/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.14269537]

Post effay houses

[Anonymous No.14269794]

in 50 years that property isnt going to be worth shit, if its still standing at all. financial stability is fashionable, giving in to a """trendy""" house on a waterfront in a world with rising sea levels isnt.

[Anonymous No.14269820]

>>14269794
Ok dad, but I think he was just saying it looks cool.

[Anonymous No.14269835]

>>14269537
I wonder if one nowadays would hire an architect to build a Gothic house instead of a modern trendy minimalist house. I don't know the advantages/disadvantages of this choice.

Either way, there you have a effay house.

[Anonymous No.14269853]

>>14269835
Yeah... sometimes architects are hired to design homes and buildings in a classical style, but that's rare. Generally if an architect gets the chance to design something in a classical style, any classical style, it's a rare little treat and they'd be extatic to do it. Generally speaking.

[Anonymous No.14269855]

This is now a general architecture, landscape architecture and interior design thread.

[Anonymous No.14269875]

>>14269537

[Anonymous No.14269876]

[Anonymous No.14269965]

4chan should have an architechture board
Just saying

[Anonymous No.14269993]

>>14269835
those houses are a lot more expensive to build than modern ones, at least in burgerland. getting those cut stones is a lot more expensive than 2bys, sheetrock and siding, roofs take up more material, and all that metalwork and trim would have to be custom. the labor is also a lot more, having peope deal with larger stones, not being able to walk on roofs without special equipment, stronger foundations for added weight. the labor really adds up and most people who would want a gothic house would want an original, so the market would be tiny. maybe it could work in countries where the land and permitting itself is very expensive, like ive heard german houses are made of more expensive materials because of the other costs, or if the location makes the land costly.

[Anonymous No.14270104]

Is this faggot shack /fa/?

[Anonymous No.14270125]

[Anonymous No.14270587]

>>14269965
It should. How do we make this happen?

[Anonymous No.14270589]

[Ł Ľåwľìêț No.14270592]

>>14269537
Just bought my house with a gf, you guys like it?

https://youtu.be/zwvsgNmFnaQ

[Anonymous No.14270595]

>>14269794
It's not standing, anon. It's floating, and looks to be anchored to those concrete pillars on the side.

[Anonymous No.14270604]

[Anonymous No.14270605]

[Anonymous No.14270606]

Go pagan-core

[Anonymous No.14270609]

[Anonymous No.14270611]

[Anonymous No.14270616]

>>14269835
>>14269875
>>14270604
>>14270609
these are cool. thanks for sharing

[Anonymous No.14270619]

>>14270616
my pleasure capitano

[Anonymous No.14270623]

[Anonymous No.14270627]

[Anonymous No.14270663]

>>14270623
Wow this is such a dated aesthetic, I love it

[Anonymous No.14270668]

[Anonymous No.14270671]

[Anonymous No.14270674]

[Anonymous No.14270680]

[Anonymous No.14270683]

[Anonymous No.14270849]

>>14269835
patrican. looks fucking menacing

[Anonymous No.14270859]

>>14269835
>youll never live in house like this
damn

[Anonymous No.14270874]

>>14269965
I second this.

[Anonymous No.14270876]

[Anonymous No.14270880]

[Anonymous No.14270883]

>>14270880

[Anonymous No.14270925]

>>14269794
>giving in to a trendy house on a waterfront in a world with rising sea levels isn't

it's a Dutch houseboat. it even says "FLOATING" in the filename, you tard

[Anonymous No.14270998]

[Anonymous No.14271007]

>>14269965
should be architecture and design. I would love to discuss graphics, textures, fonts, and buildings with you fags

[Anonymous No.14271012]

>>14270668
geometric grass spaces like that are disgusting imo

[Anonymous No.14271019]

an absolutely classic

[Anonymous No.14271025]

>>14271019
rare interior shot

[Anonymous No.14271027]

>>14271025

[Anonymous No.14271069]

>>14269965
this

[Anonymous No.14271153]

>>14270880
>>14270883
glorified depressing commie block

[Anonymous No.14271273]

>>14271153
That's the Alexandra Road Estate, located in London. It has won several awards.
Back to /pol/ you troll

[Anonymous No.14271310]

>>14269537
Was this the one on Grand Designs that floated? Was fucking cool.

[Anonymous No.14271430]

>>14269993
Anon from the post you replied here;
thank you for your input anon, I was always in doubt about this subject.

[Anonymous No.14271449]

>>14271273
Even if it had won a 1000 rewards it's still depressing.

[Anonymous No.14271459]

>>14271025
Reminds me of this. Only Rapture is more comfy

[Anonymous No.14271530]

>>14271007
*rabbles in agreement*

[Anonymous No.14271550]

[Anonymous No.14271566]

>>14271273
its still shit
i'm always dumbfounded hat bongs regard it as the pinnacle of architecture

[Anonymous No.14271591]

>>14269965
/pol/ would colonize it immediately (not saying it's necessarily a bad thing though)

[Anonymous No.14271702]

>>14271153
I disagree. I think the desighn in new and a unique way to save space and still get people in. As oppose to a giant shoebox that you shove people in. This one alows more room for gardens and life

[Anonymous No.14271733]

>>14271591
That is a bad thing. You wouldn't be able to have a discussion about modernist architecture ever because it would just be posts upon posts of "Jewish architects ruined beauty" "modernism is a plot to undermine culture" etc. I don't even entirely disagree with that. But if every counterpoint in support of modern design just boiled down to "cuckcuckcuck" that would be p boring.

[Anonymous No.14271735]

>>14271702
This. Better to have one kick-ass common space than countless shitty little side-yards

[Anonymous No.14271740]

>>14271025
Holy shit that's so nice
there's something about living in a futuristic, steel and glass condo complex and decorating like an old victorian parlour that really floats my boat

[Anonymous No.14271782]

>>14271733
I think you're kind of a faggot if you're scared of being called a cuck. I know you phrased it slightly differently by saying it would be boring, but most people can see right through this. Why would anybody in their right mind support modern or even postmodern architecture and design?

[Anonymous No.14271812]

>>14271591
i wish this show spent more time showing what the european cities look like, new york just looks the same.

[Anonymous No.14271827]

[Anonymous No.14272046]

>>14271782
Your a cuck

[Anonymous No.14272048]

>>14271782
yeah I mean, there are some merits to modernism. there are some more enlightened elements to it when done right. Ideally I would like to see a mix of all architectural styles out there, and i do think modernism is overly dominant right now. These are the kinds of ideas I would love to discuss with people who are informed about it and open to having a conversation.

also fuck you. Don't project on me you mouth-breather.

[Anonymous No.14272216]

>>14271733
>You wouldn't be able to have a discussion about modernist architecture ever because it would just be posts upon posts of "Jewish architects ruined beauty"
But that IS the discussion. That genre of architecture doesn't have any history to speak of.

[Anonymous No.14272223]

>>14270876
Hnng.

[Anonymous No.14272326]

>>14272216
it doesn't have a history in the sense that it is new. so what they fuck? are you saying any innovation or new style is a NWO psy-op to undermine culture just because its new?