Why is women’s fashion so bad?

[Anonymous No.13553243]

Compared to men’s fashion, it seems so bland. Designer clothing looks so similar to fast fashion brands. Even their outfits look the exact some, they all have the same color combinations or the style of fit (e.g. skinny jeans or short shorts). Shouldn’t they be able to make really interesting outfits based on the amount of freedom they have?

[Anonymous No.13553246]

>>13553243
It’s the exact opposite, tard

Female fashion sections are usually far more extensive and varied

[Anonymous No.13553257]

>>13553243
Lmfao how clueless can you be

[Anonymous No.13553262]

Don't even bother OP, /fa/ and most of for chinks are a bunch of AGP faggots with no sense of fashion that thinks the opposite.

[Anonymous No.13553276]

Women can pull off far more colors.

[Anonymous No.13553278]

>>13553243
>women's clothing stores have 3 stories full of different options and designs for women
>men only have a little corner

[Anonymous No.13553286]

>>13553246
>>13553278
I’m not arguing that they have more choices, I’m arguing that their outfits never stand out. I can’t tell a girl who has designer clothing on from a girl that’s wearing h&m

[Anonymous No.13553288]

>>13553286
Thats because you’re looking at the woman herself

Not at her clothing

I am a man and I only ever notice the clothing on other males.

[Anonymous No.13553313]

There's too much variation in women's fashion. They have no staples or real tradition to draw from, so they have no serious basis to experiment from. Notice how nowadays women usually wear men's clothing, like in OP's picture: t-shirts, pants, shirts, blazers etc. And what do they do with them? Just a random combination or colours, patterns, and shapes with no real purpose or aim.

Have you ever heard of a woman who wore the same item for years and years, and as time went on she treasured it more and more and it aged better and better? Women mostly just like to wear new things that catch their attention, and they buy loads of new things. They don't buy anything with the intention of wearing it for years, maybe even the rest of their lives. So the clothes they wear are cheap and pretty tacky, and as soon as they get bored of develop their own style, they either do the above and constantly change how they look or just follow whatever is trendy at the time.

Most women dress like shit. They don't learn about style or materials, or how things work together or anything. It's like they just walk around doing a parody of men by wearing disgustingly glaring men's clothes shaped for women.

[Anonymous No.13553332]

>>13553288
I’m taking about the individual peices of clothing regardless of whether somebody is wearing them

[Nine !!UR+6a9KIzNW No.13553336]

I don't think women's fashion is bad as it is hard. Because like how the other posters mentioned before there is so much variety, way more textures and patterns, men's fashions (traditional / current) seems stale in comparison. It's easy to fall under very norm standards in women's fashion but with a little effort I'm sure most women will look better than us dressed than we can. They just have too many tools under their belts.

[Anonymous No.13553410]

>>13553336
That makes sense. I think one of the reasons that men’s fashion looks better to me is because we still are able to push the barrier a bit where women already have so nothing stands out as interesting

[Anonymous No.13553443]

>>13553410
There is no barrier for women's fashion. They have no standards for quality in any context, it's purely arbitrary what they decide is good at any one moment and what isn't. The material, the choices of colour and tone, the fit, and so on, are completely random for them. Most women prefer to either wear extremely plain colours (usually black or white - so edgy) or choose incredibly bold colours that stand out way too much (again - so edgy). They don't put thought into anything they wear, they never get better at choosing what to wear, it's just all random shit plopped together.

You know, I'm generalising because some girls actually do dress really well. My sister does, and you can tell because the materials and colours all work, and so she's worn the same stuff for years, just occasionally adding or removing bits, like you should do, not changing your entire wardrobe every year. But at least when men aren't good or don't give a shit they can fall back on classics, or you know, basic clothes that were actually designed for them. Women complain that shopping is so hard for them, but they're the fucking consumers, they create the demand because they only ever choose based on an instant of 'ooh this is new and not bad i'll buy it' and then they wear it for a short while and then get rid of it. This is stupid but is a defining feature of women's fashion.

[Anonymous No.13553580]

imo men's and women's fashions have pros and cons that stem from their economic/societal role. I don't have a lot to comment on men's fashion.

I think a large part is that women in general are encouraged to be into fashion at a normie level. Wear makeup, follow trends, do your hair - all to look nice & attractive. It's expected and to an extent, it's easy. There are guides all over of things you should buy based on body type, new things you need this season, how to achieve __ style, and so on. It's not necessarily easy to actually look nice but you don't have to go hunting for something catered to you. There is a greater market for women's fashion because it's pushed as a necessity.

I think what happens because of this is that less % of women that are 'into fashion' are actually seriously involved in it. There may be more by volume but since the entry level is so low, more people are diluting the consumer choices and steering it into F21, etc. There are more choices, but quality - encompassing well produced clothing to conscious consumption and somewhat artistic outfit building - is again, diluted.

I think this creates issues like people have brought up, and I have felt this as well. The mfa and ffa subreddits kind of show this too - I think the female fashion has more interesting ideas but can lack foundations, while male fashion has a better foundation but can be boring as fuck. Obviously this is an extreme generalization, but I browse both and here, and the women's subreddit will have way more interesting inspiration album ideas (https://inspo.cc/ for a list) but will have stupid, low quality shit and badly fleshed out ideas mixed in. So I think to be successful, you should be creative but also reel yourself in and quality/taste check things.

It goes without saying that women can wear any article of clothing without issue which can limit men's fashion.

[Anonymous No.13553703]

>>13553580
>https://inspo.cc/

https://inspo.cc/a/I50ZcyD/ragganuffin-life

Where can I find girls that dress like this?

[Anonymous No.13553730]

>>13553332
You have a shitty eye if you can't distinguish between two silimar garments (in person) that have a slightly different fit, fabric, quality and construction.

[Anonymous No.13553897]

>>13553703
>https://www.reddit.com/r/femalefashionadvice/comments/8wcgcz/raggamuffin_life/
that's the discussion, maybe stalk the people that liked it?

[Anonymous No.13553928]

>>13553897
Is it possible to find girls that dress like this that don't post on reddit?

[Anonymous No.13554418]

>>13553897
I looked at the post history of the first reply;

She is a ~25 year old (I think doing residency) med school student who was a Christian planning to remain pure until marriage who was raped(?) while drunk (and a virgin obviously) at ~22 years old by her friend who she then continued fucking for allegedly self-destructive purposes and then got in a 2 year relationship with him until he dumped her.

[Anonymous No.13554951]

>>13553703
>https://inspo.cc/
>albums by the members of r/ffa
funny how they still dress like shit even with all this inspo

[Anonymous No.13556395]

>>13553286
you can't tell the difference between a $10 shirt and a $100 shirt? Even with the artificially raised price tag you should be at least able to to tell the difference in material and construction

[Anonymous No.13557576]

>>13553313
this is true, i was thinking a few months ago about how women have no staple outfits that work in all occasions, like a man's suit.

[Anonymous No.13557598]

>>13557576
that would be called the little black dress, anon. the problem is that women will shop for whatever is on trend rather than building the staples. so they're retardedly buy a little black dress but with some embellishment/cut that makes it "unusable" after a year or two.

look at my pic. left is a classic cut that is appropriate for a work event, going out to a nice dinner, the opera, a wedding, or a cocktail dress code event. it may not be 'perfect" but it's appropriate and no one would second guess it. on the right is a dress that could be used for most of those as well, but it has ruffle sleeves that are very clearly a 2017/2018 trend and will be outdated in another year.

the shopping for trends rather than staples also makes them buy cheap clothing, spending more money overall, and looking like shit because they're buying cheap clothing.

[Anonymous No.13557756]

>>13553443
>>13557576
>>13557598

Is this even possible for women's clothing though? Don't you think a 'classic wardrobe' from 2008 would look dated by now?

[Anonymous No.13557788]

>>13557756
completely possible, they just need to shop for timeless silhouettes. this dress is "dated" as 2008 but it still works perfectly fine in the current office place. desu what makes it dated is that specific teal color. if it was black or grey it could pass easily.

[Anonymous No.13557797]

>>13557788
i couldn't find a good example but 2008 office wear that does not currently work is the pencil skirt with a super wide belt and a ruffled shirt on top.

[Anonymous No.13557800]

>>13553243
not even worth arguing with an idiot like you

[Anonymous No.13557801]

>>13557598
>>13557788
Dresses are dumb and you have agp.

[Anonymous No.13557802]

>>13557800
Fuck off with your cute animu girl shit you auto fellator.

[Anonymous No.13557811]

>>13557801
>and you have agp

What does this mean?

[Anonymous No.13557815]

>>13553243
You got it backwards
Girls have a ton of variety, whereas guys have about 3 outfits

[Anonymous No.13557818]

>american'ts wake up
>tranny posting begins
Lmao what a bunch of faggots, just because you look like shit and your hormones are out there doesn't mean women fashion is better.

[Anonymous No.13557819]

>>13557815
you have shit style if you only have three types of outfits. just looking at the catalog of effay there's multiple styles that girls can't even wear

[Anonymous No.13557825]

>>13557818
You seem to be lost, this is a thread about women's fashion being worse.

[Anonymous No.13557829]

>>13557825
My post wasn't about Opie.

[Anonymous No.13557851]

>>13554951
it's r/clothing the few women with interesting/up to date clothing have almost all stopped posting. they routinely have arguments over whether or not mid calf riding boots are still in fashion lol pic related has a "fair" saying she's a valued advice giver

[Anonymous No.13557857]

>>13557851
there's some good ones, but i'm hardly cherry picking with these posts from today's WAYWT.

[Anonymous No.13557858]

>>13557857

[Anonymous No.13557861]

>>13557851
*flair

[Anonymous No.13557864]

>>13557858

[Anonymous No.13557867]

>>13557864

[Anonymous No.13557926]

Because most women dont care about things in general they lack the mental drive to be actually interested in a certain topic. Fashion is no different all that matters is that they spend copious amounts of money in fast fashion stores or designer stores that have some importance to everyday people (CK, MK, Armani etc)
On the other side they also want to stand out if they play the fashion game. This is where you get women wearing things that dont match, colors that dont match all for the sake of "fashion"
Look at some of the React videos with kids you will notice that even at an early age women tend to judge subjectively whereas men try to be objective.

[Anonymous No.13557928]

>>13557926
They certainly hate being copied so you won't find them on Internet discussing stuff

[Anonymous No.13557930]

>>13557928
On the contrary women love to copy others. But with the goal/possibility to one up them.
Lets say girl A buys an ombre sweater girl B will like it aslong as she can then buy one that is better/more expensive etc

[Anonymous No.13557932]

>>13557928
what are you talking about? women are social creatures that are always looking for approval, they love discussing "do you like this, have you bought this, is this okay?" half of the questions on female based fashion forums are "how do you feel about xyz?" it's constant validation with very little risk taking. maybe that's why they all wait until fashion trickles down to fast fashion store and then they immediately overwhelm the market with certain looks.

[Anonymous No.13557935]

>>13554418
The absolute state of women

[Anonymous No.13557937]

>>13557932
that last girl literally was asking for other woman's approval to wear brown shoes

[Anonymous No.13557938]

>>13557930
If they were friends they wouldn't mind. Not with strangers though.
>>13557932
Asking question for valid =/= asking to be copied, though it's invalid. All the more they would hate you if you copied after they get validation

[Anonymous No.13557940]

>>13557938
women don't get outfit validation unless it's copied. they may "hate" it, but that's secretly what they want.

and if someone didn't want to be copied, why would they expose their "idea" to the fucking internet

[Anonymous No.13557943]

>>13557940
>someone didn't want to be copied, why would they expose their "idea" to the fucking internet
Ask those tattooers on Instagram or tattoo generals too. I am very curious about that.

[Anonymous No.13557944]

>>13557932
its an advice sub you dumb cunt

when did being an incel become fa

[Anonymous No.13557947]

>>13557858

>public school teacher
Private school only for my future kids.

[Anonymous No.13557948]

>>13557938
It doesnt matter if they're strangers because the main problem is not the copying itself but how the person copying looks. Its biology women cant stand other women looking better or as good as them. Men dont have that problem.
Asking for validation is the same as asking to be copied because it quickly turns into an echochamber that will be either positive or negative and in both cases there is a strong chance that the women want copy the style but ofcourse one up it.

[Anonymous No.13557950]

>>13557944
How much of it do you think is legitimate advice and not subjective circlejerking?

[Anonymous No.13557992]

>>13557811
It means that the poor thing suffers from severe autism

[Anonymous No.13557997]

>>13557932
>1 year ago
>2 years ago
>1 year ago
>5 years ago
>5 years ago
>6 years ago
>1 year ago

So what, a few times a year on average a woman asks?

I don't disagree with your point, but why would you choose this screenshot?

[Anonymous No.13558135]

>>13557943
they want people to buy their services...it's advertising.

[Anonymous No.13558141]

>>13557997
sorry I didn't limit my search to the past year for you. If you go to that subreddit and you can see that half of the posts are asking for individual validation on whether or not it's "okay" to wear an item....that they found at a major retailer.

[Anonymous No.13558348]

>>13557867
>>13557864
>>13557858
>>13557857
>>13557851
>>13557932
>>13557950
>>13557997
>>13558141

It's an advice sub, and you can see from the waywt posts a lot of people are trying to get better. A lot of people post asking really stupid things because they are insecure dressing themselves. Hopefully taking pictures and getting feedback helps them, but that depends on them and if they actually get any good advice (which also could be coming from people like them).

Let's not turn this into just a 'girls suck' thread, check out /malefashionadvice for some truly pointless posts.
>https://www.reddit.com/r/malefashionadvice/search?q=feel%20about&restrict_sr=1

[Anonymous No.13558360]

>>13558141

>is this /fa/?
>is that /fa/?

like there's anything besides that here either

[Anonymous No.13558371]

Women have no innate creativity and dress primarily to fit into particular social groups

Hence women's fashion

[Anonymous No.13558389]

>>13558371
sorry to tell you this, but that's common in humans

[Anonymous No.13558401]

>>13558348
But women are supposed to do better. They have one job which is to be quirky and wonderful and beautiful and they just can't do it at all.

[Anonymous No.13558407]

>>13553286
Oh, just say you hate women and go.

[Anonymous No.13558415]

>>13558407
The fucking state of women thinking that criticism is in any way equivalent to hatred. Real hatred of women comes from wanting something from them that you lack but can never have. It's the entire basis of romance anyway. The fucking nerve of dumb chicks to think that saying that women look tacky wearing whatever piece of shit they decided to blindly take off the shelf that week at topshop is 'hate'. Get over yourself, whore.

[Anonymous No.13558422]

>>13557932
That’s literally /fa/ Jesus fucking Christ

[Anonymous No.13558426]

>>13558415
You didn’t have to make this thread and write all that just to say you hate women. Why say long word when short word do trick

[Anonymous No.13558433]

>>13558401
maybe you feel like that, but don't men have that job also?

>>13558415
lots of women dress badly, but
>Real hatred of women comes from wanting something from them that you lack but can never have
that sounds like a personal problem

[Anonymous No.13558443]

>>13558426
There are only a few women that I hate intrinsically because of their femaleness. This is the only experience of real misogyny I have ever had. There are some women who I hate because they're shitty people - not misogyny. Now most women I just think are crap in general, like most people. The default here, and online in general, is to discuss men and what men are doing, so when we graciously take time to consider women it looks like we're specifically going after them because they're women, instead of the very real fact that most people are lame. I don't hate people for sucking.

[Anonymous No.13558459]

>>13558433
>maybe you feel like that, but don't men have that job also?
The defining goal of masculinity is absolute transcendental skill. Anyone who thinks men should be beautiful is a homosexual. A man's clothing is a representation of his social class and his skill in rendering his appearance aesthetically pleasing.

>that sounds like a personal problem
It is actually a prominent theme in feminist theory. I accidentally signed up for a unit on feminism once so I know this stuff, and have the unique (and better) perspective of actually being a man who has experienced this stuff. Every woman that I ever seriously desired was also the object of my completely irrational and pathetic hatred of women, which I hate about myself.

[Anonymous No.13558460]

OP. I can’t tell what I said to turn this into a women hate thread or if that’s just what happens if you mention gender here. I just wanted some insight into women’s clothing, I guess I’m understanding it wrong.
Also I obviously mentioned that women have way more choices than men.

[Anonymous No.13558462]

I unironically like it when women dress like men business casual or whatever.
not dressing like men as in shitty baggy fits or men's clothing or tomboy shit, but i mean like women wearing well fitted polo shirts, and jumpers with OCBD shirts underneath etc, when they wear lacoste or PRL or whatever.

[Anonymous No.13558516]

>>13557950
this whole board is a circlejerk, the same shit fits, the same inspo pics, the same shitty tattoo threads

there are even face rate threads

this whole board is a mix of narcissism and insecurity

[Anonymous No.13558528]

>>13558459
maybe it's a theme because it's a personal problem that a lot of men have

>Anyone who thinks men should be beautiful is a homosexual
oh is that what women are now

[Anonymous No.13558629]

>>13557932
>always looking for approval, they love discussing "do you like this, have you bought this, is this okay?" half of the questions on female based fashion forums are "how do you feel about xyz?"
it's constant validation with very little risk taking.

Uh, you've just described this board as well.

>/fa/
>constant shitshow of "is x effay," face rate, and outfit rate (WAYWT) threads

[Anonymous No.13558677]

>>13558528
maybe it's a theme because it's a personal problem that a lot of men have
No, it's the psychological reality for any male who must inevitably commit self-harm by engaging in any kind of romantic affair or fantasy with women. The only men who don't experience this are homosexuals, who are aberrant men, men who fundamentally lack manhood. It is then the case that when women erroneously (as usual) try to surgically remove this lack/misogyny in men, the result is an unprecedented wave of homosexuality and psychologically castrated men.

>oh is that what women are now
Already my hate is turning into disdain. You were doing perfectly, demonstrating the inimitably female disinterest in matters of logic and intellect, in favour of something else that I can never quite grasp. Now you are behaving like a little girl who wants to play with the boys but can't keep up. You've completely lost your charm. Fuck off.

[Anonymous No.13558745]

women change their clothes so much because theyre not built to last. for example with mens jeans they tend to be of thicker material and have less stretch, compared to womens jeans which fall apart, stretch beyond repair or rip, within a year or two of wear.

ive kept lots of clothes from about 6 years ago but my style and size have changed since then so i cant really wear most of them or dont want to. the colours fade and the fabrics wear out.

[Anonymous No.13558765]

Isn't men's fashion pretty bland?

It's mostly different variations of shirts/t-shirts/jackets/coats/suits with some designers being wacky and adding skirts to the mix. I tend to ignore men's fashion shows because they are so boring.

[Anonymous No.13558783]

>>13558677
>it's the psychological reality for any male who must inevitably commit self-harm by engaging in any kind of romantic affair or fantasy with women

>in favour of something else that I can never quite grasp

I feel like you are buying into a romanticized view where women are mysterious and untouchable but I don't understand where that comes from or how it is productive.
Is it possible your attraction and sometimes subsequent rejection is clouding your views? Do you not have good relationships with any girls? Maybe you just aren't finding people you can connect with.

Do you have something I can read that expands on your thoughts further?

[Anonymous No.13558797]

>>13558765
Men's fashion is imbued with enormous amounts of symbolic significance (cultural, social, personal etc.), and men's fashion shows are shit because they fundamentally ignore this. Doing something new doesn't necessarily mean doing something interesting. Actually the least interesting aspects of men's clothing are these retards in high fashion. They understand nothing about fashion, most tailors are far more knowledgeable about clothes. Men's fashion WOULD be way better and more interesting if these stupid shits didn't crowd out the top level of casual style with their faggotry.

[Anonymous No.13558815]

>>13558797
>Actually the least interesting aspects of men's clothing are these retards in high fashion. They understand nothing about fashion

>fashion design graduates understand nothing of fashion
>t. random imageboard poster

[Anonymous No.13558859]

>>13558783
>Is it possible your attraction and sometimes subsequent rejection is clouding your views?
No. The attraction is the other side of the coin of hating them. They're inseparable. I can't be attracted to them without them possessing a feminine substance that I could never possibly grasp. I can hate them for it without ever even making a move or getting to know them or whatever. Misogyny is not hatred of a person, or any number of people. Misogyny is the substitution of a lack in an idea with a symbol, in this case any woman.

>Do you not have good relationships with any girls?
I've had a long-term girlfriend who I'm still on good terms with, but I never had any real romantic feelings for her. Love, sure, but no romance.

>Maybe you just aren't finding people you can connect with.
No doubt, but it doesn't change the theory, which is correct.

>Do you have something I can read that expands on your thoughts further?
Hegel -> Lacan -> Zizek... to understand the psychoanalytical concepts. How it relates to misogyny, I don't know who you would read. As far as I'm concerned no feminist theorist has ever had the mental capacity to actually understand what they're talk about, let alone explain clearly.

But don't concern yourself with this. It's such an unlikable quality in women to claim or pretend to want to understand, when it's clear they are just trying to socialize. Be better than that. Women can have intellectual quality on their own terms, not this pathetic attempt to integrate into the male intellectual realm, as most women theorists do. Be more like Virginia Woolf. You are more likable as women when you are equally hateable.

[Anonymous No.13558875]

>>13558815
>implying university actually provides a quality education
>implying that centuries of tradition don't provide a better basis for modern fashion designers to produce interesting concepts and pieces.

[Anonymous No.13558986]

>>13558859
I feel like you're using your intellect to rationalize your bad behavior.

[Anonymous No.13558996]

>>13553243
bc over th elastic 2 centuries it has devolved into stealing as much mens fashion as possible for the purpose of female empowerment and looking like a hoe

[Anonymous No.13559037]

>>13558986
What bad behavior? I don’t behave particularly badly. In fact, underneath my excellent Visvim collection I am probably quite dull in real life, all the more so in the presence of a girl that I actually desire.

[Anonymous No.13559039]

It's not so much that women's fashion is bad, it's more or less a fast paced fashion industry and the pressure from a social/visual society that demands women to fit the trend or be judged by other women. As for timeless pieces, there are quite a few, the pencil skirt is one, as is the circle skirt for more relaxed dressy occasions. Mom jeans are back in style and for women who are willing to spend the extra buck you can buy a pair that will last for years to come. I think the problem with the thread is that who you are having this discussion about is primarily younger women, who's tastes are changing with each clothing stores newest collection. When the clothes are so poorly made and the industry keeps changing, why wouldn't you replace your wardrobe nearly every season? Yes women as consumers have made it hard for us to buy quality "timeless" pieces. But when you say timeless I sure hope you don't mean the good ol' suit, white New balance sneaks, polo shirts, cargos, or beat up jeans because truth be told men's fashion is just as ever changing. As women we do have good fashion, bolder colors, more variations. Part of the timelessness is the way things are cute and as for whether we "value" a fit if you read even one tag on a pair of jeans you'd know that's a major concern of ours too. Hell we've even named body types and designated certain types of clothes for those body types. Really it's just the way the market is and the fact that your not looking full on adult women but rather celebrities who are payed to match the current fashion and young women. Ask your mom if she has a piece in her closet that's old bet you she has something over 5yrs.

[Anonymous No.13559073]

>>13559037
I was referring to your hatefulness as bad behavior, obviously.

[Anonymous No.13559100]

>>13559073
Hatred is emotion, not behavior. There’s nothing to be justified, emotions simply happen, where as behavior is something done.

[Anonymous No.13559116]

>>13559100
I fail to see a meaningful distinction, and I reject your assertion that you have no control over your own cognitive processes.

[Anonymous No.13559133]

Women clothing is shit and all you manchild trannies that believe otherwise don't clearly understand fashion.

Oh, and no matter how many hormones you takr you will never be an animu girl you excuse of men.

[Anonymous No.13559170]

>>13558996
>weak material
>no pockets
>emphasis in genitals instead of shoulders like men's
Fuck women clothing, only depressed faggots and submissive npc women wear them.

[Anonymous No.13560787]

>>13558875
>implying studying fashion at a university doesn't siphon from fashion history

[Anonymous No.13561550]

>>13557858
>superradjew

always

[Anonymous No.13561646]

y'all are just looking at the wrong outfits lol

[Anonymous No.13561663]

>>13561646
/thread

you guys are so clueless it hurts

[Anonymous No.13562576]

>>13553243
Yea I hate women too. God they are just so ugly and mean! UHHHHGHG WHY WONT THEY LIKE ME THOSE UGLY WHORES!!!!

[Anonymous No.13563101]

>>13553313
If you buy nice clothes you buy them with the intention of keeping them your whole life. sometimes I ask women where they got their top or etc and they tell me they bought it 20 years ago.
I don't know where you live but where I am women are way more stylish than men. I see so many couples where the men has no style and the women is very fashonable.

[Anonymous No.13563121]

>>13558460
>turn this into a women hate thread
that hasn't happened though
just some overly sensitive losers that equate criticsm with hate
since some people can't take criticsm
women in general don't criticise other women as directly as men would with each other, they dance around the fact
and so when men perchance criticise women the latter thus percieve it as hostility and hatred, because that's not how they do things
this is why we should have separate boards
if they can't handle it without using that old chestnut
>w-well then you must hate women!!!
whenever someone here says they don't like "thing", then they should return to that bastion of femininity in this cesspit if a site
/cgl/

[Anonymous No.13563125]

>>13559100
your hatred can come from a lack of reasoning

[Anonymous No.13563256]

>>13553243
you obviously either aren't looking in the right places or are too dull to appreciate subtlety