[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 104 KB, 1080x1080, rBVaR1vWEp6Aaq4MAAMs3rW9wdI692.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14329993 No.14329993 [Reply] [Original]

is gucci a ghetto brand? what are some other brands you avoid now that 13% of the population ruined?

>> No.14330297

>>14329993

Ferragamo over gucci anyday, ez

>> No.14330308

Most popular high end brands have flashy and garish pieces, but they still have quality items.

>> No.14330311
File: 6 KB, 401x366, 1554798671403.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14330311

Gucci, LV, Chanel, Goyard, and Salvatore Ferragamo are all 13%er brands

Fendi, Chanel, Moncler, Canada Goose, Alexander McQueen, and Hermes are all bugmen brands

That said, if you can pull any of it off in a tasteful way it doesnt matter. I dont have a lot of Prada but on the days that I wear it, I look 100 times better than the fobs who drape in it.

>> No.14330351

>>14330311
Seething poorfag cope

>> No.14330545
File: 446 KB, 1200x799, gucci-fall-2019-collection-79.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14330545

>>14329993
Depends on what you're getting from them. Belts and bags are pretty much fuckboy or mainland Chinese-tier, but Alessandro Michele's newer collections make you look a dirty hippie with money.

>> No.14330559

>>14329993
Dior >>>>

>> No.14330988

Luxury retail worker here, I got access to Chanel, Fendi, Botega and Gucci employee discounts while working at Hugo Boss, where should I pull the most triggers at?

>> No.14331289

>>14329993
>is gucci a ghetto brand?
belongs to kering, so yes

>> No.14331308

>>14331289
Official Ghetto Lux Brands:
>Givenchy
>Gucci
>Dolce & Gabbana
>Fendi
>Dries
>Balenciaga
>Prada
>Versace

SLP is the only who is not completely going after that market. Ie. the niggas who spend their entire months rent on a pair of "kicks"

But SLP still tries to appeal albeit in a very obtusely "Classical" way, even their Sneakers are just so overly "Classic" and overly boring in a boring SLP way. They can't avoid it, it's part of their DNA.

The only Lux Designer that doesn't actively target the "month of rent money on a sneaker" group is Maison Margiela, imo.

Then again, if you took away every Lux Designer's entire lines of "SNEAKERS", the Ghetto effect would be wiped away.

>> No.14331323

>>14331308
dude, there are plenty of designer brands that dont target the chink/nigger audience. but most of the kering and lvmh group do, its their job

>> No.14331327

>>14331323
What about Burberry? Have they recovered from having their brand name and look tarnished by chavs?

>> No.14331329

>>14331327
dunno, they're overpriced above all, designs aren't all that interesting

>> No.14331444

>>14331323
but that doesnt make any fiscal sense yo, the nigga/chink segment is that largest and fastest growing segment. that's where all the money is. it aint coming from rich old white folks like it was in the 90s yo

>> No.14331447

>>14331444
If anything, the 90s were the decade of black hip hop fashion

>> No.14332368
File: 178 KB, 1400x1400, 937295CF-B5D8-4ED5-BF40-D8EAC68F7458.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14332368

Anyone got pics of people dressing up in all luxury logo wear?

>> No.14332435

>>14331308
>dries
You crazy

>> No.14332476

>>14332435
Dries is 80% imported shit, it’s a complete niggas brand one step up from Ralph Lauren and Hugo boss

>> No.14332480

You won’t find a brand not ruined by hoodlums, the key is to avoid flashy accessories and jackets. Look for unique pieces and grails that don’t have the brand all over them.

>> No.14333738

You guys are pathetic

>> No.14333842

>>14329993
>dhgate

>> No.14335558

>>14329993
I consider anything with a logo larger than my thumbnail to be a trashy brand.
If they need to rely on their, usually dumb looking, logo, then the item of clothing probably looks like garbage.

>> No.14335743

>>14329993
All the brands named in this thread are fine except for the gaudy big logo pieces which where always trashy

>> No.14335760

You faggot ass crackers look like shit in anything you wear.

>> No.14335807

>>14331308
SLP just throw basic sneakers and logo tees/hoodies into their collections for the 13%

>> No.14336164

I've never seen a hoodlum wearing Hugo Boss.

>> No.14336255

>>14335743
/thread

>> No.14336320

>>14335807
>>14336164
I tried googling thug hugo boss or rapper hugo boss, and you rae right, maybe that is stil not tainted, too bad their shit is all made in cambodia.

The bottom line is, the lower class (of mind) aim to showcase that they can afford certain things that expensive, and huge logos on clothing shows that to others.

For me it is just tacky in general, I don't like seeing a Branding on my clothes, even if it is done incredibly whimsically, like purposely making it recessed or a different font, it just looks like a walking advertisement. Unless that Designer is literally paying me to advertise I would not want that type of branding.

I like the way SLP usually does it, which is classical, or they retain the same font always and keep it very small. Givenchy or Dolce and Gabanna basically drench their items in logos or "Crafty" branding, like writing it backwards. I give credit to being more creative to branding technique, but the only wa I would wear something is if it becomes so abstract and intelligible, that no one could even tell it was that Designer. Like if they only showed an extremes closeup of one letter of the Brand, but it was still the font itself.

The other aspect is most Designers have symbols now that are associated to them, like Fendi has those Bugeyes, and Gucci has the bumble bee... So basically if you see those bugeyes you know its Fendi, even though it doesn say "Fendi".