Early 2000s thread

[Anonymous No.13372209]

[Anonymous No.13372238]

[Anonymous No.13372428]

If you had a time machine would it be immoral to kidnap prime Lindsay and force her to live as your wife, taking better care of her than she did herself?

[Anonymous No.13372446]

2003-2013 was such a horrible time for fashion in pop culture

[Anonymous No.13372458]

>>13372446
Especially haircuts. Thotcore at least often comes with nice hair.

[Anonymous No.13372536]

>>13372428
>would it be immoral

yes.

[Anonymous No.13372556]

>>13372536
I feel like I'd be doing her a favour. She'd look better, be clean of drugs, have plenty of kids etc.

[Anonymous No.13372627]

i miss forums and reaction gifs, they just don't feel the same on Facebook

[Anonymous No.13372798]

>>13372209
It's the remix to ignition
Hot and fresh out the kitchen
Mama rollin' that body
Got every man in here wishin'

[Anonymous No.13372805]

these are all rappers, what were white f/a/ggot types wearing back then?

[Anonymous No.13372873]

>>13372805
for girls, it was the golden age of velour and low-rise pants

[Anonymous No.13372875]

>>13372873

[Anonymous No.13372877]

>>13372875
for men, think really baggy
and frosted tips

[Anonymous No.13372881]

apparently this was early 2ks swag in China

[Anonymous No.13372955]

>>13372881
That's Korean

[Anonymous No.13373127]

I was in another city for work recently and after a dinner we went to a small club.
They played really cool music I knew from my teenage years (early 2000s).
Then I discovered it was "oldies night".

[Anonymous No.13373130]

>>13372238
i unironically still love this.

[Anonymous No.13373187]

>>13372875
I bet her pussy was the smoothest pussy of all...

[Anonymous No.13373235]

>>13372209
Dark times

[Anonymous No.13373373]

>>13373235
They were dark times for everyone

Imagine if you are old enough the 1990s. The unbridled optimism peaking in 1999. The millennium happens on Jan 2000. Hope for a new future.

By the summer of 2001 the US is announcing its withdrawing most of its troops from the world. 1990s fashion is still rolling strong just evolving into a more adult version. Racial tensions pretty much non-existent.

9/11 happens and it all goes to shit. All of the fashion goes to dark depressing areas combined with the baggy explosion of depressing thug rap lead to the embarrassing fits of the early 2000s. Music itself goes to shit as does the world as never ending wars begin US withdrawal from the world permanently off the table.

Compare the top 10 songs of 2000 to 2002. Such a simple comparison will leave you deeply disturbed if you listen to it.

Optimism killed for years. Deep down the 1990s fashion adoption by every day plebs is our culture's deep yearning to pick up where we left off before we were so rudely interrupted.

[Anonymous No.13373394]

>>13372209
i liked the tight t-shirts. everything else was trash.

[Anonymous No.13373397]

>>13373373
Why is that man so excited to have two boxes of the worst operating system ever?

[Anonymous No.13373403]

>>13373397
It was the 90s. Everyone was happy all the time.

My family had my first Windows 95 computer and everyone was thrilled about it.

Our previous one was one that the OS was black and green text only.

[Anonymous No.13373408]

>>13372458
>Thotcore at least often comes with nice hair.
Give an example.

[Anonymous No.13373416]

>>13373373
>Optimism killed for years. Deep down the 1990s fashion adoption by every day plebs is our culture's deep yearning to pick up where we left off before we were so rudely interrupted.
Now try to think about what it must feel like to be German.

[Anonymous No.13373418]

no pictures, but remember when girls were twee as fuck? that was cute af

[Anonymous No.13373421]

>>13373397
Easy to say now when we've had more Windows and other OS releases since.

Back then, Win98 was basically it FOR MOST PEOPLE.

[Anonymous No.13373422]

>>13373403
But using terminal makes you feel like you're in the matrix :)

It alxo makes you less of a frothing retard in terms of being able to use a computer

[Anonymous No.13373426]

>>13373373
>By the summer of 2001 the US is announcing its withdrawing most of its troops from the world.
No it didn't
Dubya campaigned on being isolationist, and then ramped up spending and bases and beligerence with Russia and Iran

[Anonymous No.13373428]

>>13373416
I remember being in Germany for 3 months back in 2006.

Frankfurt had more Muslims than San Diego had Mexicans. Cant even imagine what its like now.

[Anonymous No.13373437]

>>13373373
That shit is deep (and 100% accurate).

>>13373403
Exactly.

I'm currently between 30 and 40 years old and at first, I thought that I was the only one who felt out of place in the current world.

But over the years I realized that I'm not the only one, that in fact the vast majority of my generation feels like this, hence why 90s retrogaming, 80s grid aesthetics or Synthwave is such a big hit with my generation.

[Anonymous No.13373440]

>>13373422
Considering just a few years ago the oldest generation couldnt even operate email and had to call people for help means the even Windows XP was non-intuitive to the human brain.

Simplification will continue until 100% adoption. Considering a bunch of sub 89iq peoples exist on the Earth the modern desktop will be unusable and convoluted to your grandchildren.

[Anonymous No.13373448]

>>13373428
>Frankfurt
Shit city, shit people. Only Berlin is worse, but in another way. Frankfurt is drugs and crime, has been for a long time.

[Anonymous No.13373466]

>>13372798
Still the best party/any other sort of degen sesh-starting song ever

[Anonymous No.13373475]

>>13373373
>Racial tensions pretty much non-existent

What did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.13373489]

>>13372556
But she'd have no live with you. No chance

[Anonymous No.13373496]

>>13373475
Think back

Every white kid was watching basketball and loved Jordan and other basketball stars before the league started thugging out.

It got so bad they had to institute a dress code in the 2000s. Before that the NBA adopted the depressing thug culture of the early 2000s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_dress_code

Early 2000s thugwear arguably was one of the most racial divisive fashion developments since the 1970s.

[Anonymous No.13373511]

>>13373496
>Every white kid was watching basketball and loved Jordan and other basketball stars before the league started thugging out.
Yep. Jordan, Magic Johnson, Shaq, Penny Hardaway etc.

There were occasiona lriots like Rodney King, but tensions in everyday life were much much lower if not non existant.

[Anonymous No.13373564]

It was a dark time for pop culture fashion. But there was interesting stuff happening on the runway. If you disagree and can't back it up with a pic, you're blinded by nostalgia.

[Anonymous No.13373576]

>>13373564
>But there was interesting stuff happening on the runway.
Not sure what you mean BUT the 90s were THE era of Supermodels.

[Anonymous No.13373643]

>>13373373
>racial tensions non-existent in the 90’s

what were hood movies, LA riots / Rodney King, the entire OJ trial etc

[Anonymous No.13373894]

>>13373643
yet except for the LA riots US cities didnt even burn

[Anonymous No.13373908]

>>13372875
She was really fucking ugly

[Anonymous No.13373914]

>>13373373
Very untrue

[Anonymous No.13373922]

>>13372881
four of those are still in style

[Anonymous No.13373944]

>>13373908
>Was

[Anonymous No.13374088]

>>13373576
Love the spice girls...

[Anonymous No.13374104]

>>13372873
What was the appeal with ultra-low rise shit for girls? It looks good on literally nobody

[Anonymous No.13374169]

>>13374104
same way with high waisted bullshit

[Anonymous No.13374396]

>>13372209
so girly and pretty

[Anonymous No.13374409]

[Anonymous No.13374430]

>>13373576
Yeah 90's slutwear is top tier

[Anonymous No.13374431]

>>13374169
>high waisted bullshit
So, I'm guessing you are gay? Literally every girl I see wears high waisted pants nowadays, and they did not too long ago.
Women have pretty much been wearing high waist forever, because it looks nice forever.

[Anonymous No.13374435]

>>13374431
Some of those looser high waisted shorts end up looking like their grandmas underwear.

[Anonymous No.13374647]

>>13373489
I get where you're coming from. What if she could hang out with prime Jennifer Love Hewitt and Jessica Biel all day? Maybe that would help.

[Anonymous No.13374656]

>>13373576
I meant that everyday fashion sucked, but high fashion was interesting.

[Anonymous No.13374896]

>>13374431
>>high waisted bullshit
>So, I'm guessing you are gay? Literally every girl I see wears high waisted pants nowadays, and they did not too long ago.
>Women have pretty much been wearing high waist forever, because it looks nice forever.
Fat girls ruin every good fashion trend.

[Anonymous No.13374946]

>>13373894
true. i kind of want to blame the internet as well though. Somehow it became trendy to be overly divisive. Just recently I saw a picture of a kid with a swollen face, he had the shit kicked out of him by a random man for playing knock a door run. Every single reply was ‘well if he was black he’d be dead so he’s lucky’. I know the internet has always been political even back to the days of usenet but the past couple of years have been horrendous.

[Anonymous No.13375547]

[Anonymous No.13375549]

excuse lo-qual

[Anonymous No.13375550]

[Anonymous No.13375570]

>>13372873
I really hate the "slight midriff" thing

[Anonymous No.13375576]

>>13373397
Because it was the first time the average Joe was able to buy a computer.

[Tripsk !!NfEoAU6E/r3 No.13375603]

>>13374104
It only looks good on a v flat stomach so being able to "pull off" something low rise is like a flex on other women

[Anonymous No.13375617]

>>13373437
>I'm currently between 30 and 40 years old and at first, I thought that I was the only one who felt out of place in the current world.
>But over the years I realized that I'm not the only one, that in fact the vast majority of my generation feels like this, hence why 90s retrogaming, 80s grid aesthetics or Synthwave is such a big hit with my generation.

Yep, born 1984 here so was 6 to 16 through the 90s. The other guy was right about optimism and brightness gone. 9/11 felt like a giant "don't you fucking dare" as things were really looking good. And I'm not really tin-foil-hatty, but that shit was weird and still feels like something was amiss and they didn't count on information technology being at the point it is with regards to scrutiny. Oh well.

[Anonymous No.13375618]

[Anonymous No.13375654]

>>13373373
im guessing you
a. were born in the late 90s/2000s
b. never leave your house
c. did not take history classes

[Anonymous No.13375657]

>>13373428
alright jimbob time to go to sleep

[Anonymous No.13375679]

>>13373437
You feel out of place in the current world because you're having a midlife crisis, it happens to alot of people around your age. And culture has a 30 year cycle that's why we're looking back to the 80s in the 10s, why we looked back at the 70s in the 00s, for example the that's 70s show, and why people looked back at the 50s in the 80s, for example grease and back to the future.

[Anonymous No.13375693]

>>13373373
thats completely false, by 2001 the main fashion movement was y2k, after 9/11 it slowly transformed into bling glittery shit, it didnt get darker in fact it got weirder and edgier as a response to the us war on terror. it got darker from 2010 onwards though.

[Anonymous No.13375698]

SOMEONE PLEASE POST SOME GOOD Y2K TRANCE

[Anonymous No.13375719]

Do you guys remember when thongs would stick out all the time?

[Anonymous No.13376003]

>>13372873
30 year cycle. heavily influenced by a retro 70s (nigger/urban) style with the track wear, funky materials, and colors. the internet fucked it all up and now the 80s and 90s are battling in the 10s

[Anonymous No.13376080]

>>13372877
how could anyone think that was a good idea?

[Arachni No.13376462]

>>13372627
Reddit killed forums anon. Don’t you remember.

[Anonymous No.13376549]

>>13376462
>not SA or eBW

[Anonymous No.13376564]

>>13374104
>>13374169
>>13374431
It's the opposite you fucking faggot. Low rise will always look better because it shows skin more and doesn't trick you into thinking the girl has an ass. It's always the literal homosexuals (as in, men who are attracted sexually to other men) who like high rise pants on women

[Anonymous No.13376690]

>>13372873
3/4 look ok

>>13376564
true. thought that immediately

[Anonymous No.13376721]

>>13373373
>>13373496
Yet, conversely the 90s is peak crack epidemic and height of "super predator" rhetoric.

[Anonymous No.13376997]

>>13373373
The Fact that this photo looks like it was taken in the Soviet Union is proof that fashion failed in this era

[Anonymous No.13377011]

>>13375603
Maybe. McQueen def did it for shock value. In normie fashion the midriff was the cleavage of the day. On a purely sexual level, muh dick. On a fashion level, fucked proportions.

[Anonymous No.13378402]

>>13372881
You're a retard

[Anonymous No.13378412]

>>13372209
>otto rocket and twister in the background

[Anonymous No.13378423]

In five years every single one of you are going to be looking back on the 2000s and thinking "despite all the hardships fashion back then still managed to be good."
screencap this

[Anonymous No.13378424]

>>13373576
I recognize the other ones (Turlington, Auermann, Crawford and Schiffer) but who's the one in yellow?

[Tripsk !!NfEoAU6E/r3 No.13378440]

>>13378424
Stephanie Seymour

[Anonymous No.13378506]

>>13376564
Low rise fucks up the proportions, that why for MILLENIA women worse their waistband, guess what, at the waist. Cloths naturally stay there without falling down as everythiong lower is wider. Looking whorish isn't the same as looking attractive. Seeking your ass crack while sitting is even trash in the prostitution scene. You would ironically need to be a trash human or faggot (guess its the same) to like looking at womens ass cracks more than onto a fertile looking hip.

Thank god that shit is gone.

[Anonymous No.13378614]

I hate the 00's with a burning passion

Thank god I was a kid during this degenerative decade

[Anonymous No.13378655]

>>13378614
You don't know shit.

[Anonymous No.13378659]

>>13378655
Fuck U

[Anonymous No.13378662]

>>13378659
no u

[Anonymous No.13378747]

>>13378614
The 80s were god tier, the 90s great tier, the 00s OK tier, 10s shit tier.

[Anonymous No.13378768]

>>13378747
This

[Anonymous No.13378784]

>>13372209

[Anonymous No.13378934]

>>13372877
Yep. And I have a thing for this flashy branding on the sweatshirts

[Anonymous No.13378937]

>>13374431
>t. 16 year old

high wasted was a no-no from about 1997-2016

[Anonymous No.13378945]

>>13376003
this is objectively false, it's inarguably and irrefutably always been a 20 year cycle, and anyone who thinks otherwise is literally wrong and should die

[Anonymous No.13378956]

>>13378747
I've said it before but man fuck the 80s
Gray depressing dogshit with scum across the board, and on a personal level bad times for my family and all

[Anonymous No.13379060]

>>13372209
Kakhis, blue jeans and lots of Abercrombie polo shirts were my early 00s

[Anonymous No.13379064]

>>13372881
I think Von Dutch and trucker hats were more mid 00s.
That fad died in like 1-2 years
I guess maybe longer if you count the big cities where fads originate in the first place.

[Anonymous No.13379068]

>>13372881
>>13372955
lol yeah
I'm Korean and my sister had like 5 pairs of AF1s

[Anonymous No.13379072]

>>13373576
I want to eat their clothes

[Anonymous No.13379091]

>>13375618
oh my fucking god
cursed my shit real good bro

[Anonymous No.13379620]

>>13375657
huh dude I just told you I lived in SoCal and at least have basic travel history

Rednecks dont even leave the South

[Anonymous No.13379674]

>>13378934
What's a bunch of white boys doing wearing fubu?

[Anonymous No.13379691]

>>13379674
Shitty brand really lol they dressing bad

[Anonymous No.13379702]

>>13379060
>Abercrombie polo shirts were my early 00s
I wanna see more of this in this thread pls. Preferably womens.

[Anonymous No.13379794]

>>13372209
Not upset that I missed this

[Anonymous No.13379864]

>>13372881
w2c cargo pants like that?

[Anonymous No.13379879]

>>13375719
I have a near photographic memory of every whale tail I saw in middle school and high school. My favorites are a tie between Brianna in the lunch room cafeteria in 10th grade and Samantha on the bus to Washington DC in 8th grade. Unfortunately by the time of my junior and senior years, low rise jeans were going out of fashion and being replaced by the then newly ascendant trend yoga pants.

[Anonymous No.13379895]

>>13378937
>t. historically illiterate modernist
Be it, ancient egypt, rome or china, pagan skandinavians, dindu nuffins in subsahara, middle ages in europe, or the age of inventions. Till the defeminization of the fair sex, the waist for women always where at the nomen est omen. Only when toxic (((feminism))) spread and with it the goal to blure the sexual dimorphism between the sexes to destroy their symbiosis and make them both wage cattle, did women lower their clothed waists to where men had have them. When ever society prospered and women were celebrated in their gift to give birth, so were a good waist-to hip ratio and necessary a high waist seen as beautiful. Last time in post-war europe and currently artificially pushed through the nigger infested media, similarly to beeing fat, tanned and bleached while speaking like a hood rat. This is the way normal heterosexual society sees it. Just because you like pre-pubertal "tomboys" to morally intact be able to diddle peudo boys, it will not change how mentaly healthy society views beauty.

[Anonymous No.13379962]

Oakley Overthetops

[Anonymous No.13379963]

>>13379962
Are you the guy that bought the one pair they sold?

[Anonymous No.13379965]

>>13379963
Nope

[Anonymous No.13379976]

Were any of you even fucking alive in this era? are you all 14? the coolest shit back then was (Hedi Slimane)Dior Homme and SLIM CLOTHING. Only fucking niggers wore baggy clothing. Anyone who was fashionable in that era was trying to look like they were in an Indie Rock band, and even then Indie Rock was extremely mainstream with The Libertines and The Strokes and shit. How could you have a thread about the early 2000's and not post about any of this.

[Anonymous No.13379983]

>>13379976
Because contextually we all knew this, but we knew we werent talking about this specific style when this thread was made. The "nigger" style is whats being referred to because it stands out. Thats what a lot of streetware brands and hot topic style brands and high fashion brands are emulating now you self important "look at me give me attention i know what im talking about" fucking mongo retard

[Anonymous No.13379985]

>>13379962
Would have definitely copped that if I didn't wear glasses.

[Anonymous No.13379986]

>>13379976
Also why dont you simply post about it and show us the styles you like then instead of crying about it and trying to look cool on an anonymous message board you brainlet jr high faglord

[Anonymous No.13379987]

>>13379985
Contacts my friend. They go for about 1k resale rn. Currently trying to save up for some.

[Anonymous No.13380008]

>>13379983
The nigger style doesn't stand out at all, it just stands out to you because you don't know anything about this era except the shit nigger music you listened to.
>>13379986
Because the people in the thread were saying the 2000's was nothing except frosted tips hair and huge baggy true religions when in reality it was nothing like that. There were more subcultures in that era for music and fashion than there is now, and it was way easier to enjoy them as the cities weren't as gentrified. You are an incel.

[Anonymous No.13380013]

>>13379976
quintessential i lurked sufu archives after school but will be too scared to post a fit in the wawyt once the moderator approves my membership post

slimane was always a culture vulture and a talentless hack

[Anonymous No.13380043]

>>13378747
sounds like a perfect description of nostalgia

[Anonymous No.13380060]

>>13380008
Kek dude, i vehemently avoided nigger music. Quit projecting. Bold prints and bright dayglo colours pop and thats fax you retard. There is no denying the raver, alt, and street styles stood out more than the darker indie rocker looks any day of week. Quit taking shit so personal pleb

[Anonymous No.13380065]

>>13380008
Again, just post the shit you like and quit trying to impress us kid.

[Anonymous No.13380111]

>>13380060
herb
>>13380065
plen

[Anonymous No.13380123]

>>13380013
lmao this

[Anonymous No.13380139]

>>13380013
You're mad because you're fat. How does photographing bands or using band-members/people from their shows for runway and campaign shoots make him a culture vulture? did you read this on Reddit? here's a fit right now btw triple incel

[Anonymous No.13380140]

>>13375693
>Dior aw03 - Luster

[Anonymous No.13380200]

>>13372875
Man I would pee in her ass

[Anonymous No.13380236]

Somebody please post formal atire and dresses from the early 2000s.

[Anonymous No.13380257]

>>13380139
>Calls other people fat
>Hips are 5 feet wide

You don't have the body for SLP and you never will sorry kiddo

[Anonymous No.13380259]

Favorite era, no doubt

[Anonymous No.13380277]

>>13380257
it's blatantly the camera angle you schizoid

[Anonymous No.13380290]

>>13379895
Top delusion
Fashion standards change, dude, it's not all just down to some kinda biological essentialism. People aren't hard-wired. You might as well claim that the ancients all had only one ideal for the male body as well, which is plainly wrong.
>I-it's all a conspiracy! Everybody who agrees with me is right -- the rest of you are sexual deviants!
Alex Jones pls go

[Anonymous No.13380303]

>>13380290
>fashion standards
Yeah, they change due to politics for example, which I explained is the source of shit like "low raise". I mean, that's babaies first history classes. Just like women were made into smoking to power consumerism through fashion. Stop commenting on shit you know nothing about. Claiming
>muh conspiracy lmao
on everything. The one delusional and which has fallen for obvious politically motivated trends are you. Never in the history of our species since we left the caves till the 20th century have women worn a style of dress en masse to be seen as more masculine. Let alone it beeing on vogue globally. Sexual dimorphism of our race, especially in caucasians, has been the basis for our basic aesthetics. And yes, people are hard wired, that's why the most attractive waist to hip ratio in women is globally, from pygmies to skandinavian, from the seeing to the blind from birth 0.7. Androgynic trends go against our very nature. Accept or shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.13380330]

>>13380043
>sounds like a perfect description of nostalgia
I am nostalgic, I fully admit it. If I had a time machine I'd go right back.

[Anonymous No.13380363]

>>13380277
Yeah some magical fisheye lense that stretches your hips to twice their normal size but gives you tiny shoulders and knock knees. Lol.

[Anonymous No.13380372]

>>13380139
Fuck slimane and his prefab rock n roll aesthetic. One of the coolest things about the early 2000's rock scene was that everyone looked good on a budget, bypassing high fashion.

Dior Homme at least had interesting and diverse fits/silhouettes. Post-Dior Hedi is derivative and repetitive. And it couldn't be less rock n roll for some nobody to buy a rockstar costume from SLP. Thank god the bands you mentioned spent their money on guitars and amps instead overpriced fits.

[Anonymous No.13380420]

>>13372875
damn paris had really nice face features, was she natural or ps.?

[Anonymous No.13380614]

[Anonymous No.13380621]

>>13376564
you know ultra low rise pants came into trend after mcqueen did his "bumster" pants right?

[Anonymous No.13380630]

>>13380140
you know it takes a while for paris runways to affect flyover states right

give the poor anon a break

[Anonymous No.13380851]

>>13374104
Looks great if you're thin and have abs

[Anonymous No.13380926]

>>13380303
>people are hard wired, that's why the most attractive waist to hip ratio in women is globally, from pygmies to skandinavian, from the seeing to the blind from birth 0.7
Just stop reading psypop magazine bs

[Anonymous No.13380927]

>>13373475
No racial tension among middle class blacks and whites. No one gives a shit about what fucking poor people think, they will complain about anything.

[Anonymous No.13380929]

>>13376721
>90s is peak crack epidemic

Only because they esentially legalized crack after the 90s in the form of opioids. They legislated the problem away without actually fixing it.

[igor No.13380932]

Crack is vastly overrated.

[igor No.13380935]

Shoot cocaine.

[Anonymous No.13382073]

>>13380927
The middle class is poor.

[Anonymous No.13382084]

>>13373373
american scum, serves you right.

[Anonymous No.13382097]

>>13378747
I can agree with this, the 00s weren't bad, but they were hell of a lot better than today

[Anonymous No.13382108]

>>13380139
Hey jonah

[Anonymous No.13382120]

Outfits:
Valore outfits
Dickie outfits
Track suits

Hats:
New York Yankees fitted
Trucker hats

Hairstyle:
fades
buzzcut

Facial hair:
Thin chin strap with mustache

Jewelry:
Diamond stud earrings in both ears

Spring/Summer wear:
Shirts:
Wife beaters
White tee

Bottoms:
Jean shorts
Cargo shorts

Shoes:
Af1s Jordan's or Reebok classics

Winter/fall
Coats:
Leather jackets

Shirts:
Vertical striped button ups
jerseys over white tees
Thermals
Army camo

Bottoms:
Light wash baggy jeans

Shoes:
Timberlands

[Anonymous No.13382177]

>>13380935
Maybe the best but most fleeting feeling ever?

[Anonymous No.13382191]

yoga pants>>>>>>>>>>>whale tails

>Wow, a bit of material right up your back goes past your BRRAAPPP hole.
>it's trashy AND I have to imagine the good bits and not see them.
>plus, you're in the 99.99% of girls doing it so I don't want to imagine your taint anyway.

vs

>i can just about see everything, i don't even need to imagine it!
>you probably look way better than you do naked but i can easily pretend otherwise

[Anonymous No.13382382]

>>13382108
Jonah Albert?

[Anonymous No.13382688]

>>13380926
>just stop citing evolutionary facts
Just admit that you are a degenerate fag.

[Anonymous No.13382710]

>>13376564
wrong because high waist puts emphasis on big baby making hip porportions


low rise will always look like fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.13382712]

>>13382688
Why should he admit that? He just has to reply to you with as few words as possible which means he wins.

[Anonymous No.13382714]

>>13380139
holy shit lol ur mad af dumb flyover

btw i walked for ann and haider 6 seasons dont reply to my posts again loser

[Anonymous No.13382979]

>>13380303
Wait wait, so which is it? Do fashion trends follow political movements naturally, or does fashion come from innate essentialist instinct? A charitable read of you seems to claim it's both, to some extent, but you're also tacking on some moral judgements -- that fashion that corresponds with sexual dimorphism is good, that fashion changes resulting from "politics," feminism, and capitalism/da joos are bad somehow. Is that just an attempted appeal to nature? You allude to capitalism promoting feminism in order to use women as workers, but sexual dimorphism isn't an obstacle to that at all -- just look at housewife consumer culture in the 50's, or the female poor in any era. They worked just like their men did. So I don't think you have sufficient reason to claim that androgynic fashion is harmful. Even if we stipulate your historical claims about how women have never before tried to look more manly, which I doubt, you don't have evidence of harm.

[Anonymous No.13382995]

Fashion is just planned obsolescence applied to clothes.
They've even got it to where they can design the clothes to fall apart when they'd like.

[Anonymous No.13383010]

>>13382979
>Wait wait, so which is it? Do fashion trends follow political movements naturally, or does fashion come from innate essentialist instinct?
>beeing too simple minded to understnd anything of any complexity
Fashion standards occur mainly due to natural factors (like healthy bodies, which are pretty much universal) but because even those can change (war times, people are skinnier/ can't affort/ aren't allowed much fabric/ colours) things can adapt. This always goes back into the natural state (50s with their "new style" as women could affort to get bigger breasted and hipped again and fabric wasn't restricted). So, while politics can influence fashion, this is not the natural fashion of what people actually prefer, just like low rise in men and women.

>that fashion that corresponds with sexual dimorphism is good
No, it is what it is. SD is a fact so accepting that this is our natural preferance without outside factors is just beeing truthfull and or realistic.

> Is that just an attempted appeal to nature?
Nah, read again. Just because something is natural it's not always better. But if >millenia< have proven something to be pretty much universal to human kind it is healthy to accept it for what it is instead of trying to make humans to fit a political ideal. SD is a thing and therefore it is futile and fatal to the individual as well as the collective to try and make us into androgyn characters.

>but sexual dimorphism isn't an obstacle to that at all -- just look at housewife consumer culture in the 50's
Consumerism is even higher when there is double income. A housewife can only spend so much on useless shit if shes at home and has to feed multiple kids. DINKs are the ultimate consumers.

>So I don't think you have sufficient reason to claim that androgynic fashion is harmful.
Well, you don't because you have shown to not know really what has happened and does happen. Just check out Japan.

[Anonymous No.13383047]

>>13383010
>being too simple minded...
Keep reading, the very next sentence explains why I asked that.
>while politics can influence fashion, this is not the natural fashion of what people prefer...
People adopt what they want to adopt. You can't claim that people want to adopt something because capitalists made them, and then also claim that they don't REALLY want to adopt those things, without compromising your claim that this is a functional account. It's not observation at that point, but ideologically motivated interpretation of the evidence, which are that people these days seem to prefer relatively androgynous fashions. You're not providing a WHAT, but a WHY, and that requires interpretation and judgement.

And yet, SD as reflected in fashion isn't necessary for the presence of DINKs. I already mentioned working-class women of pervious eras. What do you think poor urban women have been doing since before Adam Smith? Manual labor. It's not digging ditches, no, but as far back as Elizabeth I, poor women generally performed knitting or sewing for wealthier clients in order to survive, and that's just an example from the top of my head. If anything, encouraging SD in fashion seems more capitalist than not, in the sense that women wearing men's clothes is unacceptable, and that a household will have to buy different-looking things instead of merely what is practical to wear. So I don't buy that.
>blah blah, you're ignorant.
y-you too

[Anonymous No.13383062]

>>13383047
>incentivs and propaganda don't work against human nature
>millenias globally aren't an observation

>performed knitting or sewing for wealthier clients in order to survive
Are you telling me, women worked? Because if that's the case we can quit it, s you obviously have no idea what I am talking about and think I somehow claimed that.

>that a household will have to buy different-looking things instead of merely what is practical to wear
Both sexes need different clothing to do the same job, simply because to do it properly it has to match the body and male and female have different bodies. Let alone that women need breats support and something to tuck between their legs during their periods or openings for breast feeding. Anything practicall has to reflect dimorphism. "buying more cloths" also isn't the core of the problem. Making women think and expect from them to play "man" ( as cloths change our views of us and others) leads to fewer births through fewer feminity and straight out harming fertility (with men look no further than skinny jeans, or women which bandage their tits to not look mature, or even the fact that yeast infections are much more often found in women wearing tight cloths instead of airy skirts with suspender belts).

Society works best when people work in symbiosis instead of rivalty of the sexes. A woman can't work like a man and a man can't substitute a womans mother role.

[Anonymous No.13383064]

>>13372875
>that girl on the left

[Anonymous No.13383186]

>>13382714
I live in London, you are a mutt

[Anonymous No.13383272]

>>13383062
>>incentivs and propaganda don't work against human nature
Correct. They work USING it. Humans crave incentives naturally, and they want to belong to groups naturally. You could say that this sets certain natural instincts at odds with one another, but of course, instincts don't follow a noncontradiction principle.
>>millenias globally aren't an observation
I already explained this. The claim, "fashion has reflected sexual dimorphism until very recently," is an empirical one that I'm willing to stipulate. Your conclusion, that this change is harmful somehow, is not.

>Are you telling me, women worked? Because if that's the case we can quit it, s you obviously have no idea what I am talking about...
That was a counter-example to your claim that the attempted elimination of SD from fashion is based on capitalist oppression of women. That model fails to take into account the fact that women were used as "wage cattle" previously, which questions the necessary link between "androgynous fashion" and "capitalist oppression of women," which you haven't shown.
>"buying more cloths" also isn't the core of the problem.
Of course it isn't. I brought that up to emphasize the lack of the necessary link I described above.

>with men look no further than skinny jeans
If it is true that men's fashion encompassing skinny jeans is a machination of a capitalist elite attempting to lower fertility, why are they falling out of fashion again? This just re-emphasizes the disconnect between your evidence and your conclusion:
>skinny jeans are coming into fashion. This must be the work of the capitalists!
>skinny jeans are falling out of fashion. This must be the work of the peoples' natural instinct!
You're explaining similar events in different ways. That's not observation, that's interpretation.

[Anonymous No.13383325]

>>13383272
>skinny jeans are coming into fashion. This must be the work of the capitalists!
>skinny jeans are falling out of fashion. This must be the work of the peoples' natural instinct!
Nah, they fall out of fashion for the same reason women tend to stop using the pill. The negativ effects become known to a slowly growing majority. Just like bleaching hair white came into growing it thick and natural with native olive oil instead of silicons. It's a never ending battle against the forces trying to make people consum and the knowledge which spreads thanks to technology quicker and quicker about the down sides.

>Your conclusion, that this change is harmful somehow, is not.
My conclusion is that it will come back to high wasit and that the low raise trend was a artificial push which still fades slowly out of fashion, and will prolly only die when the uggos having grown up with them hero due to the inevitable crash of the pension system.

>your claim that the attempted elimination of SD from fashion is based on capitalist oppression of women
lol no
There is no such thing as the oppression of women, women were only a tool due to their nest building and higher consumer character as a whole.

>That model fails to take into account the fact that women were used as "wage cattle" previously
Everyone was used as "wage cattle". Everyone has to work to eat.


>which you haven't shown
Because once again you completely missed the point and inserted what you want it to be. I never claimed it has been oppression. I said that such political movements use fashion as a vehicle (cigarettes as the phalic liberation from muh patriarchy was another example during the degenerate '20s). To cut it short, watch the following as a tl;dr:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnPmg0R1M04

Either way, hail high waist.

[Anonymous No.13383384]

>>13383325
Oh, please. So skinny jeans actually fell out of fashion because men were frightened of the nut-constriction? Bullshit. But again, this only reinforces my point: you're not "just observing."

>There is no such thing as the oppression of women, women were only a tool due to their nest building and higher consumer character as a whole.
>Everyone was used as "wage cattle."
I mean, that sounds like "oppression" to me. Even categorical oppression, if women are being specially pressured to compromise their femininity/fertility. But we can call a spade something else if you want.

My objection isn't to the idea that fashion is a tool. My objection is to the gender essentialist horseshit, and the claim that tomboys or androgynous fashion are some kind of horrific aberration from Nature, or whatever. That I don't buy for a second.

[Anonymous No.13383394]

>>13383325
high waist is so fucking old already you gimp, it was literally a twelve second fad

[Anonymous No.13383962]

>>13372209
When will low rise pants make a comeback?

[Anonymous No.13383971]

[Anonymous No.13384581]

this thread is wack as fuck, how is this not posted yet. actual thirteen year olds in this thread

[Anonymous No.13384668]

>>13379895
you have hard autism, don't you

[Anonymous No.13384674]

>>13379962
>eye bra

[Anonymous No.13384686]

>>13378747
i was born in 1990 and find the 10s the best, 90s second best and 00s ok

[Anonymous No.13384835]

>>13384581
anyone got any g unit clothesline pics?

[Anonymous No.13384875]

>>13384581
Wayne pullin up in the fuckin poptarts

[Anonymous No.13384878]

>>13373576
It looks like they're wearing Power Ranger trash bags. That material and those textures look awful.

[Anonymous No.13384881]

>>13372875

>flip phone on Juicy track pants

We will never go to this peak of kino cultural garbage

[Anonymous No.13384925]

>>13384581
Which year was that?

[Anonymous No.13385112]

>>13380013
this

[Anonymous No.13385198]

>>13380043
This

[Anonymous No.13385211]

Is this mid 2000s?

I remember it being popular for a month

[Anonymous No.13385212]

[Numen !!GgBWHLRiayD No.13385599]

>you will never live through the youthful innocent pre-teen days of blue skies and shining light in the early oughties again when evey day was like a mbn game

[Anonymous No.13385712]

>>13384925
I think it's 2006, around the time he released Hustler Musik

[Anonymous No.13385764]

>>13374946
>knock a door run
where do you live where people call it that? i've always known it as ding dong ditch

[Anonymous No.13386826]

Bump.

[Anonymous No.13387290]

>>13376564
>being this wrong

[Anonymous No.13387291]

too lazy to post the link but:

(Len - Steal My Sunshine music video)

[Anonymous No.13387513]

>>13375550
fuck, I always used to pick Muska in Tony Hawk's Pro Skater games, good times

[Anonymous No.13387515]

>>13373428
lol spot a desperate burger liar

[Anonymous No.13387521]

>>13373448
you're either an incel never leaving your Keller or yet another clueless burger

[Anonymous No.13387525]

>>13373373
Nostalgia faggots should be shot at sight

[Anonymous No.13387545]

>>13385211
clearly a nostalgic photoshoot, but more current era than anything else

[nekuro No.13387595]

[Anonymous No.13387727]

>>13372446
Nah. I miss it. Everybody is so try-hard nowadays.

[Anonymous No.13388579]

Bumping.

[Anonymous No.13388582]

[Anonymous No.13388752]

>>13382995

[Anonymous No.13388802]

>>13379962

I just remember the porno with the guy wearing these, keeps spinning round while hes fucking her and doing strongman pose

[Anonymous No.13388803]

>>13384581

[Anonymous No.13388808]

>>13388802

found it: pornhub search helicopter style.

[Anonymous No.13388911]

>>13383962
I doubt they’ll come back unless people start being healthy instead of HAES. It’s fucking crazy how fat people managed to become in the last twenty years

[Anonymous No.13389005]

[Anonymous No.13389055]

>>13372875
is this Paris Hilton wtf

[Anonymous No.13389223]

>>13383971
I would do unspeakable things for her

[Anonymous No.13389295]

>>13388911
It could come back as a way for thin people to flex, like Brandy Melville is for teen girls.

[Anonymous No.13389317]

>>13372873
>stepping on your hems
why

[Anonymous No.13389479]

>>13375550
dam those wheels are so ugly lol but muska is still cool xd

[Anonymous No.13389492]

>>13389479
They're just white wheels

[Anonymous No.13389646]

>>13372881
Where can I get the hat on the top right?

[Anonymous No.13389650]

>>13373397
>worst operating system ever?
Somebody never used ME.

[Anonymous No.13389734]

>>13373475
Basically he's saying he's white.

[Anonymous No.13389748]

>>13384674
kek

[Anonymous No.13390204]

>not wanting a completely trustworthy, wholesome gf who doesnt dress like an absolute whore every time she leaves the house

oh yeah so bad

[Anonymous No.13390255]

>>13379962
>>13379962

[Anonymous No.13390290]

>>13383971
>this look would be shamed in this decade

[Anonymous No.13390309]

>>13385211
2000s fashion has to be the best example of shit fits looking good because they're on hot people. I'm behind this dykecore fit though

[Anonymous No.13390311]

>>13390255
You think you know /fa/

[Anonymous No.13390333]

>>13373475
He's too young to remember Rodney king and oj

[Anonymous No.13390546]

>>13379976
That emo shit was gay then and it's still gay now.

[Anonymous No.13390575]

>>13389317
Better than showing your fucking ankles

[Anonymous No.13390627]

>>13372873
People in Eastern Europe still dress like this.
>t. Russian living in Czech Republic

[Anonymous No.13390689]

>>13383962
Not for a while, they're unflattering on 99% of people.

[Anonymous No.13390755]

>>13390255
>>13388808
>>13388802
Fug yes my lads

[Anonymous No.13391169]

GAP had great adverts during the y2k era
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZG8220Dlco
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThzN8Wzm98k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m_X1Lm7dqo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lfzl-2iSfbM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYPWqy4XUMQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7v2-Qzqdkws
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux0h4nU-Xig
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ij-SBwKk12I

[Anonymous No.13391176]

>>13372627
lookism.net

Here's a pretty good forum.

[Anonymous No.13391179]

>>13391169
Great post

[Anonymous No.13391197]

>>13391169
You're right. Selling bland boring clothing requires great marketing.

[Anonymous No.13391227]

>>13372877
is that lil pump?

[Anonymous No.13391409]

>>13387513
I always used to make my guy a Red Skeleton with Blue Liberty spikes

[Anonymous No.13391426]

Mean Girls Lindsay Lohan is easily the best looking girl in the history of man.

[Anonymous No.13391503]

>>13390575
why not n e i t h e r

>>13391169
good post anon

[Anonymous No.13391521]

>>13374104
It was a slutty thing so you could just barely see their undies and their pants were revealing skin so close to the crotch. It was a trend popularized by slutty teenagers. Like how girls would cut their shorts so short the pockets pointed out.

[Anonymous No.13391702]

>>13384581
Man, I remember when I snowboarder as a teenager and all my shit would look EXACTLY like this at the mountain. And then the skinny jeans with waterproofing came.

[ري كظ R Y · Q V S S !KNDY.F27NY No.13391758]

[Anonymous No.13391761]

>>13391758
based

[ري كظ R Y · Q V S S !KNDY.F27NY No.13391765]

>>13391758

[Anonymous No.13392056]

>>13372209

[Anonymous No.13392558]

>>13392056
That’s evidently early 90s or late 80s, dumbo.

[Anonymous No.13392966]

>>13379674
It was the 00s

[Anonymous No.13392968]

>>13372881
basically all of this bar 1 or 2 is in style now

[Anonymous No.13392978]

where can i find form-fitting hoodies like the hooker in mulholland drive?
possibly off-topic but it does take place in the 00's.

[Anonymous No.13393157]

>>13372873
the Spears Strut vs. the Awkward Lohan Pose

[Anonymous No.13393549]

>>13379962
>Spy Kids

[Anonymous No.13393560]

>>13393549
Fuck yeah dood, spykidscore. Or i would have accepted jetsetcore as well.

[Anonymous No.13393794]

>>13392558
>that lack of symbolic interpretation

[Anonymous No.13393890]

>>13384875
Underrated

[Anonymous No.13393904]

>>13390309
Would take me right back to highschool if that was a trucker hat

[Anonymous No.13395482]

>>13373373
I have confidence we will be well on our way back there by the end of trumps 2nd term

[Anonymous No.13395486]

>>13373437
You're not alone.

We'll sort it out together anon.

[Anonymous No.13396229]

>>13372881
still have that world cup shirt

[Anonymous No.13396233]

>>13378747
maybe if ur not a minority lol

[Anonymous No.13396356]

I was born in the mid 90's so i don't remember a lot of this shit but what a comfy thread
It's great when people just have a conversation on 4chan, it was actually educational
Cheers.

[Anonymous No.13396590]

>>13391227
Kill yourself unironically

[Anonymous No.13396904]

>>13384875
Wish these were still on the shelves.

[Anonymous No.13396994]

>>13391176
Isn't lookism the incel hive? Anyone who takes the blackpill should be killed before they get the chance to ruin other people's lives.

[Anonymous No.13397000]

>>13396994
>Anyone who takes the blackpill should be killed before they get the chance to ruin other people's lives.

Can someone sparknotes me on blackpill/lookism? Looked on the site for a hot minute, but it literally just sounded like /fit/.

[Anonymous No.13397143]

ever day since this thread was created my dick has been diamonds every time i scroll down and see lindsay lohan

[Anonymous No.13397993]

>>13397143
You're welcome.

[Anonymous No.13398058]

>>13383971
hnnng

[Anonymous No.13398074]

>>13378747
>>13378768

Just wait, 5-10 years tops people will be missing the 10s. The nostalgia cycle will continue.

[Anonymous No.13398090]

>>13380290
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic_of_Enlightenment

You poor fool. Do yourself a favour and do some light reading on "critical theory" and try to understand how it is shaping the world around you. Dialect of Enlightenment is the precursor to this new philosophy that permeates liberal academic circles. It is the precursor to modern progressivesm and forms the argument for a reinterpretation of history and art through a 'non biased' (non-colonialist) lens.

[THIS No.13398097]

>>13391227
THI

[Anonymous No.13398163]

>>13398074
Yup, cuz everything only gets worse...except it actually gets better, but memory and superficial history are unreliable.

[Anonymous No.13398286]

>>13383971
is this real

[Anonymous No.13398316]

>>13392558
It’s not Dumbo. You’d see the bridges.

[Anonymous No.13398317]

>>13391169

The leather video was too much. Christ i hate leather jackets so much. They look goofy as fuck if you're not a 9/10

[Anonymous No.13398597]

>>13397000
Lookism is for incels looking to improve themselves so they can get laid/get a gf by looksmaxing. As the name suggests, looksmaxing is when you fix certain things about your appearance like you haircut, the way you dress, working out, and even plastic surgery in some cases. The black pill is basically the limit of success you can achieve with your genetics. Some people are born with great genetics that let them become Chad and others are born with inferior genetics and will never be Chad.
They have better explanations on the front page of their site.

[Anonymous No.13398855]

>>13372881
Damn, I was wearing the triple white AF1 today.

[Anonymous No.13398905]

>>13379962
Holy shit, lmao

[Anonymous No.13399934]

>>13372428
no, it would be awesome.

[Anonymous No.13399982]

>>13372798
>>13373466
Honestly still a really good jam
>>13379962
These were definitely in a video game at some point. I feel like they belong in Hydro Thunder, or SSX Tricky, or maybe the first Triple X movie (maybe I'm thinking of Riddick)

[Anonymous No.13399985]

>>13372238
Boomer faggot

[Anonymous No.13400002]

>>13379068
For monday to friday right?

[Anonymous No.13400104]

>Nu-disco
>wrap sunglasses
>RAZR phones
>Guido-core
>Escalades and Bentleys
>Glamour and being flashy

[Anonymous No.13400244]

>>13400104
Have a box full of Hed Kandi CDs. I don't really listen to them, but don't have heart to get rid of them.

https://youtu.be/6AfPKo_ufqs

https://youtu.be/6AfPKo_ufqs

[Anonymous No.13400343]

>>13379674
Same what they doing now with supreme.

[VoDKa !!gythkWOLRhu No.13400372]

>>13390627
>>13390627
In Russovy Vary maybe
t. person who meets actual czech people on a daily basis

[VoDKa !!gythkWOLRhu No.13400373]

>>13390627
In Russovy Vary maybe
t. person who meets actual czech people on a daily basis

[Anonymous No.13400376]

>>13390309
I would piss in her ass then punch her in her jaw just to remind her what a filthy little cum princess she is

Bitch would like it

[Anonymous No.13400381]

>>13384875
Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeam

[Anonymous No.13400463]

>>13400104

[Anonymous No.13400738]

>>13372238
BASED

[Anonymous No.13400772]

>>13400376
LOL

[Anonymous No.13400873]

>>13379895
I appreciate the amount of effort you put into this post, but you are a turbo faggot.

[Anonymous No.13400889]

just hit me that Gen Z is old enough to post here now

[Anonymous No.13400898]

>>13400873
You know one of the reasons /fa/ sucks so hard is you guys chasing out the spergs, right?

If all posts have to be low information, low effort and low word count - all you've got is these anonymous people making out like they're 100 iq pretty girls in high school, gossiping over lunch.

[Anonymous No.13400907]

>>13400889
You act like anyone respects age restrictions. I’m sure there have been Gen Z (kids born post-internet) on 4chan for 2-4 years.

[Anonymous No.13401426]

Can someone red-pill me about nostalgia? I've never really felt nostalgic until I started smoking weed (I'm 21). Is it a coincidence that I'm super fucking nostalgic all the time now?

[Anonymous No.13401457]

[Anonymous No.13401976]

>>13379962
Oakley Medusas

[Anonymous No.13401981]

>>13372209
I dont care how much meth she does if Lindsay needs some dick im here

[Anonymous No.13402234]

>>13378614
I am so grateful for not having to live my peak year (early 20's) in the 00s

look at this corny shit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFIe9e1QG_U

[Anonymous No.13402299]

>>13401981
same

[Anonymous No.13402303]

>>13402234
are you kidding? i mean that shit was bad but just wait 20 years when we're looking back at the shit out rn

[Anonymous No.13403247]

>>13402234
I was a kid then and I still feel ashamed by this. People wonder why guitar music is dying.

[Anonymous No.13403891]

>>13401457
This feels more like a 2010's thing.

[Anonymous No.13403912]

>>13388582
Kari has aged well for a white lady.

[Anonymous No.13404031]

>>13398090
I know what critical theory is, and I'm totally familiar with the argument that mass media is a tool of capitalist standardization. The thing is, I don't agree with that argument necessarily, which is why I'm explicitly arguing against it. Bringing the history of the argument into things and slapping a name on the theory isn't going to refute anything.

[Anonymous No.13404079]

I want to kill this thread.

[Anonymous No.13404095]

>>13396356
Are you referring to the two retards who were writing whole self deluded run on sentence essays at each other?who somehow managed to drag pseudo science and 1st grade political analysis into a debate about low rise vs high rise denim?

[Anonymous No.13404106]

>>13403891
>literal retard

[Anonymous No.13404167]

>>13390255

dude on the left looks like a condom

[Anonymous No.13404201]

>>13400244
Oh that takes me back. Thanks for posting

[Anonymous No.13404563]

I don't care what you underage cunts think, low-rise, midriffs, baggy cargos, and the matrix were all awesome.

[Anonymous No.13404614]

>>13378784
pls never stop posting this

[Anonymous No.13405412]

>>13375550
Chad Muska was my fave in THPS2

[Anonymous No.13405420]

>>13379674
Put some fucking respect on Nsync's name you child

[Anonymous No.13405425]

>>13379976
>The Libertines

fuck off britbong

[Anonymous No.13405445]

>>13384581
>Bape hoodie

Pretty sure that was 2008 bro. Pic related is Weezy in '04 though.

[Anonymous No.13405450]

>>13378937
Is that when your son killed yourself so now you have to continue shitposting in his name? Drop the act, granny.

[Anonymous No.13405572]

>>13372238
Cam'ron one of the GOATs no cap

[Anonymous No.13405709]

>>13372873
tfw still living in low rise pants era and will probably not escape it for another 10 years

[Anonymous No.13405833]

>>13400376
g-go on

[Anonymous No.13406078]

>>13400343
You mean the skating brand that was founded by white kids?

[Anonymous No.13406225]

>>13378937
I remember it happening earlier. I live in the midwest too, so it's not like we were ahead of the curb.