/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.15039414]

More hot garbage from Vaccarello.

Saint Laurent FW20

https://www.vogue.com/fashion-shows/fall-2020-ready-to-wear/saint-laurent/slideshow/collection

[Anonymous No.15039420]

>>15039414
What the fuck is this Fashionnova-tier shit Vaccarello?

[Anonymous No.15039424]

>>15039420
Vaccarello’s taking advantage of a discount he got on black latex.

[Anonymous No.15039426]

>>15039424

[Anonymous No.15039439]

>>15039420
kek

[Anonymous No.15039567]

Vaccarello ruined Saint Laurent, specially with that homosexual Ezra. Don’t @ me.

[Anonymous No.15039654]

>>15039426
>>15039424
>>15039420
>>15039414
Amazing designs, colours and fabrics!

[Anonymous No.15039701]

>>15039567
HEDI COME BACK

[Anonymous No.15039706]

Fashionnova? No, Saint Laurent.

[Anonymous No.15039707]

Utter shite. Fuck Vaccarello.

[Anonymous No.15039709]

>>15039706
Looks cheap but cannot deny the sex appeal

[Anonymous No.15039721]

>>15039414
Show had shit casting too. 66 looks in total, 22 non-white “models”. Look up the SLP FW14 under Hedi, 0 non-whites.

[Anonymous No.15039723]

>>15039707
damn that gook is ugly af

[Anonymous No.15039921]

>>15039567
kys

[Anonymous No.15039925]

>>15039706
Hot af

[Anonymous No.15039929]

>>15039567
Based and Hedipilled.

[Anonymous No.15039932]

>>15039721
Idk where you guys get theopinion that whites look better than for example africans in clothes hahahaaha it's so retarded

[Anonymous No.15039962]

>>15039932
“Haha it’s retarded”

One look at this photo and you see what stands out, non-whites.

Collections can be described as a singular aesthetic and non-whites ruin that. They ruin the cohesiveness of the show. It’s like a bright red stain on the centre of your plain white shirt. Distracting, out of place, and absolutely unneeded.

[Anonymous No.15039964]

>>15039962
Compare that to this. This is obviously more cohesive and impactful.

[Anonymous No.15039966]

>>15039964
Now I’m not saying all whites are beautiful, no. Here’s SLP. Though I find some of the models in this photo ugly, it still shows a cohesive aesthetic. The designer’s vision is clearly identifiable. The vision isn’t tainted by an out of place non-white.

[Anonymous No.15039969]

>>15039966
really weird thing to get worked up about

[Anonymous No.15039974]

>>15039969
Critiquing the casting of a show is soooo weird!

Imagine a white Porsche 911. Beautiful car. Now imagine if the hood was replaced with a black hood, the fender replaced with a red fender, the front bumper replaced with a blue bumper. Now it looks ruined because it isn’t cohesive anymore. It’s now patchwork of mismatched colours. It’s the same with castings. As I’ve said, non-whites ruin the cohesiveness of a singular aesthetic.

[Anonymous No.15039975]

>>15039962
Non whites can pull off colors that whites can't due to their skin tone and build. Also according to your logic a collection using all black/asian models would also be fine lol.
>Distracting, out of place
Have you never seen a black person before lmao where do you live

[CecilDrakeInSeattle !effayRxItQ No.15039982]

>>15039974
It's like having a grey suit with a black collar/lapels on the suit, not that the black is ugly, just that it's out of place. It ruins the whole balance and the flow.

[Anonymous No.15039987]

>>15039975
Yeah sure, go hold Nigeria Fashion Week with all blacks, I wouldn’t mind that at all. My problem is that the COHESIVENESS of the show and the vision is muddied and ruined by the inclusion of non-whites in the castings of European fashions shows, designed by European designers, held in European cities.

[Anonymous No.15039989]

>>15039982
That’s my point. They always look out of place. Instead of strengthening the designer's vision they ruin it, they stand out like a sore thumb. It's purity being defiled. Imagine the Primavera by Botticelli, an ethereal painting, now replace one of the Three Graces with a non-white. The painting is immediately wrecked. The visual cohesiveness, the flow, the balance, and the emotion, all of it is ruined.

[Anonymous No.15039992]

This >>15039989 is Valentino SS16.

Would you guys say the Primavera needs to include darkies? Designers imagine a vision and execute it. The couture collection from Valentino SS16 was obviously inspired by Greek goddessess, now when you think of Greek goddesses do you imagine a nignog or do you imagine someone ethereal?

[Anonymous No.15039993]

>>15039992

[Anonymous No.15040005]

>>15039993
oh my god whats wrong with the right womans feet

[Anonymous No.15040014]

>>15040005
I think the front foe area of her feet is just a tad bit wide. All the models in this show were barefoot.

[Anonymous No.15040018]

>>15040014
toe*

[CecilDrakeInSeattle !effayRxItQ No.15040019]

>>15039989
Yeah it's like having some WW1 movie in the tranches and there is a random African guy or Indian. It just detracts from the image and story and makes you focus on race.

Yes those people existed in WW1 but they would have almost all times being within their own regiment of the same people.

It's why forced "diversity" is such garbage. It does not make people more "tolerant and accepting" and it does the total opposite because people will always rebel about things that are forced rather than being natural and organic.

[Anonymous No.15040020]

>>15040014
Model feet are the sexiest feet in the world I LOVE shots like this

[CecilDrakeInSeattle !effayRxItQ No.15040022]

>>15040019
TRENCHES** I think I said it like a black dude IN DA TRANCHES

[Anonymous No.15040026]

>>15039993
who is the model on the left

[Anonymous No.15040038]

>>15040019
You made me think of 1917 and how it was so obvious they fell for the “why do war films only show white men” complaint so they overcompensated for it by obviously shoehorning plenty of non-whites.

>>15040020
https://www.vogue.com/fashion-shows/spring-2016-couture/valentino/slideshow/details

>>15040026
Sara Dijkink.

[Anonymous No.15040065]

>>15039962
black one is cute the nonwhite behind her is ugh

[Anonymous No.15040068]

>>15039975
>Have you never seen a black person before lmao where do you live
Dude. Just go back already. You clearly don't belong here.
>>15039987
bro that's like SOOO racist! FUCK YOU NAZI

[Anonymous No.15040163]

Based takes itt. Nu SLP sucks and I hate shitty casting too

[Anonymous No.15040238]

>>15039707
Bruh moment

[Anonymous No.15040264]

>>15039932
because the pock models used in the industry are an attempted facsmile of white models they usually have white facial features and share the same build as white models rendering that retarded "oh blacks can wear different clothes cause they have different body types arguement" moot and the whole point of having "diverse" models moot as well.

>>15039962
this guy is a retard but the point that diversity for diversitys sake is retarded still stands

>>15039974
youre missing the point i think, parts of the car add something to the car itself. my view is that models add nothing to the clothes but, clothes are useless with out bodies so you need to sell them on sme kind of a body. id much prefer if models had their faces covered and were as thin and flat as possible. theyre objects in the most banal sense especially now with some of the ugly fucks they send down runways.


but the bigger issue here is that for some reason people view models as aspirational and a standard of beauty thus we need to shoehorn pocks into modelling because otherwise the implications are unpleasant. rather than accepting that models are a facet of beauty and not aspirational in anyway. as a man who wants to be 6 ft 2 but have a 36" chest and 26" waist its fucking retarded.

theres a lot of talk about disrupting or deconstructing systems especially in fashion but why arent people just ignoring the systems or trying to go their own way, being beholden to the systemic powers is this weird vicious power cycle but, if all that bs about all this being a social construct is true then why acknowledge these "standards" at all? its so dumb someone tells you oh no you cant wear this cause of your identity thats retarded. why would you ever listen to them

[Anonymous No.15040271]

>>15039987
europe has pocks now, no ammount of whining changes that the powers that be have decided thats how its going to be

[Anonymous No.15040274]

>>15039975
no one has an issue if you use pock models exclusively this is a bad arguement

[Anonymous No.15040276]

>>15039932
you live in the west yes? are you unaware of eurocentric beauty?

[Anonymous No.15040328]

>>15039992
>>15039993
why are you stupid

[Anonymous No.15040374]

>>15039414
Do you have a problem with daddy Vacca boi?
Pathetic

[Anonymous No.15040562]

>>15040328
i actually really dig this. which designer?

[Anonymous No.15040594]

>>15040562
it's prada ss13

[Anonymous No.15040605]

>>15039414

Guess he wanted to double-down on the current leather trend in women's fashion - no clue why, it isn't selling at all.

>>15040594

Damn, because of the ugly toe boots I thought it was Margiela. Thank God Prada doesn't look that catastrophic anymore.

[Anonymous No.15040649]

>>15039414
Vogue's pictures are terrible as usual. Watch the video of the show instead. The clothes look good.

[Anonymous No.15040652]

>>15040605
>Thank God Prada doesn't look that catastrophic anymore
?

[Anonymous No.15040712]

>>15039414
Saint Laurent really started going downhill when they began using negro models.

[Anonymous No.15040724]

>>15040712
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.15040735]

>>15040712
Based

[Anonymous No.15040913]

>>15040605
>Thank God Prada doesn't look that catastrophic anymore.
I think the cut on the dress is nice. Like, classic and futuristic. I think it looks very Prada :)

[Anonymous No.15040937]

>>15040328
What are you trying to point out? That Maartje looks odd there? Every girl in that show had weird lesbian hair. At least I’ve the decency to use photos from the same shows to talk about my points.

[Anonymous No.15040962]

>>15040019
It must be tiring to always having race hangups on your mind.

[CecilDrakeInSeattle !effayRxItQ No.15040988]

>>15040962
It has nothing to do with that, can you even read? I notice a mole in a cage of mice. It's as simple as that.

[Anonymous No.15041859]

>>15040712
Saint Laurent stopped being Saint Laurent when Hedi left.

[Anonymous No.15041871]

>>15039962
>t. Adolf Hitler

[Anonymous No.15042103]

>>15040988
You just did it again. Like I said, must be tiring.

[CecilDrakeInSeattle !effayRxItQ No.15042108]

>>15042103
Why would simple things be tiring? Does adding 1 to 1 tire your brain? Are you slow?

>i see no difference in this picture
>if you see a difference it must be tiring

Lmao how are people like you real? There is zero consciousness with you, almost mechanical.