[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 214 KB, 1200x1600, 20160308131434.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11045951 No.11045951 [Reply] [Original]

last one at 300

we post and rate each others collections

>> No.11045963

>>11045951
>lack of color
>to much vans
6/10

>> No.11046466

bump

>> No.11046474

I have way too many fucking shoes.

>> No.11046485

>>11045951
3 vans
3 converse
3 chelsea boots

nice variety anon

>> No.11046490

>>11045951
I really like what you have anon, but you should probably have some dress shoes and practical boots

>> No.11046517
File: 2.47 MB, 4128x2322, 20160310_181833.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11046517

I'm the fag from the leggings thread

>> No.11046528

>>11046517
My collection sucks, halp

>> No.11046644

>>11046528
stop buying polo shoes

>> No.11046808
File: 1.64 MB, 3264x2448, 2016-03-09 19.58.12 HDR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11046808

Had to downsize to fit into a small closet. I need more effay shoes but I get most of mine from thrift shops.

>> No.11046896

>>11046644
I thrifted them, I know they suck

>> No.11046900

>>11046808
Ver good

>> No.11046923
File: 2.65 MB, 4320x2432, IMG_20160129_163032234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11046923

Want some chelseas and some more color. Recs anyone?

>> No.11046948
File: 545 KB, 2319x1657, File Mar 01, 22 11 00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11046948

Planning to add chealses and black cps

>> No.11046949
File: 14 KB, 569x231, shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11046949

can someone who owns VANS and ALLSTARS do me a solid?
can you tell me whats the size difference is, if there is any.
im looking to buy a pair of vans online and to avoid returns ill try to get the size right the first time based on my allstars size.

>> No.11046972

>>11046949
go a half or full size up from converse to vans; converse tends to fit big while vans fit true to size

vans tend to fit wider than chucks tho

>> No.11046978

>>11046808
>>11046900
l m a o

>> No.11047086
File: 482 KB, 1920x1440, 283f6652-a0a1-42f1-bd19-3f0690fbc18b..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11047086

got gats on the way
prolly need somrthing with color too

>> No.11047108
File: 49 KB, 618x403, ggggg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11047108

>> No.11047189

>>11045951
This is some basic bitch /fa/ wear.

>> No.11047191

>>11046949
As >>11046972 said, Vans are wider than chucks, but for Converse I go uk 8 and for Vans uk 8/us 9

>> No.11047194

>>11046923
how do you like the eytys?

>> No.11047268

>>11047194
I loved them when I first got them but I literally never wear them anymore. Was thinking of selling them.

>> No.11048090

>>11045951
what kinda chelseas are those?

>> No.11048108
File: 1.45 MB, 3264x2448, IMG_1453.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11048108

Swapped out black tech runners for B/W short tongue geos

>> No.11048223

>>11047086
id on bottom left plz?

>> No.11048393
File: 15 KB, 356x508, 431b979a-f815-4aea-a9d3-db486651aa9f..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11048393

>>11048223
our legacy from a couple of seasons back

>> No.11048538
File: 1.40 MB, 966x814, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11048538

>> No.11048553

>>11048108
very nice, and
>short tongue geos
hnnng please post pics

>> No.11048568
File: 1.05 MB, 2316x3087, File Mar 11, 10 40 24.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11048568

>>11046517
shit

>>11046808
horrible

>>11046923
meh

>>11047086
p good

>> No.11048616

>>11048568
are we giving a pass now to the original cdg white converse?

don't see much of a point at all in high tops aside from basketball sneakers.

>> No.11048630

>>11046923
w2c those nike gat-type trainers?

>> No.11048632

>>11046948
solid collection :)

>> No.11048639

>>11048616

i like to have a fair amount of high tops. i live in boston, so its often cold as fuck or snowing/raining, so i like the extra protection on the feet.

really bothers me when people where mid/high tops with shorts though (athletic setting obv is cool)

>> No.11048670

>>11048090
which ones? They are all from asos

>> No.11048694
File: 3.06 MB, 4128x2322, 20160311_183016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11048694

>> No.11048718

>>11048639
weather dependent and for athletic settings, obviously.

i have mixed feelings about cdg play generally—like a good deal of their runway and ready to wear stuff, but it's out of my price range (which isn't inconsiderable).

i try to stick to items that even make sense, historically, to have a logo on them: currently have a navy intarsia knit cardigan and 2x navy polos.

used to have the white chucks but looked odd w/ my overall aesthetic. replaced them with cp achilles white lows, which take a lot of shit on this board recently for being meme-core, but if you have seen a single catalog or lookbook this season, they're basically defining 75-90% of mens footwear for the season. they go with everything.

to circle back to cdg for a bit, if you're not filthy rich or willing to spend super big on designer off the rack, their fragrances (tho hit are miss) are at least wildly different from most other mall tier: 2, 2 man, wonderwood, etc.

>> No.11048723

>>11048718
and by "their runway and ready to wear" i mean the main comme des garcons line, not cdg play.

>> No.11048727

>>11048694
bleh barf—the red stripe on those gray vans slip-ons is disgusting.

>> No.11048729

>>11048108
v nice, v specific. would be interested in seeing fit pics to get a sense of your overall aesthetic's vibe.

>> No.11048761
File: 27 KB, 546x513, 1334920469783036.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11048761

>>11048727
its brown

>> No.11048770

>>11048761
bloody-stool brown, maybe.

either way totally fucking disgusting.

>> No.11048776

>>11046808
vans on the right are pretty fresh imo

>> No.11048780

>>11048538
mirin' those responses
my fuckin grails

>> No.11048782

>>11048538
id on the black derbies/wtc? hoping they are not 1461 dr martens mono . . .

>> No.11048783

>>11048780
they were mine too until i got them lol
the ozweego silhouette is much nicer these are way too boxy

>> No.11048787

>>11048782
they are... why are you hoping they arent

>> No.11048790
File: 1.79 MB, 3264x2448, kiks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11048790

deep depression bois
r8 it

>> No.11048796
File: 162 KB, 880x1130, common-projects-black-cadet-derby-in-black-product-0-401393646-normal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11048796

>>11048787
only for personal reasons—1461 mono dr martens is a perfectly safe choice; i just don't like the thickness or material on the soles and am looking for something w/ same utility but a little more unique?

i have the nappa black standard 1460s; cp cadet derbies.

don't like the grosgrain pull tabs at the back/not entirely sold on the crepe soles. comfy but not super durable and even harder to dress up.

>> No.11048798

>>11048783
yeah the ozweego silhouette is more wearable but i fucking love that colourway, as well as the bubbles on them

>> No.11048799

you guys have the shittiest taste in shoes i've ever seen *snaps fingers

>> No.11048800

>>11048796
if you have the money check out raf and dior derbies they have very similar silhouettes to docs

>> No.11048804

>>11048799
post yours, then. that's kind of how it works, man.

>> No.11048815

>>11048800
the raf ones are pretty cool but i prefer a true derby lace system over a blucher. some of their silhouettes are a little exaggerated on the toe box/in clown shoe territory, too.

the dior are dope but a bit dressier—and very close to the three-eye armani derbies i copped last month, maybe.

the search continues . . . maybe i'll just break and get the 1461s.

>> No.11048828

>>11048815
have you checked these out?

http://www.drmartens.com/us/p/16074600

maybe they'll do (or have done) a black colorway . . .

>> No.11049069
File: 1.99 MB, 1135x920, swag.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049069

R8

>> No.11049079
File: 176 KB, 409x407, 1402093930896.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049079

>>11048568
>owning ANY pair of jordans.

>> No.11049084

>>11049069
where did you cop arizona pumps

>> No.11049096

>>11049069
what do you wear with those ridiculous arizona iced tea lows

>> No.11049103

>>11049069
Why would we rate your shitty taste if you didnt?

>> No.11049105

>>11048616
>don't see much of a point at all in high tops aside from basketball sneakers.
Most retarded thing I heard today

>> No.11049157

>>11049079

i play basketball in them. also, im not autistic and can recognize that some are aesthetic ie black cement 3s and 4s, and space jams/concords. other than that, i would agree pretty much all jordans are vulgar in a non-athletic setting

>> No.11049206

>>11049105
defend your opinion, then, fucktard. otherwise you're just another kneejerk nahsayer limpdick.

>> No.11049210

women should leave this board

>> No.11049227

>>11049206
lol you fucking idiots

http://breakingmuscle.com/family-kids/high-tops-are-ruining-your-kids-feet-and-knees

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-top

even high top chucks are baseketball shoes.

>> No.11049229

>>11049206
don't see much of a point at all in denim aside from panning for gold

do you hear how retarded you sound writing off an entire type of a piece of clothing now?

>> No.11049235

>>11049229
i don't disagree, if you're talking standard indigo denim. it looks like shit and is severely overworn in contemporary society.

>> No.11049244

>>11048568
awful

>> No.11049253

>>11048630
nike killshots

>> No.11049270

>>11049244
post urs

>> No.11049318
File: 2.76 MB, 3840x2160, DSC_0004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049318

Rate please

>> No.11049360

>>11045951
>>11046808
>>11046923
>>11047086
HAVE YOU HEARD OF SHOE POLISH FUCK?!!!

>> No.11049375

>>11049360
show me your polished shoes and boots

>> No.11049381

>>11049360

all leather shoes aren't meant to be polished mr neckbeard

>> No.11049395

>>11049318
shoe trees in aldos LOLOLOLOL

>> No.11049421

>>11049375
I did, see >>11049318
>>11049381
Almost all of them should actually. Not polishing or treating means they'll deteriorate quickly.

>> No.11049431

>>11049395
Aldo shoe trees are cedarwood, sure I could pay 3x that for on-brand y ml trees but what's the point when it's just a shaped piece of wood?

>> No.11049432

>>11049421
>>11049421
>Not polishing or treating means they'll deteriorate quickly.
l m a o

>> No.11049435

>>11049079
>dude common projects and ultra boosts are epic

>> No.11049446

>>11049432
Show me any creditable source which advocates not polishing leather shoes. I'm actually curious where you formed this opinion?

>> No.11049451

>>11049446
Show me any creditable source which advocates always polishing every leather shoe. I'm actually curious where you formed this opinion?

>> No.11049476

>>11049451
You're on a fashion forum, are you seriously trying to argue against polishing leather shoes? Google ' should I polish my shoes' and read the volumes of responses with a resounding yes of course.

Why do you think you shouldn't Polish your shoes? Leather is a skin, you need to treat it in order to make it last. Incidentally it looks nicer.

>> No.11049477
File: 266 KB, 1300x867, CPOT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049477

Recent cop, thoughts?

>> No.11049478

>>11049476
polishing is not conditioning you fucking moron

>> No.11049490

>>11049478
again feel free to Google this question on whether or not to polish and whether it has a positive or negative impact on your leather shoes when applied correctly.

Please shoe me any semi authoritative source backing you up please.

>> No.11049497

>>11049490
feel free to take your polish and shove it up your ass lmao, learn how to read while you're at it

>> No.11049505

>>11049497
I take it the Google search didn't return results that conformed to your misinformed ideas. Good polish does treat your leather but if you want to ignore that and ruin your nice leather shoes then don't let me stop you.

>> No.11049515

>>11049505
is that why all your shoes look like shit? 'cause you're polishing so much? rofl

>> No.11049525

>>11049515
So have you got any information to justify your opinion? I really don't understand what you have against shoe polish, it's hyperbole that you should polish your shoes?...

>> No.11049536

>>11049525
have you got any shoes that don't look like garbage?

>> No.11049555

>>11049536
Have you thought of answering any questions without ad hominem?

Anyway it's clear you're just trying to troll without having anything meaningful to say, but at least you're keeping this thread alive.

>> No.11049559

>>11049555
so that's a no? i guess that's what happens you you polish your shoes into shit. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>> No.11049576

>>11049559
Show us your immaculately unpolished leather shoes then.

>> No.11049579
File: 1.67 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049579

Sold the Lunarforces, may cop Qasas.

I got white and blue velcros for a steal, how much should DS black be worth

Anything else I should flip or any other high top recommendations?

>> No.11049592

>>11049579
Extensive!

No non-sneakers though?

>> No.11049599

>>11048568
You basically called the people with the same kinds of shoes as you shit and still posted this

>> No.11049613

>>11049599

i was commenting on their colorways, not commenting on the brand or model

>> No.11049621

>>11049613
Good to know you don't care about quality but just comment on attributes apparent to toddlers.

>> No.11049633

>>11049621

who gives a fuck how good the quality of a shoe is if it looks like shit?

also, i was mainly talking about like vans/adidas other common shoes. we know the quality. but if u have some ugly as fuck teal vans or faded red ones with maroon laces, im gonna say your shoes are ugly because of the color. while all black vans or all white vans (inb4 dam daniel) are aesthetically much better looking and go way better with outfits.

fucking autist

>> No.11049654

>>11049633
I find it funny that your objection was due to colour and not the obvious fact of their tragically inferior quality. You were quite right to slag them off, unfortunately for the wrong reasons.

>> No.11049672

>>11049654
not everyone can afford $500 shoes man. (the right) $50 vans can look good with the right fit. if i'm rating, i'm gonna rate based on aesthetics, knowing not everyone can afford the highest quality shit.

nobody is posting pictures of vans for you to say the quality isnt as good as some rick owens shit or something

>> No.11049682

>>11049672
vans look like shit though lmao

>> No.11049692
File: 375 KB, 1500x1000, nike-stefan-janoski-cherry-blossom-0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049692

>>11049084
they were on the arizona website a while ago, don't sell them anymore
if you really want a pair then the nikesb janoski "cherry blossom" is extremely similar (pic related)

>> No.11049693

>>11045951
id on the converse bottom right

>> No.11049697

>>11049477
prob the best out of the bape x puma collab, next to the green camo disk blazes

>> No.11049708

>>11049672
Fair response. But if someone is proud of their low quality shoes is there any point in bleeting about the colour choice when they clearly have neither the taste nor the wherewithal to know otherwise?

>> No.11049713

>>11049692
thanks for the help man ill see if any come up on ebay in my size

>> No.11049722

>>11045951

Literally nu male

Nasty guy.

>> No.11049728

>>11049708
yes, cause all black/white vans are sooo much better than teal or faded red with maroon. people can learn fashion.

more importantly, i was only commenting cause people posted pictures wanting comments. which is the whole point of this thread.

>> No.11049746

>>11049722
u mad? :^)

>> No.11049756
File: 633 KB, 1175x2681, Photo (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049756

>>11048553
I'll take a pic when they arrive
>>11048729
I usually wear rick owens with one or two pieces from other designers I like, e.g. OG Helmut, OG Raf, Undercover, & Julius.

>> No.11049757

>>11049579
love it. cant decide between those tech runners or the black on whites

>> No.11049758

>>11049728
Depending on the colour and material of the clothes I can see any shoe colour contrasting matching or complimenting so without that context I don't understand commenting on shoes apart from their quality? undoubtedly a nicely matched or complimented pair of vans will complete an outfit better than a clashing pair of Edward Greens, but without the clothes context all you can comment on is colour.

>> No.11049766

>>11049758
*...all you can comment on is quality

Sorry, without this correction I contradict myself.

>> No.11049773

>>11049318
are the black ones for wearing with a kilt?

>> No.11049779

>>11049757
Get the B/W ones much more desirable.

>> No.11049795

>>11049773
Yes furthest black ones to the top right are Ghillie Brogues and are exclusively worn with black tie kilt attire. You should see how long the laces are, fucking foot after foot of cord!

Also this is why they are in such a sorry state, I've not had an excuse to tend to them since a wedding last summer.

>> No.11049820

>>11049579
>tech runners
>raf stans
>ozweegos
>response 1s
>response trails
>nike x acronym
>palace x adidas
bruv this is a seriously buff collection
this is what i'd buy if i was fucking rich
10/10 best collection in thread

>> No.11049826
File: 2.91 MB, 2533x1974, 20160311_151044-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049826

R8 pls

>> No.11049911

>>11049826
Shame you wasted all that pristine shelving on nigger-wear

>> No.11049923
File: 2.20 MB, 1920x1920, IMG_20160227_153733.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11049923

Jordan fag incoming

>> No.11049934

>>11049923
are you black

>> No.11049985

>>11049477
damn I might get those

>> No.11050071

>>11046517
What are the blue nikes top right ?

>> No.11050079

>>11047086
What are those black boots?

>> No.11050088

>>11049599
I was thinking the exact same thing.

>> No.11050113
File: 313 KB, 800x600, IMG_20160311_195237-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11050113

>> No.11050162

>>11050088
not boots bro
vans xtuff

>> No.11050209

>>11049579
Walking meme

>> No.11050224

>>11046808
you don't need 3 pairs of vans man

>> No.11050233

>>11049446
>>11049476
>>11049490
you made the claim
you provide the fucking source

>> No.11050239
File: 69 KB, 960x719, 12833298_174789156237088_2117311590_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11050239

hi greg - from the back, left to right.
aj4 wc 2016
black/milk geobaskets
rep turtle dove 350s
pirate black 350s (real tho)
raf velcro hi (selling tho)
bape x undftd x adidas superstar 1
ozweego kyogre
y3 qasa triple black
asics x bodega GLV get wet
Adidas NMD
Y3 Yohji Boost floral
zx flux x italia independent camo
flyknit lunar 2 multi
zx flux ballistic
triple black roshe (havent worn since i got qasa)
adidas pure boost
some New balance im not sure
stan smith black
zx flux green

>> No.11050256

>>11050209
Post your Pleb Nike shit collection

>> No.11050279
File: 186 KB, 779x779, ed6e075881.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11050279

>> No.11050295

Lol why are you guys leaving your shoes on top of your beds

>> No.11050313

>>11049431
I think his point was "why even bother with trees on such a cheap shoe".

ID on the black derby boots?

>> No.11050550
File: 476 KB, 1280x957, IMG_20160312_140632.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11050550

I'm new to this so feel free to rip me into pieces, although some constructive criticism would be nice.

>> No.11050556

>>11050550
inoffensive
nothing special but better than most of the trash in this thread

>> No.11050559

>>11050550
Why do you own 2 pairs of white runners? Why not replace one with something else?

>> No.11050561

>>11050559
I was thinking of ditching the stan smiths I definately prefer the c85s but not quite sure what i should cop next

>> No.11050795
File: 195 KB, 1080x1081, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11050795

r8

>> No.11050830

>>11050795
b8

>> No.11050838

>>11045951
2/10

>>11046517
5/10

>>11046808
3/10

>>11046923
7/10

>>11046948
6/10

>>11046949
0/10

>>11047086
1.5/10

>>11047108
7/10

>>11048108
8/10

>>11048393
4/10

>>11048538
3/10

>>11048568
1/10

>>11048694
1/10

>>11048790
2.25/10

>>11048796
5/10

>>11049069
4/10

>>11049318
3/10

>>11049579
9/10

>>11049826
6/10

>>11049923
5/10

>>11050113
7.75/10

>>11050239
4/10

>>11050279
8/10

>>11050550
0/10

>>11050795
2/10

>> No.11050844

>>11050239
>roches

>> No.11050881
File: 1.10 MB, 2448x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11050881

lol

>> No.11050888

>>11050881
lmao what the fuck are those timberland sneakers what are you doing with your life
>>11050795
sell me some drugs

>> No.11050913

>>11048108
im getting android vibes. i feel like i need to inform a bladerunner. everything is too clean.. too focused

>> No.11050918

>>11050838
>all this shit taste

>> No.11050923

>>11049069
NIce Arizona Tea shoes

>> No.11050939

>>11050550
i dont like the cw for the ultraboost. only one i really like tho is the wool grey

>> No.11051024

>>11050838
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZrHBMqj_9g

>> No.11051026

>>11050550
i'll rate this a 7/10
Needs to be a bit more diverse

>> No.11051027

>>11045951
How do you like the parchment 2s? I was considering getting conxcdg but those look pretty slick

>> No.11051028
File: 889 KB, 2304x1296, 20150823_093338.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11051028

1/2

>> No.11051031
File: 13 KB, 232x217, download (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11051031

>>11051024
Not him but I'll hit you with that swift
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yecFTeMVSlo

>> No.11051034
File: 924 KB, 2304x1296, 20150823_093357.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11051034

>>11051028
2/2

Central coast, CA, high desert fag

>> No.11051048

>>11051034
GOAT

>> No.11051059

>>11049477
pretty sweet

>> No.11051113

>>11049421
>Almost all of them should actually. Not polishing or treating means they'll deteriorate quickly.
>not polishing or treating

so first you say not polishing
and everyone calls you a retard because of it because you are wrong
then you try to salvage yourself by tacking on "no treating" too

no polish doesn't mean no treatment whatsoever you goalpost moving autist faggot

>> No.11051117

>>11046949
I wear a 10 in all vans and got a 9 in converse

>> No.11051118

>>11051028
>>11051034

wipe down your leather

>> No.11051120

>>11048108
any fits with the rick creepers? been interested in them for a while now but never seen any fits I liked

>> No.11051130

>>11046948
do you have wide feet?

>> No.11051223

>>11050313
And both of you miss the point that the just because the trees are aldo doesn't mean the shoe is the same brand. FYI none of them are aldo.

The Derby boots are Loake Rookes. Took about about a week to break them in then I shined them and they're now my favourite.

>> No.11051635

>>11051223
>Loake Rookes
they are still cheap/under $400-500.

>> No.11051669

>>11050838
>>>11048796
>5/10
5/10 for that particular shoe?

that's just one shoe of mine out of ... hmmm ... 16?

>> No.11051695

>>11051223
everyone misses the point: why would a person even go into an aldo in the first place.

>> No.11051704

>>11051027
I love em, I'm using the white laces to make em look like cdg converse.

>> No.11051718
File: 1.48 MB, 5312x1448, shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11051718

>> No.11051750

10/10 Best yet.

>> No.11051842

>>11049253
ah thanks!

>> No.11051871

>>11049923
Boy I'm about to flame yo ass. "Wannabe hype beast but the way my bank account is set up" looking ass. "Hey coach, put me in" looking ass. How's high school? You having fun? I bet your teachers really love seeing you for the fifth year in a row.

>> No.11052110
File: 2.92 MB, 291x300, 1429352781560.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11052110

>>11050838
>2.25/10

>> No.11052113

>>11049923
get rid of everything apart from the preme 5s and whatever those black and gold ones are (and maybe the flyknits) and start over

>> No.11052167

>>11049756
Horribel outfit

>> No.11052189
File: 2.12 MB, 3020x1836, 20160312_092241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11052189

Not shown are Doc Mono 1461s.

>> No.11052241

>>11052189
>the black ones
are those erik schedin?
how's the quality conpared to cp?

>> No.11052282

>>11052189
what are those white shoes?

>> No.11052290

>>11052189
ID the top rights please

I like your shoes they are nice

>> No.11052300

>>11052282
>>11052290
lurk more

>> No.11052315

>>11052282
>>11052290
MMM GATs
>>11052300
:^)

>> No.11052322

>>11052241
Yep. It's a bit wider than CPs but the quality is on par with them. I'm currently using these as beaters cause it's soo easy to clean.

>> No.11052442

>>11050239
>shoes on bed

fucking animal

>> No.11052500

>>11050550
id top right shoe

>> No.11052724

>>11052500
nike huarache
>>11052442
my shoes are actually clean

>> No.11052825
File: 256 KB, 1080x1583, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11052825

have a pair of guidi derbys coming in

The damir sopro boots dont even belong here, theyre beaters af

>> No.11052837

>>11052825
What do you do with the second shoe that isn't on your wall?

>> No.11052863
File: 169 KB, 734x998, 1453940074364.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11052863

>>11052837
LOL
that's a picture of shoos on the floor, just put sideways you goofus

>> No.11052887

>>11052863
i think he was joking anon

>> No.11052896

>>11050795
I honestly have a fetish for sleazy air max tunned

so yeah....

>> No.11053167

>>11052825
id on top left? those don't look like geos to me m8

>> No.11053290

>>11050550
Get some non-sneakers

>> No.11053573

>>11050550
ID on bottom right shoes?

>> No.11053576

>>11050795
E S H A Y S

>> No.11053595

>>11053573
Tubular viral

>> No.11053635

>>11053595
Thanks

>> No.11054321

>>11053167
crust geos

>> No.11054400

>>11046949
buy vans slips only if you wear loose, cropped pants. otherwise you'll look like a 13 year old scene girl. that being said comfiest shoe i own

>> No.11054401

>>11048790
depression is like the furthest thing from cool - dont even

>> No.11055524

>>11050239
How do the rep 350s compare to the real ones?

>> No.11055541

>>11050795
L A D S

>> No.11055571

>>11046949
Same size for me between Vans and Converse.

>> No.11055719

>>11050079
Vans HI8 Black. I have those, very nice shoes.

>> No.11055821
File: 2.02 MB, 3264x2448, IMG_1774.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11055821

>>11045951
My collection

>> No.11055826
File: 1.88 MB, 3264x2448, IMG_1777.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11055826

>>11055821
Just the GAT's

>> No.11055828

>>11055826

Wtf

>> No.11055831

>>11049360
no need to insult poles

>> No.11055844

>>11048796
solovair, bruv

>> No.11055856

>>11046948
what are the top right?

>> No.11055900

>>11055826
certainly wouldn't mind having all of those, but damn, talk about going full MMM
which are your favs?

>snakeskin reflective
>the ones looking like corroded bronze
hnnnghggg

>> No.11055908

>>11055900
The 3M pair is hands down the coolest, but the pink is so rare and perfect for summer that I love them too.

The black pair was a gift from my little brother and sister, so if I could only keep one it would have to be those.

>> No.11055926

>>11045951

>> No.11056047

>>11055821
>>11055826
GOAT

>> No.11056073

>>11056047
>GOAT
no, it's GAT

>> No.11056086

>>11052825
Jesus ed. Cop a fucking DSLR so you can take decent fit pics, you obviously have a pretty solid wardrobe.

>> No.11056099
File: 2.74 MB, 1418x1070, Screen Shot 2016-03-13 at 21.24.58.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11056099

how do you like my shoes lads

>> No.11056103

>>11056099

sick shoes famalam

>> No.11056107

>>11056099
L O N D O N
O
N
D
O
N

>> No.11056109
File: 176 KB, 1024x1365, 1fJTuaqg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11056109

am i still emo or

>> No.11056116
File: 2.59 MB, 3264x5502, Shoe Collection.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11056116

>>11045951
Rates please. Might replace the Ted Baker Blues with some Guidi Derby's or something...

>> No.11056167

>>11056107
U P N O R T H
P
N
O
R
T
H

>> No.11056207

>>11048790
shoes on bed/10

>> No.11057099
File: 1.00 MB, 2592x1456, IMG_20160313_234845848.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11057099

Am I a bad person for having this much Nike?

>> No.11057142
File: 2.90 MB, 3840x2160, DSC_1097.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11057142

Pls rate

>> No.11057287

>>11050881
i see a lot of people that have wear marks on their toe area on docs, what do you do to get those?

>> No.11057297

>>11057287
trip and eat shit a million times, i guess
that kind of wear doesn't seem natural, so maybe they just kicked and scraped it against the curb on purpose

that, or the leather is so shit that it starts degrading?

>> No.11057500

>>11057142
id on the slip ons

>> No.11057511

>>11049579
v nice collection

>> No.11057537
File: 61 KB, 640x693, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11057537

>>11049579
Those Ozweegos

>> No.11057551
File: 2.14 MB, 3893x2914, 20160313_160403~02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11057551

I'm a poorfag don't hate

Or do hate, I don't really care

>> No.11057563

>>11057551
>chromes
please tell me you ride

>> No.11057593

>>11057511
>>11057537
https://youtu.be/cRpdIrq7Rbo?t=147

>> No.11057602

>>11045951
wtc cream colored converse looking things?

sorry i just have no idea what they are...

>> No.11057649

>>11057500
y-3 qasa lows

>> No.11057861

>>11057602
chuck Taylor 2 parchment

>> No.11057968
File: 1.97 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11057968

+ black MM GAT

>> No.11057988
File: 58 KB, 960x719, 12659594_146199755762695_833782184_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11057988

pls

https://www.grailed.com/listings/413663-Raf-Simons-Velcro-Sneaker-High-Black

>> No.11059541

>>11050113
really dig the asics what model?

>> No.11059548

>>11051718
really dig the asics whats the model?

>> No.11059910

>>11049756
you got an ig? if so post

>> No.11059927

>>11048108
>>11049756
very ricky and nice outfit
>>11049579
very casual but nice
>>11049826
hooplife
>>11052825
nice as always ed
>>11055821
maison margiela (the tight way, the right way)

>> No.11059955

>>11056099
Those Dior's oh wow

>> No.11060010

>>11049069
I hope you emptied the can before you put your feet in there!! No one wants tea in their socks!

>> No.11060034

>>11050550
post some fit pics w the club C's??? Just ordered a pair and am p excited for them.

>> No.11060044

>>11057099
That's enough Nike to get 4 Chinese boys lunch!!!