Military

[Anonymous No.13842894]

How deep down that route do you think it's acceptable to go? I don't want to look like some radical pol scum, but I like the aesthetics

[Anonymous No.13842900]

[Anonymous No.13842901]

Garsing gsg-19 pants

[Anonymous No.13842904]

Is this OK with a regular wide belt?

[Anonymous No.13842912]

[Anonymous No.13842921]

Attach a pouch and us as a waist bag, but not so shitty?

[Anonymous No.13842923]

>>13842894
>>13842900
>Molle on pants
Vomit.png

[Anonymous No.13842925]

Go pro with that? This might be too much though

[Anonymous No.13842942]

>>13842925
lmao what the fuck why would you wear a camelbak in urban scenarios

[Anonymous No.13842981]

>>13842942
to carry my fuckin booze with me

[Anonymous No.13842984]

>>13842942
>>13842981
d'uh

[Anonymous No.13842993]

>>13842981
Great way to fuck the bladder in short order

[Anonymous No.13843007]

STOLEN VALOR all civs who rep military

[Anonymous No.13843386]

>>13843007
U kiddin`?

[Anonymous No.13843394]

>>13843386
Either that or you look like a larping faggot

[Anonymous No.13843398]

>>13842894
>>13842900
pretty cool

>>13842904
>>13842912
>>13842921
>>13842925
pretty cringe

[Anonymous No.13843542]

>>13842894
one item + a bag/backpack.
if you work in firearms or related industry you can safely get away with more.
for anon general: you start looking like a tard if you get all decked out

[Anonymous No.13843552]

>>13842900
The combo of the boots and the way the pants sit on them makes this look like /out/core which isn’t exactly /fa/.

Also lmao at how tight those pants look on your waist.

>>13842921
I fucking hate the chest bag/chest rig trend and this is no exception

[Anonymous No.13843959]

>>13843552
Obviously not me on those pics. Obviously have to have the pants sit well on your ass, if you're gonna wear them. Obviously the boots I'd go with must be way higher.

Guess I'll waste the idea with those straps or whatever those are called. Camelback too (except for the booze, yeah). But how do I make the fit look military, but not milsurp?

[Anonymous No.13843976]

I bought a woodland camo jacket from the military surplus store cause it was quality and pretty cheap. Looks pretty cool too.
Pants like in OPs pic is pretty gay because you probably are never in a situation where it will be to your benefit to have those types of pants and they're of little to no utility to you.
For example I wear carpenters jeans most every day but I am a carpenter and they're useful, you on the other hand are wearing military pants for fashion and fashion is for homosexuals.

[Anonymous No.13843980]

>>13843959
Higher black boots
That was a quickfix

[Anonymous No.13843993]

Opinions? Aren't pants like this just "techy" and not specifically military?

[Anonymous No.13844075]

>>13842900
what a fat fucking gut

[Anonymous No.13844078]

>>13842993
just take the one out of box wine

[Anonymous No.13844259]

>>13843959
>Guess I'll waste the idea with those straps or whatever those are called. Camelback too (except for the booze, yeah).

Don't listen to the guy who hates all chest bags/rigs. Clearly he has different taste, which is fine, but not helpful in this case.

[Anonymous No.13844297]

This aesthetic interests me.

[Anonymous No.13844796]

Once again, isn't this a branch of tech wear?

[Anonymous No.13845277]

>>13842894
Don’t wear too many pieces
Try stick to black or olive, if you go camo probably flecktarn but there are a few others
If buying milsurp eastern european is normally a good bet
Milsurp boots and belts (and dress belts) are good
Short back and sides haircut, wear a watch, tuck your bootlaces in

[Anonymous No.13845282]

>>13844297
cringe

[Anonymous No.13845808]

I think some military designs are just so good that "civilian" companies can't compete. Designs are made to fulfill a purpose, and the best are usually adopted. And surplus is the best for the price. Its like having faith in an Apple product, only the opposite qualities.

This ECWS gen 1 parka has zippers under the arms to convert into a poncho, very robust double zippers and snaps, huge pockets and hood, with a very high collar. With space for a liner, and access to the water proof layer so you can put tape on the seams.

[Anonymous No.13846036]

>>13845808
the underarm zips are for ventilation, you cant turn it into a poncho

[Anonymous No.13846155]

>>13845808
w2c that specific one?

you've sold me

[Anonymous No.13846218]

>>13845808
>>13846155
nvm found it

[Anonymous No.13846281]

>>13845808
>the best are usually adopted

[Anonymous No.13846286]

>>13842900
brrr :-/

[Anonymous No.13846291]

>>13844297
faggot^30

[Anonymous No.13846675]

>>13846218
>nvm found it
>doesn't post link

[Anonymous No.13846786]

>>13842894
im going for a more modern military tech

this is what i went out in minus the hat.

[Anonymous No.13846988]

>>13846786
yikes

[Anonymous No.13847633]

>>13846786
That is... Not particularly cool. An what so military about that look?

[Anonymous No.13847829]

>>13846786
lol

[Anonymous No.13847832]

>>13846786
Fat mall cop-core?

[Anonymous No.13849247]

>>13843993
those or shoes, or to be more precise: boots.
did you forget to breath for like 5+ minutes?

[Anonymous No.13849277]

>>13846786
got the george costanza look down pat

[a fucking ghost No.13849289]

Simple, you don't cosplay.
You take parts you like and adapt it to suit your environment

[Anonymous No.13849297]

>>13846786
Please for the love of god get wider pants. Your legs/proportions look terrible. Also uncuff, looks whack.

[Anonymous No.13849333]

>>13843542
This. Singular military item plus visible functional accessory when going into general public

[Anonymous No.13849370]

>>13846786
I’m gonna go against the established opinion and say that you actually look mostly ok but made some big mistakes

Don’t cuff your pants while wearing casual shoes like that, and I think you should untuck your shirt.

Honestly I think the jacket is pretty nice, but the texture is fairly shiny. Try pairing it with shoes with a similar shine. I think the textile texture of the shirt and the hat kinda clash but I don’t know maybe it can work. Maybe unbutton the shirt and have a white t-shirt underneath

[Anonymous No.13849893]

>>13846786
this cant be real, how do you retards manage to do this every time

[Anonymous No.13850019]

>>13842894
It's all just fabric, people who are gonna think you're crazy for wearing it are gonna think the same thing no matter how much you wear.

Just wear what you like.

[Anonymous No.13850024]

>>13843007
stolen valor doesn't exist.

[Anonymous No.13850027]

[Anonymous No.13850030]

[Anonymous No.13850032]

[Anonymous No.13850033]

Czechlovakian army or German polizei parka?

[Anonymous No.13850034]

[Anonymous No.13850038]

how bout ancient roman military?

[Anonymous No.13850040]

>>13850033
Dafuq, 4chan messing up my pics

[Anonymous No.13850046]

>>13850040
what website are you buying these off?

these both look good but i like the left better, im interested in it myself to go with my trackpants

[Anonymous No.13850049]

>>13850046
You can find both parkas on numerous milsurp sites, polizei has lots variations, though.
https://www.varusteleka.com/en/product/czech-parka-with-liner-olive-green-surplus/5757
https://www.epicmilitaria.com/czech-olive-green-m85-adult-parka.html
https://swisslink.com/new-czech-parka.html

Check these for example, though I can throw you some more links.

I'm in Ukraine however, so my sources will be irrelevant to you.

[Anonymous No.13850078]

Nine times out of ten, a designer has done a more stylish and less larpy interpretation of any military piece you think is cool.

Surplus is cheap and all but it's cut and designed with function in mind. I pretty much guarantee you're not going about your day wearing six layers and storing your entire life in pockets on your person. Only people who live like that are homeless...

[Anonymous No.13850092]

>>13850078
I'll try and be at least a little helpful though. Here are designers with lots of military influence. Buy second-hand when possible.

Nigel Cabourn - heritage British military pieces with a more modern cut

Helmut Lang - pretty much brought military clothing to the masses in the form of tactical sweaters, boots, and various jackets

Raf Simons - disciple of Lang

Martin Margiela - subverted the industry by taking actual milsurp and rebranding it with his own label, sometimes changing details as well

Dior under Hedi Slimane ca. '03-'09 and Dior aw12 under Kris Van Assche - sleek, often dark high fashion takes on militaria

Cloak - short-lived label by Alexandre Plokhov and Robert Geller generally focusing on period military garb with quirky details

Robert Geller mainline - Heritage military, a more down to earth Dior

Balmain under Christophe Decarnin - slim badboy military influence, especially ss10 (Decarnin) and ss14 under Rousteing

early Julius_7 - really dark post-apocolyptic goth shit that's sometimes overdesigned, worth a mention for the 'gasmask' pieces and their take on the German pilotenstiefel

Ann Demeulemeester - moody romantic clothing with a heavy Edwardian and military influence, key pieces being combat boots, jack boots, and officer jackets

there are plenty more but that's something to go on
I'm not hating on milsurp, just pointing out that without heavy modifications a la Knoch, most of it will fit you like a bag

[Anonymous No.13850687]

>>13850027
that's nice!

[Anonymous No.13850695]

>>13850038
Cop

[Anonymous No.13850963]

Recently copped this Korean-war era US Army trench for $40. Also wore a Pea Coat I got for $16 out last Thursday and got a lot of positive reactions.

[Anonymous No.13850979]

>>13842894
>>13842900
If you're afraid of a more militaristic look because your basedboy politics take issue with it then it's not for you.

[Anonymous No.13850987]

>>13844297
The Tachyons are nice boots.

[Anonymous No.13850988]

>>13850979
I think OP might have meant just not looking like an autist from /pol/, if you've seen any of their meet-up pics.

[Anonymous No.13851004]

>>13846786
The only thing "military tech" about this fit is the bomber jacket but every normie wears a bomber these days so it shouldn't count towards the "only one or two milspo items in a fit maximum" rule.

[Anonymous No.13851021]

>>13850092
I see what your saying but milsurp is still pretty cheap and for some things I don’t see the point in getting a designer version, eg; boots, trousers, belts

You’re right about the sizing, but it’s really not hard to alter your stuff youself. Just a needle, thread and a backstitch

Gonna save that list though, thanks

[Anonymous No.13851321]

>>13850687
https://www.grailed.com/listings/7191302-military-x-vintage-38r-german-fireman-s-leather-jacket-peacoat-barnstormer-kutchserjacke?

make an offer ;)

[Anonymous No.13851413]

>>13851321
https://www.grailed.com/unreal1999

While I'm at it, I have a bunch of shit listed.
I'm aware most of the prices are high, but thats just to leave room for price drops to bump the items.

I'm very open to offers.

[Anonymous No.13851458]

>>13850963
NOICE

I love mine '53 M-51

[Anonymous No.13851478]

>>13851413
Ha what a con man

[Anonymous No.13851504]

>>13851478
I wouldn't say 'make an offer' if I didn't mean it :P

[Anonymous No.13851532]

>>13846786
This is Costanzacore.
You posted it that thread, then in terrorwave general, and now here. You were right the first time. Embrace it.

[Anonymous No.13851744]

>>13849289
based
literally what I do with my issued shit
butit pretty much just limits me to the jacket and boots

[Anonymous No.13851864]

>>13842921
i like this anon
dont let this thread turn into another half naked ww2 cosplay obsessed thread, i like seeing modern milspo threads since theyve become incredibly rare

[Anonymous No.13852560]

>>13846786
All you have to do is untuck your shirt and this fit is gold. Everyone is talking shit but you look coordinated and approachable which is leagues above most of /fa/.

minus point for the hat and having shit political views though

[Anonymous No.13852753]

>>13842900
>>13842894
>liking fascist aesthetics
oh boy

[Anonymous No.13852851]

>>13843993
got these in ridgerock last friday, v. nice and surprisingly practical for hiking

[Anonymous No.13853157]

>>13852851
Nice to hear that. Looking at grey or black pair... Sometimes. Had thought about orange plus white pants and so on, I guess it is called lunarcore. Cool, but so very impractical.

>>13851864
You are the first to like the bandolier thing, actually. And I asked a LOT of people about it before. Anyway, I want to believe it can look appropriate.
And yes, the emphasis is pretty much on the word "modern" in modern military fashion. All those trenchcoats and bombers are not exactly what I meant

[Anonymous No.13853162]

>>13850092
Went through the list, found some interesting stuff, thanks. Alexander Plokhov started "Nomenklatura", now that's the thing

[Anonymous No.13853697]

>>13852753
>Not liking fascist A E S T H E T I C S
oh boy