/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.13042782]

How to fix this board?

[Anonymous No.13042784]

>>13042782
>

[Anonymous No.13042786]

t. bald whiteboi

[Anonymous No.13042906]

>>13042782
stop obsessing about masculinity

[Anonymous No.13042913]

It's broken by definition. Fashion is an innately soy interest and if you're not here to laugh at others, you're the problem.

[Anonymous No.13042943]

>>13042906
>stop obsessing about masculinity

[Anonymous No.13042947]

The degeneracy thread is the only good one there. And it's the second thread created of that type.

Personally I like to /fa/ get more edge.

[Anonymous No.13042948]

>>13042943
that is really the main difference between old and new /fa/. if you want old effay stop the spergtastic obsession with being a manly action man and stop spouting soy every second.

[Anonymous No.13042952]

>>13042782
Both look bad. Reviewbrah is GOAT though, as always.

[Anonymous No.13042961]

>>13042782
By making /pol/fags fuck off

[Anonymous No.13042973]

>>13042782
Both of these look like sissyboy shit. Screw off.

[Anonymous No.13042976]

>Let me complain about the threads on the board and those lacking
>Let's not make threads I want to see and make a change

[Anonymous No.13042989]

>>13042976
The last option takes effort, so these attention whoring idiots are never gonna do that.

[Anonymous No.13042998]

>>13042976
As if you get a lot of responses that contribute to the thread. Qualityposting is not encouraged.

[Anonymous No.13043003]

everyone who says soy on this board has had this happen irl

[Anonymous No.13043006]

whatever it takes to get the /pol/tards and fragile masculinity fags to get the fuck off my fashion board

[Anonymous No.13043017]

>>13042998
Well anone viewing this thread now knows what to do. If your post is really of quality, make sure to support it.

[Anonymous No.13043019]

>>13043006
>fragile masculinity fags

Well, masculinity are behind stable civilizations.
Femininity destroys what masculinity has built up.

[Anonymous No.13043024]

>>13043019
You sound so fucking cringe. Go out and get some fresh air.

[Anonymous No.13043025]

>>13043019
>

[Anonymous No.13043028]

>>13043017
What do you think I'm doing?

[Anonymous No.13043029]

>>13043024
>"You sound so fucking cringe. Go out and get some fresh air."

[Anonymous No.13043032]

>>13043003
but soy doesn't contain estrogen, it contains isoflavones. it actually worsens the effect of my hrt so I avoid it, since it binds with estrogen receptors so real estrogen can't do its job

[Anonymous No.13043040]

>>13043019
Now there's some hard analysis. Did you read aristotle perhaps?

[Anonymous No.13043045]

>>13043040
>aristotle

...: "To the best of our knowledge Aristotle did not participate in pederasty, as this was not the custom in Macedonia. I believe he was shocked at the prevalence of the custom in Athenian society, as well as of prostitution."

Well, count me in.

[Anonymous No.13043046]

>>13043017
>Well anons viewing this thread now know what to do.
Knowing is not the same as doing.

[Anonymous No.13043054]

>>13042782
can soyboys be /fa/ if they're gayboys?

[Anonymous No.13043060]

>>13043045
wow, he wasn't a pedophile, very impressive and notable!

[Anonymous No.13043063]

fuck off

[Anonymous No.13043067]

>>13043045
Who the fuck are you quoting? Stop posting the same three pictures, you dweeb.

[Anonymous No.13043076]

>>13043060
>>13043067
>Plato, Aristotle and Socrates all agree homosexual acts are disgraceful

Source: http://www.princeton.edu/~anscombe/articles/finnisorientation.pdf

[Anonymous No.13043079]

>>13043045
>huge full beard
>a fucking pipe
king of numales

[Anonymous No.13043084]

>>13042906
>>13042947
>>13043006
Why has there been more outcroppings of androgynous fashion threads as of late? I'm assuming with the current gender / transgender, it's more avant-garde but in a way that's acceptable stylistically as fashion.

I personally like masculine styles, but the most 'masculine' style currently inhabiting this board is either the milspo threads or the 20 reply americana threads, of which the former is more interesting and higher effort and the latter is too associated with compensatory redditors trying to makeup for being skinnyfat urbanites who seek to embody the hard life of their depression era, duderanching grandfather, while also being largely insignificant in volume as of this fashion cycle.

I think /fa/ is at it's peak when specific substyles are being explored and created in generals and whatnot. Lunarcore and Terrorcore were pretty good innovations, and the fragrance and watch threads are pretty good. Maybe androgyny is the current topical flavor of the month, but I'm looking forward to the next since I don't enjoy androgyny or feminine styles for my wardrobe.

[Anonymous No.13043087]

>>13043045
>>13043067
pretty sure this dude actually googled "was aristotle gay". ignore this guy, he's either baiting or a flyover state tier coping nu-male

[Anonymous No.13043090]

>>13043087
Yeah, he obviously didn't have a clue who aristotle was except that he was some bearded greek dude

[Anonymous No.13043092]

>>13042782
>getting /pol/ to fuck off
>raising the minimum age to post to 22

And bald with a beard is about as “soy” as it gets if you want to play that game.

[Anonymous No.13043095]

>>13043032
good thing your telling me, the guy who invented the soyboy meme, this useful information

[Anonymous No.13043098]

>>13043087
>>13043090
>"Yeah lets continue, darling...."

[Anonymous No.13043103]

>>13043019
What the fuck are you """rugged individualists""" doing on a fucking fashion board.

[Anonymous No.13043105]

>>13043084
It will be. As much as I want to see it become bigger, there's little people willing to try the style out and so little that can actually look good in it. Not a fan of a lot of Americana, but Milspo is lacking.

Not a fan of lunar or terror because one has hardly had anything to define it as a style, and terror is just classified as a fit set in a destructive background, or in the act of rioting.

[Anonymous No.13043109]

>>13043098
you're trying to make fun of gay people which is not only totally uncalled for but you either already had this picture downloaded or you looked this up just to shitpost in this thread and i'm not sure which is worse

[Anonymous No.13043111]

>>13043103
Fixing it.

[Anonymous No.13043119]

theres a deep sense of insecurity in about 95% of the posts in this thread

[Anonymous No.13043125]

>>13043105
I see Terror more as a themed style that's based around power. Plain-clothes operators, the IRA, bank robbers, terrorists, irregulars are touted as inspo and examples. Thing is, it's a style that may embody that, but alone it lacks the appeal of power and force that makes the clothing cool by association.

Milspo needs an infographic and more consistent posters than telnya and the oddballs who occasionally post fits.

Lunarcore needs more of the same, but it's essentially a looser, palette bound techwear.

[Anonymous No.13043127]

>>13043111
Fuck off back to 2005 you "fratire" cringelord. Go tell Chuck Norris jokes with some other insecure virgin.

[Anonymous No.13043140]

>>13043111
Lol. I think you are the same person who was doing this some months back. Fight the good fight.

[Anonymous No.13043499]

>When you sperg out because people have different opinions on something completely subjective

[Anonymous No.13043506]

But everything on the left is considered soyboy here.

[Anonymous No.13043521]

>>13043111
>>13043019

Men in tights, high heels, makeup, and wigs shaped the Western World. "Rugged" men were potato farmers who had to flee to a different continent because "m...muh religion."

[Anonymous No.13043539]

Why are vans "soy"?

[Anonymous No.13043550]

>>13043539
Looking in the mirror should illuminate the reason. Docs are soy too, before you ask.

[Anonymous No.13043551]

>>13042782
marketer sausagefest vs fun & curiousity

i fucking hate this place because of the left part of your picture

[Anonymous No.13043558]

>>13043045
>>13043076
You must have some serious issues if the first thing you do when someone brings up Aristotle is check if he fucked boys. Like seriously, get your brain checked.

[Anonymous No.13043568]

>>13043550
I don't own any. They seem pretty normie, but idk about soy.

[Anonymous No.13044289]

>>13042782
>Nearly 99% of /fa/ nowdays
Really anon tell me bout the "good old days". I guess you've been here for a whole month. Seriously this place has always been shit but since /pol/ and /r9k/ infested this board its been complete shit. Like unbearable.

[Anonymous No.13044550]

>>13042782
autoban flystate ip addresses

mandatory wardrobe check before posting (min. ownership of 15 designer garments four figure RRP)

[Anonymous No.13044604]

>>13042782
/fa/ has been shit since 2014. we have to remove the streetwear infestation first

[Anonymous No.13044638]

>>13042952
Honestly maybe we should just abandon /fa/ to be drowned in soymilk and ask gookmoot for a /brah/ board to discuss good style on.

[Anonymous No.13044737]

>>13043084
answer: there hasn't. /fa/ used to be more androgynous

[Anonymous No.13044744]

More high test cross-board posters from /k/, /fit/ & /ck/ like myself, get rid of all the underage b& (which is 80% of the board) and ban anyone who wears vans, because they're obviously mentally underage.