[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 234 KB, 816x612, wew.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888727 No.9888727[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

i know you're out there, i know you're not all kanye west loving, nike wearing, asap rocky liking plebs.

there was a time when /fa/ wasnt just about crossposting faggots and their hair style, knowledge and consumption of designer fashion was once assumed, not a rarity. you still browse, ive seen the recent cops threads, you're out there, you're just not discussing.

as always, cucks not welcome.

>> No.9888765
File: 59 KB, 640x426, Photo on 5-23-15 at 3.45 PM #2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888765

>>9888727
out here

>> No.9888774
File: 810 KB, 1064x639, Screen Shot 2015-05-24 at 3.31.23 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888774

>>9888727
tropical wool suit, unsure of the season. fits well, breathes nicely. have a tank from 2000 on the way too. really nice stuff popping up recently.

the suit is great but it has this sheen that i'm not crazy about, but i found it for a steal and will get a few wears out of it before i consider passing it on.

>> No.9888778

>>9888727
how much did you pay for the raf parka?

>> No.9888779

>>9888765
is this the top from aw03?

>>9888778
3000

>> No.9888780

>>9888774
the white l/s with strapped cuffs look really good here, i need one for layering.

>> No.9888781

>>9888727
fuck. that raf pcl trench... i've never even seen one for sale. how much u get it for and when?

>> No.9888792

>>9888779
yea this is the one. the fabric on these is so fucking nice, they're really comfortable. very glad i found two in my size.

>>9888780
i was watching the 2003 a/w runway a few times today and couldn't help but pair one of the shirts with the suit.

honestly a not sheer pair of trousers and some t-shirt and i'll be set for a while.

>> No.9888825
File: 40 KB, 450x600, 14d3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888825

>>9888727
anyone know anything about the raf "limited edition" line? from what i can tell the pieces seem to focus around designs from iconic archival pieces. some not though, like the graphic printed shirts. but yea does anyone know?

pic related

>> No.9888828
File: 1.09 MB, 1933x3263, 1426228779569.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888828

>>9888792
what size are you? is the white one just the basic version with straps and no other accessories?

>>9888781
3000, like 3 months ago.

>> No.9888833

>>9888828
do you even like the album or painting or are you just wearing it because it's raf

>> No.9888836
File: 38 KB, 626x964, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888836

>>9888828
they're both size s, the black runs a but bigger than the white though. also the only difference seems to be the extra strap from the black one.

pic is from s/s 2000 tank

>> No.9888838
File: 36 KB, 650x916, $_57-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888838

>>9888836

>>9888833
please

>> No.9888842
File: 23 KB, 333x500, f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888842

>>9888825
yeh idk, ive seen a few of them, im pretty sure most of them were released in japan in conjunction with certain stores for his 10th anniversary. only info ive read online has always been speculative.

most notable examples are the curriculum bomber with all the raf shows from 95 to 05 on the back, but that is really weird tbh, some of the shows are spelled/named incorrectly, pretty sure its some japanese thing released with raf approval but not raf design. the other is the suit that has raf simons name written all over it in the form of pinstripes.

>> No.9888845

>>9888838
i dunno you seem fairly double standard considering you call out supreme and hba fans for wearing brand spammy logos and pieces, which i agree with to an extent
then you dont even really seem to care about the musical relation of the piece

its like wearing a joy division unknown pleasures shirt without being into joy division, astronomy, or electronics

>> No.9888848

>>9888833
Pigfuck flaunts his weak style just to annoy the rest of us

>> No.9888852
File: 90 KB, 800x533, $_57-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888852

>>9888842
that makes sense actually, i can see that being the case. the heredity shirts are selling for cheap on y!jp. shills tryna flip them shits on grailed lol

mine was a turtleneck that in hindsight i might have paid a bit too much for considering what you said but we'll see once it arrives.

recently found three new order cassettes for like $10. yea i actually use the cassette deck in my car and it's cool as hell having new tapes for the summer

>> No.9888855

>>9888845
i am not pigfuck . . .

>> No.9888856
File: 87 KB, 900x460, rsaw03still4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888856

>>9888845
i do like jd and no, but that really isnt the point, even if i didnt id still like the piece.

for aw03 raf was given access to peter saville's design archive to use for the show, the designs and graphics form the foundation of many of the pieces. it transcends any brand identification/promotion thing, its not used for recognition or shameless association, the show is dedicated in part to bands like joy division and the cultural impact of their music and the aesthetic nature of the post punk subculture.

the pieces work in unison with the graphics, they arent just a platform for a shameless, knowing 'wink' of cultural awareness like supreme shit, won't even bother discussing hba.

>> No.9888860

>>9888856
how does it feel knowing that a sweater that you own was originally modeled by a black man

>> No.9888865
File: 17 KB, 457x500, $_12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888865

>>9888852
yeh be wary of the LE shit, its certainly not raf simons in the same way the other pieces are. i've seen the shirts you're talking about, cant really shed any light on what they are, all they do is further muddy the 'limited edition' thing.

only piece i had was the curriculum bomber, like the old 00-01 bombers its forstex garments, only its all the one size(tagged OS but the inner forstex tag is XXXL)

its really quite shit tbh, a lot of the collections arent even named, and some are named incorrectly like ss02 which is written as 'who unto those..' instead of 'woe unto those'

>> No.9888866
File: 69 KB, 397x810, tumblr_nl542vwnFr1sit95lo1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888866

>>9888828
Hey

>> No.9888874
File: 51 KB, 480x640, 1022737.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888874

>>9888860
indifferent, its not like he wore every one that was produced.

also, too the dude asking about LE, this piece is tagged limited edition and has definitely been made by raf, it has the patch(not a print) and the fleece inner of the rest of the aw03 sweaters.

so the tag is official but it mightve been licensed out for different events.

>> No.9888881
File: 519 KB, 1256x2469, IMG_6605.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888881

>>9888866
:)

>> No.9888884

>>9888865
ya i'll stay away if anything i'll just re-sell to break even on the turtleneck no big deal

that's hilarious though i'm imagining the actual process of rushing to get some repros of special pieces just for some hyped store opening and actually making and selling fake raf in the end lol

>> No.9888892

>>9888874
shit, now i see about how ambiguous this limited edition thing seems. do you own that? i'll have to be discerning i guess about what to pick up because some of the pieces seemed really interesting. some seem like shit knock-offs tho

>> No.9888902

>>9888892
nah i dont have that sweater, some guy on sf offered it to me for like 600 in 2013 which seemed ridiculous at the time but its probably worth double that now.

the shirts definitely seem almost fake, from what ive seen the LE is not very common though.

>> No.9888914
File: 650 KB, 640x961, double.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888914

>>9888856
fair enough
i feel as though its somewhat unfortunate that the album cover features rennaiance art as it seems to contrast too strongly with punk subculture and gives the impression that the cover is just a 1:1 rip of the painting, if you dont notice the color pallette in the top right

i also think you shouldnt discount hba so readily. i agree that they have alot of 'wearing money' type clothes, but some of their more showy pieces such as the stocks, bondage pieces as well as the timberland avalance boots are very nice. i particularly like pic related

>> No.9888923

>>9888914
there is nothing at all redeemable about HBA, its the worst, i cant think of anything more offensive than HBA.

>> No.9888930

>>9888923
been trill, off white

>> No.9888952
File: 2.03 MB, 2592x1936, absolutely disgusting.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9888952

>>9888930
i just googled them, i preferred not knowing things like this existed.

>> No.9888969

>>9888774
this looks really good, do you have a blog where you post your purchases/fits?

>> No.9889014

Is adidas ok?

>> No.9889032

>>9889014
adidas is cheap slav trash and no amount of designer collaborations will change that

>> No.9889041

>>9889014
their trackpants are OK for comfy cold days imo

>> No.9889343

tight