/fa/ - Fashion

File: 45 KB, 634x476, 2F7867F200000578-3364939-image-a-2_1450390985814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Jan 30 12:24:29 2017 No.12194708 [Reply] [Original]

Considering Travis Fimmel is around 510, how much would i need to weigh at 5'6 to achieve his physique??

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 13:37:56 2017 No.12194872 >>12194708 Need to weigh? Are you retarded?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 13:49:41 2017 No.12194896 >>12194708 >5'6

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 14:18:59 2017 No.12194962 File: 976 KB, 931x577, what you think you will look like vs what you really will look like.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] he have long clavicles and you don't an you probably also have wide hips, you will never look like him

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 14:55:07 2017 No.12195064 >>12194708 >5ft 11.75in (182 cm) http://www.celebheights.com/s/Travis-Fimmel-48169.html I'd guess he weighs ~170 lbs in your picture.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 15:01:59 2017 No.12195086 >>12194962 right looks better

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 15:12:31 2017 No.12195114 >>12194708 >5'6" Are you 12?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 15:16:06 2017 No.12195128 >>12195064 lol, much less than that he has very little muscle and low fat, he doesn't weigh much probably 160

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 15:17:15 2017 No.12195135 >>12195086 Stronger, but definiately not better

Anonymous Mon Jan 30 17:00:15 2017 No.12195502

>>12194962
i actually used to have a really similar body type before, but my bodies gone to shit since, just trying to eyeball what my goal weight should be
My hips might be a little wider though

>>12195064
celebrity heights is always wrong, pretty sure they have justin beieber at like 5'10 too

>>12194896
>>12195114
guys c'mon i'm trying!!

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 17:58:18 2017 No.12195728 bump

>>	Anonymous Mon Jan 30 18:03:09 2017 No.12195746 140-145 with sub 10?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 31 06:59:08 2017 No.12197212 >>12195746 >sub 10 lol no

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 31 07:55:11 2017 No.12197291 >>12194962 Is that David laid in the first pic ? I think he is juiced up ..Def not natty

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 31 08:22:05 2017 No.12197330 >>12197212 lower bf always looks better my man aim for 12 then

Anonymous Tue Jan 31 09:01:17 2017 No.12197374
File: 1.15 MB, 1208x666, 1485770839137.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>12197291
>Def not natty
ye he is fucking huge bro it is totally not all filters, lighting and angles

>>12195086
no you are wrong

>>12195502
no celebheights is the most accurate website

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 31 09:08:42 2017 No.12197387 Don't worry about getting big because he isn't big at all. The way he looks is not because of how much he weighs. He has good proportions and insertions. 100% genetics

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]