[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 85 KB, 640x539, 1380046080_1380008463401.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10195717 No.10195717 [Reply] [Original]

Old one 3 hunna

http://www.zappos.com/nike-roshe-run-iron-green-seaweed

Would /fa/ cop?

>> No.10195788
File: 31 KB, 540x360, 18afabd32c1e4f03b59971087adc8cf8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10195788

>>10195717
dude please please please don't buy roshes
they were played out a year and a half ago, they're just awful and embarrassing now.
A good alternative (best in that price range, at least) to that shoe you posted is the New Balance 696 Deconstructed in the green colorway.
Best of luck

>> No.10195795
File: 108 KB, 2000x2000, C6165_EF3771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10195795

C/N?????

>> No.10195813
File: 46 KB, 975x1463, 5232401040764_061_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10195813

coach jacket c/n?

>> No.10195818

>>10195813
w2c?

>> No.10195828

Have an opportunity to buy some Common Projects heavily used but not scuffed to shit for the low (~100 from a guy I'm friends with) but it'd require me spending all the money I have on me b/c I'm between paychecks. I'm super tempted to jump on it but I also know I should probably be more frugal with my money.

The only financial responsibility I have right now is my credit card being near maxed out. So I'm torn. Buy the shoes now and pay my card next week, or pay my card now and then possibly never get the shoes.

>> No.10195829
File: 265 KB, 562x358, cop or naught.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10195829

>> No.10195837

>>10195829
forgot to post comment

left or right?

>> No.10195854

>>10195837
neither they are both very bad
you will never shine brighter than the connotations of the grid pattern
its a sweat for 3 months

>> No.10195855
File: 152 KB, 611x371, Screen Shot 2015-08-01 at 8.24.34 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10195855

cop or not?

>> No.10195860

>>10195828
Pay card now, offer guy $20 extra if he waits a week to sell to you.

>> No.10195866

>>10195854
>connotations of the grid pattern
>sweat for three months
what do these phrases mean english isn't my first lang

>> No.10195871

>>10195829
The one on the right is better but I'd also have to know how much it costs before I could suggest you buy them.

That's something that you could really only get wear out of in the colder transition between late fall and early winter, with a parka or something over it to tone down the pattern.

>> No.10195883

Is it worth re-soling beat-up desert boots that are, aside from a nearly-gone sole and some nicely-beaten up seude, perfectly fine?

>> No.10195887

>>10195860
that's all i needed to hear. i'll wait a week

>> No.10195889

>>10195813
def cop

>> No.10195918

>>10195866
sorry
i mean that all the ideas surrounding grid patterns in fashion + art atm are associated too much with a certain set of ideas, and its hard to work into an outfit without people simply reading you as that you're wearing a big grid pattern sweatshirt

and i reckon grid patterns like that are very connected to a really temporary trend so that after a certain amount of time like 3 months you might find yourself regretting it, it's not very eternal. not that any clothes are but i think this is especially passing :)

>> No.10195987

>>10195918
it's fine, thanks for the explanation. theyre both relatively cheap so i'm like not too worried

>> No.10196013
File: 153 KB, 468x427, Screen Shot 2015-08-03 at 12.37.57 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10196013

c/n

>> No.10196278

>>10196013
nooooooo

>> No.10196414

>>10195855
If you have outfits to go with them sure

>> No.10196419
File: 19 KB, 300x259, timberland_eurohiker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10196419

Very on the fence

They're so ugly yet have so much potential

>> No.10196420

>>10195788
Thanks anon, I'll check these out.

>> No.10196429

>>10196419
the brown is nice but get something less bulky

>> No.10196431

>>10196419
i find these rly cute if u wear up with a sort of trashy and scrappy outdoorsy outfit like some baggy cargos and a plain big sweatshirt and some kind of baseball cap

>> No.10196448

>>10196419
Super durable and probably comfy af as well

>> No.10196476
File: 635 KB, 1180x654, shues.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10196476

Can't decide on a pair of asics. I think I'm leaning towards 3 though.

>> No.10196480
File: 64 KB, 640x1136, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10196480

Need Minimal beaters

Yes/no?

>> No.10196525

>>10196476
4, but tbh they all look like shit.

>>10196480
wtf dude for 48 quid you could do so much better. If you want minimal beaters just get some vans or new balances or adidas or gats. who gives a flying fuck about memes too. They're recommended for a reason, but those shoes have a bulbous toebox. Like doc marten toebox or some shit. Don't waste your time with that trash

>> No.10196542
File: 75 KB, 1000x1000, asics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10196542

>>10196476
go hard or go home
not joking btw i like these ones a lot more
the ones u posted are bornig

>> No.10196543
File: 23 KB, 330x330, imgrc0063463739.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10196543

>> No.10196547

>>10196543
polynesian core

>> No.10196563

>>10196525

Vans are equally priced where I'm from and 48€ is hardly anything.

>> No.10196661
File: 188 KB, 1600x1600, zoom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10196661

>>10195813
would cop
>>10195795
just cop the sk8 hi from vans

thinking about this one. yes or no?

>> No.10196683

>>10196563
Then spend a bit more and buy something actually decent, even if they are just "beaters."

My mistake though, thought that was in pounds instead of euros

>> No.10196703

>>10196661
please don't

so many actually not hideous sneakers available.

These look very dad or 40 year old dude throwing sneakers on to look 'casual'

>> No.10196712

>>10195918
dude its a fucking grid it's not a complex floral or Hawaiian shirt.

you're overthinking this fashion thing by leaps bounds and miles.

Make it work? Just don't match it with another gridded or patterned item.

jeans and some black or white sneakers.

>>10195829
the right.

>> No.10196723

>>10196712
to go further, all of this is by me, keep in mind I live in NYC, so this whole "don't get caught in an old trend stuff' is bullshit, because there are very few that are so hideous they are only warn because they are popular.

There are still some guys in camo.
Certain things become trendy that were already staples.

Like after plaid had it's huge harrah in everyday fashion in like 09-11 it wasn't a faux paux to wear it after.

>> No.10197285
File: 348 KB, 499x499, g3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10197285

>> No.10197854
File: 9 KB, 428x550, 44799073MU_21_a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10197854

c/n

>> No.10197859
File: 33 KB, 419x610, tumblr_nqvfwrfaiI1tme4tvo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10197859

>>10196419
>>10196476
>>10196542
>>10197854

>> No.10198183
File: 70 KB, 800x800, new-era-snapback-2-tone-chambray-grau-patch-kappe-9fifty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198183

friend wants to sell this to me for £10

>> No.10198284
File: 155 KB, 1880x1253, sat_sum_153986.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198284

Should I? And which color? I'm scared cause I have a big head tho...

http://www.saturdaysnyc.com/item/canyon-nylon-2

>> No.10198371

>>10196278
why tho?

>> No.10198551
File: 38 KB, 710x752, common-projects-bball-high-in-leather-1692-navy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198551

I can get it for 2hunna euros - c/n?

>> No.10198561

>>10198551
cop!

>> No.10198573

>>10198551
really gross
>>10198371
they are just extremely ugly shoes lol
>>10198284
its a plain hat
does it suit your style? imo older looking and slightly less structured caps look better but wtv its a pain hat
>>10198183
really awful
>>10197854
shit
>>10197285
crap
>>10196661
shit
>>10196543
shit
>>10196480
all white sneakers look lame and too internet get something with some actual design input
>>10196476
all shit
>>10196419
fun
>>10195855
gross
>>10195829
gross
>>10195813
fine
>>10195795
ugly
>>10195788
ugly
>>10195717
ugly

>> No.10198746

>>10198573
Do you know of any brands that sell plain-looking, less-structured hats? I'm actually not a huge fan of caps with reinforced front panels (e.g. snapbacks), so this was the closest I could find.

>> No.10198748
File: 1.85 MB, 1600x1500, huey tee copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198748

>> No.10198753
File: 201 KB, 1520x855, Janoski Max Clearwater.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198753

Cop or not?

>> No.10198764
File: 148 KB, 870x1110, image1xxl (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198764

>>10195717
£57 on sale from £115 nudie jeans

should I get them?

>> No.10198775

>>10198746
funnily enough marks & spencer sell some nice plain caps if you're in the uk
otherwise just look on ebay for used or unbranded cheap shit, also charity shops are good if you dont mind someone else's head having lived in it :)

>> No.10198782
File: 71 KB, 1000x667, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198782

A t-shirt like this.

>> No.10198789
File: 103 KB, 574x956, Screenshot_2015-07-30-13-54-00-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198789

Which, if I intend to wear with both shorts and full length pants?

>> No.10198795

>>10198789
Low

>> No.10198799

>>10198789
high top, imo low top looks like some middle school bullshit. if you got the steeze for it, you can wear highs with shorts.

>> No.10198801

>>10198789
lows!

>> No.10198803

>>10198789
Hi Tops, low tops look kinda shit imo.

>> No.10198847
File: 96 KB, 672x1080, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198847

cheap Monday bayani c/n?

>> No.10198852

>>10198847
they're comfy as hell. pretty timeless design. cop cop cop.

>> No.10198864
File: 123 KB, 1080x994, Screenshot_2015-08-03-08-06-37~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198864

C/N?

>> No.10198873
File: 37 KB, 650x650, 11083670_820090188058082_1963077995160809518_n[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198873

cop or not? 40$

>> No.10198876

>>10198847
w2c?

>> No.10198884

>>10198789
lows look rly good irl
they seem chunkier than in pictures, its good
>>10198847
boring item boring style but totally inoffensive and people will give you compliments
>>10198864
>>10198873
no to both

>> No.10198886
File: 96 KB, 700x700, Adams.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198886

Cop for about 1 hunna?

>> No.10198889

Should i get a black or sage green ma1 flight jacket? i wear black jeans and mono docs? is black safer?

>> No.10198901
File: 19 KB, 338x507, 5232462117006_001_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198901

Cheap Monday Stay Parka

>> No.10198926
File: 439 KB, 1024x683, 8111902038_a440ae05af_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10198926

Red Wing Beckmans (cigar)

>> No.10198936

>>10198886

yeah dude. w2c. real legit irl

>> No.10198973

>>10196480
I just ordered those so I'm a little biased but I think they're sick as hell, plus they're super cheap on sale from a hundred bucks (i'm in the US)

>> No.10198976

>>10198926
cop, they're solid boots.

>> No.10198991

>>10195813
w2c

>> No.10199007
File: 210 KB, 800x800, image003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10199007

I would replace the stip with holes
c/n

>> No.10199053
File: 53 KB, 975x1463, 5232424850045_001_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10199053

thinking about getting this

>> No.10199545
File: 860 KB, 1440x2560, Snapchat-4636918010269600306.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10199545

Posting for the guy that posted in last thread about the pacsun bullhead joggers. I copped em in the mall for 50 and they are very comfy and fit pretty well. I'm 6' 155 lbs with 32 waist and bought the medium. I truly hate the fact that the back pockets are fucking sown shut even tho there is legit a pocket in there. I think it might be because the pockets would sag with out them or somthing. Anyway stitching is similar quality to urban outfitters brand of chinos.
7/10 so far I like it.

>> No.10199581
File: 1.31 MB, 1564x1564, IMG_20150803_095816.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10199581

>>10199545
Pick of back and good and bad stitching

>> No.10199594

>>10199545
Nvm pockets meant to be opened by cutting the light tacking holding it shut

>> No.10199736

>>10199581
can i ask you a question?

>> No.10199748

>>10198789
Highs

>> No.10199857
File: 177 KB, 1604x616, nike-white-hot-pack-02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10199857

left or right

>> No.10199881

>>10199857
right

>> No.10199884

>>10199857
left

>> No.10199897

>>10199857
both awful

>> No.10199901

>>10199736
Go ahead

>> No.10199926

>>10199901
lemme ask u something first tho

>> No.10199930
File: 27 KB, 500x387, 1436110009343.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10199930

>>10199881
>>10199884
>>10199897

Im serious. I recently copped the right ones and havent used them yet but i thinking about selling them

>> No.10199932

>>10199930
they are really bad def sell them

>> No.10199940
File: 70 KB, 920x920, 184GVM-ALT2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10199940

>> No.10199969
File: 911 KB, 2400x3100, ol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10199969

>> No.10200043
File: 112 KB, 630x420, Nike-SB-Trainerendor-Black-03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200043

Pretty dead set on these, but thought I'd get a second opinion

>> No.10200066

>>10200043
Velcro is for mentally retards

>> No.10200070
File: 104 KB, 1024x683, DSC01310.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200070

cop or not

>> No.10200075

>>10200043
cop

>> No.10200094

>>10200043
>>10200070
dead sneaks

>> No.10200098

>>10199926
Pls

>> No.10200102

>>10200094
What does that mean?

>> No.10200108

>>10200102
ur aiming for something that is dead
not so much the af1s but the trainorenders are garb
af1s just dont look good on 90 percent of the ppl who wear them and if you are in the ten percent you will already know

>> No.10200115

>>10198789
Lows. Don't be the middle school ska kid.

>> No.10200134 [DELETED] 
File: 1.13 MB, 701x882, las.swet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200134

>>10195717
cop or not? Im not fat so that would not be a problem.

>> No.10200162

>>10200108
I think trainerendors look pretty dope. Can you be more specific?

>> No.10200167

>>10198573
You think everything is shit. Jeff pls go

>> No.10200180

>>10200162
i have never seen a stylish person wear them
they dont exist out of people who learned to dress on the internet rly
or just that kind of urban outfitters/hypebeast crossover niche

>> No.10200192

>>10200098
so is that a yes or no to asking u something?

>> No.10200216

>>10200180
Is there something wrong with wearing a shoe that nobody else wears, if it looks good on me?

>> No.10200224

>>10200216
no im saying everyone wears them
but nobody stylish does

>> No.10200238

tfw no one replies to my posts in these threads >>10198764

>> No.10200269
File: 344 KB, 900x671, nike-stefan-janoski-max-wolf-grey-white-04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200269

?

>> No.10200300

>>10200238
they are too slim for the wash

>>10200269
no

>> No.10200312

>>10200192
Depends on ur middle name

>> No.10200466
File: 164 KB, 1066x1600, ebay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200466

Should I cop these knockoff Birks?

>> No.10200476

>>10200466
Nope. Real Birkenstocks aren't even that expensive, and it's a shit trend anyway.

>> No.10200478
File: 140 KB, 1600x1066, ebay2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200478

>>10200466

>> No.10200484

>>10200476
I'm not paying $100 for a pair of sandals. These are only $18

>> No.10200497

>>10200484
these look shit tho

>> No.10200511

>>10200466
>wearing sandals unironically
40 year old dad with man boobs detected

>> No.10200523
File: 300 KB, 1920x1440, birks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200523

>>10200497
I guess they're not a splitting image of each other...

>>10200511
I'd be wearing them with socks and pants -- i.e., comfycore.

>> No.10200533

>>10198573
noob gtfo /fa/

>> No.10200541

>>10200312
what why? u gna lemme ask u or what?

>> No.10200546

>>10198573
why u hate verything bruh

>> No.10200550

>>10200523
>I'd be wearing them with socks and pants -- i.e., comfycore.
christ stop talking like this
birks are fine
dont get the ugly cheap ones
those are one of the dullest birk models though

>> No.10200568

>>10200550
>christ stop talking like this
Sorry, forgot I had to use memespeak on /fa/.

thx bruh, really good advice tbh

>> No.10200576

>>10200568
what are talking about, you were talking in memespeak thats whats dumb lol
it just reduces everything to such simple ideas that u cant even talk about clothes it just means nothing lmao

>> No.10200599
File: 25 KB, 500x404, $_12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200599

c/n

>> No.10200600
File: 111 KB, 1425x1425, sitinto.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200600

C/N?

>> No.10200609
File: 79 KB, 650x377, suede.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200609

>> No.10200631
File: 114 KB, 640x1136, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200631

Too hipster what do you think if I bought it what would look good with it.

>> No.10200657

>>10200631
not hipster, just ugly

>> No.10200679

>>10200541
Sure homes why not

>> No.10200737

>>10198886
No. Get a real black harrington, these collars are high school tier

>> No.10200830
File: 82 KB, 975x1463, 5222462115001_001_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200830

should I get these cheap mondays?

>> No.10200852
File: 23 KB, 500x500, B34241_01_standard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200852

>>10200599
I would not, can't see a fit
>>10200600
cud be gud
>>10200609
cop
>>10200631
please don't
>>10200830
why not

cop or not?

>> No.10200863
File: 402 KB, 2000x2000, 01-07-2015_commedesgarcons_sa3100gsilverwallet_silver_sh_3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10200863

this wallet

>> No.10200892

>>10200609
>>10200269

even though the price isnt bad i still dont think the shoe is worth it
>>10200852
the print in combination with the three stripes are a bit awkward looking. but a different cw might look pretty good.

>> No.10200939

>>10200679
ye alright lemme jus axe

>> No.10201053
File: 15 KB, 500x500, ultraboost.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201053

>>10195717
ultra boost
c or n for daily-ish wear?

>> No.10201084

>>10200939
Axe me pls

>> No.10201088
File: 13 KB, 500x500, S84596_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201088

>> No.10201100
File: 254 KB, 640x427, cdm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201100

I need dry feet during harsh winter without a fucking work boot

>> No.10201121

>>10198573
jeff fuck off

>> No.10201127

>>10201088
I have them and the quality isn't great tbh, get af1 hi tops instead

>> No.10201281

>>10201100
These are not bad but there are way better boots

>> No.10201284

>>10201281
examples that have a similar silhouette?

>> No.10201293

>>10200863
Are you a woman? If so cop

>> No.10201299

>>10201293
no. man.

>> No.10201322

>>10198748
w2c?

>> No.10201326
File: 490 KB, 666x460, Is-The-Nike-Air-Max-90-Infrared-Returning-In-2015.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201326

Cop or nah ?

>> No.10201338

>>10201326
fuckin cop infrareds are sick

>> No.10201378

>>10201326
cop

>> No.10201379
File: 679 KB, 1535x2048, our legacy perfect tee jacquard dot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201379

35 euros

>> No.10201485

>>10201053
any opinions or alternatives?

>> No.10201552

just got hired by Gap, have a 50% or more discount on everything

should I buy anything

>> No.10201672
File: 175 KB, 975x1463, 35634401_102_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10201672

>>10195717

>> No.10202071

http://www.zappos.com/nunn-bush-nelson-brown

http://www.zappos.com/nunn-bush-nelson-cognac

Thinking about getting one or the other (or neither) to wear around a casual office environment, sitting at the desk all day.

>> No.10202130
File: 145 KB, 870x1110, timexwaterbury.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10202130

>>10195717

>> No.10202133

>>10202071
I like them both, honestly. I can't speak to quality but I'd pick the cognac pair. Probably more versatile.

>> No.10202166

>>10200043
good luck finding that CW in the right size

>> No.10202182

>>10196476
If there is one thing I hate about /fa/, it's the taste in shoes. School-Shooter 15's aren't good looking, please don't get them.

>> No.10202202
File: 109 KB, 1571x2000, 44782325JM_14_f[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10202202

mcq
$150 down from $500
one of the few "mixed material" trainers i actually like

>> No.10202214

>>10201322
w2c pls?

>> No.10202296

>>10199007
looks cool and durable, what is it?

>>10199940
terrible

>>10200863
dude, no

>>10202130
cop

>> No.10202314
File: 314 KB, 750x1334, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10202314

Raf tweed blend coat

Opinions? Thanks in advance comrades :)

>> No.10202326

>>10201284
yea but they aint good in a harsh winter

>> No.10202340

>>10202314
>raf by raf

thats not raf

>> No.10202346

>>10200852
graphic weave pack is the only good veritas imo

>> No.10202352
File: 39 KB, 565x372, 369201-565x372[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10202352

>>10202346
forgot pic

>> No.10202356

>>10202340
I know it isn't, but I don't know why. I've heard this on numerous pieces I've inquired about.

Do you have any information? I'm not a giant Raf Simons fan, I more enjoy YSL-tier pieces. However this is coaxing me to try something different, and I don't want to just blow money on it in case it truly isn't worth it.

Thanks ya :)

>> No.10202358

>>10202314

>>10202340
this

it's nice though, i like the texture stripe going on and the hidden button placket. very coppable

>> No.10202363

>>10195717
for $83

>> No.10202373
File: 127 KB, 700x700, 8898308866078.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10202373

>>10202363

>> No.10202382
File: 162 KB, 1571x2000, 44782325JM_14_e[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10202382

>>10202202
nother pic
feel like the hooks ruin these but maybe might look better with some different, more casual black laces?
help fa

>> No.10202396

>>10200599
i can imagine the kind of person/style it would take to pull these off
i can't quite put it into words but you almost surely are not that person

>> No.10202530

Solid cop? They look like they're in good condition.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/261983101786?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649

>> No.10202888

these threads are so funny like you guys are literally asking children what to spend you money on :O

>>10202382
these are very very horrible

>> No.10202893
File: 371 KB, 1024x680, clarks desert mali boot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10202893

Clarks Desert Mali Boot. Cop or Not?

>inb4 mfa

>> No.10202895

>>10202893
they look kinda flat, if thats what they actually look like then dnc

>> No.10202913

>>10202893
Forgot to post a link.

http://www.clarksusa.com/us/mens/mens-view-all/Desert-Mali-Black-Leather/p/26110038

>> No.10203127
File: 331 KB, 640x480, 15119003-0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10203127

?

>> No.10203144

>>10202893
imo the only cute clarks are desert treks

>>10203127
these are fun but not if you are wearing all black

>> No.10203163

>>10203144
>desert treks
that stitching in the middle reminds me of yeezy 350's.

>> No.10203235

>>10201672
no way dude

>> No.10203240

>>10203127
info?

>> No.10203246

>>10203240
Dr Martens FARRELL

>> No.10203276
File: 217 KB, 636x440, stan smith updt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10203276

HELP ME FAST /fa/
Adidas Stan Smith UPDT - cop or not?
Or should I just go for the regular classic Stan Smith?

>> No.10203280

>>10203276
regular duh

>> No.10203439
File: 18 KB, 584x708, sc_096600_c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10203439

jacket

>> No.10203453

>>10203439
ugly

>> No.10203454

>>10198889
bump ppls

>> No.10203470
File: 69 KB, 535x800, uhuh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10203470

>>10203453

>> No.10203475
File: 66 KB, 762x1100, copornot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10203475

cop or not ? the jacket / vest

>> No.10203500

>>10203475
Cop, but don't wear it like that turbo pleb.

>> No.10203510

>>10203500
ahahaha of course anon, I was thinking about uni tee and not rolling up sleeves

>> No.10203526
File: 151 KB, 1200x1200, GERHARD-TEE_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10203526

c/n ?
"sweat" tee shirt in french terry

>> No.10203566

>>10203510
Good stuff, w2c by the way?

>> No.10203792
File: 182 KB, 1023x683, New_Balance_CRT300_VW_Sneaker_politics_life_style_mode_de_vie_hypebeast-1_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10203792

These or Stans?

>> No.10203834

>>10203792
those

>> No.10203946

>>10202296
Some chinese crap but it looks cool, is cheap (29$) and I'm broke
found it here but I'm not sure it'll help you, it's in polish
http://allegro.pl/pojemny-czarny-plecak-sportowy-podrozny-z-plotna-i5528463742.html

>> No.10204002

C or N? Is the heel too much? I don't feel much like spending £600+ on SLP
http://www.sixtiesbeatwear.co.uk/product/high-cavern-black-suede/

>>10203792
Defiantly those

>> No.10204006
File: 23 KB, 500x500, High-Cavern-Blk-Suede-Hero-500x500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204006

>>10204002
Whoops, forgot the file

>> No.10204038
File: 3.01 MB, 3264x2448, 20150804_121331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204038

>>10203792
Those

>> No.10204061

>>10204006
>>10204002
People will think you're a huge faggot. Can you handle that?

>> No.10204064

>>10204061
I am a huge faggot, so is it okay?

>> No.10204065
File: 321 KB, 956x1280, Foto 2 (2) - Kopie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204065

not sure about this jumpsuit

>> No.10204074

>>10204064
I guess so buddy. Just didn't want you facing the social repercussions of wearing those without fully knowing what your in for.

>> No.10204085

>>10198782
Google "black fucking polka dot shirt"

>> No.10204087
File: 22 KB, 400x400, grey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204087

Have black pants and want another shoe to go with. Are grey shoes/ black pants combo overdone??

>> No.10204160

>>10204087
Who cares dude those shoes are so unobtrusive and low key. No one will even remember them after they see them

>> No.10204236
File: 64 KB, 500x375, IRONY swatch watch Happy Joe_thm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204236

cop or nah?

>> No.10204247
File: 10 KB, 203x250, 1437677465450-P-2872415.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204247

?

>> No.10204304

>>10201084
aight my question

>> No.10204331
File: 75 KB, 960x960, swift.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204331

c or n?

>> No.10204384
File: 9 KB, 320x320, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204384

i know its a meme but its also a very cheap meme

>> No.10204391

>>10204065
sieht ziemlich langweilig aus, du brauchst was das die brüste pusht

>> No.10204445

>>10204391
das.

>> No.10204447

>>10204331
no no no no no no no no

>> No.10204460
File: 30 KB, 620x465, 1438687858776[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204460

Looks like old man shoes, but i kind of like them, cop or not?

>> No.10204462

>>10204384
holy shit lol w2c

>> No.10204478

>>10204460
nay. there are better palewave nikes. get ones with a different profile.

>> No.10204506
File: 38 KB, 560x694, denim parlk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204506

cop denim parka?

>> No.10204702

>>10204331
no. that whole message is just depressing because it's speaks about the shitty sites of human nature but then instead of saying something meaningful and worthwhile it wants you to indulge in mindless consumerism to cope with it. buying shit music no less.

>> No.10204734

>>10195813
W2C GOD DAMN

>> No.10204827

>>10202326
anything waterproof? I'm fine with wearing thicker socks provided that they look similar to the desert malis while being waterproof

>> No.10204844
File: 104 KB, 450x337, corn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10204844

cop or not?

>> No.10204975

>>10198795
>>10198799
>>10198801
>>10198803
>>10198884
>>10199748
>>10200115

>>10198789

Have fun deciding.
Also highs to keep the low high trend going

>> No.10205025

>>10204844
cop

>>10204236
it's right on the fringe of too much shit going on, cop if you can rock it

>> No.10205031

>>10203792
I have both


NBS are more comfortable but they have kind of a weird sillouhette on the feet. They also seem to get dirtier and are difficult to clean off.

I like them both pretty equally though, I find stans to be more versatile because of the pure white instead of cream

>> No.10205041

>>10198789
lows
always get lows
do not get highs
get lows

>> No.10205070
File: 46 KB, 366x679, casio.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10205070

>> No.10205076

>>10198748
pls pls w2c? no reverse image search

>> No.10205096

>>10205076
>>10201322
>>10202214
what the fuck is wrong with you retarded subhuman mouthbreathers

>> No.10205167
File: 303 KB, 754x695, Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 21.40.07.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10205167

>>10205096
>implying you can find the shirt

>> No.10205177

>>10205167
go look in the anime thread you fucking idiot

>> No.10205330

>>10205177
>boondocks
>anime
I don't think it's idiotic to be surprised that's in an anime thread

>> No.10205419

>>10205025
>it's right on the fringe of too much shit going on, cop if you can rock it

thanks, I'll think about it but it should be fine, I got less busy looking watches too.

>> No.10205437
File: 60 KB, 540x540, 359097_01_02_PNA[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10205437

I kind of like the color blocking on these and they're cheap and comfy.

should I just go all black?

>> No.10205455

>>10205437
happy halloween

>> No.10205647
File: 156 KB, 800x600, IMG_0962.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10205647

y/n and why

>> No.10205654

>>10205647
sure, looks cool.

>> No.10205680

>>10205070
With another strap, sure

>> No.10205970
File: 61 KB, 336x596, nakef3003812867_m1_1-0._QL90_UX336_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10205970

>>10195717

>> No.10205980

>>10205647
looks good, dawg

>> No.10206023
File: 10 KB, 377x482, yee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10206023

http://store.y-3.com/us/y3store/sneakers_cod44877014rj.html

>> No.10206035

>>10206023
Dnc imo.

>> No.10206038

>>10205970

too much

>> No.10206059
File: 71 KB, 545x363, apollomoc-blue2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10206059

>> No.10206062
File: 95 KB, 650x650, aXm2931xjU.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10206062

>>10205970
I dig. I'm strongly considering copping it too.

>> No.10206078

>>10206059
the fuck is that

it's like the bastard child between CDBs and Fluxes

>> No.10206083

>>10205031

how have you been cleaning these?

>> No.10206086
File: 1.50 MB, 250x233, 1438113712191.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10206086

>>10206059
Absolutely not.

>> No.10206179

>>10206083
I haven't had to clean the stans yet because I'm more careful with them, but with the NBs I usually get a microfiber cloth and water with a little soap

>> No.10206531
File: 57 KB, 609x1024, I-Love-Ugly-Military-Pant-Coffee_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10206531

i love ugly military pants (in this color or black)

>> No.10206586

>>10197854
ima go ahead and ask for more opinions b/c i actually like them. they're these : http://www.thecorner.com/us/men/high-tops-trainers_cod44799073mu.html?utm_campaign=J84DHJLQkR4&utm_content=10&utm_medium=affiliazione&utm_source=linkshare_us&tp=40548

>> No.10206906

>>10206586
i'm thinking about these too... leather seems good quality but they remind a bit too much of air force 1's

>> No.10206913

>>10199594
lmao dumbass.
>>10199857
neither nigger
>>10199940
dnc
>>10200043
c
>>10200269
>>10200609
dnc
>>10200863
c
>>10201053
c

>> No.10206927

>>10201100
Malis won't keep your feet dry. Water seeps in between the sole and uppers very easily.

>> No.10207126

>>10196419
cool with comfy pale fit
shit with almost anything else

>> No.10208094

>>10195829
id on the right ? where to find

>> No.10208264
File: 59 KB, 620x430, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10208264

I'm loving this meme

>> No.10208318

>>10208264
ech.
the white part in the front looks kind of disturbing.

>> No.10208401
File: 348 KB, 800x1067, 10622717_10204722525597807_882648056704455560_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10208401

Going for 90 on Grailed

>> No.10208417
File: 37 KB, 502x644, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10208417

>>10208401
Cop

cop or not? 80€

>> No.10208540
File: 892 KB, 1128x2000, ragbo4202533203_m1_1-0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10208540

>> No.10208887
File: 154 KB, 1000x822, PINKBG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10208887

c/n?
just a pink graphic t

>> No.10208900

>>10208887
W2c I love me some ugly mane

>> No.10208911
File: 29 KB, 446x522, hmprod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10208911

Y/n?

>> No.10208912

>>10208887
this is dank shit right here mane

>> No.10208917

>10208900
http://www.adlibco.us/product/sky-blue-i-ma-let-da-uzi-spit-shirt

>> No.10208932

>>10208917
>>10208900
oops

>> No.10209052

>>10208911
Do it, looks nice

>> No.10209078

>>10208911
w2c?

>> No.10209223

>>10200224
you're a faggot

>> No.10209225

>>10209078
H&M Anorak, I'm assuming.

>> No.10209288

>>10203526
cop

>> No.10209329

>>10204331
Is this supposed to be a reference to Sonic Youth? And no.

>> No.10209423

>>10209078
H&m

>> No.10209664
File: 299 KB, 440x370, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10209664

which one of these should I buy?

>> No.10209697
File: 277 KB, 1200x1200, one.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10209697

Which? I have a voucher. Ignore centering.

>> No.10209705

>>10209697
top right

>> No.10209985
File: 12 KB, 400x400, shopping.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10209985

?

>> No.10210049
File: 445 KB, 1200x1747, 146[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210049

>>10209697
I recognize that incestuous imouto!

http://exhentai.org/g/784757/4c2b887302/

>> No.10210171
File: 79 KB, 1100x506, Which Shoe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210171

>>10195717
Which shoe for this upcoming fall?

>> No.10210251

>>10210171
Right one

>> No.10210302

>>10210171
I own the pair on the right, make sure to treat it with some sort of protection because they stain really easily, other than that, decent shoes

>> No.10210318
File: 668 KB, 573x810, ctrl-warrior-knit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210318

HELP.

>> No.10210392

>>10210302
Thx, Recs on how to protect it without fucking up the shoe in the process?
>>10210318
Yes, looks solid.

>> No.10210404

I'm not looking at anything specific, but how quality is APC's stuff? I'm not usually about buying overpriced basics. However, I need a couple sweaters/jumpers for fall/winter and I've had horrible luck in the past with fits. I just want something that's simple, clean, and comfy.

>> No.10210432

>>10201672
Link Pls

>> No.10210459

>>10204506
oh man, this is the kind of shit I love. slightly abnormal but not annoying and in-your-face about it. it's just a parka. but denim! cop. and tell me w2c while you're at it.

>> No.10210480
File: 37 KB, 900x900, pokhara.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210480

c/n

theyre in the mail

>> No.10210484
File: 32 KB, 490x282, barferito.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210484

>>10210480
naw dawg

>> No.10210532

>>10210392
It's actually striped anon.

>> No.10210625
File: 607 KB, 800x792, 1437311408184.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210625

>>10210532
thx bbygrl

>> No.10210634
File: 58 KB, 520x693, cn9542301.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210634

I got $20 off at gap wtf do i cop there

>> No.10210640

>>10210634
wrong fucking image. I was thinking of copping thsoe sandals for next to free but decided i should probs only buy leather sandals

>> No.10210644

>>10209697
all of my why

>> No.10210652
File: 71 KB, 153x157, 123456.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210652

>>10210480

>> No.10210668
File: 289 KB, 502x468, 1436055692395.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210668

>>10210480
I ded

>> No.10211042

>>10202130
just get a seiko 5

>> No.10211410
File: 1.26 MB, 2400x3100, shoe_009e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10211410

4 post left. Cop these for $57 new? I want supercolors but adidas a shit and won't restock.

>> No.10211432

>>10210480
Are those the new yeezy 150 boosts?

>> No.10211457
File: 466 KB, 1531x523, Tevas.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10211457

Which ones I should go for? I like the looks of the one on the left and it's cheaper but not as durable as the right one. Going for a more techwear look.

Chacos are out of my budget

>> No.10211465

>>10211457
oh god don't buy the right I own left and they are great

>> No.10211467

>>10210634

dude it's the gap, not a big deal

if you're lucky you can get some nice jeans that were usually $60 for $10

>> No.10211471

>>10211465
Alright then. The right looked too much like dad shoes anyways. How are the durability anyways? Not really going to use them for hiking or anything like that.

>> No.10211657

>>10211465
Could you give an example of a fit with the shoes on the right? I'm really considering buying a pair, but I'm not sure.

>> No.10212213
File: 42 KB, 600x900, KENNEDY-VAPOR-2_1024x1024[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10212213

Does anyone have these? Are they a good alternative to CPs or are they kentwang tier?

>> No.10212518
File: 142 KB, 1200x1800, ragboneofficer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10212518

>>10195717
Rag and Bone Officer boot in tan.

>> No.10212567

>>10211410
Those are really nice. I like the subtle contrast colouring.

>> No.10212582

>>10211042
Already copped lmao

>> No.10213342

>>10195795
cop

theyre dope af