[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 57 KB, 736x906, 1444062349-13770d58d9e9cc057376ffb868fe364e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12017043 No.12017043 [Reply] [Original]

Where the fuck do I find these old type of jeans that girls are wearing ?

>> No.12017047

The thrif

>> No.12017062
File: 113 KB, 675x900, american-apparel-medium-wash-high-waist-jean-original-207116.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12017062

vintage stores, thrift, american apparel, etc

>> No.12017069

>>12017062
Where the fuck do you get jeans for men that go that high? Should I just get women's jeans?

>> No.12017089

>>12017069
that's definitely an option but you're better off buying jeans from brands that make them for men (ie wrangler, ll bean, certain models of levis).

>> No.12017123

>>12017089
There aren't any men's jeans that look like that, unless I'm just looking in the wrong places. It's less men's high-waist jeans, and more men's jeans that look like that picture.

>> No.12017456

It looks like they're wearing men's jeans that have been tailored to their waistline.
>>12017069
Buy oversized men's jeans (length wise) and get them tailored.

>> No.12017682
File: 578 KB, 1280x1275, 1465937421182.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12017682

>>12017123
tf are you talking about

>> No.12017739

>>12017682
w2c im so fucking tired of mid and low rise

>> No.12017746

>>12017739
american apparel

>> No.12017909

>>12017739
Same, but I've tried on high rise jeans and they really all dont fit me properly

>> No.12017988
File: 129 KB, 580x800, 1384419536581.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12017988

>> No.12018002

>>12017988
what shoes is that call girl wearing

>> No.12018006

>>12017739
see: >>12017909
high rise jeans are dope until you gain/lose 5 pounds or try to sit down.

mid rise is the best.

>> No.12018008
File: 14 KB, 236x339, ultralow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12018008

whats wrong wif ultra low???

>> No.12018009

>>12018006
screw off

>> No.12018027

>>12018006
Im underweight so that's not an issue
w2c ?

>> No.12018074

People that have started claiming they love high rise jeans are just contrarian fucktards trying to sound unique in a sea of low rise jeans.

High rise generally looks retarded as fuck outside of photoshoots on guys. Hell, it looks retarded even in photoshoots. It can look pretty sexy on some girls, but who gives a fuck about girls.

Mid rise is the best.

>> No.12018078

>>12018002
jack purcells

>> No.12018090

>>12018074
kindly show us an example of your precious mid rise jeans

guaranteed they're just glorified low rise

>> No.12018116
File: 266 KB, 900x1200, shia-labeouf-skinny-jeans-tucked-into-boots-1014-02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12018116

>>12018006
>>12018074
the high rise jeans are usually thrift shop finds, don't know of many new manufacures (could be wrong). Old school denim was 100% denim, not like nowdays where even men's jeans tend to have 1-3% spandex mixed in. Makes for much more comfortable longer lasting jeans. I wonder if the perception of high rise jeans would change if ppl could get their hands on ones with new-tech denim.

>> No.12018136

>>12018116
>spandex
>much more comfortable longer lasting jeans
you're joking right

>> No.12018383

wrangler

>> No.12018471
File: 2.57 MB, 2492x1872, 20161204_024418.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12018471

>>12018116
>spandex
>much more comfortable longer lasting jeans

Fucking righto
Had 'em for 4-5 months

>> No.12018484

>>12017739
wrangler

>> No.12019373

>>12017682
l know it's not the thread's purpose but god l hate these /fa/ babby fits

Simple shirt with tucked in 70's jeans and vans, who the fuck thinks this looks good or interesting or anything

>> No.12019391

>>12018006
mid rise i p cool, you can crush ball rise with it too

>> No.12019403

>>12018008

The 2000s have been over for six years.

>> No.12019420

>>12019373
fuck you

>> No.12019426

>>12017682
They just look 'off' to me. Maybe I'm just bad at telling what rise a pair of jeans are.

>> No.12019435
File: 1017 KB, 2738x2268, 1450038674111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12019435

Thrift
Wrangler Cowboy Cut
American Apparel 100

>> No.12019966

>>12017043
Rachel looks so fat

>> No.12019988

>>12018116
>spandex
>longer lasting
Ok

>> No.12019989

>>12018090
By that logic high rise are just over glorified low rise. You're a fucking mongoloid.

>> No.12019992

>>12019435
Jim Carrey looking good there

>> No.12019996

>>12019435
Is the thing in red a tranny? Look at that face.

>> No.12020000

>>12018116
Shia core is literally better than ninety-five percent of all the shit that gets posted on this board. Including your Marty McFly dad jeans.

>> No.12020015
File: 14 KB, 480x480, 10862474-8024417940299590.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12020015

>>12019989
the difference between low rise and mid rise is marginal. it's dumb millennial bullshit for people who read gq and don't have the confidence to fully dedicate themselves to a look.

look at this shit. how is this any better than low rise? it's practically the same.

>> No.12020031

>>12020015
This is what I meant with >>12017123 -- the difference in rises with men's jeans is so marginal.

>> No.12020043
File: 276 KB, 1512x1512, 1479960496437.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12020043

>>12020031
there are plenty of men's jeans that go up to the belly button, women's just look higher because on average they're slimmer than us

>> No.12020047

>>12017682
fuck this is a terrible fit
>the shitty rolls
>blue on blue
>casio watch(terrorwave with 60s greaser doesn't go well)
>the super low cuffs with vans

jesus l a d

>> No.12020052

>>12017746
>tfw live in ireland and the last american apparel shop in dublin is closing down (as well as the european website)
why even live

>> No.12020053

>>12020043
And they're ridiculously hard to find because nobody makes/buys them.

>> No.12020055

>>12020053
>(ie wrangler, ll bean, certain models of levis)

>> No.12020056

>>12020047
>"60s greaser"
>"blue on blue"
lmao kid

>> No.12020063

>>12020055
I cannot find anything from those brands that are what I'm looking for,
>unless I'm just looking in the wrong places.

>> No.12020068

>>12020063
>cowboy cut
>literally any ll bean denim
>501s, 505s, 550s, etc.

>> No.12020076

>>12019373
70s jeans? What are you, 12?

>> No.12020563

>>12020056
dude if this is your fit i'm really fuckin sorry

>> No.12020599

>>12018116
the boots look good but everything else is pure shit
if youre wearing boots like that you need to have more layers on top to make your upper body part look "bigger"
these boots will never work with a tshirt/tshirt+hoodie combo, unless the hoodie is really oversized AND fits you really well

>> No.12020922

>>12019403
my tongue that wants to be drawn along the top of that waistline doesnt give a shit

>> No.12020933

>>12020052
lmao they are all closing down mate. American apparel is done. might be around for another year or two

>> No.12020964

>>12020933
good fucking riddance. it's cheap shit that they sell at a huge markup under the guise of "m-made in america!!!" i tried on a $70 skirt and it was see-through. it felt like it came from aliexpress. fuck AA