[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 582 KB, 2000x2000, louis-vuitton-christopher-pm-monogram-macassar-canvas-men-s-bags--M43735_PM1_Focus_view.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10396465 No.10396465 [Reply] [Original]

If you could afford, would you buy Louis Vuitton and other expensive clothing?

>> No.10396472

I'd just buy a shitload of designer Japanese clothes/bags
But "luxury" fashion house labels are so tacky....so many better options for the same price

>> No.10396483

Not Louis Vuitton hell no. So flashy it ruins the point.

>> No.10396491

Err, I'd wear a lot of Dior Homme

>> No.10396515

>>10396472
>>10396483
you guys do realize LV makes stuff without it's monogram printed all over right?
lol
just because the main items bought are gaudy does not mean everything they sell is like that
it's a business
they know it sells, but they have more than that
and now that marc isn't there, the clothes should be better

>> No.10396519

>>10396465
>would you buy Louis Vuitton

I already do

>> No.10396523

>>10396515
Look beyond the big fashion houses and you'll realize that the quality, fits, and designs are better from high-end boutique labels

>> No.10396535

>>10396523
i didn't argue against that
but the fashion houses who have/had couture ateliers definitely have better mills and qc than high end boutique PL's

>> No.10396550

>>10396535
No way
I'd trust the QC from a Japanese company turning out fifty jackets at a time over one of those trashy Italian sweatshops with forced African labor churning out thousands of bags at a time

>> No.10396558

>>10396519
Post with timestamp.

>> No.10396575

>>10396465
i'd buy brooks brother a whole lot more

>> No.10396587

>>10396558

how fucking poor are you that you want me to time stamp my lv shit? are you from pakistan or india or something? smh tbh fam lv is pretty accessible to most people.

>> No.10396589

>>10396587
I don't know very many people with LV their prices are pretty high
Different fag by the way

>> No.10396630

>>10396465

Always hated the LV monogram. Looks pretty stupid -- like it gets a pass just because it is LV, but if any other brand tried it, people would shit on it.

See: Tous.

If I was rich sure, I'd buy expensive designer clothes. Hell, my most expensive is a Nordström shirt. I just need it to be durable and to look good.

>> No.10397478

>>10396587
Lol this, plenty of people on this board buy trick owens, is lv really so unbelievable?

>> No.10398711

>>10396630
see >>10396515

>> No.10398875

I'd probably buy some Visvim and a few designer suits, but that's all.

>> No.10398884

>>10396465
Nope. The brand name is tainted because of cunts. Look at what happened to Burberry and Ralph Lauren.

>> No.10398904

>>10398884
....what happened to Ralph Lauren
I'm too intimidated to even go into their stores

>> No.10399289

>>10398904
>>10398884

If you actually venture into top end fashion stores you will realise that there are within the company a range that aren't so blatant in their labeling.

Ralph Laurens low tier is their Polo stuff adored by plebs however they have their purple and black label for those classy mofos

>> No.10399309

I would probably buy Goyard bags and wallets, but nothing else similar to that.

I would buy other brands if I could afford it.

>> No.10399623
File: 363 KB, 452x710, 1441256101497.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10399623

>>10396558
Please be trolling. I hope people this poor dont have access to my internet.

>> No.10399901
File: 56 KB, 620x387, roof-011_3348332b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10399901

I feel like a lot of people on this thread are hating on LouisV because they cant afford the products. And as far as saying Italian brands are shit Versace does some of the best looking clothes out there!

>> No.10399917

>>10396465
Maybe the bags, thats it,
>>10398884
RIP Balmain

>> No.10399922
File: 65 KB, 500x375, wooo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10399922

>>10399901
the bait has been set

>> No.10400463

>>10396515
it's really the association put with it, LV has some nice menswear, same with gucci, it's just the brand can be off putting to some people.

>> No.10400472

>>10399901
I'll bite, A lot of italian brands get a bad rep for their products, because the most purchased/copied/ faked items are usually their flashiest and tackiest, don't believe me? just look at new money chinese kids with their giuseppe zanotti shoes.

>> No.10400490

>>10400472
which, ironically, is why most of those labels put out the tacky overbranded shit, to make it more difficult to copy and because copying a design is not illegal but copying a tradmarked logo is