[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 17 KB, 786x293, diffusion-of-innovation-chart1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11104984 No.11104984 [Reply] [Original]

where do you think you fall on the scale, /fa/?

where would you ideally be if you could?

what's stopping you?

>> No.11105453

Early adopter/early majority

too poor to become an innovator because I have to wait for sales

>> No.11105759

>>11105453
what's your aesthetic like

what do you think innovators are wearing currently

>> No.11105788

Early adopter. I wouldn't say I'm innovative but I experiment a bit.

>> No.11105813

All of /fa/ fits into the late majority group or the laggard group. This has always been true. This will always be true.

>> No.11105823

>>11104984
laggard

I'm just picking up roshes and janoskis now famabam. Might move on to stan smiths in the next year or so

>> No.11105832

Past laggards, I am the true hipster.

>> No.11105835
File: 2.23 MB, 320x384, 1457151958715.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11105835

>>11105823

>> No.11105836

>>11104984
This board likes to think it's 'innovative' or an 'early adopter' of trends, but it's been shit for the last 3 years. The idiots here just don't want to admit that the board hasn't been relevant and is dying.

I'd argue that MFA is ahead of this shitfest now.

>> No.11105858

>>11105813
p much this

/fa/'s usually late as fuck when it comes to already established trends, i guess it depends where you live though, living in the city gives you a greater chance at being an early adopter/early majority. critical mass is zara/h&m tier i assume like monochrome and """"minimalism"""" atm and there still hasn't been a strong backlash/rebound style on here

>> No.11105892

>>11105858
I think it has less to do with location and more to do with the average age of people on /fa/. Most of the people here are simply too young to be up on new trends.

>> No.11105919

>>11105836
/mfa/ is just fashion standard
not even innovative or early adopter

>> No.11105925
File: 1.99 MB, 1936x2592, 1458747036610.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11105925

>>11105892

>too young to be up on new trends

>> No.11105938

>>11105925

you look like a clown. this is awful even if it's a le ironic funnee joke fit haha get it, i look bad?

>> No.11105955

>>11105925
BOY IF YOU DON'T

>> No.11105956

>>11105938

>too new to even realize this was one of stances' fits from 2014

>> No.11105963

>>11105956

okay? it still looks bad, even if it's a joke. even if it's a repost. even if it's from 2008. on this forum we discuss and post clothing. clothing was posted, i discussed it.

it being from 2014 changes nothing.

>> No.11106053

>>11105759
>what's your aesthetic like
minimalistic i guess, i like to combine luxury pieces with casual clothing

honestly i probably fall into early majority but people cant dress for shit where i live so im considered a rare dresser

>> No.11106100

>>11106053
>i probably fall into early majority
Not even close.

>> No.11106214

>>11106100
ok

>> No.11106240

someone please post what innovators are wearing so I'm ahead of everyone

>> No.11106253

>>11106214
>>11106100

honestly its kinda hard to rate where everything is.

i would probably put vetements/gosha/ looking poor core as early majority

and minimalist clothing/extremely clean silhouettes safe color pallets as late majority.

it seems like color is coming back into style but I have no idea what the early adopters and innovators are wearing atm.

>> No.11106287

i am beyond time

>> No.11106476

>>11104984
>mfw being an *extreme* laggard, due to cyclic nature of fashion, makes you de facto innovator

>> No.11106717

I'm late/laggard, still in school and try to save money when I can. Sometimes I can score some really sweet deals, but I also dress like a normie so it isn't difficult

>> No.11106789

Where are you suppose to go if you want to know what would be considered "early adopters" fashion?

>> No.11106961

>>11106789
if you have to ask you don't deserve to know