[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 80 KB, 1000x1000, 140679_side_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10521762 No.10521762 [Reply] [Original]

are these still cool

>> No.10521764

Yep

>> No.10521765

n o

>> No.10521771

>>10521762
paint your converse

>> No.10521772

Good beaters

>> No.10521799

i have the lows for beaters

>> No.10522180
File: 87 KB, 1000x667, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10522180

the newer 70s ones are better

>> No.10522205

>>10522180

this

>> No.10522256

>>10521764
>>10521765
classic /fa/

>> No.10522262

>still cool
they were never cool fam

>> No.10522797

i saw someone wearing these in auschwitz two days ago, no joke.
So no. they're not cool anymore

>> No.10522841

>>10522262

This tbh

>> No.10522881
File: 628 KB, 1711x961, cdg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10522881

been wearing mine as beaters for like 2 years, theyre dirty as fuck. ive only seen 2 other people with them and they were both the lows.

heres what they look like after there was a flash flood and i had to walk through dirty water.

>> No.10522961
File: 67 KB, 640x640, 12080642_1653336304878149_1634553436_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10522961

>>10522881
nice.
mine are pretty beat to shit as well.
i wear them to muddy music festivals in the summer

>> No.10523000

>>10522881
I wore my black ones for about 5 months as my daily beaters and they look worse than yours lmao

>> No.10523590

>>10522180

These look too loud. Like the old ones better.

>> No.10523600

>>10522961
what jeans are those?

>> No.10523613
File: 67 KB, 673x446, pKPuhGH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10523613

>>10522881
>>10522961

Bad pic but mine at their dirtiest. Fucked them up wandering around Bonnaroo on acid

>> No.10523624

>>10523613
hey do you have a tumblr or something where i can look at all your fits?

>> No.10523633

if you're still in middle school then yeah

>> No.10523641

>>10523624

My instagram is @vanitybro

>> No.10523717
File: 331 KB, 900x600, CDG x Converse Low.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10523717

out of all of the low ones, which ones should I cop?

http://www.selfridges.com/GB/en/cat/mens/shoes/trainers/lace-up-trainers/comme-des-garcons/

>> No.10523730

>>10523641
Dude your fits are dope...

>> No.10523746

>>10523717
the black ones with the small logo
the other black one has that white contrast stitching wich I hate

>> No.10523866

>>10523600
american apparel stone wash

>> No.10523868 [DELETED] 

>>10523641
followed!

>> No.10523896

>>10521764
>>10521765
effay in a nutshell

>> No.10523943

I have a pair of black ones in used condition in UK8/US 8.5

They don't fit me because I am size 9.5 US. I wore them nevertheless, but they were too tight...

Anyone looking for some on the cheap?

>> No.10523964

>>10521762

they never were

high school tumblr emo shoes

expensive converse with a heart on the side


aesthetically decent but there are plenty of other options

>> No.10524006

>>10522797
Remember kids: if it's Auschwitz its OUT-witz

>> No.10524265

>>10523943
Yeah I would Def cop those off you anon how do we procede?

>> No.10524605

>>10524265
I post pics later

>> No.10524746

Gonna cop these - what's the sizing? i'm a perfect 10.5 US in vans but I've heard the sizing is weird on these

>> No.10524791

>>10523641
you are to good for /fa/

>> No.10524890

>>10523730

Thanks man

>>10524791

Says more about /fa/ then it does me tbh

>> No.10525216

>>10523964
can you list some other options?
i've been looking at shoes like pottery but would like other shoes to consider.

>> No.10525577

>>10521762
yeah

>> No.10525699

>>10523866

how do you like them?

>> No.10525705

>>10524890

really liking those fits, you don't let the meme clothes wear you like a lot of users on here do

>> No.10525740
File: 61 KB, 261x212, 1445283749407.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10525740

They were never good. They're as embarassing as coach or mk purses.

>> No.10525922
File: 756 KB, 2083x1998, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10525922

Just got mine

>> No.10526044

>>10524746
Im a 9.5 in vans, with a tiny bit of toeroom. I went with a 9 and they fit really well with a bit of toeroom, so if I was you I'd get a 10

>> No.10526150
File: 55 KB, 1366x768, decker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10526150

Holy fuck you guys are all so retarded. You get your cocks so hard about a pair of converse with a 1/2 inch heart drawn on them that looks like some shit a 7th grader would doodle on his shoes because he is so "creative".

/fa/ has confirmed shit taste between this shit and rick/raf/dumb ass ninja shit.

techwear 4 lyfe fags

>> No.10526235

>>10525922
Those look gr8.

>> No.10526296

>>10526235
might throw cream laces on them to match

>> No.10526450

>>10526296
Let them get naturally discolored

Part of my laces are red from when I spilled soup on them

>> No.10526839

>>10525922
dope asf

>> No.10527122

w2c the small heart white tops in the uk? google is being shit

>> No.10527590

>>10527122
somebody in this thread already posted a link to selfridges.

>> No.10528396

>>10526150
It was never about the heart. /fa/ jumped on them because the shoe design removes many of the detracting elements from usual converse (e.g. contrast stitching, the racing stripe).

At the time, /fa/ hated things like this (e.g. would black out the stitching on sk8-his, etc.). I think it's true to some degree nowadays, though I don't see it as much anymore.

>> No.10528400

>>10521771
this

>> No.10529023

>>10527122
none of which are the high tops with a small logo u mong

>> No.10529116
File: 33 KB, 450x361, 27183584-closeup-portrait-upset-sad-depressed-worried-young-adult-man-student-son-father-worker-isolated-whit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10529116

tfw no size 13's :(

>> No.10529150

>>10529116
Converse really start to look too long and disproportionate at that size, so don't sweat it.

>> No.10529169

>>10529150
any shoes you know that look good on size 13?

>> No.10529191

>>10528396
this exactly, the cdg play heart is just a bonus imo. its probably the only piece of branding i like tbh

>> No.10530404

>>10525699
they're alright wish the inseam was longer though

>> No.10530526
File: 229 KB, 1024x1306, 177314686.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10530526

>>10529116
im a size 12 - 13 and i got the size 11s and it took like 2 days to adjust but they fit now $$$$$$$$$

>> No.10530601

>>10523613
AYYYY KIRKLAND TRAIL SOCKS WEARIN ASS NIGGA LMAO

For real though, those socks are comfy as fuck

>> No.10530604

>>10529169
new balance

>> No.10531307

>>10530601

Ayy Kirkland socks fam

>> No.10531444

>>10530601
>>10531307

kirkland socks GOAT

>> No.10531468

>>10528396
I don't really buy this explanation. Those "detracting elements" are less garish than a red cartoon heart. It's just successful branding.

>> No.10531887

>>10524605
Patiently waiting for the cop

>> No.10531934
File: 369 KB, 718x538, cRa6ZDg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10531934

>>10531468

What >>10528396 described is my thoughts exactly.

For example the new ones have contrast stitching and big Converse logo on top of the already huge half of the heart.

I prefer the old ones, despite the fact that All Star '70 is a nicer silhouette compared to regular.

>> No.10532318

>>10525922
they'll age beautifully. don't mow your lawn in them like that fucking autist that keeps posting his converse that are just dark green on the bottom and look like shit but embrace the dirt. laces will turn cream in no time

>> No.10533867

bump

>> No.10533961

>>10531934
>For example the new ones have contrast stitching and big Converse logo
Wait, really? That's complete garbage. I always had thought the old design was purposefully trying to pare down superfluous details, and let the heart be the single (yet somehow still minimal) design element beyond the shoe's silhouette and its blocks of color.

Kind of defeats the purpose to put the branding and details back in. I don't know why they would do this.

>>10531468
In a way, the heart design is far more minimalist than all those superfluous details. The heart features simple, almost abstracted shapes, and is filled with solid color. Compare this to all the shit in the Converse logo (or even the racing stripe, contrast stitching).

>> No.10534162

>>10521762
wtc creame?