[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 133 KB, 540x577, ed5b3e25-7bf7-4664-acb1-3e87686886ac-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076025 No.11076025 [Reply] [Original]

Whats /fa/'s opinion on this?

>> No.11076028

I kinda like my clothes that fit my body soooooo

>> No.11076032

>>11076025
Some clothes canbe tailored for both men and women but on a bigger scale it's ridiculous

>> No.11076036

it's zara, it won't catch on because people who buy zara know nothing about fashion.
but imo, androgyny can look really good if done right

>> No.11076038

>>11076025
>Zara

Who fucking cares.

>> No.11076057

http://www.zara.com/us/en/trf/ungendered-c816001.html

It's just basic tees and sweats rebranded as genderless to pander, seem hip with the times, and get some sweet sweet social media points.

>> No.11076075

gay

>> No.11076254

>>11076057
This.

It's pretty fucking dumb, just to pander to mentally unstable people.

>> No.11076306

>>11076025
Where I live, the clothes selection Zara has for men is faggy and tacky, so yeah, big news.

>> No.11076312

I bet the sizing is so fucked

>> No.11076349

I like women in women's clothing, not men's. No one wants shit like this apart from a few tumblerinas, evidenced by the majority of people who dress like their fucking gender. Even the feminists I know are comfortable with their feminity and don't wanna wear men's clothes. Because frankly, "gender less" always means baggy and manly

>> No.11076350

>>11076057
all with already masculine cuts. girls never had an issue with shopping in the mens section for stuff like that.

the jeans from that line only come in 3 sizes fucking MESS. from an advertising view it's genius, i'm just bitter so many people are falling for it and it's not me making $$$ from that idea

>> No.11076353

>>11076025
'unisex' has been around for ages, it's the exact opposite of new. They're just calling it 'genderless' to pander to tweenage SJWs

>> No.11076360

all of these look like mens clothes i don't understand how this is genderless just buy a sweatshirt from the mens section lmao

>> No.11076361

>>11076349
>i like
>no one wants
>everyone else must think like me
Fuck off kiddo

>> No.11076364

>>11076361
Survey the population and you'll find not everyone is a faggot lover like you

>> No.11076369

>>11076361
Look around you in the street, you shaft whiffer.

>> No.11076370

>>11076349
>>11076353
why do people here overrate tumblr so much, it's not even considered one of the main social network platforms. when put up against facebook, twitter, instagram, and snapchat (especially in regards to monetization, advertising, etc.) tumblr is beyond irrelevant.

last i checked a lot of the items from this line were sold out. "sjw tumblrs" wish they had that power (they never will btw)

>> No.11076374 [DELETED] 

>sizes: S, M and L

fatshaming REEEEEEEE

>> No.11076387

>>11076370
I'm seeing the third wave feminist ideology already taking roots in my country through women "web journalists" who are vulgarizing the nonsensical ideological bullshit and those ideas come above all from tumblr and twitter.

>> No.11076391

Men shopping in women's section and vice versa have rarely been an issue for people who actually enjoy fashion. They're just doing this to pander to the SJW crowd

>> No.11076403

>>11076387
Shut the fuck up you salty virgin no you don't

>> No.11076420

>>11076403
yes I do, fite me irl faggot

>> No.11076422

>>11076370
Whilst in fact not so much nowadays, it was a launching pad for many young radical feminists in recent years. I personally know of mutual friends who learned of sjwism on tumblr and perfectly fit the memes

>> No.11076436

>>11076025
Everything is soooooo basic in this line, why even bother? :/

>> No.11076438

I do not care much for Zara, but it's nice to see genderless fashion approaching.

Personally I think men's items are mostly uninspiring and leave little creativity, which limits expression (at least that's how I feel).
I personally wear female pieces too, but of course not everything looks nice on me, so it's a knife's edge of balance between tacky and cool. That being said, I personally have an issue with going outside wearing for example a skirt because of the social pressure and how (especially my guy friends at least) get insecure about the feminity associated with female pieces.

>> No.11076451

>>11076438
Men's fashion is more versatile, more useful and is more at the cutting edge. Stop being a special snowflake and leaving the Crossdressing in private

>> No.11076464

Makes me happy to see more big dogs approach genderless fashion but i dont think zara droping this boring line of clothing is going to have any impact at all

>> No.11076465

>>11076451
I don't see how it's more versatile in either texture, colors or cuts.

Men's wear have definitely been defined by practicality, which I enjoy -- but fashion isn't always about practicality.

>Cutting edge
What do you mean?

>> No.11076470

>>11076025
Zara was pretty gay from the get-go, no surprises here

>> No.11076472

>>11076464
Yeah me neither. Zara is not very good to begin with and this line doesn't seem to be much fun anyways. It seems mostly masculine and minimalistic, in a boring way.

>> No.11076476
File: 6 KB, 250x250, 1458012941409s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076476

>Zara

>> No.11076491

>>11076465
Hip hop culture and streewear are the new normal for men, and normal people now recognise nice fits. Mainstream female fashion is just dull fastfashion from Topman because they all insist on getting a new outfit each event. I'm not saying most women dress badly, but it is pretty dull

>> No.11076504

>>11076057
>http://www.zara.com/us/en/trf/ungendered-c816001.html
wtf haha, its literally nothing.

>> No.11076507

>>11076491
Yeah, I definitely agree with that. I'm not talking about wanting the male wardrobe to downgrade in quality, but rather expand in options. No piece of clothing is necessarily masculine or feminine, so you can play with ideas for "unconventional options" for men and make them look good.

Though I do not enjoy hypefashion and streetwear, I appreciate how broad and moving it is. It's great for fashion.

>> No.11076519

>>11076438
ahahahaha fucking faggot just kill yourself

>> No.11076525
File: 16 KB, 600x600, 1443461372036.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076525

>>11076254
>>11076353
>>11076387
>>11076391

le sjw cultural marxist cuck feminist XDDDD

>> No.11076528

>>11076519
I always wonder why people react in ways like this. What do you care? Seems like a destructive way of living

>> No.11076529

>>11076387
And celebrities.

>> No.11076578

>>11076528
I really don't care, if you want to be a little sissy and prance around in women's clothing be my guest buddy.

just kys first though

>> No.11076592

>>11076578
You clearly care

>> No.11076601

>>11076592
I just think it's fun to mock people like you.

You guys are so deluded lmao

>> No.11076610

>>11076601
To both statements: why?

>> No.11076625

>implying zara cares about gender bullshit
just easy money

>> No.11076626

>>11076025
So basically they just put some boy's hoodies in the girl's part of the boutique and try to get some hype for it.
At least selling women clothes to men would have been a bit more 'controversial'

>> No.11076655
File: 141 KB, 938x800, skirt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076655

>>11076610
First: you know that first feeling you get when you see someone so much weaker, someone so damaged? That's why.

Second: the fact that you think it's a balance act between 'tacky and cool' wearing pic related as a guy, and that your friends are just insecure about it. They aren't. They just don't want to be associated with mentally ill people.

It would be a lot more acceptable if you didn't pass it off as normal and just admit that you want to be a kinky transvestite.

>> No.11076665

>zara trying to look like they give a shit while systematically exploiting a shitload of people
>having underaged kids working 12 hour days
>and ripping off designs left and right

The funny thing is it'll work because liberals are fucking idiots and only care about the latest trend of popular shit to care about.

>> No.11076666

>>11076025
They're not really supporting gay rights are they ? This kind of thing is like the uber-SJW. Fucking pretentious mamacitas.

>> No.11076667
File: 13 KB, 397x400, 12767646_10153526914953022_875529145_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076667

>>11076655
>First: you know that first feeling you get when you see someone so much weaker, someone so damaged? That's why.

>> No.11076684

>>11076655
Not him, but you have to be really retarded or closed-minded to think it's either all manly man clothes or a fucking fetish microskirt, and that there is absolutely nothing in between.

>> No.11076698

>>11076655
I'd wear that desu. I dress pretty inoffensively outside but it makes me hard dressing like a sissy in private

>> No.11076702
File: 243 KB, 550x578, costanza.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076702

>>11076655
>this is what you consider "normal" female clothing

>> No.11076707

>>11076684
And you have to be retarded to think he doesn't just want to be a little girl because he has some serious issues. If he wants to be like >>11076698
and dress like a sissy faggot in the private of his own room, that's perfectly fine: trust me, I'm a fucking degenerate when it comes to sex as well. I just don't try to rub it in peoples faces and make it seem normal.

>> No.11076722
File: 328 KB, 1280x1272, tumblr_nxymk405kr1t7hir2o4_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076722

>>11076707
But that's not the intention at all.

You don't think a guy could wear this and look decent?

>> No.11076749

>>11076722
Make some changes and it might fit a japanese monk in a temple. Maybe.

Can a pasty, white faggot from /fa/ make it work? No.

>> No.11076792
File: 1.44 MB, 3612x2408, 1431724395403.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076792

>>11076491
>>11076507
I definitely agree with both of you, especially on the streetwear thing. I still don't like the current state of fashion for men, however.

Streetwear has definitely caused a lot more men to become aware of how fashionable they are and so more men are trying to look better, but men are still pretty limited on what they can wear. On the contrary, women have almost limitless options available to them From skirts and sundresses to streetwear as well. They can wear anything from what is only sociably acceptable for women to everything men already wear, which gives them a lot of versatility. It's just a shame that most women dress like this nowadays (although I guess you could say most men dress the same too, but at least they have more excuses).

>> No.11076809

>>11076792
I have never felt so sorry for The United states before.

>> No.11076820

>>11076749
What do you think men CAN wear and look good then?

>> No.11076822

>>11076025
We had this thread like a month ago and nobody cared. It was actually unanimous.

>> No.11076855

>>11076820
Not even the guy you're arguing with, but what a retarded question. Pants, shirts, sweaters etc. You know, things men have been wearing for a long time now?

>/fa/, where if you don't dress up like a woman you simply don't dress well

>> No.11076856

>>11076057
could be marketed as the women's basics line and no one would tell the difference

>> No.11076862

>>11076855
No, I was just curious what he'd consider good looking.

>> No.11076868

>>11076862
Full Rick.

>> No.11076896

>>11076025
>Zara
Meme but if genderless clothing catches on I'm abandoning society

>> No.11076904
File: 43 KB, 414x432, Low-sexual-dimorphism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076904

>>11076025
Fantastic.
Embracing androgyny is a major step towards realizing the Aryan ideal.

>> No.11076911

>>11076025
Didn't acne do this first? Zara can't do anything original

>> No.11076931
File: 433 KB, 2439x1600, 2011-12-15(55635)_Fu-Manchu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11076931

>>11076025
gender-less only works for women

unless you want to accentuate your man tits

>> No.11077018

>>11076904
>androgyny
>two men in picture

>> No.11077059

>>11076025
Guy did not get 2nd richest mofo fo nuffin ma boy. Dude knows what he be duin and need no validation from a polynesian salmon farmer forum, that is for sho.

>> No.11077631

>>11076525
JIDF gtfo

>> No.11077695

>>11076025
>MUH GENDER

Empty term being driven to oblivion

There's already a word for this, it's called UNISEX you illiterate pseudo-Marxist pigs

>> No.11077710

>>11076057
it's just unisex clothing? why are the plastering a marketing gimmick on unisex clothing?

>> No.11077739

>>11076025
wow androgyny is totally such a new thing in the fashion world