[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 43 KB, 480x660, omega-seamaster-diver-300m-omega-co-axial-master-chronometer-42-mm-21022422001002-list.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14265752 No.14265752 [Reply] [Original]

Are Omegas worth it? I'm in market for a watch that screams class. I'm wearing a Geneve (which I really like) and would like to go for something newer, but these new Omegas just feel kinda meh. Am I missing something?

>> No.14265910

>>14265752
I just got a 1970s Geneve today.
Do you want a dress watch or diver?
Post pics?

>> No.14266481
File: 3.92 MB, 4032x3024, IMG_0434.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14266481

>>14265752

If you want something more classy, go for an Aqua Terra, I have a Seamaster 300 and i think the value for money when compared to something like Rolex is outstanding, considering my SMP is half the price of a Sub. I actually own a Sub and bought the Omega to wear more casually but it's taken me by surprise to the point where i realise now the Rolex is outdated and boring, everyone has one, and people that see it will probably think it's fake.

TL-DR: Omega watches are excellent value, well made and you won't look like a dick wearing one like you would a Rolex.

>> No.14266604

>>14266481
I'm personally a fan of the Planet Ocean Seamasters. Especially since you can get a steel version in 39.5mm, so it's perfect size

>> No.14266610

Would buying a Railmaster be wrong? I hate the speedmaster and the seamaster is the worst omega fullstop

>> No.14266613
File: 92 KB, 1176x784, onetimeusepicture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14266613

>>14266604
An example of it.

>> No.14266637
File: 238 KB, 800x1100, seamen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14266637

>>14266610
Wow, rude.
But why not one of these Seamasters? They're a lot closer to the Railmaster look than the Diver.

>> No.14266687

>>14266637
oh shit, i stand corrected would cop this over the railmaster

>> No.14267289

>>14266687
Yeah, the Seamaster 300 is fucking gorgeous, and only 41mm, so it's not fuck-huge.

>> No.14267329
File: 748 KB, 1125x1117, IMG_6538.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14267329

>> No.14267384

>>14267329
And none of those Submariner copies is a Seamaster, which looks completely different, so what was the point of posting this picture?