[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 542 KB, 800x800, black jeans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12928025 No.12928025 [Reply] [Original]

are these pants cool?

>> No.12928026

>>12928025
Nah they are gay too tight and that fake rip shit is gay

>> No.12928033

>>12928025
ive been tempted by things like this from shitty facebook adverts for ages, i doubt they will look nice in person

>> No.12928051
File: 2.23 MB, 2400x2838, cop or not.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12928051

>>12928025
i've wanted one of these for so long now, but always been on the fence. is this shirt cool?

>> No.12928373

look up Balmain new friend

>> No.12928657

>>12928025
I got a pair similar from pac sun, and I can say they are literally cool.
They weren't as tight as I thought they'd be so it's relaxing to wear, and they seem to be super breathable so I was walking around all summer without a problem.

>> No.12929009

>wearing skinnier pants than your gf does

Seriously faggots, if you think this looks good, then you should just kys.

>> No.12929275

>>12929009
>gf

>> No.12929391

>>12928025
They're not pants.
They're trousers.

>> No.12930246

>>12928657
>they are literally cool
Put them in your oven then, faggot

>> No.12930256

>>12929009
It looks good if you have big strong legs, twinkboy

>> No.12930429

>>12928025
yo fuck the pants, what are those shoes plsty

>> No.12930433

>>12929391
Focking americans, eh?

>> No.12931257

>>12930256
If you have big strong legs then you shouldn't wear fucking tight pants to show them off like a complete utter faggot, it only makes you look like a homo retard.

>> No.12931889

These are represent right? I had a pair like 4 years ago and I wouldn't recommend, if you want the style for a similar price get some Naked and Famous stacked denim instead.

>> No.12931901

>>12930429
ann demeulemeester scamasciato

>> No.12932044

A bit "too much" but decent
the quality is probably pretty bad tho

>> No.12932083

>>12928025
tryhard, edgy "i want to look like my anime characters"-tier. So no anon, not really .

>> No.12932097
File: 187 KB, 1500x1500, MW40_201T_LUCKY_JEANS_PANTS_SHORTS_BLUE_MAIN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12932097

>>12931257
>t.
what are you doing on /fa/?

>> No.12932120

this board is a joke if you think that trash in op is even close to acceptable you have no business discussing fashion

>> No.12932121
File: 113 KB, 733x806, buffalo-plaid-jcrew-gardenista.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12932121

ok tell me, is this shirt cool?

>> No.12932155
File: 2.06 MB, 1750x1041, 1509926493430.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12932155

>>12932097
so you think pic related is good looking and acceptable?

>> No.12932248

>>12928051
idk dude, its a risky one to pull off. i would say dnc desu, sorry :/

>> No.12932276
File: 58 KB, 660x440, Hilfiger-Jeans-TGJ.01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12932276

>>12932097
Pic related only this can be acceptable and not make you look like a teenage ladyboy. If you want to attract underage girls/boys, then go ahead and wear shit like in OP's pic. Skinny jeans for men should be banned.

>> No.12933287

>>12932276
how's that yard work going, Rand?

>> No.12933503

>>12932155
Big legs in trousers look pretty good tbqh

>> No.12933517

>>12932097
>>12932155
Can we agree that both of these examples look like trash?

>> No.12933520

These are just Balmain ripoffs. Balmains are cool in pictures, but most people don't have the wardrobe to pull them off.

>> No.12934006

>>12932276
>Skinny jeans for men should be banned.
holy shit am i in 2008 again

>> No.12934019

>>12928025
yes they're basic but have those details