No.15210858]

chippewa, just oiled these. still kinda blown away the leather on these barely creases on the toe box

[Anonymous No.15211066]

Are Rick creeper boots worth the money?

[Anonymous No.15211077]

>>15207681
Give it a good brushing.
What color? Black can't be fixed

[Anonymous No.15211112]

>>15209198
not him, but yes
pic related

[Anonymous No.15211122]

>>15205918
>>15206500
>>15207626
>>15208156
>>15208237
>>15208783
>>15209261
>>15210440
>>15210486
>>15210542
>>15210654
>>15210858
REDDIT

[Anonymous No.15211137]

>>15205260

>Murican brands in patrician tier

Yeah, no.

[Anonymous No.15211141]

>>15211122
>anything that isn't spergy autistic combat boots is "reddit"
Imagine being you

[Anonymous No.15211144]

just picked up a pair of these bad boys.
what do you think?

[Anonymous No.15211149]

>>15211144
ugh yikes big cringe why did you buy doc ma-
>solovair
oh i mean super based, anon! epic!

[Anonymous No.15211322]

>>15210370
>i won’t post boots because my autism flares up and i can’t ignore 4 links at the top of the thread
if you don’t want people to make fun of your clown shoes, just say so

[Anonymous No.15211329]

Any thoughts on Red Wing Heritage 9197 Postman boots? IIRC they were never released in the US, but I'm always keeping my eye for them on eBay.

[Anonymous No.15211334]

>>15211329
>redditwings

[Anonymous No.15211344]

>>15211329
>Crepe Soles
>Red Wings
>Black Boots
Firm do not cop.

[Anonymous No.15211738]

>>15210164
https://youtu.be/0DzVq9RsMMQ

[Anonymous No.15211742]

>>15210542
I dont mind the style but i don't like any of those colors. I would like an off white or grey or white

[Anonymous No.15211749]

>>15211144
beautiful

[Anonymous No.15211919]

>>15211329
friend of mine has a pair, they're supposedly super comfy.

[Anonymous No.15212098]

I found a pair of these weird old RM Williams boots on ebay going for cheap. Talk me out of it anons

[Anonymous No.15212105]

>>15212098

also pics of the soles and inside

[Anonymous No.15212207]

How much do you guys normally pay for boots? I want to get a pair of these but they go into the $300 range

[Anonymous No.15212411]

>>15211122
>First reply is Viberg
Imagine losing all credibility this fast

[Anonymous No.15212416]

>>15212207
boots are pricey, if you like the pair and it's from a quality company, I say go for it.

$100 or less: shit tier, not worth it unless a boot that retails for closer to 200 is on sale for less.

$100-250: acceptable tier, many quality entry-level boots fall into this tier

$250-$400: mid-tier.

$400+: high tier. Highly regarded companies, best quality leathers, most hyped etc. Depending on the leather, some brands that typically fall into lower price points might have boots in this range as well.

[Anonymous No.15212522]

>>15211122
post your boots now

[Anonymous No.15212668]

>>15208788
Natural welt.

[Anonymous No.15212671]

>>15211122
t. seething poor fag

[Anonymous No.15212692]

>>15212416
>$100-250: acceptable tier, many quality entry-level boots fall into this tier
name some, pls

[Anonymous No.15212797]

>>15212692
mid tier milsurp boots, meermin, docs (if you're into that type of thing)

[Anonymous No.15212807]

>>15212692
>>15212692
Many will likely disagree but this would include boots like Red Wings and Wolverine on the higher end of the spectrum. Also Chippewas, Solovairs, stuff like that. At this price point, there are typically compromises made. Mid-tier seems to be the sweet spot for quality and style without being too overpriced. Some of the lower end of the high tier would fall into the mid-tier during sales as well

[Anonymous No.15212838]

I have no idea what I'm looking for in a boot. I like the silhouette of these, they don't look too bulky. Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.15212863]

>>15212838
You're either going to look like an off-duty mallcop or like a grown man who still wears velcro sneakers

[Anonymous No.15212892]

>>15212863
...but they aren't velcro sneakers?

I don't want them for normal fits I want a boot that'll look sleek with a techwear type of fit

[Anonymous No.15212896]

>>15212892
They aren't literally velcro sneakers but they got the weird ugly shape of a velcro sneaker, ya dig?

[Anonymous No.15212897]

>>15212098
do not buy used boots

[Anonymous No.15212906]

>>15212807
>>15212797
can u give some examples of brands for the $250-400 tier?

[Anonymous No.15212950]

>>15212906
(some) danners, sanders&sanders, some allen edmonds

[Anonymous No.15212958]

>>15212906
Also oak street bootmakers

[Anonymous No.15212972]

posting danner CHONK kino

[Anonymous No.15212978]

>>15212972

[Anonymous No.15213010]

>>15212207
$300 for alligator boots? you must be crazy

[Anonymous No.15213027]

>>15212896
I don't dig. These look nothing like velcro sneakers. Think McFly, think

[Anonymous No.15213036]

>>15213027
You're blind.

[Anonymous No.15213113]

>>15212692
There’s that South American shoe maker who make nice Goodyear welted boots can’t think of the name

[Anonymous No.15213124]

>>15213113
>South American shoe maker who make nice Goodyear welted boot
Beckett Simonen

[Anonymous No.15213211]

>>15211077
its brown

[Anonymous No.15213336]

thoughts?

[Anonymous No.15213387]

>>15212098
do it idiot

[Anonymous No.15213392]

>>15212098
6in is weird and used is eewwwww

[Anonymous No.15213501]

>>15205189
cop or not?

[Anonymous No.15213507]

>>15205189
I don't always have the confidence to wear these but when I do...nothing feels better.

[Anonymous No.15213525]

>>15210486
Post a pic of cowboy boots and we'll tell you.

[Anonymous No.15213528]

>>15211141
Not who you responded to but you can smell the onions coming off a lot of those "boots". The kind of boots you wear while sitting in the corner of a room watching 2 dudes fuck your gf in ways she won't let you fuck her while you hold back tears and fail at convincing yourself that you're enjoying this.

[Anonymous No.15213622]

>>15213528
Not who you responded to but the way you cling to internet memes is pathetic

[Anonymous No.15213632]

>>15213622
not who you responded to but the way that you’re getting triggered by this and constantly giving (you)s is pathetic
move on with your life faggot. it’s ok if someone makes fun of the type of boots you like to wear.

[Anonymous No.15213636]

>>15213632
not who you responded to but this is a discussion board you fucking idiot people can respond however they please

[Anonymous No.15213653]

>>15213636
Not who you responded to but posting that you’re triggered by someone’s memes is off topic from the thread and only serves to push the thread closer to bump limit without any substantial discussion.
This post and the replies before it are a waste of thread space and any responses to this post not directly related to boots are a waste.

[Anonymous No.15213848]

>>15212906
whites

[Anonymous No.15213850]

>people thinking danners are quality boots
what the actual fuck
in my industry danners are seen as exclusively for the poor, like you get those when you are still in school for your first season of work

[Anonymous No.15213852]

Clown Shoes General - /honk/

[Anonymous No.15213861]

>>15208237
Letting you know these boots are fucking stiff

[Anonymous No.15213873]

Man, the Moc 875 is great and very comfy, i kinda love Redwing now.
Maybe i will buy another one in red or navy color.

[Anonymous No.15213876]

>>15212838
the suede ones look fine for casual wear, danner quality is pretty great, go for it

[Anonymous No.15213878]

>>15213873
soi meter is through the roof on this picture

[Anonymous No.15213883]

>>15213873
can moc toe ever look good?

[Anonymous No.15213886]

>>15213878
But i don't have beard or wear flannel

[Anonymous No.15213889]

>>15213886
you’re still a soi faggot.
also buy pants that actually fit you instead of doing those shit cuffs.

[Anonymous No.15213893]

>>15211322
>clown shoes
Already went over this in my first post, nobody wears that shit as actual workwear. Nobody needs to see my scratched up old Rossis, this is a fashion board. Might post if I decide to cop some RMWs.

[Anonymous No.15213976]

>>15213850
is your industry swallowing loads

[Anonymous No.15213989]

>>15213850
poor people don't buy $200 boots

[Anonymous No.15214008]

>>15213976
forestry
>>15213989
I spent $530 on mine and still had room for improvement

[Anonymous No.15214016]

>>15214008
>I spent $530 on mine and still had room for improvement
yeah, so? what does that have to do with the shoe budget of poor people?

[Anonymous No.15214025]

>>15214016
that the poor people purchased $200 for work you fucking imbecile

[Anonymous No.15214035]

>>15214025
no one gives a shit about logging or shoes for work (no one said anything about practical use; this is /fa/ if you hadn't noticed, and physical labor is decidedly not effay). i was talking about poor people in general, and poor people don't buy $200 shoes.

[Anonymous No.15214041]

>>15214035
>moving goalposts
>thinks that working in the woods is not effay
>thinks you can't be effay whilst at work
talk shit, post fit
let's see those boots kid, I can't wait to see what you wear if you think $200 isn't destitute-tier when it comes to boots

[Anonymous No.15214050]

>>15214035
Poor people still work retard

[Anonymous No.15214062]

>>15214050
They spend $50 to $100 every year.

[Anonymous No.15214063]

>>15214050
yeah, and they buy whatever is at Walmart for $40

[Anonymous No.15214070]

>>15214062
>>15214063
Your work gives you credit towards boots and you use that to buy $200~$300 heavy duty boots, at what is functionally a steep discount, that won't fall apart on you in the middle of a shift. Have you never had a job?

[Anonymous No.15214074]

>>15214062
>>15214063
>anon goes to /fa/ while going to community college and living with parents without ever having a job
fucking based

[Anonymous No.15214078]

>>15213893
still haven’t posted boots yet

[Anonymous No.15214101]

>>15214008
you swallow loads

[Anonymous No.15214129]

Imagine what granddad would say after seeing all of these sticklimb pussies walking around in WWII USGI pattern boots

[Anonymous No.15214154]

>>15214129
my grandpa has dementia and doesn't remember anything before this week

[Anonymous No.15214162]

>>15214101
be the best you can be, friend

[Anonymous No.15214188]

>>15214129
The same thing when he sees his homosexual mixed race son tweaking. Pride.

[Anonymous No.15214190]

>>15214188
aww man are these boots for faggots?

[Anonymous No.15215035]

>>15214190
have you forgotten what board you're on, faggot?

[Anonymous No.15215135]

Is there anything more satisfying than moisturizing a nice pair of Reddit wings?

[Anonymous No.15215153]

>>15210486
i wear western/roper boots every day. always getting compliments on them.

[Anonymous No.15215209]

>>15213622
who you responded to and the way you responded just confirms my opinion

[Anonymous No.15215294]

>>15213883
Yes, but people need to stop buying ugly ones

[Anonymous No.15215297]

>>15215294
Pic not related I presume

[Anonymous No.15215304]

>>15215297
indeed. red wing's moc toe looks like shit compared to the one I posted

[Anonymous No.15215308]

>>15215304
Pretending to be a retard is still being a retard, your look like trash

[Anonymous No.15215512]

>>15213883
Only good moc toe is the Indy

[Anonymous No.15215518]

got those, french shoe maker (finsbury), good quality for good price

[Anonymous No.15215559]

>>15212838
Tachyon's look like clown shoes in real life. The toe box is massive. They make iron rangers look like a slim boot.

[Anonymous No.15215659]

>>15215135
yes - cleaning and moisturzing an actual pair of work boots, specifically thorogoods

[Anonymous No.15215772]

>>15215559
That sucks. Can you recommend an alternative? I always liked how the first gen sfb's weren't bulky. Something like those, but not the current sfbs they're ugly

[Anonymous No.15216046]

>>15215294
that's a norwegian/split toe not a moc toe

[Anonymous No.15216091]

>>15211122
the boots i posted are literal work boots lol

[Anonymous No.15216195]

>>15215772
Honestly the gen1 sfbs looked the best. Try bates lites. My boot autism figured out that a lot of Shia pics, he's actually wearing bates lites and not SFBs like in pic related. You can tell by the sole and eyelets.

[Anonymous No.15216202]

>>15216195
The problem with bates lites is that they don't have a matte black variant.

[Anonymous No.15216306]

>>15216195
S T O L E N
V
A
L
O
R

[Anonymous No.15216423]

cop or not ?

[Anonymous No.15216562]

any other good boots for jogging in?

[Anonymous No.15216565]

>>15216562
Joggers gonna jog

[Anonymous No.15216568]

>>15216423
cop for SEX

[Anonymous No.15216582]

>>15216562
...what?

[Anonymous No.15216596]

>>15216582
im looking for jogging boots anon, so i can go for a casual jog 87 miles from my home with my trusty hammer.

[Anonymous No.15216683]

>>15216596
okay then, carry on

[Anonymous No.15216801]

>>15216562
Jogger is our word you can say jogga

[Anonymous No.15216804]

>>15216306
this. that guy needs to kill himself before someone does it painfully slow to him.

[Anonymous No.15217003]

All right, tell me what boots I'm allowed to like so people on this board won't call me a soi boy cuck monkey

[Anonymous No.15217039]

thoughts?

[Anonymous No.15217279]

>>15213501
cop

[Anonymous No.15217281]

>>15217039
they look decent but I feel like there has to be a better-looking boot for whatever aesthetic you're looking for.

[Anonymous No.15217282]

>>15216306
>no ranks or medals
>no claim of service of any sort

He's literally just wearing USMC branded merch, there's no legal case for valor being stolen here and that's not a crime anymore anyway since it turns out it was unconstitutional.

[Anonymous No.15217285]

would he listen to five finger death punch or seether

[Anonymous No.15217288]

So im getting a logger boot because they look fucking sick. my issue is brand since I've never gotten a made to order boot before. Right now im deciding between Nicks, Whites, and Wesco. any of you guys have had experience with these brands or any words of reccomendation for me?

[Anonymous No.15217315]

>>15217281
looking for something slightly less larp-y than paramemes. these seem ok but not sold on the eyelets

[Anonymous No.15217463]

Can you please recommend me boots as in pic related BUT waterproof and warm? I was thinking on buying these Solovair's but I've read that they're not really suitable for snowy and cold winters.

Thank you!

[Anonymous No.15217630]

>>15217315
just get paramemes and chop the top 2 inches off unless you're really attached to that slightly thinner toe box. the wide toe box of the paramemes is comfy as hell though

[Anonymous No.15217641]

>>15215518
do they have leather soles?

[Anonymous No.15217663]

>>15217463
Just wear those with thick wool socks dumbass

[Anonymous No.15217671]

>>15217641
Not this model

[Anonymous No.15217801]

tfw intrigued by kulien but there's nothing on the internet

>>15214101
only if he works for cal fire

>>15213850
to be fair, trails guys beat the piss out of their boots and I know several who like Rain Forests

>>15217288
wescos for the widest range of custom options
whites for history and supposedly good customer service
nicks (or drews/franks/jk, not that you asked) for actual working boots

[Anonymous No.15217827]

>>15217663

Ah, so all this time I've been looking for waterproof boots I should have just worn the wool socks? Thanks, genius!

[Anonymous No.15217966]

>>15217801
Oooo thank you for the info. I heard of franks only once a while ago. Will look into those and drews

[Anonymous No.15218014]

>>15208783
Those are amazing looking ngl

[Anonymous No.15218243]

>>15217827
Just use sno-seal, dumbass

[Anonymous No.15218580]

>>15217801
>whites for history and customer service
>nicks/jk/drews/franks for actual working boots
there is literally no difference between whites and any of the other brands you listed
all of the guys from the spokane boots shops worked for whites at some point
they all use the same leather
they all use the same techniques
they all build custom PNW logger's boots
the smaller brands just take longer to make, and are willing to do meme designs like half roughout and two-toned colouration
meme designs != better construction, you fucking retard

life of boot will be determined more by oiling than by brand when it comes to the spokane boots
fucking TIRED of you retards spouting off about this shit, THEY ARE THE SAME FUCKING BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT

[Anonymous No.15218590]

>>15217801
>CALFIRE
nope, private forestry, aka the respectable working man

[Anonymous No.15218595]

if you are a city cuck boots are so fucking cringe. Go drink your latte fucking fags

[Anonymous No.15218767]

>>15217671
i love dainite soles. Really the way to go for boots you want to be functional but keep on the dressier side vs something like a lug. I have a pair of Oak Street Bootmakers Lakeshores with them, really great.

[Anonymous No.15218793]

>>15218767
sick iron rangers bro, I love how the soles are the worst of both worlds and contrast like absolute dogshit, definitely a steal!

[Anonymous No.15218886]

>>15215135
Oh man, I've got these but they still look too new and right out of a factory. Can't wait until they look like this.

Did you put an insole in yours?

[Anonymous No.15218891]

>>15215135
Post more.

[Anonymous No.15218952]

>>15211066
Most designer boots are only priced so high because of the name and style, not because of the construction or quality. Past $500, there is a lot of diminishing returns.

[Anonymous No.15219134]

>>15218580
>there is literally no difference between whites and any of the other brands you listed
mmm I don't know about that. white's lists their upper leather as 7oz, nicks and franks as 7.5-8oz. similarly, I'll point out that nicks and franks do a 1" thick sole stack stock whereas whites uses a 3/4" thick sole stack at the same price point. now, presumably whites could build you a nicks clone if you asked, but they'd probably charge you more.

I'll also point out that Drews (stock, I don't know about custom) uses the same leather weights, sole stack, and lasts as Whites (again, stock) while charging ~$100-$150 less in a variety of designs. I've heard that they're actually built in the Whites factory, though I don't know.

And, now I think about it, Wesco stock lasts are pretty flat in the arch and have a steel shank. The other makers have lower-arched lasts but only do leather shanks. Makes a difference if you're spending a bunch of time on ladders, a shovel, or climbing spurs (though the others will do a leather lineman shank, again at extra cost, for those applications if you ask.).

[Anonymous No.15219181]

>>15219134
actually, I just checked the Whites website and they don't list leather weights or sole thicknesses at all, which strikes me as suspicious. additionally, their prices are like $40 more than I thought they were.

Not to say that there aren't lots of guys who have Whites for work and like them, there certainly are, but that's not where I'd go if I wanted a pair of PNW loggers for work.

[Anonymous No.15219198]

>>15207626
look very cheap

[Anonymous No.15219468]

>>15215135
shits are more wrinkly than my nutsack but that's what you get with imported leather

[Anonymous No.15219667]

>>15219134
>>15219181
>main complaint is leather weight, has no evidence to back it up
>second complaint is price

metric being judged:
10" high boot, all black roughout, 3/4" heel, fire compliant
>nicks
costs $515, and does not allow for returns, and you must order it custom, and it will take 6+ weeks to ship
>drews
costs from like $430 and up, their site is trash and there is almost no information available about their boot, I would never fucking buy their shit, leather ranges from 7-8 oz
>franks
$495, with all roughout needing to be special ordered. all returns carry a 15% restocking fee, and you cant return special order boots. you also can't buy online (easily) from what I can tell, and would have to call them up to buy a pair
>whites
$540, and returns are more than welcome and you can often find pairs that are off-the-rack that you can buy then and there

you can meme all you want, but every single serious forester I know only wears whites. random fuckos their first year on the line wear jimmy's or bobby's or drews or whatever the fuck, but the lifers wear whites. I've seen a few experienced people buy nicks, but that's because they wanted to try nicks after going through 1-2 pair of whites
I have never heard of anyone complaining about whites, but I have seen a ton of blown out memebrands from spokane
danners, wescos, carolinas, hawthornes, milsurp, etc. are all poorfag memeshit and need not apply
>needing a steel shank or 1" heel
for what fucking purpose would you need them, 3/4" is more than enough to sideslope, and you aren't climbing ladders all day like a lineman or arborist. if you are climbing ladders or heel-driving a shovel all day, buy fucking lineman's boots you retard, these boots are heavy enough as is

all of those brands came from people who used to work at whites. and yet they have stayed small ever since, because they dont get enough business to expand. whites does, though

[Anonymous No.15219669]

>>15219181
>doesn't wear logging boots for work
>weighing in on what type of logging boot is best for work
I don't talk about what kind of chisel should be used for making a statue, because I don't make statues.

[Anonymous No.15219674]

Left or right?

[Anonymous No.15219678]

>>15219674
they both look like they cost $32 (a months pay in the country you purchased them in) in an outdoor bazaar that is ripe with the scent of fermented sweat and poorly-wiped asscrack
I would rather walk barefoot than wear either of those, the left one LITERALLY has the texture and sheen of an actual turd, the right one is laughably garish

[Anonymous No.15219696]

>>15219678
Granted, the left indeed looks like a turd.
But how the right one "garish"? It's not formal, sure. Can you provide an example of "not garish" shoes of the similar color?

[Anonymous No.15219699]

>>15219696
"how is the right one garish"
>"suede" (read: fake suede)
>weird texture
>edges seem to have been artificially darkened
>blue and white sole that looks like it's made out of foam
>looks incredibly thin
it's a light brown suede shoe
if you want one that doesn't look like shit, get a light brown non-suede monkstrap shoe

[Anonymous No.15219711]

>>15219699
>looks incredibly thin
Yeah, it's for summer.
>"suede" (read: fake suede)
It's not suede or "suede".
>monkstrap
I don't wear formal suits.

[Anonymous No.15219718]

>>15219711
well you seem dead set on wearing your chinkshit povertywalkers, enjoy

[Anonymous No.15219742]

>>15219718
I apologize for my arrogance.
Could you, as an affluent white person of impeccable taste, forgive me and provide me with some more of your invaluable expertise?

[Anonymous No.15219751]

>>15219742
>being a snarky cunt after refusing all advice
lmao
you want a thin, light brown, "not suede or "suede"", non-formal (formal would mean you are at the Met Gala, not your middleschool dance, by the way)
all of the shoes you post just look incredibly cheaply made. I don't care to wear that sort of shit. none of it is going to last very long, so just get what you think would fit the outfit you have in mind.
what is the point of these replies jesus christ dude

[Anonymous No.15219772]

>>15219751
>formal would mean you are at the Met Gala, not your middleschool dance
We got a WASP here, boys!
How many of your ancestors were on Mayflower?

[Anonymous No.15219778]

>>15219751
>incredibly cheaply made
They are cheap. But this board is called "/fa/shionable faggots", not "conspicuous consumption".

[Anonymous No.15219797]

>>15219772
>knowing words makes you a WASP
this post is epic as h*ck!!
>>15219778
objects that are well made do not have to be conspicuous
it's interesting that you use that term when one of the shoes originally under consideration was a light-brown square-patterned monstrosity with a white and blue sole
in fact, they were so obviously poorly made that I would argue they are more conspicuous than something of a higher quality that does not need to appear garish in order to grab the attention of mouth breathing retards

[Anonymous No.15219807]

>>15218793
Yeah?

[Anonymous No.15219809]

i like these

[Anonymous No.15219810]

>>15219797
>knowing words
Now, don't be shy here. You're a regular at Met Gala.

[Anonymous No.15219813]

>>15219810
literal cope

[Anonymous No.15219815]

>>15219772
>>15219810
>not knowing what formal means on a fashion board
embarrassing

[Anonymous No.15219877]

>>15219815
>"formal" means a world-famous fashion event, nothing less
Dude, "formal" just means dressed-up for a serious social occasion. It may be a business meeting, funeral, wedding or even a middle-school dance.

[Anonymous No.15219920]

>>15219877
>Formal wear, formal attire or full dress is the traditional Western dress code category applicable for the most formal occasions, such as weddings, christenings, confirmations, funerals, Easter and Christmas traditions, in addition to certain state dinners, audiences, balls, and horse racing events. Formal wear is traditionally divided into formal day and evening wear; implying morning dress (morning coat) before 6 p.m., and white tie (dress coat) after 6 p.m.[citation needed] Generally permitted other alternatives, though, are the most formal versions of ceremonial dresses (including court dresses, diplomatic uniforms and academic dresses), full dress uniforms, religious clothing, national costumes, and most rarely frock coats (which preceded morning coat as default formal day wear 1820s-1920s). In addition, formal wear is often instructed to be worn with official full size orders and medals."
>The required clothing for men, in the evening, is roughly the following:
>Formal trousers, uncuffed, with stripes on leg seams
>White piqué front or plain stiff-fronted shirt with a detachable wing collar, cuff links and shirt studs
>White piqué bow tie
>White piqué vest (waistcoat) or cummerbund[1]
>A (dress coat) tailcoat
>Black patent leather court shoes
>Accessories
I would love to see a picture of your middle-school dance where people were wearing cummerbunds, tailcoats, their full medals, and detachable collars
you
retarded
faggot

[Anonymous No.15219928]

>>15219920
These epic dudes are formally dressed for the appropriate formal occasion.

[Anonymous No.15219940]

>>15219877
>conflating formalwear with "wearing something nice" or """fancy"""
the absolute state of the underaged and third world

[Anonymous No.15219943]

>>15219928
I don't understand how you think this aides your case
They aren't dressed formally, they are wearing clothes they thought are "fancy", or "nice".

[Anonymous No.15219949]

>>15219940
These children are wearing bowties and shit, so they're dressed formally, meaning they follow a certain dress code for a serious social occasion, you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.15219955]

>>15219949
except formal wear is a certain and specific style of dress that they are not adhering to, therefore they are not dressed formally
you are trying to argue like pic related is a pair of dress shoes, because it has a heel and laces and is black

[Anonymous No.15219966]

>>15219949
Bowties aren't formal in and of themselves.

[Anonymous No.15219983]

>>15219966
Yes, they become formal in the context of the formal events, such as school dances.
>formal wear is a certain and specific style of dress
Lol, no. Formal and casual are not "styles" per se. You can dress up as Pope for a theme party and it still be a casual look.

[Anonymous No.15219991]

>>15219983
So you're saying those kids could turn up in tshirts and joggers, and their clothing would magically be formal because it is a formal event?

[Anonymous No.15219999]

>>15219983
your argument is fucking retarded
>people at the Met Gala wear pants
>"haha therefore if I wear pants it's formal!"
you understand that there are different levels of formality, yes?
you can wear a stained wifebeater and flip flops, which is fine for around the house if you are a slob
you can wear a clean shirt and pants, which is fine for most situations in daily life
you can wear a button-up shirt and slacks, which is casual professional attire (dates go here)
you can wear a button-up shirt with a tie, which is semi-casual professional attire (middle-school dances go here)
you can wear a suit, which is professional attire (job interviews go here)
you can wear a tuxedo, which is semi-formal attire (weddings go here)
and then you can wear the highest degree of dress that your culture offers, the type that you would wear to see a royal wedding, or to an extremely fancy event (like the Met Gala), or a masquerade, or any other high-society function
just because you are wearing this style of clothing, does not mean it is that level of event. just because you wear a custom, hand-sewn, diamond encrusted ballroom gown whilst buying groceries, does not mean that buying groceries is a formal event
likewise, just because you are wearing a stained wifebeater, does not mean that the royal wedding is an event akin to smoking weed on your tattered couch

formal wear, just like casual wear and business wear, is an actual, codified, recognised, and agreed-upon structure and classification of clothing
the fact that you do not know this on the fashion board is honestly laughable

[Anonymous No.15220000]

>>15219991
No, because social norms dictate a certain dress code with ties or bowties, waistcoats, suits, etc.

[Anonymous No.15220009]

>>15220000
alright, so you agree that there are words associated with levels of dress
and that these levels of dress include certain clothing items in them
and yet you also think that once you include a tie and jacket, it just stops. that's it, tie + jacket is the end-all be-all in terms of defining categories of clothing
a $70 H&M slim fit suit with a banana tie is formal, as is a custom-fit Saville Row tuxedo. and there is no way to differentiate them
Plastic leather chinkshit shoes that are glued together are formal, and there is no differentiation with custom-fit calf-leather double monkstraps
you fucking baboon, you god damned fool

you can "dress up", you can dress "nicely", you can dress "fancy", you can dress all of these ways, and it is still not FORMAL. those children would look out of place at a royal event, they would look out of place at the Met Gala, they would look out of place at a masquerade ball
because they are not wearing formal wear, they are wearing some shoddily made chinese scrap that their mom bought at walmart

[Anonymous No.15220010]

what kind of boots would go with a loose tank top and some blue jeans?

[Anonymous No.15220017]

>>15220010
Are you going for the douchebag cowboy look?

[Anonymous No.15220019]

maintenance day

[Anonymous No.15220031]

>>15220017
nah more of a urban hooligan look

[Anonymous No.15220048]

>>15220019
got to clean off the dust buildup from walking in from the parking lot to your cubicle.

[Anonymous No.15220100]

>>15210542
I like the style but I'm sure they have the same amount of longevity as a $20 pair of canvas flats.

[Anonymous No.15220107]

>>15220100
My beat up old pair has lasted longer than any Vans or Chucks I've owned, but the genuine leather is peeling all over and there's a part where the ball of my foot bends that has started to disintegrate.

[Anonymous No.15220111]

>>15220009
>levels of dress
wat
Also, tl:dr, contain your autism.

[Anonymous No.15220114]

>>15220009
>those children would look out of place at a royal event, they would look out of place at the Met Gala, they would look out of place at a masquerade ball
Yes, because they're dressed formally for a formal occasion of the school dance.
People dressed for a funeral would look out of place at a wedding, you mong.

[Anonymous No.15220139]

>>15220114
>literally illiterate

[Anonymous No.15220144]

>>15220111
>>15220114
>subhumans legitimately cannot understand that events have different dress codes
why are you on /fa/

[Anonymous No.15220146]

>>15219674 (You)
>>15219678 (You)
>>15219696 (You)
>>15219699 (Checked)
>>15219711 (You)
>>15219718 (You)
>>15219742 (You)
>>15219751 (You)
>>15219772 (You)
>>15219778 (You)
>>15219797 (You)
>>15219807 (You)
>>15219810 (You)
>>15219813 (You)
>>15219815 (You)
>>15219877 (Checked)
>>15219920 (You)
>>15219928 (You)
>>15219940 (You)
>>15219943 (You)
>>15219949 (You)
>>15219955 (Checked)
>>15219966 (Checked)
>>15219983 (You)
>>15219991 (You)
>>15219999 (Checked)
>>15220000 (Checked)
>>15220009 (You)
>>15220111 (Checked)
>>15220114 (You)
>>15220139 (You)
>>15220144 (Checked)
all me btw
also im gay

[Anonymous No.15220270]

Are there any good looking waterproof boots that fit a business casual preppy look?

[Anonymous No.15220296]

>>15219667
>>15219669
I do wear loggers for work though, see the (admittedly not super boot-focused) pic I posted above. Old pair in this post pic (and above) are Drew's, new pair are Nick's. Both have been dandy, for what it's worth--pic was from last season, I've put a fair amount of time on the Nick's since this pic.

>every single serious forester I know only wears whites
I'd say probably a plurality of the guys I know who wear Vibram-soled loggers for working innawoods wear Drew's. From there in order of declining frequency it's Nick's, JK/Franks, Whites. Roughly where are you? This may be a regional thing.

>1" heel
Ah, sorry, I meant midsole stack. So leather insole, leather midsole, rubber slipsole, vibram. This is independent of heel/toe delta--the point is that it's a bit stiffer, which is a little harder to break in but nice for humping heavy shit or "kicking steps" (not really but kinda) in steep loose slash and duff. My Drew's were the low-heeled Forest Trail and I might actually go back to that style.

>all of those brands came from people who used to work at whites. and yet they have stayed small ever since, because they dont get enough business to expand. whites does, though
Nick's has expanded, which is why they moved locations in 2016 or so. Frank's and JK both started within the last 5-10 years whereas Nick's has been around since the 70s and Whites has been around since the 1870s; none of them grew fast. Separately, I want to question the claim that expansion = good (from a work boot standpoint) insofar as a lot of White's growth has come from the Japanese fashion market and being acquired by, what is it, Lacrosse? I'm also pretty sure that a lot of Nick's growth has come from the fashion side. Which, hey, good for them, but it doesn't say much about their work line.

[Anonymous No.15220305]

>>15220270
>good looking waterproof boots that fit a business casual preppy look?
>posts high top sneakers with 2 cents worth of "boot" hardware tacked on the outside arbitrarily
you should be ashamed

[Anonymous No.15220313]

>>15220305
I posted those because the only waterproof boots I can find are either hiking boots or duck boots, which look like crap

[Anonymous No.15220316]

>>15220296
>I'd say probably a plurality of the guys I know who wear Vibram-soled loggers for working innawoods wear Drew's.
And, to clarify, I don't know what you count as a "serious forester"--I don't think any of those guys are RPFs or anything--but I'm thinking here of guys with multiple seasons in Western wildland fire, trails, timber sale prep, and/or timber felling. Most of the new guys I see go with Haix, Scarpa, Hawthorne, or occasionally Whites (because their dads said Whites were the best and they didn't bother to comparison shop). I did know one dude who got Danners and spent all season complaining about blisters, but that was more of a fit issue than a construction issue, I think.
>mfw he was from CDF

[Anonymous No.15220320]

>>15220313
They literally look like hiking boots with a sneaker sole.

[Anonymous No.15220604]

>>15220270
bean boots kek

[Anonymous No.15220866]

>>15218767
How's the comfort on them?

[Anonymous No.15220871]

>>15220031
Timbs

[Anonymous No.15220874]

>>15220019
Nice collection, are those RM Williams?

[Anonymous No.15220894]

>>15220313
You're barking up the wrong tree. First off -- any real leather boot is gonna resist water. If you go stomping through snow, then yeah your feet will get wet. If your snow is so deep that you need a snow boot, you should buy whatever works and change at the office.

The more important thing is "how does the sole do in slippery conditions?" I have a pair with a dainite sole. I wouldn't wear them if it was snowing heavily or pouring rain, but I can wear them out and still have dry feet of its just a light snow or some puddles around. If it is snowing heavily or raining, I'll reach for my bean boots. Now, I am in engineering so I wear what I want to the office, but I imagine if I needed to, I would either leave a pair of shoes or just bring them with me to where I need to go. Otherwise, any boot on the dressier side is gonna do okay

[Anonymous No.15220942]

>>15220894
Thanks mate.Cheers!

[Anonymous No.15220950]

What are these?

[Anonymous No.15221002]

>>15220950
solovairs

[Anonymous No.15221013]

all these boots look straight post some faggy shit ty

[Anonymous No.15221034]

>>15221002
Thanks!

[Anonymous No.15221546]

>>15221002
Nah those are DMs, yellow stitching and soles.

[Anonymous No.15222265]

I know this is the millionth time this has been asked, but do para boots run tts or should I half size down?

[Anonymous No.15222491]

>>15213883
When they’re broken in and the crepe sole is rounded they look great. That Oro leather they’re made of is pretty reactive as well, gets a great patina over time.

[Anonymous No.15222504]

>>15219468
SB Foot is an American tannery. The grain break you’re seeing in that black prairie hide is a natural characteristic of the leather.

[Anonymous No.15222506]

Can anyone ID these boots?

[Anonymous No.15222930]

>>15205189
I've been staring at these for the past week.

They're on discount 56 dollars. Leather, handmade.

I'm not toally sold on the buckle, but I want to go for a 18th century whaler's look. and they'll probably go well with my handmade sweaters.

Opinions?

[Anonymous No.15222939]

>>15210440
These are fucking disgusting. Please defend this post

[Anonymous No.15222944]

>>15212098
Enjoy your infection

[Anonymous No.15222952]

>>15222930
You could remove the buckle with a metal snipper, just clip it and it should slide out from the leather strap.

[Anonymous No.15223000]

>>15222930
its cute how sensible you are.

[Anonymous No.15223016]

>>15222952
>clip it
i meant snip it.

[Anonymous No.15223034]

>>15220874

Right 3 are Meermins. I find them to be immense bang for the buck, lasts are super sleek.

[Anonymous No.15223036]

>>15222506
Fuck off
>>15222930

[Anonymous No.15223040]

>>15220270
Veldtschoens from Northamptonshire?

[Anonymous No.15223159]

>>15223040
Those are beautiful mate! Cheers

[Anonymous No.15224490]

hi

[Anonymous No.15224512]

>>15224490
Perfect. I find them noisy though.

[Anonymous No.15224824]

>>15224490
nice clown shoes

[Anonymous No.15225671]

>>15210316
Not a great fit

[Anonymous No.15226006]

>>15217463
Panama Jack has gore-tex boots that look similar but not identical. Don't know if that makes them fully waterproof.

[Anonymous No.15226088]

>>15210316
Great fit

[Anonymous No.15226219]

>>15226006
I never ever hear Panama jack mentioned. They seem like good boots to me though.

[Anonymous No.15226405]

>>15226219
had a pair that lasted me a couple of years and held up pretty well until the sole came loose. Ditched them in favour of Solovairs because I prefer the look of Solovairs. The quality of PJ is pretty good for the price-point though.

[Anonymous No.15226408]

Just bought the mono 1460 docs and i love them. You people talk like you live in the 1800s and spend each day walking and working in horseshit. None of your boots will ever get too worn unless you use them each day like an idiot and then you might have to buy a new pair of 150$ boots in ten years.
Dont listen to these elitist faggots, buy the boots you like

[Anonymous No.15226425]

>>15226408
the fact that you love fashion means you're going to want to change your clothes very often. I don't see the point of putting a lot of money in a pair of boots which you will get tired of very quickly. But the boots you like. Dr Martens will last enough.

[Anonymous No.15227021]

>>15226408
Agreed, you can find exceptional boot craftsmanship for under 100 USD. If they "only" last three years you already got 30us a year spent in shoes, plus by then it is time to renew your wardrobe. even if you want similar boots again, it makes sense to grab a new different pair.

I personally have some boots I got in 2011 and while they're in good shape I don't wear them anymore because I just got tired of what they look like.

[Anonymous No.15227214]

>>15226405
That's off putting, I don't care for a bargain at the cost of quality. That's a shame because I like the way they look. And the company image is good too.

[Anonymous No.15227586]

Just to be honest, I got some old Knobelbecher (Army boots), have them since 3 Years, cost me 20€ better leather quality then any other shoe/boots I've ever had. I don't understand some of you why you spend your money on expensive but still shit boots. Whats the point of having Boots and not using them for their intended purpose, which should be harsh/extensive use.

[Anonymous No.15227639]

[Anonymous No.15227863]

>>15226425
>>15227021
doc memes would get torn to literal ribbons within a month
the austrian memes lasted about 9 months with regular oiling and maintenance
do you people just live in an apartment and never leave your house at all? how the fuck do your boots last that long

[Anonymous No.15227872]

>>15211344
>>15209449
wtf is wrong with clarks and crepe soles?

[Anonymous No.15228180]

should i size down for corcoran jump boots?

[Anonymous No.15228247]

>>15227872
Nothing at all, just 4chan contrarianism against reddit

[Anonymous No.15228289]

>>15227863
My friend got a pair of solovairs back in 2012 while he studied in London and they're still going strong.

I do live in an apartment and use my boots mostly in the city. But sometimes take light hikes in them. Ofc if you need work boots, get work boots. Otherwise, don't waste your money.

[Anonymous No.15228297]

>>15228247
clark's are shit quality chinkcrap and crepe soles fall apart quickly and leave rubber pebbles everywhere. also the soles tend to get dirty really quickly.

[Anonymous No.15228317]

>>15213852
It's only a clown shoe if you're a lanklet

[Anonymous No.15228321]

>>15215659
>specifically thorogoods
please leave

[Anonymous No.15228468]

Will black 8 eye solovairs make me look too druggie emo gay ef/fa/y? I really like them but I'm trying to look more normalchad in general. reddit autism wings are out of the question

[Anonymous No.15228507]

anyone have on-foot pics of the canadian mk4 boots? some pics of the boots look relatively slim but others make them look chunky as fuck. been looking around for some black combat boots that arent the paratrooper meme

[Anonymous No.15228531]

doc martens original...
https://www.instagram.com/p/B_0g-L-JFaD/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

[Anonymous No.15228614]

Thoughts on Wolverine?
These are only $200 and I really like the silhouette. They have two lines, these being "BLVD" and another for about twice the cost called "1000 Mile," and I can't really tell the difference. Both are goodyear welt, so I'm assuming it's just leather quality? How bad are these $200 ones gonna be?

[Anonymous No.15228847]

>>15228614
probably similar to thursday boots and others in a similar pricepoint
should be fine, not going to be omega high quality, but should last you a year or two assuming you dont beat them to shit

[Anonymous No.15228929]

>>15228614
>Thoughts on Wolverine?
It's a solid boot. You can't go wrong with this brand really. >>15228614
>These are only $200
For 200 you will get a decent boot.
>>15228614
>and I really like the silhouette
Then you should go for it
>>15228614
>1000 Mile
Would be a better boot, but if you are just getting into boots, then, start with the aforementioned model. See if they hold up well, and then go from there.
>>15228614
>I can't really tell the difference
1000 mile is definitively a better boot.
>>15228614
>How bad are these $200 ones gonna be?
Well, they will probably be about half as good as the ones that cost twice as much. Give or take. But they will also be two times as good as a $100 wolverine boot. And 4x as good as a $50 boot. Wolverine is a tough boot brand, it's in the name. Whereas a "Thursday" boot, is a Fashion boot. Made for style not toughness.

[Anonymous No.15228977]

>>15228614
I've seen 1000 miles go for about 200 and they will be the better made boot, just have to hunt for deals. I got mine for 180.

[Anonymous No.15229023]

these good?

[Anonymous No.15229029]

>>15222939
>t. virgin docs

[Anonymous No.15229094]

>>15228929
>Wolverine is a tough boot brand, it's in the name. Whereas a "Thursday" boot, is a Fashion boot. Made for style not toughness.
imagine actually believing this
>$400 boot is 2x good as $200 boot is 4x good as $50 boot
you need to be over 18 to post here

[Anonymous No.15229147]

>>15229094
t

[Anonymous No.15229274]

>>15229147
diminishing returns

[Anonymous No.15230105]

>>15228977
Where do you usually go to find them? Might be a retarded question but I don't browse /fa/ all that much

[Anonymous No.15230380]

>>15210316
what model are those?

[Anonymous No.15230395]

>>15230105
amazon and nordstrom rack is a good place to start

[Anonymous No.15231440]

>>15213861
They just arrived and holy shit you are right. this break in is gonna be fun. fit is perfect otherwise.