[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 270 KB, 1180x1238, que.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13767722 No.13767722 [Reply] [Original]

can we all agree that /fa/ approved adidas are :

>samba and their shittier look alikes
>bw army
>ultra boost 1.0
>yeezy 700's
>yung 1s
>quesence
>continental
>most of the EQT line
>qasa
>ozweeegos
>temper runs
>ultra boost mid

while non /fa/ adidas are :
>NMDs
>yeezy 350s
>super stars
>stan smith
>anything pharrel
>most of the newer shit like kamandas, propheres, and deerupt

>> No.13767726

>>13767722
Kamanda / Sobakov are very good.
Deerupt and Prohpere not so much.
There is nothing wrong with NMDs as long as they're not Pharrells.

>> No.13767740

>>13767722
Kamandas are GREAT, and you forgot yeezy 500 in the /fa/ group. I'd also put UB mids in the non/fa/ group, but otherwise spot on.
>>13767726
Nah, NMDs got played out thanks to normies.

>> No.13767983
File: 323 KB, 1500x1500, 307810-na-1-XLarge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13767983

>>13767722
Ended up copping these for work.

>> No.13767987

>>13767722
>kamandas
Pic related looks so good, i hope they're going other colorways for them.

>> No.13767990
File: 121 KB, 1140x800, adidas-kamanda-G26797-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13767990

>>13767987
God damnit.

>> No.13768006
File: 16 KB, 258x353, IMG_20181017_032559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13768006

>>13767722
you're fucking wrong

>> No.13768079

>>13767990
>>13767990
jesus christ

>> No.13768125

>>13767722
adidas has more clout but I'd prefer puma.

>> No.13768198
File: 182 KB, 1200x1200, Y-3 Runner 4D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13768198

best adidas of the year

>> No.13768204
File: 150 KB, 1140x800, adidas-yeezy-700-mauve-EE9614-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13768204

>> No.13768210
File: 58 KB, 800x600, 522699_v2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13768210

>> No.13768228

>>13767722
id?

>> No.13768237
File: 58 KB, 642x603, article-2024001-0D5CB5C100000578-825_642x603.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13768237

are people really buying common projects when better looking white sneakers exist for the same price or less in 2018

>> No.13768248
File: 2.64 MB, 3264x2448, 20181008_134835.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13768248

>>13767722
>quesence
mein neger

>> No.13768257

>>13767990
damn... it would look so nice with a normal outsole

>> No.13768374
File: 15 KB, 600x299, adidas-i5923-cq2489-color-white-white-55ae-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13768374

>>13768198
good shit, but I don't have >$1000 to pay for resale.
I just picked up these i5923s, what does /fa/ think about these?

>> No.13768378

>>13768374
look fly man id wear em

>> No.13768436

>>13768374
Inikis aren't bad. They're not supportive enough for real active use, but for casual hanging out they're comfy and well cushioned. That's a nice colorway. It will get dirty, though.

>> No.13768452

so basically every adidas shoe? just whats approved by what people usually wear? normcore

>> No.13768510

Yall dont fuck with the PODs?

>> No.13768515

>>13768510
Too new. Waiting for them to go on sale. They were even $90 at the Adidas outlet last time I visited.

>> No.13768627

>>13767722
700s are trash

>> No.13768640

>>13768257
Wouldn't that just be the Samba?

>> No.13768943

>>13768510
They feel too much like a cheap shot at AM270s

>> No.13769108

>>13767722
Thinking of copping the shoe on sale in the OP.
However the thumbnail the shop uses has a weird af looking toebox, anyone who has experience with it?

>> No.13770315
File: 140 KB, 1140x800, mustcop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13770315

>>13767722
Absolute must cop 2018!

>> No.13770862

>>13767722
I thought /fa/ was into Stan Smiths because they're clean white sneakers

At least they seemed pretty down with them a few years ago when I actually browsed this board

>> No.13771084
File: 258 KB, 2684x1630, oyster-holdings-adidas-bw-army-bc0545-pair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13771084

thoughts on these

>> No.13771090

>>13767990
Shit this looks better than the regular Kamanda. Hell when did they announce this? Is it out?

>> No.13771118
File: 128 KB, 730x420, adidas-never-made-colecction-lanzamiento-portada-730x420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13771118

>>13771090
its part of the never made pack which is basically a mix of sneakers + different soles

>> No.13771463

>>13767990
copping immediately

>> No.13771631

>>13771084
gum is better

>> No.13771633

>>13771118
can adidas scrap the plastic midsole tab meme already???

>> No.13771836

Why does /Fa/ hate NMD’s?

>> No.13771854

>>13771836
Played out.

>> No.13771862
File: 258 KB, 720x1280, IMG_20181018_115422.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13771862

how do you guys feel about the copas?
no i don't play soccer ;b
the tongue is kinda long, does it look goofy?

>> No.13771899
File: 314 KB, 1087x725, 709F8EA9-858E-4E06-99F0-FC1D459E8C29.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13771899

>>13771854
Guess that’s true they are super comfy tho, I really like these Goretex NMD’s but are they manchild shoes a 27 yo boomer shouldn’t wear?

>> No.13772033

Bump

>> No.13772063

>>13771862
lemme get another angle

>> No.13772231
File: 107 KB, 1000x1000, adidas-seeulater-pk-primeknit-winter-wool-black-sneaker-de.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13772231

desu

>> No.13772267

>>13768248
Poseur.

>> No.13772273

wtf most of these are Robert Downey Jr. manlet elevators

why would you wear these

>> No.13772324
File: 153 KB, 1400x1000, adidas-Rising-Star-X-R1-Never-Made-Pack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13772324

>>13767990
Pretty ugly, however, pic related has my attention. Not really in the mood to drop 150 on sneakers though

>> No.13772912

>>13770862
/fa/ dislikes anything as soon as it becomes normie-core.

Stans are still fine they just don't fit the superiority complex anymore.

>> No.13772919

>>13772912
>samba isn't normie core
ishiggy

>> No.13772940

I agree with this but they is a exception 350 turtledoves is a okay Adidas shoe

>> No.13772985
File: 342 KB, 900x600, Livestock-adidas-Consortium-Pack-Release-Date.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13772985

>>13771899
they're too chunky imo, I was really wanting them for a while but then I saw them on a fuerdai kid and it looked like he was walking around with trashbags on his feet. I like the livestock goretex shoes more, gonna cop these soon.

>> No.13773035

>>13772912
This.

Superstars and Stans are both top-tier. Superstars in particular are THE definitive adidas shoe, no matter how much that might piss teenagers off.

>> No.13773078

>>13772985
Damn they look like trash bags huh? I’m yet to see anyone wear them in person they def aren’t cheap but I’m not a poorfag so I’m not worried. I like the idea that they are weatherproof for winter. I’m just worried I’m getting to old to be wearing them.

>> No.13773087
File: 72 KB, 320x400, adidas-originals-nmd-cs1-gore-tex-sneakers-in-black-black.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13773087

>>13773078
maybe he was just wearing like 3 sizes too big or something, you never know with these rich fuerdai. There's these that are gore-tex and less chunky, they also have different colorways. I've always hated to the plastic tag thing on that sides though

>> No.13773157

>>13773087
I’ve seen those as well I like the others more just because they are all black and seem less prone to getting dirty as NMD’s are a bitch once they get dirt on them. I think I’m just gonna go ahead and get them seem like a comfy winter pickup that can go with all sorts of outfits.

>> No.13773203

>>13771631
Gums sold out everywhere sadly

>> No.13773205
File: 56 KB, 840x840, AQ0868_04_standard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13773205

>>13767722
>non /fa/
>stan smith
lol fuck u

still waiting for the white recon stan smith shoes to g on sale. Hopefully 2 or 3 more months. The recon stan smith leather looks so comfortably soft

>> No.13773209

>>13773087
>maybe he was just wearing like 3 sizes too big or something,
Why the fuck do people do this. Saw some idiot lug around clown shoes you could probably fit 3 fingers behind the heel

>> No.13773428

>>13773209
probably because that size was the most expensive. intl students don't give a shit about comfort and quality, it's all about the flex

>> No.13774946
File: 2.10 MB, 4032x1960, 15399701002247957764768325663685.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13774946

>>13768198
As a lad who quite literally only has Y-3 in his sneaker rotation, I wholeheartedly think these are shit. I've tried on the Harigane a few times now (the top primeknit part that these are based on) and the upper is just not good. I'd hold off for now and wait till FW19 or SS20 when they pump put more 4D models.

>tfw they'll never go back and make a weather version of the Qasa Boot ;_;

>> No.13774952

>>13771899
These would look alot better if you took off the pull tabs

>> No.13776096
File: 117 KB, 2016x733, Packer_Slider.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13776096

why is no one talking about this

>> No.13776104

any all black threestripes rec?

>> No.13776112

>>13776104
look up pics of NBHD inikis

>> No.13776119

>>13773205
>>13772912
>>13770862
>>13771836
Sambas are like air force 1's, they will never die. NMDs are a played out shoe that didn't stand the test of time. Stan Smiths and Superstars have a shitty toebox which are not effay

>> No.13776137

>>13768257
>>13768640
They're CountryxKamanda, so if you want a regular sole you want the adidas country.

>> No.13776181
File: 33 KB, 750x422, llisi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13776181

350's a shit
700's a wavy
750's ???

>> No.13776488

>>13776096
For a reason, anon.
A good reason.

>> No.13776522

>>13776181
Everything but the 700s are fuerdai-core desu.

>> No.13776847
File: 398 KB, 754x476, adidasunknown.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13776847

Ok adifags w2c

>> No.13777174
File: 64 KB, 840x840, CG5509_04_standard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13777174

thoughts on these?

>> No.13778403
File: 272 KB, 1200x1200, ATMOS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13778403

Are the ones I just bought approved? Only 500 pairs made and were available for 1 day only in Japan.

>> No.13779042

>>13778403
>>13777174
Yes

>> No.13779198

>>13772231
absolutely based

love mine