/archistethics/

[Anonymous No.12876996]

[Anonymous No.12876998]

[Anonymous No.12877001]

[Anonymous No.12877002]

[Anonymous No.12877006]

[Anonymous No.12877008]

[Anonymous No.12877014]

[Anonymous No.12877018]

[Anonymous No.12877023]

[Anonymous No.12877028]

[Anonymous No.12877077]

>>12876996
>>12876998
>>12877001
>>12877002
>>12877006
>>12877008
>>12877014
>>12877018
>>12877023
>>12877028
so disneyland, keeping in mind disney was a nazi.

boring as fuq.

[Anonymous No.12877089]

>>12877077
t. i have no history to be proud of so i hate on other peoples

lmaoatu

[Anonymous No.12877190]

get on my level

[Anonymous No.12877250]

>>12876996
pleb-tourist core

[Anonymous No.12877264]

The Soviet pavillion in Expo 58.
The early cold war sounds like a much more interesting era to live in tbqh

[Anonymous No.12877268]

>>12877264
Another pavillion but can't remember which.

[Anonymous No.12877273]

I would post more but most my shit I already posted on a recent thread and I don't wanna do it again

[Anonymous No.12877274]

[Anonymous No.12877276]

>>12877273
Oh fuck this isn't /his/ lol. Guess I'll post them then.

[Anonymous No.12877282]

>>12877276

[Anonymous No.12877283]

>>12877282

[Anonymous No.12877285]

>>12877283

[Anonymous No.12877290]

>>12877190
Lmao. all posts before this are like stockimages, or what appear on shitth postcards that fat american housewives send to their relatives when they visit urope

[Anonymous No.12877291]

>>12877285

[Anonymous No.12877293]

>>12877290
yeah I don't know what is people's obsession with those shitty german houses

[Anonymous No.12877298]

>>12877293
fuck no image the fuck

[Anonymous No.12877300]

>>12877089
/pol/ please go. its nice to visit nuremberg or whatever but oversaturated images of random german timber houses really isn't aesthetic, it's tacky. its grandma-tier taste

[Anonymous No.12877302]

>>12877298

[Anonymous No.12877306]

>>12877302

[Anonymous No.12877311]

>>12877306
persian architecture coming soon

[Anonymous No.12877312]

>>12877311

[Anonymous No.12877313]

[Anonymous No.12877317]

>>12877312

[Anonymous No.12877318]

>>12877317

[Anonymous No.12877320]

The penis building

[Anonymous No.12877321]

>>12877318
kay here it comes

[Anonymous No.12877325]

>>12877321

[Anonymous No.12877326]

>>12877317
>>12877312
LOVE this location! I photographed a lookbook for a Parisien brand there.

[Anonymous No.12877327]

>>12877311
http://architectureofdoom.tumblr.com/

[Anonymous No.12877328]

>>12877325

[Anonymous No.12877329]

[Anonymous No.12877333]

>>12877328

>>12877326
Nice. It's in Spain right? Wish I could go there, it's an awesome building

[Anonymous No.12877336]

>>12877333

[Anonymous No.12877339]

>>12877336

[Anonymous No.12877345]

>>12877339
And some more Modernist-Postmodernist architecture that I forgot

[Anonymous No.12877348]

>>12877333
Nice digits. Yes it's in Calpe, Spain. The owner of the buildings is a fucking asshole. At first he gave clearance fo the shoot but when he saw our whole team preparing he suddenly asked for money. Luckily a local who was with us fixed it and came to his senses.

[Anonymous No.12877351]

>>12877345
this thread better not die holy fuck, Ive been here for half an hour I think

[Anonymous No.12877353]

>>12877351

[Anonymous No.12877358]

>>12877353
kay im done

[Anonymous No.12877360]

>>12877358
thanks for the contributions good sir. Nice thread so far

[Anonymous No.12877368]

[Anonymous No.12877371]

[Anonymous No.12877389]

[Anonymous No.12877411]

>>12877389
barogue is so tacky.

[Anonymous No.12877494]

[Anonymous No.12877510]

>>12877348
How did you get into your place, as a photographer realizing lookbooks for fashion brands? Just trying to understand ways to enter the industry, thanks ahead for your time

[Anonymous No.12877517]

>>12877368
what the fuck

[Anonymous No.12877618]

>>12877273
>>12877276
>>12877283
I love and hate brutalism.

[Anonymous No.12877660]

[Anonymous No.12877672]

>>12877618
because like anything, there is really shitty brutalism, and really masterful brutalism

[Anonymous No.12877680]

>>12877672
Well, it doesn't belong in cities. It needs to be in nature by itself to stand in contrast.

[Anonymous No.12877688]

>>12877510

I'm not even a professional photographer actually. Grew up in Brussels and work at a creative agency as multimedia artist. Kangol contacted us for an assignment and I went to Paris to help coordinate it. They were very happy with the results and I worked with them again. Their model was actually the one who recommended me for this shoot so that's how it all got to happen.

[Anonymous No.12877691]

>>12877688
forgot pic

[Anonymous No.12877697]

[Anonymous No.12877700]

[Anonymous No.12877708]

[Anonymous No.12877743]

[Anonymous No.12877747]

[Anonymous No.12877896]

>>12877190
This is fa

[Anonymous No.12877962]

>>12877089
these are kind of boring. nothing super interesting just nice to look at, and nothing especially high res

[Anonymous No.12877968]

>>12877680
Brutalism in cities is good though. Love that barebones utilitarian concrete look

[Anonymous No.12878050]

>>12877680
i can see where you're coming from but cant say i necessarily agree

[Anonymous No.12878074]

>>12876996
>HDR
Fucking stop.

[Anonymous No.12878331]

>>12877291
ah Geneve!

[Anonymous No.12878600]

>>12877411
I find it really refined.

[Anonymous No.12878661]

>>12877077
You probably live in Houston. Enjoy your floods.

[Anonymous No.12878664]

[Anonymous No.12878830]

[Anonymous No.12878832]

[Anonymous No.12878934]

[Anonymous No.12878939]

[Anonymous No.12878958]

>not living on a highway

fucking plebs

[Anonymous No.12878963]

[Anonymous No.12879236]

>>12877962
architecture isnt supposed to be "interesting", its supposed to be looking nice. when you go to a restaurant you expect nice food, not a piece of turd on your plate just to make it "interesting"

[Anonymous No.12879263]

>>12877968
>>12878050
It clearly belongs nowhere near say >>12877743.

[Anonymous No.12879270]

>>12877320
NA MI NOVIO

[Anonymous No.12879343]

post your favorite residential architecture
post the place/house where you would want to live

[Anonymous No.12879715]

>>12879236
posting that shit here is like going into a michelin-starred restaurant and asking for a slice of meatloaf and boiled potatos

[Anonymous No.12879728]

>>12879343
1930s British Suburbs are the peak of low-density development and have never been matched desu senpai.

>modernist planning, vernacular materials (and the occasional mock-tudor flair) - innovative yet inoffensive
>nice big rooms and solid brick walls
>reasonably sized drive and garden - neither cramped boxes or supermarket carpark-tier deserts of empty grass and gravel
>fireplaces
>still manage to be reasonable walkable, cycleable, and have solid public transport links

sadly most new developments here are faux-18th/19th century shit that manages both to be tacky, car-dependent, cheaply built and cramped as fuck

[Anonymous No.12879804]

>>12879715
no, posting modernism would be like going to a micheln-star restaurant and axing for a turd sandwich (medium)

[Anonymous No.12879958]

Almost got an apartment in pic related but went to someone else

[Anonymous No.12879963]

>>12879958

[Anonymous No.12879966]

>>12879963

[Anonymous No.12880024]

>>12878050
Ew

[Anonymous No.12880133]

>>12877077
this
I didn't realize this was a tourist aesthetics thread

[Anonymous No.12880355]

>>12880133
Does everything that isn't social-critical theory based brutalism trigger the post-marxist new left AFA shills on this board?

[Anonymous No.12880921]

>>12880355
this

[Anonymous No.12880960]

>>12880355
Lmao. Nazis thinking tacky postcard pictures are representation of anything traditional.

[Anonymous No.12880969]

[Anonymous No.12880978]

>>12880960
> tacky postcard pictures
Bingo, all nationalism is steeped in tacky historical revisionism

[Anonymous No.12881462]

>>12880978
All social-critical theory is based in deliberately erasing history in order to spawn a false myth of creation for the masses and a true genesis only for the intelligentsia ruling caste. Hence it is in the interest of the borderline fluxus-of-architecture brutalist to piss on, shit on, and rape, anything that alludes to identity or inheritance for anyone but the philosophical marrano, and to crush the past with a future where everyone obeys in harmony in structures that could only be spawned by peaceful and prosperous submission to the chosen people.

That said this is not all of brutalism. But knee-jerk attacking anything from before the year 1900 is a telltale sign a social-critical marxist parasite having infiltrated the discussion.

[Anonymous No.12881472]

>>12881462
Fucking hell these nu nazis are thick

[Anonymous No.12881545]

>>12881472
>nazi
Because I trigger you okay

[Anonymous No.12881558]

[Anonymous No.12881618]

>>12881545
whatever faggot.

[Anonymous No.12881634]

[Anonymous No.12881648]

>>12877014
don't post these ugly things ever again ya hear

[Anonymous No.12881653]

>>12877320
benous Aries I assume

[Anonymous No.12881655]

>>12877190

you've gotta be fucking me. that's the most depressing looking shit ever. oh wait, i forgot depression was effay

[Anonymous No.12881770]

[Anonymous No.12881777]

[Anonymous No.12881789]

[Anonymous No.12882009]

>>12881545
>>12881462
>>12880355
Nazi architecture was fucking trash-tier my man, either cardboard classicism that would have eroded away long before 1000 years had passed or literally just draping swastikas over anything built prior to 1920 and calling it 'architecture of das volk'.

Italian fascism was 20th century dictator aesthetics done right.

[Anonymous No.12882015]

>>12882009
The whole Eur area has a pretty cool aesthetic. it feels really cold and hollow, especially compared to the rest of historic rome.

[Anonymous No.12882020]

>>12877274
This looks like Mdina, Malta. Basically every house on the island looks like this apart from like 2 cities.

[Anonymous No.12882197]

>>12881653
Montevideo

[Anonymous No.12882212]

>>12877023
people shat on you for this but I really like those japanese villages. they're removed from modernity, but not in an excessive way.

[Anonymous No.12882220]

>>12877282
>>12877283
>>12877285
run of the mill boring shit not any better than op. nice filters faggot

[Anonymous No.12882264]

>>12877023
>>12882212
this looks so fucking comfy.

[Anonymous No.12882307]

>>12882264
yes it does

[Anonymous No.12882332]

Germans can into comfy peasantcore, too!

[Anonymous No.12882391]

>>12877368
why does everything look so smooth in this pic

[Anonymous No.12882398]

>>12879958
This is in London?
These places look sick, for some reason I love the look of mossy cement, maybe cuz I'm from a really day place

[Anonymous No.12882475]

>>12882398
Yeah, Camden

[Anonymous No.12882482]

>>12877660
freeway park is dope
I walk through there whenever I'm downtown

[Anonymous No.12882489]

>>12878600
it's the architectural equivalent of G-Star Raw
elements of it are nice but as a whole it's just overdesigned

[Anonymous No.12882803]

>>12880024
unfortunately, you're wrong.

[Anonymous No.12883183]

>>12882391
It's designed by michelangelo. He was a madman, i tell you!!

[Anonymous No.12883240]

Of course fa would like modernism. You're contrarian and even your clothes say "i want to be as much of an inconvenience as i reasonably can"

[Anonymous No.12883247]

Gate

[Anonymous No.12883251]

Classical is coming back

[Anonymous No.12883253]

Ornamentation (arrest me i'm a criminal)

[Anonymous No.12883256]

>>12876996

street I live on, I think it's dope as hell

[Anonymous No.12883257]

[Anonymous No.12883260]

>>12883240
Depends on the circles you run in. If you hang around with a lot of design or arch majors liking modernism is a normie as it gets. Being into post-modernism is what gets the arch normies dicks in a twist.

[Anonymous No.12883262]

>>12883256
Are those energy lines?

[Anonymous No.12883263]

>>12883251
Probably not.

[Anonymous No.12883283]

>>12883263
I know for a fact that it is

[Anonymous No.12883290]

>>12883283
What evidence do you have?

[Anonymous No.12883292]

>>12883290
Lots of them but if i give them to you i lose my leverage

[Anonymous No.12883299]

modernists get out REEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.12883301]

>>12883292
You have as much leverage as you have evidence.

[Anonymous No.12883303]

>>12883301
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/10/the-architectural-trads-are-back-we-should-celebrate

I'll throw you the smallest bone
What i have hidden would destroy your modernist brainwashed mind

[Anonymous No.12883317]

German embassy, uae

[Anonymous No.12883321]

[Anonymous No.12883322]

>>12883303
I don't even like most modernism (because modernists are fucking douchebags), but one short article giving a few examples (one of which is really a post-modern design from Adam Nathaniel Furman), is not enough to convince me there is a general trend.

[Anonymous No.12883325]

>>12883322
It's one article, but it's more than we've had in decades. Surely there are not many statistics on building trends, it's merely a felling out on the street. The public support is overwhelmingly turning in favour of traditional. Such is the case that one revitalization (i'll look up which soon) of a property belonging to a saudi prince here was canceled and a traditional architect was called in to make his project.

[Anonymous No.12883339]

*blocks your path*

[Anonymous No.12883342]

[Anonymous No.12883346]

[Anonymous No.12883365]

[Anonymous No.12883426]

Ugh, all those anons ejaculating over huge blocks of concrete, I want you to know you disgust me.
Sure, there are some nice examples of brutalist architecture or socialist modernism. But for the most part, this style of urbanisation wreaked havok on the cities and its citizens. Sure, it might look exotic, or monumental, but it completely disregards the people living there.

Some of you may see pic related as aesthetic. But if you ever grew up among this type of architecture it conjures nothing but images of extreme poverty, terrible living conditions and pathological families.

[Anonymous No.12883443]

>>12883426
It's not like the style of architecture is to blame for the state's inability to provide basic necessities for its citizens or the fact that housing was so scarce you frequently had to cram entire families (or even multiple families) into one or two rooms.

You can also appreciate Soviet military music or socialist realism without admiring the system that produced them.

[Anonymous No.12883447]

>>12883426

So fucking true

[Anonymous No.12883460]

>>12883443

I can see where you are coming from, but I have to disagree on the architecture part.
Soviet architecture wasn't just bad because state couldn't maintain it. Their very design was flawed. For example, all of the soviet flats were built in an extremely cheap way, with very small living spaces and very thin walls. Their segmented nature makes it very difficult to inspect their structural integrity and it is quite common these days to see blocks of flats literally coming apart at the seams.

[Anonymous No.12883469]

>>12883426
>I want you to know you disgust me

This is an imageboard so of course people will look at things more superficially. People here aren't architects so they just care about the aesthetics. Same way people might find a car cool looking that actually drives bad and has bad reliability.

[Anonymous No.12883481]

>>12883460
And it's not just the materials, the whole "style" originates from a premisse of deconstructing previous tradition and doing away with it.

It has dissonance between starting from blank and being actively opposed to tradition. The first one is a false premisse, as it starts taking all that is traditional and attempts to shit on it.

Another lie, to cry and try to convince us that their focus is on form follows function. Were that true, a box with a roof and doors and windows would always suffice, not a crazy unscrupulous shape which, to be honest, is just shitty ornamentation.

If you want humble or bragging you can find in traditional styles. If you wabt modernism you just have crumble

[Anonymous No.12883482]

>>12883460
I didn't grow up in a place like that, although I did study and work with quite a few people who got out of the Eastern Bloc before it fell. So I want to be clear that I'm not trying to defend the USSR or its system, at all. I can't stand it when I see people glamorizing what really was, from all their stories and everything I've read, an almost comically shitty place to live.

But in fairness, my understanding is that most of those places were thrown up very quickly and were quite explicitly *not* meant to be permanent dwellings, but as a temporary fix for the post-war housing shortage - more just places to people to live for a few years, to get them out of the even worse pre-war communal apartments that most of them were living in, while better apartments were being built. I'd guess they fulfilled their purpose about as well as could be expected during their intended service life. It is of course the fault of the state that the permanent apartments never materialized and they just kept fucking using the temporary ones decades after they were supposed to be vacated and (I assume) detonated.

[Anonymous No.12883489]

>>12883460

Not to mention, all of the developments were centrally planned. Soviet cities were designed to be utopian and modern. Huge blocks of flats flat surrounded by parks and highways. Doesn't sound bad as an idea. But parks in in Eastern Europe turn to mud, during autumn and winter and these days serve as nothing but parking lots. And those huge highways? They were built with public transport in mind and are not able to sustain the increase in car ownership. The huge distances between building made it very difficult to get anywhere on foot, even if the population density was relatively low.

My point is that soviet architecture and urban planning might seem utilitarian, but it's actually the exact opposite. They completely disregarded how people live and were so hell bent on creating an utopia that they didn't even consider how those cities might look within 10 years.

[Anonymous No.12883491]

[Anonymous No.12883499]

>>12882489
this comment made me wanna overdesign your Raw G-Star

[Anonymous No.12883536]

>>12883469
Disgust was a strong word. So I apologize for that. But I've been seeing a certain trend on the internet, where rich millennials from western countries fetishize soviet poverty. Then I go outside and I'm reminded it will be another 50 years before we can make our cities functional again.

>>12883481
Yes, you are very correct. Not to mention, soviets had a tendency to remove ornaments from historical buildings (or whatever remained of them after WW2), completely demolish huge swaths of the cities, or build modernist nightmares right next to historical architecture.

>>12883482
No offence taken at all and I definitely didn't take your comment as an attempt at glamorizing soviet states.

You are very correct in saying that a lot of the soviet housing was temporary. In fact, I would actually that what the soviets did in the late 40's and early 50's in my own country (Poland) was actually quite impressive. Before the war we had millions of people living in villages with no running water or electricity. The early soviet developments increased the living standards for the huge percentage of the population and their effort to rebuild some of the cities (like Warsaw) were incredible.
But what they have done architecturally in the 60's and 70's is truly a crime. That's where most of the cheap housing really comes from and that's where they would just plow through with developments disregarding any future concerns.

[Anonymous No.12883543]

>>12880978
most of those buildings are from 13-18th centuries you dense fuck, can you stop being a contrarian faggot and hating on anything that's "old" because its not trendy?

[Anonymous No.12883552]

>>12877077
t. American

Or one of those weirdos that actually thinks living around commie blocks/council flats on a day-to-day basis doesn't result in suicide.

[Anonymous No.12883602]

>>12882212
>>12882264
>>12882307

I went to Shirakawa-go. If being swarmed by Chinese tourists in a village you had to get to by bus is comfy then yes, yes it is.

[Anonymous No.12883623]

[Anonymous No.12883695]

>>12883426
This is how those buildings looks like in 2k17

[Anonymous No.12883696]

>>12883695
Still shit

[Anonymous No.12883995]

[Anonymous No.12884507]

>>12882009
>Italian rationalism

My negro

[Anonymous No.12884512]

[Anonymous No.12884515]

[Anonymous No.12884524]

[Anonymous No.12884535]

[Anonymous No.12884585]

>>12883443
>the state's inability
Hold up.

[Anonymous No.12884628]

>>12883602
every single place of even moderate interest is swarmed by chinese tourists these days

[Anonymous No.12884700]

>>12883443
Except you appreciate buildings not just for their asthetic qualities but also for their functional qualities.

[Anonymous No.12884774]

>>12884628
this, getting damn annoying

[Anonymous No.12885090]

>>12884628
>go to see Lion of Lucerne
>see more chinks and poos than Swiss

[Anonymous No.12885726]

[Anonymous No.12885742]

>>12885726
Again with the postcards

[Anonymous No.12885752]

Hala Olivia, Gdańsk, Poland

[Anonymous No.12885775]

Are ruins /fa?

[Anonymous No.12885785]

>>12885775
so shocking... so bizarre.. so awe-inspiring. this is true beauty!

[Anonymous No.12885887]

proposed entrance of london

[Anonymous No.12885894]

>>12885887
soane really overcooked it sometimes

[Anonymous No.12885898]

proposed amsterdam stock exchange

[Anonymous No.12885902]

old germany

western cities before ww1 are the height of city beauty

[Anonymous No.12885906]

[Anonymous No.12886406]

I fucking love modern architecture. Here the Netherlands we have shitty "historical" villages and towns out of medieval times. They are ugly they are not modern, no beautiful glass buildings, no IT jobs, only this boring small-town-life (everyone knows everyone, no diversity, etc.)

They should be destroyed imo, they actually cost us money. Especially throwing money and restaurations of castles and other boring buildings costs billions of euros. These building are not energy efficient and so they also contribute to climate change.

We should start by demolishing these old crappy buildings and invest in new infrastructure, climate neutral buildings and sustainable energy. This is the future and which will make more money instead of just "m-muh culture".

[Anonymous No.12886453]

>>12886406
some people actually think like this

[Anonymous No.12886469]

>>12877077
>>12878661
>>12877089
>>12883552
ya'll i live in east berlin

[Anonymous No.12886765]

>>12877300

I find those houses meh, but i don't know why the fuck everyone keeps posting disgusting soul less glass, steel and concrete commie blocks...

[Anonymous No.12886782]

>>12882489

This board is filled with retarded American teenagers isn't it?

I'm out. Come here once and a month and every time I leave I do so in the full knowledge that no one on this board has a fucking clue about life.

[Anonymous No.12888231]

>>12876996
>>12876998
>>12877001
>>12877002
>>12877006
>>12877008
>>12877014
>>12877018
>>12877089
>boring stock image postcards
>shitty HDR, over exposition, over saturation
>tourist-tier kitchy facebook mom aesthetics
Delete this thread.

[Anonymous No.12888449]

>>12882803
Are you fucking stupid? This is the definition of tasteless late 00's architecture.

[Anonymous No.12888450]

>>12883256
>aarhus
try again

[Anonymous No.12888592]

>>12883491
cool

[Anonymous No.12889290]

>>12888231
(You)

[Anonymous No.12889555]

>>12886406
Hang yourself if you unironically like modern architecture. I can't tell if you're trolling or not. That looks like a fucking bath tub.

[Anonymous No.12889561]

>>12878050
Looks like someone was given 24 hours to make a prison look slightly better.

Still garbage.

[Anonymous No.12889576]

>>12888449
The Clyfford Still museum is very highly regarded. It's more about texture and chiaroscuro. It is intended to compliment the art it houses. To just call an award winning building tasteless is ignorant of everything it is. It is, in fact, one of the most tasteFUL buildings I have ever visited.
I'm not a blind lover of all things modern, and certainly not all things contemporary, but (you)re wrong.

[Anonymous No.12889591]

>>12889561
get ignorant, stay ignorant

[Anonymous No.12889596]

[Anonymous No.12889631]

>>12882009
add a giant broken pediment at the top and you've just invented postmodernism 40 years early

[Anonymous No.12890490]

[Anonymous No.12890699]

>>12885902
Are u literally me? I'm glad i'am not the only one who feels this way.

[Anonymous No.12890703]

>>12890699

[Anonymous No.12890705]

>>12890703

[Anonymous No.12890707]

>>12890705

[Anonymous No.12890713]

>>12885775
Such a shame

[Anonymous No.12890798]

>>12879728
pebble dash is so nasty tho

[Anonymous No.12890892]

[Anonymous No.12891077]

>>12883325
Unfortunately, what "the public" thinks as cool is usually not very effay.

Just look at Russia and you'll see that people haven't learned anything in 70 years. Still same tasteless stucco classicism as before.

[Anonymous No.12891111]

>>12885902
Back then when cities were built for people, not for cars

[Anonymous No.12891307]

>>12881462
This, they want to disinherit us so they make us feel like nothing around us has any connection to us. It’s about alienation.

[Tripsk !!NfEoAU6E/r3 No.12891317]

>>12876996
>>12877008
>colmar
>>12890699
desu cobblestone is rough on shoes

[Anonymous No.12891351]

A little bit of USSR

[Anonymous No.12891367]

[Anonymous No.12891392]

>>12877077
>kEePiNg In MiNd DiSnEy WaS a NaZi

[Anonymous No.12891548]

>>12876996
>>12876998
>>12877001
>>12877002
>>12877006
>>12877008
>>12877014
>>12877018
>>12877023
>>12877028
>>12877089
>>12877268
>>12877274
>>12877298
>>12877320
>>12877321
>>12877325
>>12877328
>>12877329
>>12877333
>>12877336
>>12877339

[Anonymous No.12891612]

I think its time we build this.

[Anonymous No.12892052]

[Anonymous No.12892137]

>>12890713
>when you try to preserve German culture for a thousand years and end up destroying it in 5

[Anonymous No.12892140]

>>12890798
most houses from that era are in brick or painted solid colour or solid colour on pebbledash (or a mix of the two), raw pebbledash is pretty rare

[Anonymous No.12892156]

>>12892137
The Nazi's weren't trying to protect the Medieval architecture or German culture they wanted to replace all of that with shitty brutalist/fascist crap. Germany still has more Medieval architecture than anything you can find in Britain or France though the latter is second best, pic related is literally a time capsule

[Anonymous No.12892375]

>>12892156
>a town built for people not cars
my heart is leaping in joy

[Anonymous No.12892437]

>>12877190
jesus christ that's ugly