[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 195 KB, 960x640, 1442223188326.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425395 No.10425395 [Reply] [Original]

New TECHWEAR thread, old one reached image limit.

>outdoors/hiking-core welcome edition

>> No.10425401
File: 54 KB, 900x675, 900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425401

>>10425395

>> No.10425404
File: 489 KB, 1120x450, 2015-08-26-03-08-2845061268.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425404

>>10425401

>> No.10425405
File: 89 KB, 1280x828, 11270679_1420511111606012_4502740200627924453_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425405

>>10425404

>> No.10425407
File: 86 KB, 916x1024, 1442930447-pyjj7xf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425407

>>10425405

>> No.10425411
File: 228 KB, 491x627, 1396412498629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425411

>>10425407

>> No.10425414
File: 141 KB, 500x750, 1396427372059.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425414

>>10425411

>> No.10425416
File: 587 KB, 900x1350, 1409287661007.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425416

>>10425414

>> No.10425421
File: 187 KB, 1280x853, 1409287729069.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425421

>>10425416

>> No.10425428
File: 264 KB, 848x1024, 1410270844291.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425428

>>10425421
End of dump for now

>> No.10425458

>>10425416
This is nice, something new.

Anyone have any experience with Guerrilla Group stuff?

>> No.10425473

I bought adidas tubulars because I thought I would look techwear. I was wrong. what shoes to cop?

>> No.10425475

>>10425473
tubulars look like 12 year old kid's shoes
sorry you learned the hard way

what color and you want low or high tops?

>> No.10425481

>>10425475
black + low preferably. open to anything

>> No.10425483

>>10425481
by nike frees

but know that 5.0 has the most cushion and 3.0 has the least. flyknit is optional.

>> No.10425485

>>10425481

just a few easy to find sneakers under $200 off the top of my head


nike flyknit free run
puma trinomic/discs
reebok insta fury
some nike huarache colorways
all black asics gel lites

>> No.10425489
File: 1.04 MB, 1518x2272, 1442224517099.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425489

Can i get an exact id on this bag?

Thanks

>> No.10425491

>>10425489
nice meme

>> No.10425492
File: 143 KB, 747x1121, 1442223284269.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425492

>>10425473
check out nike sb janoski air max in black, most comfortable shoes ever

pic unrelated to nike sb

>> No.10425494

>>10425473

yohji qasa highs in black

>> No.10425495
File: 39 KB, 565x372, 1394633631086.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425495

>>10425481

>> No.10425496
File: 86 KB, 800x600, 17-07-14-uitgelicht.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425496

>>10425481
.

>> No.10425497

>>10425495
goat

>> No.10425503

>>10425496
had them w/ the white sole before I bought the tubulars lmoa. might look into the nike acgs. thanks friends!

>> No.10425504

I bought Outlier Slim Dungarees in 32 which is my normal jean size and they're far too small.

Do they have clothes sized down? The waist is tight and they're light tights on my legs.

>> No.10425510
File: 75 KB, 720x720, 1442260493159.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425510

>>10425495
>>10425496
what are these

>> No.10425511

>>10425504
>he fell for the outlier meme

but seriously, they are true to size, not vanity sized. so if you are 32 in levis or whatever, you true waist is probably 34 or 35

>> No.10425513

>>10425496
not these. terrible

>> No.10425517

>>10425511
Well here's to waiting another two months for them to come back in stock

Are there any other trousers out there which offer water resistance in a casual style?

>> No.10425521
File: 847 KB, 570x900, 1442225355064.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425521

>> No.10425522

>>10425521
>cold enough for gloves
>wears roshes
why

>> No.10425523

is it possible to techwear with bright colours? oranges/reds/yellow shells are really nice

>> No.10425525

>>10425522
repost from a thread i saved abit ago

>> No.10425526

>>10425523
yes but probably will look more like a hiking outfit than that urban ninja aesthetic

>> No.10425538
File: 165 KB, 649x480, gyakusou-fw2011-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425538

>>10425523
gyakusou

>> No.10425543

Anyone know what the Arc'teryx military discount is? I've been waiting for so long to find out I'm wondering if it's just worth buying the civvie versions instead.

>> No.10425550
File: 60 KB, 630x304, gyakusou_6319_original_2218.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425550

I wonder what the new gyak season will be like. AW12 was the goat

>> No.10425556
File: 185 KB, 1500x1000, i6fwkjjlfwycl486zf5p.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425556

>>10425550
almost everything from ss'14 went to my local outlet. it was really bad. ugly, flimsy and overpriced even at 75% off

this looks kind of cool

>> No.10425564
File: 989 KB, 749x885, GYAKUSOU.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425564

>>10425556
I copped these from ss15 this year. they're nice but not as nice as 11-13

>> No.10425578

>>10425405
are these like $600 and sold out 5 years ago?
if not w2c

>> No.10426138

Does anyone have that picture of the person going from black to white near his legs with with leggings and white shoes.

How does one pull that off? Can you only do it iwth black/white?

>> No.10426296
File: 291 KB, 690x460, merrell_korea.jpg-original.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10426296

>>10425489
Guy pictured here, i don't know where i found/bought this bag, and there is unfortunately no tag in it. I think you should just look for late 90s and early 00s hiking backpacks.

>>10425578
They are from and wander. I don't know if they still make this exact model though.


>>10425523
Yes. There's a strong /out/ vibe associated with it.

>> No.10426367
File: 1.36 MB, 3972x1933, 14356947873423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10426367

Still working on what I'd want my ideal mini wardrobe to be.

At the moment I have one merino shirt that I basically wear all the time. It's amazing but I need more colours.

>> No.10426528
File: 117 KB, 481x640, tumblr_nv92xejWHI1tk8glao1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10426528

where can i cop a decent shoulderbag without obnoxious branding to add into my tech fits in an olive drab colour?

Ideally would have a stabiliser strap to look extra tech

id love an acr bag but i cant justify spending that amount of money on a messenger bag

pic semi related

>> No.10426537

>>10426296

Who dat grill?
Need an outdoor qt rn to go explore innawoods and stuff tbh

>> No.10426589

>>10426367
What kind of faggot socks are those, jeez at least get pure black.

>> No.10426619

>>10426589
I like Fair Isle patterns

>> No.10426794
File: 14 KB, 284x177, qt_asian_out_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10426794

>>10426537
>you'll never have a qt gf to go /out/ with

>> No.10426797
File: 1.50 MB, 1024x640, qt_asian_out_large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10426797

>>10426794
Pic for ants, sorry

>> No.10427104

>>10426797
sometimes i like the hiking aspect of techwear more because at least the average person can actually use it. same with activewear, people can use it for jogging or training. the acronym/veilance aesthetic is kind of over kill for the average person unless you are into urban parkor

>> No.10427180

>>10425492
Do not do this, this is a troll. Please do not be trolled.

Janoski's are worse than Tubulars in MiddleSchool-tier list

>> No.10427189

>>10427180
agreed

>> No.10427410

>>10425489
>>10426296
what were those pants, are they the kith ones?

>> No.10427868
File: 37 KB, 736x470, niket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10427868

my dick

>> No.10427903

>>10427868
really well made and comfy too. decent water resistance which i didnt expect from them as well. also surprisingly light. nike really got it right with this shoe

>> No.10427912

>>10425510
there nike pants but they are no longer on sale

>> No.10427932
File: 131 KB, 1090x1500, ISAORA_2429_TaperedUtilityPant2.0_DarkGrey_659f0981-7fa8-4778-be93-89358392917e[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10427932

Does anyone have experience with Isaora (specifically sizing)? Looking to get some of their pants since they're on sale.

>> No.10427935

>>10425510
Nike trainerendor and adidas zx flux.

>> No.10428105

>>10425414
Good but Roshes.....

>> No.10428131
File: 22 KB, 530x480, RH-08190-1-pdp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10428131

>>10425492
Are these redwings close enough to the look and aesthetic of the boots in that pic?

>> No.10428142

Can't believe I missed this
Sold out already
Porter x Stone Island
For the /tech/ moonwalkers

>> No.10428144
File: 23 KB, 400x417, 560572961300004700ea771b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10428144

>>10428142

>> No.10428153

>>10428144
looks alright. handled a new porter backpack in navy, but at $550 i didnt feel the quality was any way worth the price
im assuming that went for even more

>> No.10428168
File: 93 KB, 800x600, serveimage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10428168

Anyone know any good brands/pieces for coastal/saltwater environments? I know techwear is supposed to handle whatever weather that comes your way, but what is good for being in and around the sea? I know that Patagonia has a few things, but a lot of the outdoor brands I come across are more about snow or hiking, etc. What kinds of fabrics should I be looking for?

>> No.10428172

>>10428153
Nah it was about 550 also

>> No.10428179

>>10426528
milsurp + DIY

>> No.10428180

>>10428168
I'm thinking canvas, dude
Since that's what sails are made of

>> No.10428204

>>10428168
CP Company Sportswear started as a sailing/maritime product line. I've got some stuff from them and it's a bit more marine focused.

>> No.10428251

I don't have a single pair of joggers, my entire lower body wardrobe is slim fit jeans/trousers/chinos, what shoes (like the ones mentioned in the thread already) would you guys recommend in this case? Or are joggers necessary for these kinds of shoes

>> No.10428265

>>10428251
sneakerboots can look pretty good with black chinos or jeans
i dont like the trainers/running shoe look with jeans though. i'd get some black joggers if you want to wear trainers with pants imo

>> No.10428407

>>10425523
they would need to be at least saturated tbh

>> No.10428414

what are the go-to brands for pants and shorts?

>> No.10428618

>>10428414
what kind and what price range?
isaora has some pretty decently priced shorts (for techwear)

>> No.10428627
File: 138 KB, 700x700, 1393069804199.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10428627

>>10428618
I know that I shouldn't ask for much with my shit budget but ~50USD a piece is my max
>isaora
Will check out, thanks

>> No.10428641

Can anyone recommend a tech softshell for under $200? Preferably with minimalist styling, and in black or grey.

>> No.10428656

>>10428627
Kmart has black nylon shorts, black leggings (can layer these two), and black basketball shorts in poly. Nice for disposable black shit you can train in and not care if you wreck it.

>> No.10428826
File: 100 KB, 400x600, acr1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10428826

>>10428131
The boots in that pic look to be Visvim, so... yeah, in the same way that a Porsche Cayman is close enough to a 911.

>> No.10429180

>>10427104
>veilance
>parkour

>> No.10429230

>>10429180
back to reddit

>> No.10429236

>>10425458
GG pants are so sexy

>> No.10429576

>>10425496
wtf lol these are fucking dope

>> No.10429613

>>10429576
no they sucks

>> No.10429688

>>10427868

So, are the new trainerendors from nike SB the same technically as old acg ones?

>> No.10429739

>>10429688
The NEW ones are. The only difference now is the logo on the tounge. The old SB trainerendors were shit and had attached sock tounges

>> No.10429771

>>10429739

Ehh, that logo is ugly af. Why can't they bring old acg trainerendors? Anyway thanks for info, I might cop them. Will they work as urban winter sneakers? I mean some snow and a lot of melting diarrhea on streets.

>> No.10429794

>>10429771
yeah, mine still look decent after last winter. The suede materiel on the upper is pretty durable and thick and the sole is good for walking but you might need to clean them ever week or so if your walking through shit snow. also the toe box creases pretty heavily but I think they look good beaten up

>> No.10430046

>>10426367
bag?

>> No.10430051

>>10426797
>Tfw Yoona will never be your gf

>> No.10430110

>>10430046
Goruck GR1

>> No.10430244
File: 694 KB, 1512x750, boblbee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430244

>> No.10430260

>>10430244

does that thing double as a snow shovel or what

>> No.10430275

>>10430260
its hardshell certified back protector, the negative space is so you can attach a cargo net or other bags, photo gear, whatever

>> No.10430292
File: 91 KB, 1024x831, 1436341217451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430292

>>10425395
pic related is techwear at its finest

>> No.10430312
File: 6 KB, 206x211, 1329464177619.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430312

>want to techwear thread
>get geologistcore instead

>> No.10430314

>>10428627
do not get a us army desert night jacket. It is more of a over coat and they do not have pockets.

>> No.10430394

>>10430312
this. can we split the happy campers off into their own thread pls

>> No.10430565
File: 428 KB, 1000x667, tumblr_nhb28ttYdq1sokt9jo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430565

>>10425395
that 2-in-1 ACG jacket is so fucking fire

>> No.10430595

>>10430314
noted, thanks

>> No.10430828

>>10430595
when I say dont have pockets I mean that the pocket flaps are only there so you can reach in to your jacket underneath. that camo pattern is fucking sexy doe

>> No.10430857

>>10425416
w2c jacket?

>> No.10430864

>>10430857
Would tell but already expecting the classic "w2c cheaper version?"
Is over 1k
Just look at the pictures

>> No.10430877

>>10430864
I just want a new jacket like this. If I could find one similar I'd cop it. I'm guessing this was some designers work right?

>> No.10431022

>>10429739
the new ones are the ones on the nike site right now?

>> No.10431040

>>10425521
lol, stop posting this fit, seriously, i fucking regret that i posted it at all. I just had unused roshes that i bought for cycling and other dirty stuff, i don’t wore them doing ‘normal activities’.

>>10425522
Those are cycling gloves.

>> No.10431209

>>10431040


what trousers are those my man?

>> No.10431233
File: 73 KB, 1200x1200, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10431233

lunar force 1 duckboot

>> No.10431272

Hi, do you know where I can find some pants like that
>>10425489

or more like the zanerobe sureshot, they are like slim training pants or something and everybody in the techwear fits seems to wear them.

The sureshots sure look dope but they come with a pretty steep pricetag imo

>> No.10431286

I'm on the fence about pis related, it feels a bit too tacticool, but at the same time the laser-cut PALS looks way better than sewn-on webbing. Any advice?
Or if you know of a good backpack that has at least two big pockets with the exterior one having a clamshell opening, I'm all ears

>> No.10431293

>>10431209
Levi's Commuter Cargo pants, pretty great for 40 bucks.

>> No.10431305
File: 681 KB, 1500x1082, directActionGhost.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10431305

>>10431286
Fuck me

And don't tell me goruck, they're fucking expensive and you don't even get chest nor a hip strap.

>> No.10431537
File: 243 KB, 1000x1333, 1436240248634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10431537

>>10430828
yeah, makes sense as it's only supposed to be a weatherproof top layer.

>> No.10431593

>>10431537
whats this jacket, man?

>> No.10431594
File: 123 KB, 1190x944, SR71_crew.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10431594

>> No.10431660
File: 34 KB, 351x640, 1430950088899.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10431660

>>10431593
think it was Stone Island
Can't remember and can't seem to find a source

>> No.10432312

>>10431305
I have a tactical nylon/polyurethane backpack in black. it goes alright with some outfits. I agree that goruck is overpriced shit. The one you linked looks ok except for the branding, but it's not too noticeable.

>> No.10432349

>>10431594
yooo

>> No.10432358

what are some solid brands to tag on Grailed for techwear?

>> No.10432375

>>10432358
Nike NSW, Veilance, ACG, C.P. Company, Maharishi, Isaora

>> No.10432385
File: 856 KB, 1536x2048, Nike_ACG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432385

>>10429771

they won't re-release the ACGs so you late to the party fuccbois know their place.

>> No.10432388

>>10432358

most good techwear shit is not resold

>> No.10432389

>>10432385
I keep shoe trees in mine and it got rid of the toe box creasing eventually.

>> No.10432392

>>10432388
that's also because it falls apart sadly. acronym is well made but it just doesn't last. and it's hard to do repairs on it because of the construction.

>> No.10432403

>>10432392
Do any of the /out/ brands have issues with the jackets falling apart
Snow Peak, north face, Patagonia, etc

>> No.10432421
File: 20 KB, 429x410, reaction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432421

>>10432392

somehow i doubt you've ever handled a piece.

>> No.10432428

>>10432403
If you are hard on any clothing it's going to suffer from wear or tear. acrnm is more form over functoin and isn't really designed to last in the way that TNF et al. are
>>10432421
have owned 2, albiet second hand but they are not bullet proof or even that robust. im assuming you've never owned any if you thought they were hard wearing

>> No.10432487
File: 77 KB, 667x1000, 1441969129509.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432487

>> No.10432705

>>10426528
Direct action gear?

>> No.10432727

>>10432428
>If you are hard on any clothing it's going to suffer from wear or tear

why buy anything at all if you cant rank them?

>> No.10432737

>>10432727
thats why i dont put much stock into higher end techwear. the cheap stuff is 90% as good for 10% of the price. cheap and disposable seems smarter to me if you are going to actually be active in this and not just pose around

>> No.10432824
File: 90 KB, 356x640, ink1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432824

god-tier techwear inspo coming through

>> No.10432827
File: 37 KB, 351x640, ink2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432827

>>10432824

>> No.10432830

>>10430565
Where to cop ACG shit?

>> No.10432831
File: 42 KB, 281x500, ink3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432831

>>10432827

>> No.10432834
File: 45 KB, 315x500, ink4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432834

>>10432831

>> No.10432839
File: 105 KB, 374x500, voll-22231-org.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432839

This is moving into /lunarcore/, but I'd still say it's tech-wear-ish

Anyway, you think I should cop?

What would you think if you saw a 20 year-old guy walking about with this crazy-shit?

>> No.10432842
File: 108 KB, 600x450, isa1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432842

It came from sufu

>> No.10432843

>>10432839
nothing. everyone dresses like shit anyway. wear whatever you want. i might check out your jacket because its shiny. thats about it

>> No.10432844
File: 106 KB, 600x450, isa2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432844

>>10432842
This is all Isaora apparently. I guess this puts forward the case that you have to be slim or fit to pull this look off.

>> No.10432950

>>10432830
Nikelab

>> No.10433095

>>10431022
Yes, the black ones

>> No.10433353

>>10432392
>but it just doesn’t last
I own tons of acronym. Yes, EPIC or STOTZ cotton WILL fade, but other than that, it has same quality as any good top-tier outdoor brand. GT pieces are pretty much indestructible.

>>10432737
You’re right, but you’re on FA, not OUT. It’s like saying, that Zara is same as Rick Owens, but x10 cheaper. You’re judging items by design and fit first, because it’s fashion brands in the first place.

>> No.10433355

>>10432824
>>10432827
>>10432831
>>10432834
>god-tier techwear
This guy dresses basic as fuck, not that this is a bad thing, but you can look the same or better wearing jeans and white t-shirt

>> No.10433382

>>10433355
>being this jealous of sufu-king inkinsurgent

>> No.10433391

>>10425521
w2c the pants or some similar?

>> No.10433396

>>10433391
>Levi's Commuter Cargo pants, pretty great for 40 bucks

>> No.10433397

>>10433391
Dude, >>10431293

>> No.10433606

>>10427932
Just copped those exact pants. Size runs a lil big

>> No.10433891

recommendations for dark hued breathable pants suitable for urban backpacking in the summer at

<<$200

for a jacket ill simply take an nike windbreaker

>> No.10433914

>>10427868
w2c?

>> No.10434260

w2c a decent techware jacket?

>> No.10434285

>>10433914
on the internet

>> No.10434297

>>10433382
come on i dont care if its SI or arcteryx but this is just dick riding if you consider these godtier inspo

>>10433891
outlier futureworks

>> No.10434304

>>10427410
They're american vintage.

>> No.10434322
File: 73 KB, 640x640, 1440113493624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10434322

>>10430312
Geologyfags have to squat in techwear threads because they are a very small minority of /fa/'s population, and if a geologycore thread is created, it usually dies with very few replies.

>> No.10434371
File: 103 KB, 800x600, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10434371

>> No.10434629

>>10430565
W2c

>> No.10435146

>>10432824
>>10432827
>>10432831
>>10432834
>>10432842
>>10432844
sufu is a joke. thank god its dead now

>> No.10435219

>>10435146
You’re writing ‘sufu is a joke’ on /fa/, are you serious? /fa/ is a worse than any fashion related website

>> No.10435220

>>10431593
>>10431660

Pretty sure it's stone island: shadow project. There was also similar parka in copper colourway and it was even more beautiful.

>> No.10435395
File: 993 KB, 2028x1238, sufu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10435395

>>10435219
fa is probably worse
but sufu being a joke now is a fact if you were on the past 7 years

ironically trunks imo made the best insight on sufu right now

>> No.10435486
File: 39 KB, 842x406, axbebb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10435486

>>10435395
Yes, sufu is dead, but i don’t see how being dead equal being a joke. 7 years is a lot, i got there in 2011, wish i had witnessed all 2005/2008. Kinda missed all this old vis, wtaps, bape, baggy fits vibe. I just visit few threads on regular basis there, everything else is super-slow and not interesting.

/fa/ is not even close to sufu regarding fits, people with knowledge etc.

I guess the era of forums is fading out in general, due social networks.

>> No.10435634

>>10435486
you're right /fa/ surpasses it now that there is literally only 1 post being made a day on sufu's most popular board. they are gone

sufu has always been garbage for techwear anyway, let's leave them out of this thread

>> No.10435673

>>10435634
It just seems like fashion forums aren't being used more, do people just not want to talk fashion any more?

>> No.10435681

>>10425521
I know these are Levi commuter cargo pants but I can't find them in stock in black anywhere, let alone for $40 like people in the thread said.

>> No.10435688

>>10435486
well half of 4chan or some shit spammed the waywts so everyone doesnt want to be associated with that shit

>/fa/ is not even close to sufu regarding fits, people with knowledge etc.
true, but considering NOW there's practically no fits or knowledge

>>10435634
>sufu has always been garbage for techwear anyway,
idk techwear is basically dressed by the internet and thats sufu (see their thread)

>> No.10435698

>>10431293

Where are you seeing these for 40 bucks?

>> No.10435717

>>10435681
Yeah, that's the old line that is not beinh released anymore afaik
Saw a pair on ebay for ~40USD recently

>> No.10435725

>>10435486
forums still retain hardcore users as they have that special snowflake factor that mainstream social media doesn't have. While what you're saying is generally true I would not dismiss forums just yet

>> No.10435728

>>10435634
Acronym thread is great though, it’s literally the only place where you can see so many dedicated ACR fans. I go there mostly because of that, techwear thread is garbage, but at least all users visiting it are educated enough, to ask for advice if needed. I visit /fa/ like few times a month, because all i see here, is shitposting.

>> No.10435746
File: 29 KB, 500x667, 1430898898314.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10435746

What color choices does /fa/ lean to?
Black from head to toe VS majority black with highlights of white and bits of gray VS more equal color integration of your choosing

>> No.10435750
File: 28 KB, 336x86, Screen Shot 2015-09-29 at 03.29.15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10435750

>>10435725
All forums that i was frequent on dying or dead already. Forums like hypebeast still lives just because of huge website traffic. Standalone ones will die eventually.

>> No.10436185

>>10435746
all black, or mix of greys, browns and blacks. white with black has too much contrast imo

>>10435728
they should move the acronym thread to styleforum. styleforum's userbase is better than sufu and bigger and more active. also the designer specific fits on styleforum are the best of all forums currently. people could contain on there and just sit in streetwear and denim in the acronym thread, and potentially contribute to other threads as well. before sufu just shuts and all the posters and content are gone for good

>> No.10436387

>>10432834
nice jacket can I get id?

>> No.10436784

>>10436387
probably arcteryx

>> No.10436874

>>10436387

Arc'teryx LEAF Minotaur jacket in Crocodile. Looks like he's taken the velcro patches off the upper arms though.

>> No.10437001

>>10432842
>>10432844
haven't laughed this hard in a long, long time

>> No.10437330

>>10436185
>styleforum
Forum only for real, classy men *tips fedora*

>> No.10438331

>>10432385
Seriously? Well that sucks

>> No.10438354
File: 73 KB, 600x600, img63966347.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10438354

Not sure if this the right thread, but I'm looking for a fishtail parka with a detachable liner so I can wear it whenever

>> No.10438657
File: 184 KB, 1054x655, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10438657

>>10430292
You were close