Watch thread - /wt/

[Anonymous No.14734583]

Required viewing for new people:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPT-tPj38vw


Guides:

> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
> Guide for poorfag plebs: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK

Should I buy this fashion brand watch?

> Scroll through this album first, then if you still don't care and just want something that looks good then go for it:

https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Previous thread:
>>14713976

[None !IGORsW/P/E No.14734587]

[-] thread

[Anonymous No.14734615]

Post Panerais

[Anonymous No.14734629]

>>14734380
That looks bad imo, but I saw a nice canvas band that I'll go for, thanks.

[Anonymous No.14734730]

quick wist check FUCKERS

[Anonymous No.14734736]

>>14734730
How do you rate superman?

I was seriously considering it. But £900 for a standard grade eta.

Navygraf wouls be a contender but i cant get over the faux patina lume

[Anonymous No.14734740]

Visodate or sarb033/035 next?

[Anonymous No.14734835]

>>14734615
>shitaly

[Anonymous No.14734900]

>>14734740
No.

[Anonymous No.14734940]

I'd like to get my first nice watch and I'm looking for something a little more dressy. Currently my only mechanical watch is pic related.

I'd like to spend around 1000-1500€ from a bonus I'm getting fairly soon, but I'm not sure if that's enough. Any recommendations?

[Anonymous No.14734962]

>>14734736
I wanted a modern watch that was a heritage, or reissue, of a 60s or 70s tool diver... initially I had the seiko turtle reissue but it was too big for me. Pic related.

The price is pretty high for what you get. There are no guarantees that this is manufactured in France - only assembled. I imagine most of the parts are created in China.

I primarily brought this for the visual look. It is a 1:1 recreation of the vintage YEMA Superman. I just think it's the most attractive watch ever made.

Bracelet is thin and feels good, has micro adjustment and a 2cm wetsuit extension which gives you relief at a moments notice when you are out and about. Sapphire crystal is fine, a little over reflective maybe, but the way the dome warps light plays well with the dial and hands. White C3 lume, which is on par with the seiko turtle (aka the best in the industry). Dial black is very, very deep black. Quality of the metal hands/dial printing/lume application is as you'd expect for the price.

Flat out the biggest criticism is the bezel lock. It's not very effective in locking the bezel assuming you have the screwed down crown set tight. The whole concept of being unable to change the bezel underwater is a fucking joke. When I picked it up I assumed the bezel lock system would not affect the water resistance. It is such a massive and stupid flaw that I would say, don't buy this watch. Go for black bay. If you want a sub 40mm diver, you're fucked asides from longines legend 36mm and Oris 65 36mm

[Anonymous No.14735087]

>>14734615
I'm crushing hard as fuck on the 289 and 511, but the prices on them are a bit, hmm, yeah.
Definitely something I'd say is worth saving up for, but with me heading back to uni next autumn, buying new watches of that calibre is probably not the greatest idea.

[Anonymous No.14735091]

>>14734962
tasteless trash

[Anonymous No.14735216]

>>14734615
I would love a radiomir if the y could find a way to get minute markers on the sandwich dial

[Anonymous No.14735218]

>>14734736
>Yema
More like Yikesma

[Anonymous No.14735876]

Just got this in today

[Anonymous No.14736049]

Best datejust, go.

>Hard mode: No 16013's allowed

[Anonymous No.14736053]

>>14736049
way too easy. green face.

[Anonymous No.14736234]

>>14734940

Save up and get a used Air King. 14000 reference model.

[Anonymous No.14736305]

I’ve relatively recently purchased this watch and I’ve come to dislike the band I currently have, could anyone provide some recommendations.

[Anonymous No.14736348]

I saw a reverso today.
Why does that thing exist?

[Anonymous No.14736469]

>>14736348
So polo players can flip it around & stop the crystal getting bashed by a mallet.

[Anonymous No.14736487]

[Anonymous No.14736622]

It finally happened guys
Casio just released the first line of watches with stainless steel vintage case since 80's

[Anonymous No.14736636]

>>14736622
Cool

[Anonymous No.14736656]

Im looking for a simple chronograph that is preferably mechanical. Something similar to the Seagull 1963.

I'd buy the Seagull but I'm torn since China is shit

Any suggestions?

[Anonymous No.14736657]

>>14736622
Vicious mall shitter.

[Anonymous No.14736661]

>>14736656
Have you looked at Seiko's chronograph offers?

[Anonymous No.14736740]

>>14736661
I have, there's a few that caught my eye. I was wanting automatic/mechanical but I think those are out of my price range anyways.

Any opinions on junkets or zeppelin?

[Anonymous No.14736744]

>>14736622
How much? Will pay 30$ tops

[Anonymous No.14736758]

>>14736744
that's the price for plastic ones

[Anonymous No.14736768]

>>14736740
I have little experience with either, but I do have severe mistrust in any german manufacturer.

[Anonymous No.14736772]

>>14736768
Why is that? I don't have any experience with them either

[Anonymous No.14736777]

>>14736622
Wow that's beautiful reminds me of pic related which I wish they had in a men's size. Where can I buy it?

[Anonymous No.14736788]

>>14736772
It feels to me like many german brands just cost along on a general "germany makes quality products" sentiment, even though things like Sinn makes ghastly watches with bought in movements and dials.
All in all, it feels like there is little to no reason to ever buy german over, say japanese, when they put in no effort.

[Anonymous No.14736793]

>>14736788
I'll refer you to damasko. Some of them look ghastly but you cannot underestimate the concentrated german autism that goes into the materials and workmanship. Family owned as well iirc

[Anonymous No.14736805]

>>14736793
german autism is literally just marketing, I hope you don't actually believe in stuff like that.

[Anonymous No.14736813]

>>14736777
it's hard to find them currently
you can try here:
https://www.watchshop.com/casio-collection-watch-a1000m-1bef-p100032445.html

[Anonymous No.14736833]

>>14736805
Fine it is just concentrated autism. Happens to be german in this case.

[Anonymous No.14737317]

>>14736744 €100
https://www.watchshop.com/casio-collection-watch-a1000m-1bef-p100032445.html

[Anonymous No.14737873]

>>14736622
technically there is an edifice line digital by casio which has a steel case and has been around forever.

[Anonymous No.14737938]

Someone posted this pic early this week, and holy shit these two watches just shit on everything. Wish I could just blow 13k like nothing

[Anonymous No.14737989]

>>14734615

[Anonymous No.14737996]

>>14736656
Buy the Seagull; there's nothing wrong with it if you get it from the right supplier and have a watchmaker nearby in case you have any doubts when you receive it. Mine is still running well (within 1 second per day), but I give it a few days rest every so often because now I have a rotation for work.

What are your concerns? (aside from China is shit, which is a rather undifferentiated statement given what you're thinking of buying)

>>14737938
Yup...they're the pinnacle of each aesthetic. All you'd need is an IWC Flieger, a Patek or Vacheron Constantin dinner watch in gold, and you'd be set for life.

[Anonymous No.14738000]

Rate my furture collection, I know its Omega heavy, if the rolex bubble pops I'll ad a sub.

Any recommendations for 38mm watch? For my 6th

[Anonymous No.14738012]

>>14738000
>rate
It depends on what you want them for, how often you'd wear them, what you do for work or hobby, etc.

As an example, if you swim a lot, the seamaster makes sense. If you dive, it definitely makes sense. If you don't go near water most of the time, it's unnecessary and the money could go towards something else.

The constellation is fine...but for what purpose? If a dress watch, why not go for the gold variant?

Speedy is excellent choice, though I prefer Cal. 321 (more pricey, but iconic).

Grand Seiko...I never liked the aesthetics personally, but I understand wanting to get at least one example of the technology. Maybe you should look for something more 'exciting' in the colours and design.

As for the digital....I still don't know why people like these things at all. But there we are...no comment.

[Anonymous No.14738047]

In the watch thread a few days ago someone suggested you get a monoprice clip on pickup and use TG timeographer software to regulate your watch on the cheap.

I just plugged mine into the PC and put it on the watch and its saying my watch is 2000 seconds a day out (which is obviously not correct since its like 40 seconds)

Any advice on how to get this software to work?

[Anonymous No.14738061]

>>14738012

Seamsater would be my travel, go anywhere do anything watch. I live in a wet part of the world, I'd like an aqua terra but I'm going to pick over it the seamaster for the ceramic + movement.

I do like a smaller watch (constellation) on a leather strap and that's what I first wore, so it's kind of me getting back to basics, my dad has a 60s gold seamaster, which will be left to me so I'd feel like I'm doubling up.

I have decided yet on the speedy model

Wanted a F9 movement, one less watch to service I am trying to stay under 10k don't want to much money in watches.

Steel g shock is just a beater for around the house, how else am I to set the rest of them :)

Ty for your input, maybe I will rethink the GS, I would like a better dial on it.

[Anonymous No.14738094]

>>14738061
A couple of ideas to think about.
1) Movement: The co-axial movement at this stage is only reliably serviced by Omega. Independents who can do it are far and few between nowadays, and given that Omega has stopped selling their parts to independents (like Rolex did officially years ago), you're looking at a situation where you MUST service it through Omega in the future. Movements that use a standard lever escapement can still be done by independents, for a lot less and with you determining precisely what you want done. Normally I'd say don't worry about this, but the issue is that the co-axial has not proven to be any more reliable or accurate than a trad lever escapement that is well balanced, and furthermore the average service times of the co-axial (which were initially advertised to be over 10 years) is now down to 5-7 from Omega officially (depending on the country, model, year, etc.). Which happens to be the same timeframe as trad movements.

2) The aqua terra is an excellent watch, far less expensive, and more 'under the radar'. Consider it seriously.

3) If you're getting a gold seamaster from the 60's, then you are in a sense doubling up so don't bother with the constellation unless you have cash to burn.

The other thing to consider is how much wear you'd get out of your watches. I find that the ones I wore for the longest periods (i.e. during school, during uni, etc.) are simply the ones that feel the most like 'mine'...whereas the new ones I've gotten recently still feel like they're imposters...lol

Ultimately get what you want, but the more watches you have, the less connection you'll feel to them and eventually you'll either turn into me (who has no interest in buying any watches in the future forever) or the Anon here who has the watch that you have to water to keep it going....his collection is remarkable, but gigantic.

[Anonymous No.14738099]

>>14735876
Ghastly

[Anonymous No.14738126]

>>14738061
Something else that came to mind.

For a long time, my Seamaster was my go-to travel anywhere watch, but after getting it serviced I decided I'd use it only for work and scuba, and my 'beater' would be pic related.

I can go to the range with it, I can go on rollercoasters with it, and I'm not really worried. Yes, modern mechanicals have lots of shock protection, but I'm at the point now where full services just aren't worth the money anymore, so if I can avoid them and use my independent for a fraction of the price, I'm happier.

There's nothing wrong having and using nice watches...but these days I wouldn't travel to places I don't know wearing any of my nice ones. It's just a feeling...the world has gotten more dangerous lately.

Back to the seamaster or aqua terra though: they're both very good for different occasions, and dress up or down depending on what you need. The Ceramic bezel looks nice...but isn't anything to write home about after a year or so.

GS has a lot of possibilities; the dial you posted wasn't bad...just...indistinct. If you want it to fly under the radar, then it's fine...but their attention to finishing is excellent so you might as well get one with detailing on the dial...you know what I mean?

[Anonymous No.14738156]

>>14738126
What's a watch that's exactly like this but not xboxhuge?

[Anonymous No.14738172]

>>14738156
I'm afraid it comes with the territory. The black/black North American version isn't made anymore, and the Japanese ones are going fast if you want one. All watches with sliderules are large...if you go with a Breitling it'll be just as present on the wrist. But that's the function; it's not a dress watch, it's not something that should fit under a suit or a collared shirt sleeve cuff. It's a 'military' style watch. Enjoy it for what it is, and if you want something different, look for something different.

[Anonymous No.14738212]

>>14738094
>>14738126

I hear you on the coaxial, I don't mind getting it service with omega as long as its 7 year maybe push to 10, I make quite alot. I honestly didn't think about the bezel wear, I know the older model wears in heavy, I use a bezel alot for cooking.

I might go for the AT, price is a factor. I see good deals on the grey market now and then. I just lean more the 300m, adjustable clasp, shinyer but the AT is a better daily. I need to get over the teak dial, im 60/40 on it.

It could be 10 year or 20 years or next year for the gold seamaster, I just so happen to see a excellent example of a constellation. I have the extra cash, I'd like to finish the collection by the years end. Wear and enjoy them, maybe tweak it with a jlc (constellation is sort of a place holder for jlc ultra thin) but that would be a few years down the line.

I'd wear them daily, if I don't wear it, it normally goes, 1 in 1 out, small manageable collections are what I like. I well add higher end watch most likely in the future but no more than 6, 4 would be nice but 3 is hard for me.

No that's what the g shocks for, I clay pigeon shoot with it. Travel to London with it. Activelys. I could switch it for a gs quartz but I just need to find the right model for a good price /fair. I still feel a little errrr paying 2k for a quartz even if it's a gs.

[Anonymous No.14738347]

>>14738000
I like it. Only wondering about the Constellation - Any reason in particular for it? I'm asking because I'm interested in the DeVille Trésor, and think it looks a bit nicer, though tastes are obviously personal.

[Anonymous No.14738428]

>>14738347
I could go with a nomos or something but just feel you get a nice watch for the money with vintage omega. Why buy vintage styling when you can buy a really 60s watch for half the price. As long as your okay with 34mm and 0 water resistance.

[Anonymous No.14739792]

What do you guys think of the Seamaster 1948? I want a one and done!

[Anonymous No.14739809]

>>14739792
why not just buy a vintage one

i can help u if u want

[Anonymous No.14739900]

>>14739809
I thought about it but dealing with vintage watches can me a pain

[Anonymous No.14739901]

>>14739900
not really

also checked, so maybe thats so

[Anonymous No.14739916]

>>14734583
i bought this watch for 8$ at a shoppers drug mart 2 years ago

[Anonymous No.14739917]

>>14735091
>>14738099

Imagine beung that much of a nigger.

[Anonymous No.14739929]

>>14739901
I do like modern watches, vintage is very small. 0 water resistance, I do understand what you are saying, 90% style still omega for 6th other the price. It just speaks to me what can I say

[Anonymous No.14739963]

Do you think I could get the love of my life to talk to me again if I bought a watch, and which one should it be?

[Anonymous No.14740027]

>>14739901
>>14739809
It would also have to be a bumper movement and parts are hard to get now for them.

[Anonymous No.14740214]

>>14739963
What did you do?

[Anonymous No.14740225]

For me?

It's the breetling superocean heritage ii

[Anonymous No.14740231]

>>14736305

what about some horse butt

https://www.bandrbands.com/etaupe-horween-vintage-leather-watch-band.aspx

[Anonymous No.14740284]

>>14740214
Nothing, she just stopped talking to me, I guess she found someone better but she wouldn't say.

[Anonymous No.14740309]

>>14740284
If she was the love of your life you should have made your move, anyway, clearly a watch will not help, sports car maybe (depending her age and type of girl) but prob not. Own your own house, descent job, car, not ugly, got your shit together will but probably to late as shes sucking on fat black dick. So buy a watch to commemorate it :)

[Anonymous No.14740317]

>>14740284
God I'd have so much more saving / watches / niceeee car and not a pile of shit / more gold billion stacked / more things / small bit of land / friends :( lost a few, life, little time and shit / If I was single, don't do it!

[Anonymous No.14740323]

>>14740284
Got travel to Thailand for 3 weeks, trust me you'll get her out of your system.

[Anonymous No.14740325]

Seiko make pretty low quality watches but they sure do pack amazing lume.

[Anonymous No.14740329]

>>14739963
What watch you thinking? How do you dress? How much you looking to spend? I honestly don't think so, girls don't care about watches.

[Anonymous No.14740334]

For me, it’s the CHAD Master 2

[Anonymous No.14740349]

>>14740323
I'm not a retarded incel like you Archie, fucking ladyboys won't help.

[Anonymous No.14740360]

>>14740349
Come on BiGbOY work with me

[Anonymous No.14740362]

>>14740334
Ah god to think he could have got a Patek or lange

[Anonymous No.14740366]

>>14740225

(B)ased

[Anonymous No.14740426]

>>14736305
Pastel colored canvas maybe? The polished case kindof limits the military/tool strap choices imo. Also, dont buy suede straps from cheapestnatostraps. The name fits, mine is about to tear at the lugs after about a month of wear and the second holding ring has stretched.

[Anonymous No.14740470]

>>14740309
What can one do when someone just stops engaging entirely and gives you 2 word responses when you message them?

[Anonymous No.14740477]

>>14740470
You see her in person if your talking about messages or shes not into you anymore. Do you really want to be with some who is not 100% in it

[Anonymous No.14740481]

Anyone here in a sexual relationship with their watch ?

[Anonymous No.14740501]

Comfy.

[Anonymous No.14740506]

>>14740426
Damn I was just going to get one from there. I really like the suede strap look, where can I buy some of better quality?

[Anonymous No.14740523]

>>14740477
>Do you really want to be with some who is not 100% in it
I'd do anything if she just talked to me again, nothing more :(

[Anonymous No.14740532]

>>14734583
What's the point of wearing a watch when you have a phone? Unless you're going sea diving or mountain climbing and have a specialized watch for that purpose you'll just be seen as a try-hard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwk5OUII9Vc

Unless you also wear diamond rings, gold chains and have face tattoos ofc...

[Anonymous No.14740551]

>>14734583
Current collection, thinking about a Patek 5196R or a Saxonia manual wind next

[Anonymous No.14740564]

>>14740532
some work it's impractical to pull a phone out of your pocket whenever you need time
plus it's a good way for people to help minimize phone time, if you dont need it for a watch then you can just leave it in the car unless expecting important calls etc
there's hundreds of other reasons but to me those are the two mains ones

(I still use phone for time btw)

[Anonymous No.14740779]

>>14740564
>some work it's impractical to pull a phone out of your pocket whenever you need time
Like what type of work?
>plus it's a good way for people to help minimize phone time,
Checking the time is a few seconds tops. If you really need to know how much time passed and don want to check the phone constantly just set a timer.

[Anonymous No.14740791]

>>14740349

Just put on Tinder and you'll be swimming in hwhite wimmins gap year pussy for free if you play it right.

[Anonymous No.14740804]

>>14734583
Anyone have experience with wearing the Bulova Lunar Pilot? Is it really as fuck-huge as people say it is? Plan on buying it anyway because I'm currently collecting space watches, but I do want a respectable, functional daily. My Speedmaster catches too much attention, and the Seiko 6139's dial color doesn't mesh too well with my generally monochrome or subdued color wardrobe. My wrist size is a hair short of 7".

[Anonymous No.14740814]

>>14740804
>My Speedmaster catches too much attention
How?

[Anonymous No.14740820]

>>14740814
By virtue of being an Omega, and being a black dial chrono watch, people comment on it all the time, and assume I'm far richer than I actually am. My area's ok, but I have to pass through a depressed area on the way to work, so I don't feel that comfortable having a $3000 watch on me half the time.

[Anonymous No.14740830]

>>14740820
Yeah no, no one knows wtf a Speedy is, sorry dude.

[Anonymous No.14740845]

>>14740830
They don't know what a Speedy is, but they certainly know what an Omega is, so I try not to wear it as much even if I like the look. The Bulova looks very similar hence my original question.

[Anonymous No.14740858]

>>14739916
well it looks even cheaper

[Anonymous No.14740897]

>>14740551
very nice collection

[Anonymous No.14740958]

I have a 17,5cm diameter wrist, is a 40mm diameter (without lug) watch too big? maybe barely gets a good fit?

[Anonymous No.14740971]

>>14740958
I have a 17,7 cm wrist, and I find that 42mm is stretching it. 40 should definitely be fine. Do you have a chance to try it on?

[Anonymous No.14740976]

>>14740958
Really depends what the lugs are like on the watch

[Anonymous No.14740989]

>>14740971
>>14740976
unfortunately I can't try it on, lugs don't seem to big so I'll probably risk it. thanks anyway

[Anonymous No.14740995]

>>14736053
Worrsstttt

[Anonymous No.14741028]

>>14740989
Hope you don't get burn anon, best of luck.

[Anonymous No.14741100]

>>14740551

patek is overrated imho

[Anonymous No.14741135]

>>14737938
Sub is nice. Omega is for BETA ONIONS LOOSERS now.

[Anonymous No.14741136]

>>14740551
Nice except for yachtmaster.
>>14740958
Check the lug to lug. I wore 42mm with my tiny 6.3 wrist without overhang up to 50mm lug to lug but it was really pushing it. I have a pretty flat top wrist though.

[Anonymous No.14741336]

>>14740958
What watch is it?

[Anonymous No.14741532]

>>14740225
Gorgeous and based watch

[Anonymous No.14741584]

>>14741336
timex standard

[Anonymous No.14741586]

>>14740551
That Vacheron is amazing. Based collection.

[Anonymous No.14741826]

>>14740564
People who say they don't need a watch are losers who rely on their superiors to manage their time. Now go sort these papers until I tell you you're free to go, wagie.

[Anonymous No.14741854]

[Anonymous No.14742964]

>>14740532
Checking a watch is a lot faster than pulling out a phone.

A watch is also very important if your job involves dealing with people, since you can't pull a phone to check the time in many types of meeting. With a watch you can discretely check the time anywhere.

[Anonymous No.14743125]

>>14740532
>B>A>I>T>

[Anonymous No.14743126]

>>14741136
Is the YM really that bad? I know two-tones are generally looked down on but I’ve never never fully understood why

[Anonymous No.14743222]

>>14743126
I don't mind some 2 tones like dj or bluesy but I just find yachtmaster to be disgusting.

[Anonymous No.14743274]

>>14743222
Fair enough, can’t argue with preference. It was the first one I got and given the state of Rolex there wasn’t much in-store other than this YM, some even worse shitters and endless DJs

[Anonymous No.14743363]

>>14743126
Since they moved the Sub to the maxi-case I find a 40mm steel/platinum YM far more appealing.

[Anonymous No.14743464]

>>14743363
>more expensive than a sub
>100m wr
>hideous 2 tone options
>more polished surfaces to get scratched to shit

its just the fashion watch version of the sub. not a fan of it.

[Anonymous No.14743468]

>>14743464
>>more expensive than a sub
Retail perhaps, probably easier to get at retail. Also more because of the platinum.
>>100m wr
Enough for most people.
>>hideous 2 tone options
So has the Sub
>>more polished surfaces to get scratched to shit
This is the main downside
>its just the fashion watch version of the sub. not a fan of it.
Fair enough, you're entitled to your own opinion.

[Anonymous No.14743611]

>>14743464
>Implying the sub hasn't already become a fashion watch
I reckon the number of YMs being worn on yachts is much higher than the number of subs currently taken diving, you could argue that their roles have switched

[Anonymous No.14743935]

>>14743126
CHAD masters are great, only pussies don't like them

[Anonymous No.14744021]

Why are there two generals again

[Anonymous No.14744193]

>>14744021
Because there’s that fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.14744692]

>>14742964
>Checking a watch is a lot faster than pulling out a phone.
By a few seconds, sure. That's not enough of a reason for most people who just need to check the time periodically and not every two minutes.

>A watch is also very important if your job involves dealing with people, since you can't pull a phone to check the time in many types of meeting. With a watch you can discretely check the time anywhere.
Ok, I can see that. I don't trust the clocks on walls either.

>>14743125
It's not bait. For most people a phone is fine for telling the time and a watch is just flexing.

[Anonymous No.14744849]

>>14744692
Are you on a phone thread, you fucking idiot?

[Anonymous No.14745192]

>>14744849
Smartphones eliminates the normal use of wrist watches for most of the population meaning it's becoming more and more of an outlier in fashion. So, you either end up with rapers bragging about having "ice on their wrist" trying to associate with a bygone era or you end up with pretentious hipsters using antiquated tech as an accessory.

But I guess a thread on a fashion board shouldn't ever talk about larger fashion trends, right?

[Anonymous No.14745266]

>>14744692
>a watch is just flexing.

how is this called flexing?

[Anonymous No.14745348]

>>14745266
I used to use a cheap water proof watch for swimming too.

So we can break it down into at least two broad types:
>Luxury/wannabe status symbols
Serves as jewelry/flexing along with a hipster-like association with the past by using antiquated tech.
>Practical
For people who need to check the time very often and need those few extra seconds, can't afford to piss off customers/associates by looking at phone, don't have a phone (like young children and very poor), specialized watches designed for extreme environments/activity.

The only one that is excusable and not tryhard is the practical watches and those shouldn't be worn as fashion statements.

[Anonymous No.14745383]

Tudor Black Bay GMT. A fun, lower priced nod to the GMT-Master with a Tudor spin on it, or a poorfag cope you'll inevitably flip for a real Rolex?

[Anonymous No.14745406]

>>14745383
Looks nice but the extra hand would be more annoying than helpful in 99% of situations imo

[Anonymous No.14745545]

>>14745348
who hurt you?

[Anonymous No.14745709]

>>14745348
...Why do you think people shouldn't get to wear the jewellery they like?

[Anonymous No.14745752]

>>14745709
I used to troll random generals too.

So we can break it down into at least two broad types:
>Trolling for the sake of trolling
Serves as a way to let out their teenage angst along with a hipster-like attitude to shit on things others like.
>Autism
Certain people are very autistic and are unable to understand that people are allowed to like things other people dont like. Unfortunately, due to their severe form of autism they just cant comprehend that each person likes different things and doesnt have to conform to their vision of what is cool/acceptable.

The only one that is excusable and not tryhard is the severe autism

[Anonymous No.14745905]

>>14745383
I think that depends on whether you can accept that everyone are making Pepsi bezels now, and you just want one from a decently prestigious brand, or if you're hellbent on the Roly for some reason.
Personally, I've yet to come around to the GMT models with 24 hour markers - I feel like there's too much going on there, and it looks a bit cluttered.

[Anonymous No.14746097]

>>14740325
>Seiko make pretty low quality watches
lmao, that very watch in your pic is an SBBN Tuna.
To give you an idea of the quality of these Tunas: the notches on those bezels are individually polished, see pic.

On a Rolex Sub, those notches have raw machining marks.

[Anonymous No.14746238]

>>14745905
I personally don't like the font for the bezel on the newer GMT masters. At least the Tudor has the more classic looking font.