/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.13513446]

Do men actually where these things? They look so fucking feminine, like a teenage girls go-to sneaker, get some air forces or something lmao

[Anonymous No.13513474]

While I see more girls than guys wear these, I don't see how they are feminine.

[clam No.13513525]

They are just good quality normal casual footwear for a cheap price. I think they look good on both men and women.

But if you are going to buy Adidas, these are my personal favourite pair by the brand

[Anonymous No.13513534]

>>13513525
despite seeing a rise in profits in the last fifteen years, wages for the average worker in adidas factories has dropped by as much as 30%.

[clam No.13513545]

>>13513534
yeah, that is the one big downside of the brand but honestly most major fashion brands do that.

[Anonymous No.13513550]

>>13513534
like i give a shit lol they can get paid in semen for all i care as long as i get my shoes

[Anonymous No.13513554]

>>13513446
They were designed for and by a famous (male) Tennis player, you zoomer. They were one of the first Tennis shoes ever. It's just a piece of leather built around the shape of a foot, with minimal styling. You say AF1 but that has been the popular shoe for teenage girls since 2012 or whenever Stan Smiths started to wane in teenage girl popularity (they always were popular but both have had a resurgence in the instagram generation of teen girls)

>>13513525
These look and have always looked a lot better in my opinion

[Anonymous No.13513560]

>>13513545
all the more reason to boycott major fashion brands.

[clam No.13513568]

>>13513560
smaller fashion brands that are more ecological and treat employees better usually cost so much more that most people can't buy them

[Anonymous No.13513577]

>>13513568
>cost more

in reality
>cost the same or less

a pair of stan smiths here would be like $100-$130, and I could get ethical sneakers for $100-$150, including shipping.

if we actually had stores selling this stuff it'd be cheaper still.

[clam No.13513617]

>>13513577
But it'd still be cheaper to buy all clothes from h&m than an ethical fashion brand/retailer. I respect your viewpoint and own a ethical jacket myself.

[Anonymous No.13513625]

>>13513617
duh, like it'd be cheaper to live on instant ramen and fucking soft drinks than organic fruit. but you're paying to not harm others, the environment, or yourself.

gw on the jacket, who's it made by?

[clam No.13513629]

>>13513625
a finnish company, r-collection

[Anonymous No.13513635]

>>13513446
>They look so fucking feminine,

that's usually the case with white colored items altogether. but it's just up for debate whether you like white shoes or not.

[Anonymous No.13513641]

>>13513629
>r-collection
nice man, some fire parkas up on these folks.

[Anonymous No.13513678]

These shoes are comfy and stylish

[Anonymous No.13513825]

>>13513678
!these! shoes are

[Anonymous No.13513881]

>>13513446
but all the 'trendy' girls who were wearing stans are wearing af1s now, which also look girly