[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 32 KB, 500x500, 3456768ergd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13614293 No.13614293 [Reply] [Original]

Threat title.

As part of my /sig/ I'm trying to come up with a wardrobe that doesn't break the bank while not looking childish, mostly for uni (college). Are long sleeve polos good for everyday winter wear? If not what alternatives are there?

>> No.13614299

>>13614293
They're just fine if your winter is mild enough for them. Or spring/autumn otherwise.

Consider a neutral undershirt though.

>> No.13614309

>>13614299
>They're just fine if your winter is mild enough for them
Obviously I'd wear more than just that outside, I meant for indoor use where it's too warm to wear anything more than undershirt+shirt/polo/t-shirt.

I'm mostly curious to know if they're fine to wear or instead look too faggot-ish or whatever.

>Consider a neutral undershirt though.
I've got that covered: V neck light grey undershirts.

>> No.13614313

>>13614309
>look too faggot-ish or whatever
Just to go meta for a moment here, if you're the kind of person who speaks like that, I think your shirt won't make you any more appealing to anybody.

>> No.13614324
File: 64 KB, 1180x842, donald j trump.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13614324

>>13614313
>if you're the kind of person who speaks like that, I think your shirt won't make you any more appealing to anybody
If I were American I'd have voted for Trump: now you know that I'm a literal nazi that hates gays.

I'm just looking for something that wears nicely for everyday use without a particular stigma attached to it.

>> No.13614331

>>13614324
Dummy, you're on 4chan. We're all literal Nazis, but half of us are also gays. Just hide your power level. If you're sheltered enough to not know if there's a stigma attached to long-sleeved polos or not, then you should get out more. Answer: There's not. But your v-neck tshirt is absolutely homosexualwear.

>> No.13614357

>>13614331
>If you're sheltered enough to not know if there's a stigma attached to long-sleeved polos or not, then you should get out more. Answer: There's not.
That's what I needed to know, thanks. Although according to you there's a 50% change that you're gay, which would make your opinion invalid. So should that be the case what alternatives to the long sleeve polo are there not to look childish?

>v-neck tshirt is absolutely homosexualwear
It's only for undershirts.

>> No.13614363

>>13614357
>in case your opinion is invalid, what's another of your opinions?

I wonder what he meant by this.

>> No.13614368
File: 26 KB, 696x398, black think.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13614368

>>13614363
That there's also a 50% chance it is valid.

>> No.13614457

since there are only 2 clueless faggots arguing on this thread I'll step in and give you both some actual advice :

long sleeve polo shirts are cringe tier

if you even consider buying anything from OP pic kind of website, then you seriously need to stop buying clothes for a while and to reevaluate your taste

you're welcome guys

>> No.13614467

>>13614457
OP here

>long sleeve polo shirts are cringe tier
Oke, then what to wear?

>if you even consider buying anything from OP pic kind of website
I only picked a random image from a google image search.

>> No.13614481

>>13614467
Don't get a long sleeve polo they are unsightly. If you must, get a rugby shirt. Try British fashion websites like Hackett or Crew Clothing. Don't tuck it in and try and avoid any wacky patterns. Blue with a white collar is all you need. Wear casually with jeans.

You need to be reasonably built to properly pull off the look so start hitting the gym.

>> No.13614492

Columbia Knit

>> No.13614511
File: 69 KB, 920x380, 1533327834609.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13614511

>>13614481
>Blue with a white collar
>Jeans with sportswear
The absolute state of this board

>> No.13614520

>>13614511
I wouldn’t call a rugby shirt sportswear assuming it is 100% cotton and doesn’t have fat logos all over it.

>> No.13614546
File: 123 KB, 600x813, bb5f88b00cb078e6f5e9c6c0e0034322.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13614546

>>13614520
>Designed for sports
>Literally called by the name of a sportive activity
>Not sportswear

>> No.13614561

>>13614546
Hope you don’t wear polo shirts/tennis shirts/golf shirts then chief.

>> No.13614564

>>13614561
sportswear =/= activewear

>> No.13614578

>>13614564
The Lacoste tennis shirt, which all modern day polos are based off of, was designed to be a more comfortable tennis shirt so that René Lacoste didn’t have to wear an oxford when playing. It was and still is called a tennis shirt.
>>13614546
>Designed for sports
>Literally called by the name of a sportive activity
>Not sportswear
Sick contradiction bro

>> No.13615081

>>13614293
They're fine just not the ones in op's pic. Also it's ok to be gay, op. We can comfort you

>> No.13615097

>>13614293
Not those shitty China ones you posted. If you have a small 34 inch chest you are going to need an XXXL on those lol.

Get a basic regular long sleeve polo, they are super cheap and look fine.

>> No.13615117

>>13614293
aka rugby shirts,but delet that pic

>> No.13615228

>>13614293
Fucking nazi scumbag go back /pol/. I hope antifa will kick your teeth down your throat.

>> No.13615491
File: 80 KB, 448x513, not welcome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13615491

>>13615228