[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 63 KB, 1024x683, asos-snakeskin-white-sneakers.jpg?w=1170.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13125347 No.13125347 [Reply] [Original]

what's the most /fa/ white sneaker?

>> No.13125655

>>13125347
Common Projects

>> No.13125657

>>13125347
Common Projects

>> No.13125671

Bump

>> No.13125696

>>13125347
Common Projects

>> No.13125758

Rare Projects

>> No.13125772
File: 31 KB, 600x600, S75104_01_standard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13125772

cant go wrong

>> No.13125804

>>13125772
I’m looking for something a little less plain personally

>> No.13125816

>>13125804
have you considered common projects?

>> No.13126153

>>13125347
Uncommon Projects

>> No.13126155

>>13125347
Recurrent Projects

>> No.13126162

>>13125804
>white sneaker
>not plain
make up your mind

>> No.13126166
File: 221 KB, 2638x1760, EA719A49ADD14074A153D320A50BF75C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13126166

>> No.13126211
File: 19 KB, 540x540, 363851_01_sv01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13126211

>> No.13126224

>>13125804
Filling pieces have some good white sneakers. Cheaper too

>> No.13126243
File: 45 KB, 1000x1334, 12410276_11362866_1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13126243

>> No.13126258
File: 27 KB, 900x450, 32022_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13126258

Are we on the tail end of this trend yet? Every brand seems to make one now. Want to pick up a pair for wearing when more athletic sneakers don't really work, but I don't wanna spend a lot on a quality pair if we're approaching peak meme.

Any thoughts on a light grey instead of white?

>> No.13126261

>>13126224
300€ isn't cheaper

>> No.13126269

CP Achilles low

The most uncomfortable, though

>> No.13126349
File: 17 KB, 762x1100, NE215B03Z-A11@11[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13126349

thoughts ?

>> No.13126594

Gucci Aces or GATs

>> No.13126747

Every white shoe that isn’t Stan Smiths look like trash.

>> No.13126757

Old skool Vans, all white.

>> No.13126785
File: 11 KB, 599x346, Shoes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13126785

>> No.13126808

>>13126785
/thread

>> No.13126874
File: 26 KB, 540x640, CD1C4730-AB10-4AE4-B7CE-BEFA7AA44743.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13126874

>> No.13126897

Common Projects honestly trigger me

Do you really think the leather is magically so good that it justifies the price?

I know you can get them on sale etc but the retail is absolutely absurd

>> No.13127376

>>13126269
how? are your feet deformed or something?

>> No.13127397

GATs or Instapump Furies.

>> No.13127444

>>13125804
get air Force, or cp bball low

>> No.13127445

>>13126785
shit bro, id on those shoes?

>> No.13127577

Greats Royales or Club C 85s

>> No.13127579
File: 72 KB, 640x640, 10039387_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13127579

club c 85 vintage

>> No.13127639
File: 140 KB, 960x960, 350.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13127639

>> No.13127650
File: 398 KB, 448x478, 1486289431582.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13127650

>>13126258

Every brand except for FUCKING ADIDAS. Why is it impossible for them to make a pure white sneaker with 3 pure white stripes? No colored brand name on it, no iridescent stripes, no holes in them, no coloring at all - but apparently that's too much to ask for.

>> No.13127655

>>13127650

Oh, forgot to add - light grey is inferior to pure white.

>> No.13127857

>>13127650
they have all white stan smiths with no green

>> No.13127885

>>13125347
common projects are a shit tier reddit shoe, GATs and Stan Smiths far better.

Listen lads I love the minimalism meme as much as the next guy but common projects have NO character, they are just soulless sleek overpriced baby seal skin slippers.

>> No.13127901

>>13127885
you can get new cps for like $270 and used for like $200 that's not really overpriced

>> No.13127926
File: 47 KB, 840x840, CQ2561_01_standard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13127926

>>13127650
Adidas Court Vantage

>> No.13128094
File: 71 KB, 960x960, 27497805_2279117512105825_144749993_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13128094

Imma get myself some Reebok C85 like >>13127579 and buy myself some fake gucci aces bee for $95

>> No.13128135
File: 11 KB, 400x400, IMG_5089.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13128135

>>13127650
Adidas nizza low

>> No.13128174
File: 213 KB, 900x900, DFB6A640-BFF1-467C-997A-EA0CD4A6944C.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13128174

I quite like the look of Nike Internationalist in all white

>> No.13128208

>>13126897
You can make that argument for virtually any "high quality" article of clothing. Buying CPs at retail makes you an idiot. Buying them on sale I think is a pretty decent purchase.

>> No.13128694

>>13126785
i dont get it, i cant see anything here?

>> No.13128722

>>13128094
if you wanna pay an extra $100 on the fake guccis you can get any of the popular designs you want from hforhype. They even do a decent job with fake packaging if you care about that.

>> No.13128724

>>13126897
I kinda agree with you, what's the point in paying designer prices for a plain white pair of shoes when there are plenty of really nice looking white shoes that are under $100. I love designer, but I say if you're gonna buy designer, it should be something that stands out more.

>> No.13128834
File: 35 KB, 1200x630, saint-laurent-blanc-optique-made-in-italy-leather-hightop-sneakers-product-1-13603929-168139234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13128834

Theses are sexy, but fucking pricey

>> No.13128855
File: 383 KB, 1600x2400, 0590566001_32_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13128855

>>13125347

>> No.13129500
File: 76 KB, 748x561, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13129500

>> No.13129736

>>13128834
those look shit irl

>> No.13130476

>>13126785
I thought the fckn pic wasn’t loading baka

>> No.13130745
File: 170 KB, 2000x2000, E4932302-2D2F-4764-9C3D-F4610EB443FB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13130745

>>13125347
What does /fa/ think of Superstars? I know they’re a little boring

>> No.13130746
File: 38 KB, 680x440, doxqogmiihntitisvce8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13130746

why do college whites who dress like shit love these?

>> No.13130955
File: 42 KB, 840x840, smith.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13130955

>>13125772
Should I cop these for $50?

>> No.13130987
File: 88 KB, 1920x1080, common projects bball low.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13130987

BBalls > Achilles

>> No.13130993
File: 87 KB, 1500x1500, 24299651_fr_sc7_whwh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13130993

Can't go wrong with some AF1s

>> No.13130999

>>13130745
Gross af, and now more with the gold sign they're putting in the shoes.
even if they're overplayed, stans are the way to go with adidas.

>> No.13131180
File: 19 KB, 636x636, 85231_WT0002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13131180

MFA circlejerk cumming through

>> No.13131192

>>13131180
I like these

>> No.13131227
File: 3.58 MB, 3036x4048, IMG_20180206_013357.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13131227

>>13127579
Bump

>> No.13131229
File: 55 KB, 384x384, downloadfile-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13131229

>> No.13131230

>>13130955
yes

>> No.13131237
File: 200 KB, 940x659, D0F2DCE9-AD98-46F9-B36C-11256138D211.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13131237

>>13125347
I saw almost new common projects in person and they honestly looked shitty. I want to get some ultraboosts in all white

>> No.13131257

>>13131192
They are all gone thanks to leddit

>> No.13131322
File: 14 KB, 719x720, m33686131523_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13131322

no one believes me

>> No.13131327

>>13130993
I'm sorry but how the fuck do you wear af1s? That sole is fucking clown thick my dude

>> No.13131379

What's a good white sneaker with a sleeker silhouette? All of these are a bit too clunky for my tastes

>inb4 autism shoes

>> No.13131400

>>13131327
its an optical illusion. if you look at them in product pictures and from the side they look goofy

but if you're in real life looking at someone wear them they don't look that strange

>> No.13131450

>>13131322
Id?

>> No.13131495

>>13131229
Indeed

>> No.13131501

>>13131379

Superga Cotu

>> No.13131507

>>13130745
le asian girl from queens shoe

>> No.13131540

>>13126785
W2c?

>> No.13131599

>>13131327
The sole is big and they're heavy af but they don't look unnatural
Literally wearing them with skinny jeans of any color look really sick
Only item i'd not recommend wearing them is with shorts but thats it

>> No.13131616
File: 88 KB, 564x846, e3875398a3e386ef055910ef865f9f12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13131616

>>13131599
forgot pic

>> No.13131646

>>13127579
>>13127926
>>13127639
>>13131237

Noice.

>> No.13131831

>>13126162
Imagine thinking a shoe being white inherently makes it plain

>> No.13131845

>>13131507
Too tru

>> No.13131851
File: 3.03 MB, 1956x2194, 1517169717119.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13131851

>paying 500$ for non-leather shoes

Ah, to be a young and dumb again...

>> No.13132257

>>13130955
Only $50, from where?

>> No.13132278

>>13131599
I’m 5’7 and don’t feel as though I can pull off high top shoes, what’s your take on this? I’ve only even worn low shoes, highest being old schools that I pull my pants over. Does it give a bad silhouette? Maybe with a well proportioned fit would it work better.

>> No.13132403
File: 15 KB, 760x760, 17-07-2015_commonprojects_achillesretrohigh_white_black_2_dl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13132403

Seconding Common Projects. I like their mid-top sneakers more than the lows though

>> No.13132840
File: 9 KB, 645x773, 1514144968933.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13132840

>>13126243
>get hired to take stock photos of a white shoe
>set contrast so poorly shoe is almost invisible

>> No.13133390
File: 66 KB, 564x846, e5f1d4715c37451f84276e0115674b48.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13133390

>>13132278
They don't have a heavy silhouette, even if you would think so. I think they're comparable to Stans and Club Cs.
If you don't feel good with hi tops just try the lows, they look chunkier but good also.

>> No.13133399
File: 255 KB, 2000x2000, 49799_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13133399

>>13125347
Delicious Reebok Classics, for a mere 50

>> No.13133638

>>13131450

uniqlo u nylon low

>> No.13134670

>>13126166
Good this shit died fast.
Patches look good in clothing, not in shoes.