/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.11809535]

"Tuck your shirt in and lift up your arms, if the shirt gets pulled out of your pants, your shirt is too small. If there's still alot of excess fabric in your pants, your shirt is too big"

Is this true for tshirts, casual and dress shirts?

[Anonymous No.11809607]

>>11809535
What the fuck
How would your shirt not get pulled out if you tuck it in properly

[Anonymous No.11809612]

>>11809607
your shirts are too small bro

[Anonymous No.11809629]

>>11809535
Do you want me to wear this?

[Anonymous No.11809698]

>>11809607
>>11809612
It's not that they're too small, it's that they're too short. Most dress shirts, at least what I assume they're referring to in that quote, have a pretty long hem/tail, allowing them to be tucked in effectively.

And no, it's not true for tees and casual shirts. They should be shorter than the average dress shirt for a better silhouette, unless you're going for full tricky ricky.

[Anonymous No.11809781]

>>11809698
For me, my casual shirts and tees appear to have the same length but it just feels more constricted with the shirt on with what I'm guessing is a smaller fit

[Anonymous No.11809792]

>>11809698
you got it

dress shirts have a long hem-line, to stay into your dress trousers when... lifting your arms. Casual shirts have a shorter hemline, sometimes as short as a t-shirt.

[Anonymous No.11810694]

>>11809612
???
If i have a shirt that goes to below my ass and i tuck it in my pants it will still get pulled up even if its too long

That doesnt make sense

[Anonymous No.11810709]

>what are shirt stays

Literally sub human tier

[Anonymous No.11810724]

Most of the time your shirt gets pulled out of your pants because the arm-holes are too low, not because it is too short.