/fa/ books

[Anonymous No.14691738]

[Anonymous No.14691739]

Absolut > smirnoff

[Anonymous No.14691749]

[Anonymous No.14691759]

/fa/ incarnate

[Anonymous No.14691894]

>>14691738
(you)

[Anonymous No.14691903]

[Anonymous No.14692010]

[Anonymous No.14692014]

good book too, highly recommend.

[Anonymous No.14692016]

>>14691738
Those poem books are absolute garbage

[Anonymous No.14692021]

[Anonymous No.14692028]

>>14691759
based, unironically one of the best books I have read

[Anonymous No.14692042]

I love how he writes. He's that friendly wise and badass uncle you never had.

[Anonymous No.14692052]

>>14691738
Quality taste OP.

[Anonymous No.14692071]

What I'm reading at the moment. An interesting read, if a bit disorganised

[Anonymous No.14692109]

Anything bleek and intellectual is /fa/
McCarthy and Vonnegut are good starting points

[Anonymous No.14692165]

>>14692052
This hurt me a lot.

[Anonymous No.14692215]

>>14692016
basic bitch filter

[Anonymous No.14692230]

>>14691738
Is this bait? If so it'll work better in /lit/. One of my old friends wrote a poetry book, it's in the same style as this. The girl is proper nice, but goddamn do I cringe thinking about it

[Anonymous No.14692348]

>>14691738
I couldnt get through two pages. That things grotesquely overrated.

[Anonymous No.14692409]

>>14691738
>rupi kaur
good bait.
real answer is anything from a french or russian author

[Anonymous No.14692787]

>>14691738
Shit taste OP, read some real literature and get rid of your pseudo intellectual basic bitch 'im so smart bc I read' poem book shit.

[Anonymous No.14692810]

>>14691738
>>14692052
>milk and honey
4 lines of an incredibly basic statement that doesn't even rhyme disguised as "poetry"
>>14691759
>dorian gray as anything but tumblrcore garbage
>>14692109
>referring to Vonnegut as "bleak and intelectual"

i have never been more embarrased by this board.

[Anonymous No.14692921]

[Anonymous No.14692923]

>>14692071
The Courlessness?

[Anonymous No.14693024]

[Anonymous No.14693070]

>>14692109
>either of those
>intellectual

[Anonymous No.14693143]

>>14691738
that is embarrassing

[Anonymous No.14693150]

>>14692921
>>14692042
>>14691759
>>14691738
Cringe

[Anonymous No.14693169]

>>14691738
dostoyevsky is pretty /fa/

[Anonymous No.14693194]

>>14693150
Cringe

[Anonymous No.14693195]

[Anonymous No.14693320]

>>14691738

[Anonymous No.14693361]

>>14691738
Penguin books look generally good, also that misogynistic book with lemurs on cover which was shilled on /lit/ by its author

[Anonymous No.14693363]

Catcher in the rye, because most of the ppl posting on this board probably related to Holden Caufield when they read it

[Anonymous No.14693774]

>>14692052
LOOOOL

[Anonymous No.14693784]

>>14693195
hot

[Anonymous No.14693819]

phillip roth
Pynchon
delilo

[Anonymous No.14693821]

:)

[Anonymous No.14693997]

>>14691739
stolichnaya > absolut

[Anonymous No.14694000]

>>14693997
nod really

[Anonymous No.14694041]

>>14693821
wholesome

[Anonymous No.14694121]

[Anonymous No.14694233]

>>14691738
Is there anything more /fa/ than this?

[Anonymous No.14694246]

>>14694233
it's the go-to book for the most pretentious and most appearance-obsessed androgynous nerd losers, so yes, this is peak /fa/

[Anonymous No.14694252]

I actually read so i'll let you guys know the correct answers
>old /fa/
In Search Of Lost Time, War and Peace, Faust
>new /fa/
Atomised, 2666, CCRU WRITINGS 1997 - 2003

[Anonymous No.14694254]

>>14691749
I read this while in Russia and I didnt get executed, only a few "aw i love that book". Much more fa to read that than The Gulag Archipelago. That gets you some looks. Definitely not fa.

Im reading "seeing like a state" atm. Feels sorta incel y. Wouldnt recommend. Unless youre a girl

[Anonymous No.14694268]

>>14692021
Clean your nation

[Anonymous No.14694278]

>>14694246
You sound jealous like you haven't read it

[Anonymous No.14694283]

>>14694278
you sound gay

[Anonymous No.14694286]

>>14694283
You would be correct

[Anonymous No.14694287]

>>14694233
This quickly becomes an unreadable mess. Marx was a total hack and modern economic theory has so much outpaced him I can't see any point in reading this.

[Anonymous No.14694292]

>>14694287
The critiques of capitalism still work and modern economics doesn't ask questions about society.

[Anonymous No.14694294]

>>14691759
based

[Anonymous No.14694301]

>>14694292
>The critiques of capitalism still work
>less poverty than ever before in a world united in capitalism

[Anonymous No.14694302]

>>14693821
Do you have the life affirming bloomer film chart?

[Anonymous No.14694304]

>>14694301
Sick boomer argument you are out of your element

[Anonymous No.14694307]

>>14694294
my dorian is more angry

[Anonymous No.14694319]

>>14694304
sick non-argument you have there, chap

[Anonymous No.14694322]

>>14694319
give me minute

[Anonymous No.14694327]

>>14692021
based

[Anonymous No.14694331]

>>14693024
nice squished balls nigga

[Anonymous No.14694333]

>>14693024
extremely cute post more photos

[Anonymous No.14694363]

for me, it's Christian Kracht

>>14694322
tick, tock zoomer

[Anonymous No.14694370]

>>14694319
i make it quick. Obviously just because capitalism has brought some people out of poverty doesn’t negate all the negatives. It’s still pretty shit. The statistics on poverty not so good but I’m too lazy to fact check so I’ll let you have it for the sake of argument. sure people are lifted out of property while we still rely on slave labor from countries. If I’m using Marxist arguments even if you are lifted out of poverty your life is still as a slave to capitalists. The surplus value of your labor is still going straight to the boss. You still have alienation from your workplace. No control in your own life. Cog in the machine nothing to lose but your chains all the good stuff. Being a slave to profit is not healthy for a society and leads to horrible externalities and just degradation in society in general. No control in our lives and capitalists being in power makes it worse. so recap being a capitalist is being a bootlicker and all your arguments are gonna sound uncle tom but for bourgeois

[Anonymous No.14694422]

>>14694370

oh zoomer, I'll give you the honor of a quick death: there is no such a thing as capitalism, only varying degrees of institutionalized freedom. Property rights allow yourself to be as independent as humanly possible and they constitute the foundation for any form of codified civil rights.

Economic liberty is the basis of civil liberty, hence why everyone wants to be rich - the trick is not to give up the remaining rights in order to get them back later.

The surplus of your labour is being shared with you through wages. Does that a ring a bell for you, NEET?

Let's summarize: free market countries have the highest degree of freedom. They work because they have the highest level of financial security and political stability. In order to make your life better, you to curb productivity. In order for that to work, you need investments. How do we get people to not lock away their assets or to spend them sooner than later? Right, giving them an incentive - like a profit. Hence why financial institutions and political stability are important factors. Political stability needs liberty, because otherwise civil unrest is always on the horizon. Capitalism needs freedom and freedom needs capitalism.

[Anonymous No.14694451]

>>14694422
Oh no it's a retarded libertarian. You are actually are zoomer after all. At least Marxists get a small amount of respect libertarians are just dumb retards and everyone agrees.

Property rights important rights all that retarded shit - Property rights means ownership over the workers as my nigga chomsky says. It's no different to chattel slavery. Unless your into that think not being allowed to own black people is against your liberties which I wouldn't be surprised knowing libertarians.

>The surplus of your labour is being shared with you through wages. Does that a ring a bell for you, NEET?
no its not it goes to the boss.

>free market countries have the highest degree of freedom.
Out yourself as a retard harder. Name a free market country please.

> In order for that to work, you need investments.
Investments from the state sector is how things are made under capitalism remember. The internet, cell phone all that fun stuff.

>Hence why financial institutions and political stability are important factors. Political stability needs liberty, because otherwise civil unrest is always on the horizon. Capitalism needs freedom and freedom needs capitalism.
You mean capitalism needs to take away freedoms like we did with all the countries that exist in the world. As a libertarian I'm sure your not in support of all the overthrowing and killing and wars and crimes we committed in the name of capitalism, profit, and big business.

[Anonymous No.14694461]

>>14691738
I carry a copy of CCRU collected writings everywhere I go. Anytime I'm on public transport or in a break between lectures I flick it out and turn to a random page. I'll stay on one page for a while before exclaiming something truly revelatory about the nature of the lemurian time war and zone 6. Never fails to net AT LEAST 3 occult/astrology art hoes, as a bonus the neon green cover perfectly fits my renaissannce-cyberpunk aesthetic.

[Anonymous No.14694470]

>>14694370
>No control in your own life.
In Pre capitalist societies you had no control over your own life. Wealth and technology has given people MORE freedom and longer holidays (weekends and days off) than ever before. And no, starving whilst you hope for rain does not count as a holiday. Yeah work sucks but in every single way life is better for your worker now than during the 19th century. Better still to be a Chinese sweatshop worker than a starving peasant trying to make shitty iron in his back garden. You should like you're romanticising some pre capitalist era as being a time of freedom when firstly, every class of society was less free in general and people didn't even care that much about freedom. That's really a modern ideal. In the 10th century, rural farmers actually gave themselves up to bondage in order to have more land and for protection.

[Anonymous No.14694472]

>>14694451

I'm just an average person with your average aspiration to make the most of his life.

Property rights are literally key to civilization. Sure, some people always want more - but they are no different than communists in that regard, only more successful.

Communists on the other hand: if you don't adhere to the infinite wisdom of random people you'll be starved to death because for every meal you eat, you'll need the state's admission to turn on the microwave first. Yay!

And where does wage come from then, out of thin air? If you're labour is worth so much, why not be your own boss then? Right, nothing is stopping and it works for hundreds of millions of people.

Free markets refer to the mechanism of pricing. I don't blame capitalism for not being able to buy Crystal Meth on amazon.

And your internet provider is the state? Interesting.

Capitalism doesn't wage wars, people do. Because people are a the greatest threat there is to other people. And you better pray to god that the good guys win in the end, unless you want to get high on the Crystal Meth while dreaming about Kim Yong-Un as your best man at the wedding with your government assigned tranny-wife.

[Anonymous No.14694485]

>>14694470
>In Pre capitalist societies you had no control over your own life.
It's better than it was in the past means it's the end of the history and this is the best we can do?
>weekends and days off
Thank the socialists for that. The capitalists fought hard against it.
>I'm just an average person with your average aspiration to make the most of his life.
Sorry your political ideas are dumb you seem nice
>Property rights are literally key to civilization. Sure, some people always want more - but they are no different than communists in that regard, only more successful.
No they aren't just like feudalism, pre capitalist societies, owning black people wasn't/arent a key to civilization. Socialist societies have existed and have proven to work so you it's not really an argument your making.
>Communists on the other hand: if you don't adhere to the infinite wisdom of random people you'll be starved to death because for every meal you eat, you'll need the state's admission to turn on the microwave first. Yay!
You never read Marx or have any understand of socialism/communism huh. Marx was an anarchist who was against state ownership. Communism is a stateless society
>Free markets refer to the mechanism of pricing. I don't blame capitalism for not being able to buy Crystal Meth on amazon.
That's markets not free markets. Free markets are a libertarian utopian idea that doesn't exist in reality. This link might blow your mind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_socialism
>And your internet provider is the state? Interesting.
Looks the market isn't so free after all.
>Capitalism doesn't wage wars, people do
People wage wars in the name of profit. One example of many thousands is that Nixon ruined the chilean economy it was because big business made him do it because of their investments in the chilean economy. Coca Cola setting up death squads in other countries etc etc.

[Anonymous No.14694506]

>>14694485
>Marx was an anarchist who was against state ownership. Communism is a stateless society

He advocated for a "dictatorship of the proletariat"

>People wage wars in the name of profit.

Yeah, that's what communism is all about - destroying the society in order for the workers to have a better life. Advocate for communism = profit. That's the deal, remember?

It's like saying free choice is bad because some people fuck dogs.

The state waging wars is unrelated to property rights. Difference is that under "communism" (or every step in this direction), you have even less control over your government.

[Anonymous No.14694517]

>pleb
NOO YOU CAN'T BASICALLY ENSLAVE SOMEONE WITH THE PROMISE OF A FRACTION OF YOUR PROFIT
>patrician
survival of the fittest breh, generational wealth is basically just good genetics
>super brained individual
CAPITALISM IS MAGIC BECAUSE YOU'RE USING SHAMANISTIC TOKENS (CURRENCY) TO WARP REALITY IN YOUR FAVOUR BY USING SAID TOKENS TO ENFORCE YOUR WAY OF THE WORLD TO APPEASE DEMONS WHO THRIVE ON SELFISHNESS AND BRUTALITY

[Anonymous No.14694540]

>>14694506
>He advocated for a "dictatorship of the proletariat"
Dictatorship of the proletariat is for socialist stage. Check the wikipedia page for communism. Says stateless in the first sentence. Anyways dictatorship of the proletariat is not what you think it is. It's not a dictatorship over the proletariat it's a dictatorship of the proletariat. A dictator of the working class over the bourgeoisie. The workers state in Marx's mind was normal democracy between workers. The dictatorship being the workers over the bourgeoisie. Obviously nothing wrong with this

>Yeah, that's what communism is all about - destroying the society in order for the workers to have a better life. Advocate for communism = profit. That's the deal, remember?

No Communists wage wars for the freedom of the working class. The communist is dying in the war himself. He isn't sending other young men to die for his bank account.

>The state waging wars is unrelated to property rights.
The state wages wars because of capitalism. We know for a fact it's for profit and business interests lol. How is that not capitalism?

[Anonymous No.14694575]

>>14694485
>Marx was an anarchist
You getting him confused with Buchanan?

[Anonymous No.14694590]

>>14692014
horrendous in the best way

[Anonymous No.14694605]

>>14694575
End goal of communism is stateless. That's anarchism.

[Anonymous No.14694615]

>>14694461
I was reading it while walking through the underground and accidentally stumbled into a warp zone. Turns out I had traded places with a Bolivian farmer in 1902. When I eventually returned to my body the only revelatory experience I had was an addiction to cocaine. Fuck that book, what mental ill people don't need is someone telling them their delusions "might" be real if they believe in them enough

[Anonymous No.14694697]

>>14691903
>>14692021
only good ones itt

[Anonymous No.14694796]

had to do it to em

[Anonymous No.14695066]

Wish it were a nicer edition, oh well. Cover is eye-catching enough i guess

[Anonymous No.14695068]

>>14691738

[Anonymous No.14695144]

>>14692409
i'm happy to still see people posting shiggys on 4chan. there is hope.

[Anonymous No.14695145]

>>14691738
Are you that guy in my econ class that uses a smirnoff bottle as his water bottle? It was funny the first time you did it.

[Anonymous No.14695155]

>>14695068
Peterson is not /fa/.

[HelterSkelter !/9ifQN9f.Q No.14695157]

I really thought I'd see Latreaumont or at the very least Burroughs in this thread

[Anonymous No.14695164]

compared to all the other pseudo-intellectual drivel posted in this thread, pic related beats them all.

[Anonymous No.14695178]

>>14695157
/fa/ doesn't read.

[HelterSkelter !/9ifQN9f.Q No.14695184]

>>14695178
Idk about that, a few months ago (possibly years) it was better than /lit/ and I actually got some good recommendations. Thanks to whatever anon told me about Orokhetfo, it's like Apollinaire on amphetamines.

[Anonymous No.14695420]

>>14691738
my ex loaned me this book and I read through the whole thing in an hour and 20 minutes. she was surprised I read it that quick.
who the fuck buys these books she literally owned the whole set

[Anonymous No.14695426]

>>14695184
I mean, /lit/ wasn't great at reading last I was there. I'm guessing that's still true.

[Anonymous No.14695433]

>>14695420
Is reading just a time trial for you?

[Anonymous No.14695438]

>>14695068
Taleb is the shit.

Are Freud and Jung hard to understand without secondary sources?

[Anonymous No.14695440]

>>14692021
cringe

[Anonymous No.14695443]

>>14695433
I fucking knew that was how that post was gonna come across. The point is that there were like four lines on each page and she was surprised it only took me an hour and a half to read through it.

[Anonymous No.14695444]

>>14695438
You may want a secondary source for historical context.

[Anonymous No.14695459]

>>14695443
>I fucking knew that was how that post was gonna come across.
Why didn't you try harder to convey your point then? What is your point? Either this particular book did nothing for you or poetry doesn't do anything for you in general. Both of these points are fair (I know dick about Rupi Kaur and don't care to remedy that); however, if it's the latter, I might suggest slowing down. You might enjoy poetry more if you take the time to process it.

[Anonymous No.14695461]

>>14695444
thanks. nice trips.

[Anonymous No.14695466]

>>14695459
It was like my third time reading poetry and I asked her "Am I supposed to take a second to think about these or something?" cause I couldn't see much depth to look into in them, to which she replied "I don't think so. Just read it as poetry." and that's what I did.
Basically the book was shit and the people who enjoy it have nothing but echoes within their heads.
For the record, I have read other (and markedly better) poetry since then. My initial assumption of rupi kaur being a dogshit writer proved to be correct.

[Anonymous No.14695500]

>Rupi Kaur
Pedophile detected, how many underage girls have you statutory'd?

[HelterSkelter !/9ifQN9f.Q No.14695510]

>>14695466
Read "Hello la Jolla" and "Gunslinger" by Edward Dorn

[Anonymous No.14695515]

Is Ulysses effay?

[Anonymous No.14695662]

>>14692021
He fell for it

[Anonymous No.14695706]

>>14694540
>The state wages wars because of capitalism

All kind of states have waged wars, /sage/

[Anonymous No.14695743]

Finally finished, solid read

[Anonymous No.14695767]

>>14692010
based. good list.

[Anonymous No.14695778]

>>14693821
based

[Anonymous No.14695815]

>>14694615
huh

[Anonymous No.14695829]

>>14694461
>>14694233
Nice

>>14695068
What is your favourite work by Jung? My experience with him reading his work is not good.

>>14695438
I can't speak for Jung, but Freud is an excellent writer. Many texts can be read with ease without secondary sources, but as an intellectual historian I am not the one to advice against historical context or interesting takes on PA. The first text I read was mourning and melancholia, and it was really no problem except a few specific terms I had to look up. Personally I like texts about meta-psychology the most. Good luck.

>>14692021
Is this new? Never heard of it before, only maps of meaning and twelve rules.

[Anonymous No.14695855]

>>14695829
yikes

[Anonymous No.14695865]

>>14693821
Steppenwolf and four quartets were amazing reads. I recommend Stoner. I'll probably read leaves of grass soon.

[Anonymous No.14695871]

>>14695855
?

[Anonymous No.14695880]

[Anonymous No.14695904]

I'm not exactly proud to say it but for the past few years all I've read have been biographies, business guides and especially financial theory. It wouldn't be sad if only I worked with it but no, what I do has no relation to it and I have not even started to invest

[Anonymous No.14695910]

>>14695829
So far the Red Book, first is really really good. Although on the final chapters he uses too many paradoxes that makes me feel he's a hack.

[Anonymous No.14695911]

>>14695910
First part*

[Anonymous No.14695999]

>>14695829
>
"culture of critique" isn't actually a peterson book. its a meme

have heard it is good tho

[Anonymous No.14696003]

>>14695068
antifragile gang

[Anonymous No.14696280]

>>14691738
>shitty pseudo-intellectual poetry
this fits /fa/ PERFECTLY

[Anonymous No.14696284]

>>14694301
Im no communist but there are plenty of valid critiques of capitalism, Marx solutions were just cringe

[Anonymous No.14696293]

[Anonymous No.14696532]

>>14694233
anything really

[Anonymous No.14696537]

>>14694451
>my nigga chomsky
stopped reading right here

[Anonymous No.14696555]

>displaying booze
17 year old core

[Anonymous No.14696611]

>>14695515
Yes very

[Anonymous No.14696619]

>all this garbage

[Anonymous No.14696672]

>>14695880
Was just about to post

[Anonymous No.14696737]

>>14696537
Why? Do you happen to have some criticism of my nigga chomsky?

[Anonymous No.14696743]

>>14696737
i probably would if i'd ever read anything he wrote but no, i think the way you adressed him was just utterly cringy

[Anonymous No.14696744]

>>14696619
you're right, the Bhagavad Gita is a load of garbage. Thanks for encouraging me to avoid it, anon :)

[Anonymous No.14696762]

>>14696743
I think the way you write is cringe

[Anonymous No.14696895]

>>14696762
No bitch he's right

[Anonymous No.14696914]

[Anonymous No.14696919]

>>14692014
does he get chomped in the book too? only seen the film

[HelterSkelter !/9ifQN9f.Q No.14697170]

>>14696914
Fuck yes dude, get some Gass up in this bitch. "On the Color Blue" was life changing.

[Anonymous No.14697182]

just finished this, solid read

[Anonymous No.14697241]

It’s October gentlemen. Any Gothic Horror recommendations?

[Anonymous No.14697295]

[Anonymous No.14697324]

>>14696555
and it's not even good vodka. it's fucking smirnoff, at least if you're gonna show off your cheap shitty vodka have it be tito's or sobieski

[Anonymous No.14697330]

>>14697182

[Anonymous No.14697376]

[Anonymous No.14697591]

[Anonymous No.14697594]

[Anonymous No.14697610]

[Anonymous No.14697618]

[Anonymous No.14697626]

>>14693150
Post yours

[Anonymous No.14697785]

>>14695865
but i heard that stoner was depressing

>>14697591
noted

[Anonymous No.14697795]

>>14697618
this and designing programmes by karl gerstner are life changing

[Anonymous No.14697805]

>>14691738

[Anonymous No.14697954]

>>14694252
thanks bro

[Anonymous No.14697990]

wear nothing but cav empt for the rest of your life

[Anonymous No.14698079]

[Anonymous No.14698094]

Is 1800s literature /fa/?

[Anonymous No.14698150]

>>14694233
Cringe manual

[Anonymous No.14698151]

>>14694286
>Marxist
>gay
No surprises to be found

[Anonymous No.14698226]

>>14696762
why is that my nigga anon?

[Anonymous No.14698231]

>>14693320
Ottimo, fratello, ottimo.

[Anonymous No.14698239]

>>14698079
This. Perfume organs and jewel-encrusted turtles are very effay

[Anonymous No.14698253]

>>14696737
I do.
The minimalist program is shit and even he abandoned it
His linguistics efforts were important in the second half of the 20th century as they instigated a large debate on generative linguistics in the academia, but have largely been surpassed , specially in the field of anthropology with Gans.
His political analysis are accurate, but generally no better than pundit-level. He lacks(or willfully forgets) a deep understanding of geopolitics and macroeconomics.
His political treatises are only repeating points from other Marxist/anarchist/anarcho-communists that came before him. Also, I may not have read enough of his books, but I have never heard of him actually approaching the problem of ethics on his treatises, he always relies that the reader has a per-estabilished ethical framework(or rather, moral) that happens to align with his.

[Anonymous No.14698266]

>>14694451
>get called a zoomer
>flipping the insult back at the person who used it
>thinking Marxists get an iota of respect and aren’t viewed as a bunch of retards

[Anonymous No.14698535]

>>14698266
Also every marxist I've seen online (who revealed their age) has been < 20 yrs old. So I discard all their opinions

[Anonymous No.14698600]

>>14693997
Truth

[Anonymous No.14698627]

>>14694233
Capital is not his most /fa/ work, sorry. Try early Marx instead.

[Anonymous No.14698629]

>>14694254
Nice, do you speak russian?

[Anonymous No.14698638]

>>14694575
Jesus christ did you mean to say Bakunin

[Anonymous No.14698643]

>>14697805
Great book worst cover

[Anonymous No.14698706]

>>14696619
Some weird guy in a Nepal hat approached me and gave me a copy and asked for donations. Gave him 10 dollars and he went away. Not sure how to feel about it.

[Anonymous No.14698715]

always liked this one

[Anonymous No.14699048]

>>14695880
based book

[Anonymous No.14699416]

>>14693997

Glad to know people enjoy my countries vodka. Well, Russians and ours.

[Anonymous No.14699581]

>>14692810
>i have never been more embarrased by this board.
that's literally every single time I come back to this festering shithole of a board.

[Anonymous No.14700074]

>>14694233
Sweaty...

[Anonymous No.14700211]

yee haw

[Anonymous No.14700220]

I really wish there was a better cover for this, none of the covers this comes with are that great but the book is top tier

[Anonymous No.14700266]

Chipp - theories of modern art
>>14692923
Age of hope is crossed out
>>14694461
Cool book but I have a feeling you dress like shit if I'm being honest

[Anonymous No.14700295]

>>14698266
Marxists can get respect in some circles but not on the basis of their Marxism alone I think
>>14698627
I haven't read capital but I will agree that early Marx is pretty interesting shit

[Anonymous No.14701239]

>>14692021
cringe

[Anonymous No.14701296]

>>14694302
Yep

[Anonymous No.14701327]

>>14697785
Stoner is pretty much a giant exercise in storicism, finding beaut and meaning despite modern mundanity and mediocrity

[Anonymous No.14701379]

>>14692052
Imagine the absurd money she makes off these retarded poems.

[Anonymous No.14701515]

>>14692052
>>14701379
wtf i hate rupi kaur now

[Anonymous No.14701542]

>>14695144
>2020-3months
>not posting costanza.jpg revival
I seriously hope you guys don't do this

[Anonymous No.14701605]

>>14693150
>>14693194
dialate

[Anonymous No.14701749]

>>14697990
You are gay.

[Igor1976 No.14701755]

>>14701749
not him but explain

[Anonymous No.14701809]

>>14694233

[Anonymous No.14701816]

Any book you read for yourself, not to show off or be a smug cunt about to people.

[Anonymous No.14701823]

>>14701755
pedophile

[Anonymous No.14701862]

>>14701823
What makes you say something like that?

[Anonymous No.14701875]

>>14701862

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws

>In 1977, a petition was addressed to the French parliament calling for the abrogation of several articles of the age of consent law and the decriminalization of all consensual relations between adults and minors below the age of fifteen (the age of consent in France). A number of French intellectuals - including such prominent names as Louis Aragon, Michel Foucault, Jean-Paul Sartre,
> Jacques Derrida,
> Louis Althusser, Roland Barthes, Simone de Beauvoir, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, Michel Leiris, Alain Robbe-Grillet, Philippe Sollers, Jacques Rancière, Jean-François Lyotard, Francis Ponge, and various prominent doctors and psychologists - signed the petition. In 1979 two open letters were published in French newspapers defending individuals arrested under charges of statutory rape, in the context of abolition of age of consent laws.

[Anonymous No.14701890]

>>14692014
kurt cobains favorite book? no thx>>14694233
why not just read communist manifesto?
thats really all you need to understand karl marx' philosphy towards economics. hitler was a much deeper writer.

[Anonymous No.14701919]

>>14693997
Moskovskaya>stolichnaya

[Anonymous No.14702538]

>>14691738
>
And I thought goof ninjas were cringe. Female normies are a scourge on all taste.

[Anonymous No.14702540]

>>14701515
Well you're late, anyone over 75 iq hated her already.

[Anonymous No.14702652]

>>14701890
Cobain liked Perfume?`
how utterly based

[Anonymous No.14703181]

>>14702652
Yep scentless apprentice from in utero was based on perfume

[Anonymous No.14703189]

>>14691738
OP kys this is basic white-bitch tier literature

real /fa/ ppl only read Mishima

[Anonymous No.14703200]

>>14692071
Cringe

[Anonymous No.14703424]

>>14703189
Mishima was a literal homosexual that died like a cuck. His work really isn't worth reading either.

[Anonymous No.14703595]

>>14703189
you mean real /pol/tards who can only read novellas and like mishima because dude hes JAPANESE and LIFTS WEIGHTS and NATIONALIST