[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 80 KB, 500x500, tumblr_njkwneagQ51r8jssbo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10589601 No.10589601 [Reply] [Original]

What are some of your absolute favorite Raf sneaker/shoe colorways?

>>Obviously the Pink SS and AW12's
>>Inb4 Velcro memes

>> No.10589913

>>10589601
>those two pairs of rickdidas tech runners

>> No.10589924

>>10589601

Why do all Raf shoes look like something a white trash mom would cop for her 4 year old at Payless?

>> No.10589937
File: 29 KB, 598x399, skechers meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10589937

>>10589924

>> No.10589947

>>10589937

You didn't answer my question, insecurebro.

>> No.10589953

>>10589601
Honest question - you can answer like a dickhead if you want but w/e

What is the appeal of Raf Simons? I rarely see decent fits with these shoes. You might walk down the street in some of these, and maybe 1 person out of the 100 you pass will recognise, and the other 99 will just think you bought your shoes from some cheap chinese boutique for $8.99.
They do get a lot of love in some circles though - can someone please explain this to me?

>> No.10589956

>>10589601
Probs the rising star 2's or some of the more colorful response trails (even though I have the white and black ones from ss15 myself)

>> No.10589958

>skechers

>> No.10589961

>>10589953

inb4 herd of aggressive buyer-remorsed sheep call you poor and defend their autism shoes like it actually matters

>> No.10589970
File: 19 KB, 600x400, mfa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10589970

>>10589924
>>10589947
>>10589953
>>10589958
>>10589961

>> No.10589981

Can anyone tell me what the leather is like on the rafdidas stan smith memes?

And do they fit tts?

>> No.10589986

>>10589970
>hurr durr these people don't think these clearly niche shoes are fashionable. They're just stinky redditors they don't belong on this super fashion site like me

>> No.10590066
File: 15 KB, 454x324, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590066

Just want thse tbqh

>> No.10590076

>>10590066
grails

still looking

>> No.10590079

Any rules on the Sky Blue Raf Stans, for example
>Dont wear them with x colored pants
>Be minimal whilst wearing them
And so on?

>> No.10590083

>>10589953
>dressing for other people

>> No.10590086
File: 981 KB, 2942x2105, 1441344364077.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590086

If only the top was more cream coloured

>> No.10590268
File: 153 KB, 960x1704, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590268

these

>> No.10590270

People who say these are like Sketchers haven't touched Rafs irl... Shit this board is bad

>> No.10590274

>>10590086
Love how these feel/look irl
The pink gel bits are super dependent on the lighting though, can look pretty transparent at times

>> No.10590278

>>10590079
>Don't wear them in shit fits
>never think of fashion as a set of rules again

>> No.10590328

>>10590066

2010: the pic

>>10589970
>>10589937

sup reddit!

>> No.10590343
File: 924 KB, 1080x1440, 1413515577035.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590343

These are p cool

>> No.10590346
File: 125 KB, 478x750, 1427043382617.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590346

>>10590343
These too. Raf should do more like these on the mainline.

>> No.10590491
File: 27 KB, 1200x675, raf-simons-holographic-sneaker-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590491

One day

>> No.10590800

how do raf high top velcros fit? i'm a 13, my feet measure around 12.7 exactly tho, could i get away with a size 12/45?

>> No.10590838

>>10590066
Never really got the appeal to these? They just kinda look like high top Supra's to me. Not hating them though

>> No.10590848

Soulless designer who no longer cares anymore and hasn't produced anything good for 10 years.

You buy current Raf because of the rappers and the memes.

>> No.10590858
File: 182 KB, 1080x720, Photo on 09-11-15 at 18.04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590858

>> No.10590898

>>10590848
You hate on the new Raf and sucks mad Rafchive dick because that's the circlejerk of the year.

>> No.10590961

>>10590848
>hasn't produced anything good for 10 years
see >any of his dior collections

>> No.10590974

>>10589937
raf is /r/streetwear the designer
/r/af simons

>> No.10590985

>>10590974
You sound like you've only ever seen his memes.

>> No.10591015

>>10590086

i don't normally fuck with faggot wear but i am feelin these

>> No.10591207

>>10590974
raf x adidas must be all you know

>> No.10591291
File: 50 KB, 960x546, mw928vk_nb_14_i.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10591291

>> No.10591480

>>10590086
the only decent ones imo

>> No.10591482

>>10591291
That some nxt lvl shit, son.

>> No.10591615
File: 610 KB, 1024x1024, KTSC1762.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10591615

The pair I recently bought.

>> No.10591635

>>10590346
w2c sweater?

>> No.10593290

>>10591615
U got ig? Lel

>> No.10593308

>>10590066
Are these the astronauts?

>> No.10593844

Question,
I can get these for €80,-

Do they make fakes of these?
I haven't seen any, and i'd be surprised if there were, but i just want to be sure,
since this deal almost seems too good to be true.

>> No.10593859
File: 117 KB, 1000x1000, 17-04-2014_adidasxrafsimons_risingstar2_white_red_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10593859

bumping with grails

>> No.10593860
File: 148 KB, 1000x1000, 19-01-2015_rafsimons_platformlace_redbluegreen1_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10593860

>>10593859

>> No.10593861
File: 41 KB, 743x495, aw-10-accessories-23.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10593861

>>10593860

>> No.10593863
File: 103 KB, 480x360, Adidas-X-Raf-Simons-shoes-Response-Trail-(Dark-Indigo)-010604.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10593863

>>10593844
forgot the pic

>> No.10593864
File: 127 KB, 1200x800, img_1937.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10593864

>>10593861

>> No.10593866
File: 23 KB, 800x702, S74619_RAF SIMONS STAN SMITH AGED_nqrp4n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10593866

>>10593864

>> No.10593868
File: 78 KB, 1000x1334, 11100819_5288763_1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10593868

>>10593866

>> No.10593869
File: 155 KB, 534x800, 1446696714914.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10593869

>>10593868

>> No.10594044
File: 58 KB, 1000x1334, 11117262_5329030_1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10594044

>>10593869

>> No.10594099

>>10593308
Vandals

>> No.10594105

>>10590898
post 1 good piece from new raf

>> No.10594240

>>10590848
Kanye, Travis Scott, Rihanna and Rocky have all worn pieces at least 10 years old, so i don't really get your point.

>> No.10594290

>>10594044
>>10593868
>>10593861
>>10593860

yikes...

>> No.10594294

>>10591635
walter van bierendonck

>> No.10594297

>>10593859
hands down most normie raf adidas lol
still nice tho kek

>> No.10595271
File: 57 KB, 500x646, na05nagEOT1tii8vso1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10595271

>> No.10595888

>>10589601
Is there two different versions of the white with green raf stan smith?

>> No.10595911
File: 364 KB, 1233x2311, IMG_20151025_191906.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10595911

>>10590268
I have the version of these in green and pink with the "stingray" pattern

>> No.10596485

>>10595911
sfu?

>> No.10596500

>>10590270
you act as if they're in any way better constructed

they're literally regular adidas quality sneakers, still made in china, still plastic, and morons will still pay $500 for these

>> No.10596628

>>10596485
Yeah first year comp sci. You?

>> No.10596636

>>10596628
4th year compsci =)

good luck with your classes and hope your midterms went well!

>> No.10596647

>>10596636
Nice!

Thanks man same to you. So far so good. Got the best mark in the class in Phil 100 (lel electives) and I've been wrecking Bulatov's assignments as well. Any recommendations for classes etc?

>> No.10596678

>>10596647
I didn't actually take any electives until my 3rd year. hated the idea of them so i just put them off lol.

if you can take a course with B. Chan, do it. he's arguably one of the best lecturers. super chill, really friendly. incredibly clear with the lecture material. another good one is A. Dixon.

if you're a theoretical kinda guy, i recommend L Hafer and B. Bart.

I strongly recommend taking MACM 101 and CMPT 225 with B. Bart. It will be hard, but worth it -- his brute force teaching style will make 3rd and 4th year courses MUCH easier especially if you take upper division classes with him.

Enroll in co-op.

Join a lab, get some research under your belt.

People say S. Pearce is a terrible lecturer, but if you actually ask him questions and go to his office hours you'd understand so much more. (That goes with all professors though.)

First year is the funnest year.
Second year everything is boring and slow.
Third year things are a little more interesting.
Fourth year? Holy fuck this shit is cool.

>> No.10596688

>>10593868
actually got the chance to handle this in a store today
was so nice

>> No.10596694
File: 252 KB, 2400x1800, bayb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10596694

My velcros were my grail, now that I have them I'd love another pair but in the hightop model in either white, black or holo

would love some archive sweaters too

>> No.10596895

>>10596678
Thanks for the comprehensive reply man I've screenshotted it and will be referencing back as I go.

When you say "join a lab" that sounds like something I really want to do but have no ice what it refers to. Is there a directory of 'labs' I can work for? Is it something like research under a prof?

>> No.10596904

>>10589924
He's right
>>10589937
>>10589970
Don't try to avoid the truth please

>> No.10596913
File: 44 KB, 599x655, CAfEtUbUQAAq7eS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10596913

>>10590328
>>10590974
>>10596904

>> No.10597243

https://www.grailed.com/listings/193494-adidas-x-raf-simons-raf-simons-adidas-rising-star2

>> No.10597598
File: 1.37 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10597598

>>10597243

I was gonna get those (not in that baby boy size) but I got these instead
Everyone told me to cop the rising stars instead heh

>> No.10597713
File: 16 KB, 50x105, mgf4574567777.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10597713

>>10590343
duderino is pulling that off so well.

>> No.10597723

>>10595911
I like what I'm seeing

>> No.10597810

>>10589981
I think they fit a little bit bigger like .5

The leather was buttery and felt nice to touch but not as great as CPs. I've never worn/touched regular stan smiths so I can't really compare them