[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 45 KB, 800x525, Nike Air Force 1 CMFT Low White Shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261051 No.10261051 [Reply] [Original]

AF1 inspo thread?

>> No.10261123
File: 124 KB, 1000x667, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261123

This is now a Lunar Force 1 thread.

>> No.10261150
File: 105 KB, 700x843, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261150

Crafted by man, for god.

>> No.10261169
File: 117 KB, 683x1024, af1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261169

>> No.10261180

>>10261123
>>10261150
>>10261169
Noice

>> No.10261183

>>10261169
>2015
>not Lunar Force 1s
top kek

>> No.10261188

>>10261183
Nobody wants to spend an extra $40 just for some fucking sole color change.

>> No.10261190
File: 6 KB, 127x127, 1376528028407.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261190

>>10261150
>>10261123
>gum soles

>> No.10261191

>>10261123
>>10261150
>>10261183
how will the midsoles yellow though this is a crucial point
>>10261188
bruh

>> No.10261200

>>10261188
>Just sole colour change
>Just

"Just?" You are broke, you are uneducated, and you are a fucking weasel.

You belong on /mfa.

>> No.10261204

>>10261200
What's the difference then if it isnt just a color change?

>> No.10261207

>>10261190
Rick Owens people and people with sense will never get along and that's okay.

>> No.10261214

>>10261207
"Sense?" Sense of what?

If we're talking sense of fashion, it's a game that you're losing.

>> No.10261218

>>10261214
sense of GUM baby

>> No.10261227

>>10261214
a sense of a change in sole color that npw necessitates a $40 increase.

>> No.10261258

Air forces are ugly. get better taste.

>> No.10261270
File: 584 KB, 2000x2000, 364584.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261270

>>10261123
I prefer the one with blue soles tbh

>> No.10261272

>>10261214
Sense of what looks good. It's not a game.

>> No.10261283

>>10261270
Those are so nice.

>> No.10261603
File: 264 KB, 590x724, 1437378464547.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261603

>> No.10261615
File: 2.00 MB, 1215x922, 1437378431996.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261615

>>10261603

>> No.10261837
File: 703 KB, 637x637, 1437437564850.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261837

how you guys feel about no laces mids?

>> No.10261970
File: 1.06 MB, 1080x900, Screenshot_2015-02-21-17-23-02-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261970

>> No.10262001
File: 1.00 MB, 743x1057, Screenshot_2015-02-11-12-31-35-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10262001

>> No.10262010

>>10262001
Gross bottom half tbh

>> No.10262015

What do you mean?

>> No.10262019

>>10261051
bump bc im on the fence about buying mids

>> No.10262069
File: 1.01 MB, 810x1058, Screenshot_2015-08-17-00-40-58-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10262069

>>10262019

>> No.10262296

>>10262001
quit posting this retard

>> No.10262330

>>10262296
Quit living.

>> No.10262499

Does anyone know a website or infolink that shows the difference between low/mid/high, in terms of quality and style, bulk, aging etc, Kinda hard to pick one of the 3 that's the most versatile.

>> No.10262639

>>10261837
NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER FORGET

>> No.10262911
File: 164 KB, 900x600, classics-revisited-nike-air-force-1-07.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10262911

This thread is now in a state of emergency
>31 REPLIES AND 16 POSTERS
unless OP is a rabid fanboy (which seems unlikely since the thread was hijacked by the guy circlejerking lunar forces) this thread has been taken over by Nike viral

all of these posts (and others i missed) are samefag
>>10261123
>>10261150
>>10261183
>>10261200
>>10261207
>>10261272
>>10261283
I hope you get fired from your viral marketing job for doing a terrible job and giving yourself away

NIKE SHILLS WILL ALMOST ALWAYS RECOMMEND LUNAR. they are more expensive and, like running shoes, the foam portion of the lunar sole will die suddenly and completely, requiring new shoes. conventional af1s will never have this issue.

the lunar force 1 release this year is especially terrible due to leather quality

Nike is a shit - they have been falling out of favor with more fashionable types because sneakerheads devalue their brand. Other companies continue to further their fashionable side with collabs but Nike is dead in the water so all the viral marketers have been going at it nonstop. just like when they tried to push the air prestos or the am95 jacquard that they desperately tried to link to the rick aesthetic thru samefagging

Dear viral marketer - nike can improve their standing by stopping producing shit. here is what air force's should look like when you haven't cut the materials and construction costs to near zero

>>10262499
All of the all-whites are general release and have the same poor quality leather. it's very difficult to find decent af1s beyond thrifting. most normal people won't notice or care about the quality difference

>> No.10263392

>>10262911
and then after this post our viral friend disappears

stay classy nike :^)

>> No.10263435
File: 981 KB, 781x861, c5ac41f5e25112e7ecc06cb4918485c9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10263435

>> No.10263474

>>10262911
You really think Nike, one of the biggest if not the biggest shoe brand in the world, needs to post on 4chan slash fa to boost sales and maintain interest? Lmao

>> No.10263860
File: 342 KB, 800x600, rAF1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10263860

Just picked these up

>> No.10263873

>>10263860
You realize that you're worse than the women who buy LV, MK, Gucci, etc trash right?

>> No.10264202
File: 1.17 MB, 1077x1056, Screenshot_2015-02-11-22-06-13-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10264202

>> No.10264222

>>10263860
nice af

>> No.10264577

>>10263474
i think that nike is falling out of favor with the fashion oriented crowd and that they've resulting begun viral marketing everywhere

i exclusively referred to brand image, not sales

>> No.10264638
File: 34 KB, 640x640, Nike-Air-Force-1-Mid-07-Mens-Shoe-315123_111_E_PREM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10264638

So what's the difference between the regular nike air force 1 mids and the '07s? Also requesting more fit pics of mids

>> No.10264687

>>10264638
there isnt one, really. they started putting the 07 on all the models after 2007. unless you have a link specifically to the two pairs you mean

afaik the white mids are all the same except for the Nikelab release

>> No.10264795

So after what year did the quality drop off? If I cop new ones from Nike.com would they be as nice in terms of quality wise as opposed to old ones?

>> No.10264807

>>10264795
yeah, they're perfectly fine new

>> No.10264852
File: 204 KB, 500x370, tumblr_m0hh43EXEh1qg5rvfo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10264852

>>10264807
please don't post if you have no knowledge on the subject matter

>>10264687
around 2003ish. until then air forces still held a shape close to pic related. now they are much chunkier. general release af1s feel like they're made of milk cartons

the other poster is a prime example of what I meant when I said most people won't notice at all because most people are used to shit quality from Nike and think it's fine

they're still worth buying. they're cheap now. when they were made out of quality materials, the sticker price was the same as today.. when adjusted for inflation you can quickly see why the materials seem so cheap now vs then. the best pair they've released recently are the OG white/silver highs which are on sale right now and can be made even cheaper with a coupon

>> No.10264861

>>10264852

I meant to quote: (>>10264795)

>> No.10265027
File: 145 KB, 640x640, ni567876.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10265027

>> No.10265030
File: 2.29 MB, 1500x844, ni1395537403757.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10265030

>>10265027

>> No.10265037
File: 224 KB, 960x1280, ni1435527231029.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10265037

>>10265030

>> No.10265042
File: 168 KB, 1080x1920, ni1435180281009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10265042

>>10265037

>> No.10265047
File: 502 KB, 1704x2272, niA4Rmy04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10265047

>>10265042

>> No.10265051
File: 93 KB, 500x749, niJ7KAxV5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10265051

>>10265047

>> No.10265126

>>10263860
"no"

>> No.10265278

lows or mids for my first pair of air force ?

>> No.10265288

>>10265278
lows

>> No.10265497
File: 387 KB, 1200x1200, LNB9iCG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10265497

http://strawpoll.me/5242942
http://strawpoll.me/5242942
http://strawpoll.me/5242942
http://strawpoll.me/5242942

>> No.10265955

>>10265497
>Strawpolls between low/high
>Posts mids

>> No.10265994

debating between some white af1 lows or white superstars. Already have a pair of af1 mids, worry the af1s may be a little too clunky for general wear with jeans n shit

>> No.10265998

straw poll lows mids and highs
http://strawpoll.me/5243876

>> No.10266010
File: 397 KB, 636x635, 1436752093179.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10266010

>> No.10266020

correct me if I'm wrong but aren't these ghettonigger shoes?

>> No.10266023

>>10266010
Damn, mids without laces look good, or is it just the pic? Can anyone post more mids without laces?

>> No.10266025

>>10265042
really nice. I can't wait until mine get this worn.

>> No.10266841
File: 81 KB, 640x640, af1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10266841

>> No.10267204

>>10266023
the two pics in this thread is all I've been able to find. Gonna try it out myself once it's not 90 degrees everyday.

>> No.10267440

>>10261837
ID on the black shoes?

>> No.10267471

>>10265994

I had the same dilemma and I chose superstars.

>> No.10267499

>>10267440
saint laurent court classic

>> No.10267502

>>10263873
You realize that these aren't a real shoe right?

>> No.10267520

>>10266020
So? If they look nice on you then they look nice.

>> No.10267548

>>10267499
>$650
Haha, onto the next shoe..