[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 21 KB, 240x180, grtarpot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13572888 No.13572888 [Reply] [Original]

Shit I'm really considering white converse to cop that junky /faasfck Renton Trainspotting look. Is it a good idea? Know they gonna be dirty before u say blueberrypie and thats the way they should be, right?

>> No.13572897

They look good fresh, and they look good trashed. It really is the whole idea. The unbleached white color aren't a bad option either.

t. former converse salesman

>> No.13572900
File: 317 KB, 2000x1050, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13572900

Pretentious cuck, Renton is great but it's not 1996 and you would look stupid as fck.

>> No.13572949

>>13572900
What are you on about. Looks totally current imo

>> No.13572980

>>13572900
Chuck Taylors are timeless and utterly ubiquitous, they're about the most unpretentious sneaker one can wear.

>> No.13573349

Bumping for trashed Converse inspo (bonus points for hi-top)

>> No.13573390

>>13572900
that fit looks as good as ever

>> No.13573431
File: 671 KB, 1013x656, converse_bathtub.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13573431

>>13572888
They fall apart in a matter of nanonseconds but thats the point I suppose

>> No.13573445

>>13572888
What about black ones

>> No.13573548

>>13573431
The '70s Chuck' is the one to get. They look way better, and last much longer than a standard model.

>> No.13573563

>>13573548
Sorry pal but chucks are a horrid fucking shoe.

>> No.13573799

>>13573563
then why are you here

>> No.13573822

>>13572900
>>13572980
yeh i think hes using pretentious wrong

>> No.13573841

>>13572900
>Jacket
>Tee
>Jeans
>Converse
>Pretentious.

Did you get fastball pitched into the wall after being birthed?

>> No.13575223

>>13573431
Aren't sneakers a type of shoe? Also, what is going on in this picture?

>> No.13575347

>>13573548
70's are best

>> No.13575378

>>13575223
That was the ad campaign at the time; that Chuck Taylors weren't 'shoes' they were 'Sneakers' and you do things in sneakers you wouldn't do in shoes. I worked through that whole campaign so I'm all too familiar with it.
>>13575347
They're really fantastic; making them an always-available 'staple' instead of a limited thing is the only good decision NIKE has made since they started being so heavy handed with the brand over the past few years.