/fa/ - Fashion

CRAWWWWLIIIIIIIIIIIING IN MYYYY SKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN

>>9759287
lel

>>9759283
VSCO

>>9759283
i dont remember exactly qwhich one but it is $2,800

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Some people actually think this overly-ordinary clothes are somehow becomes "special".

>>9759850
Can'type. Ops.

>>9759850
ordinary where? lol
99.9% of people don't dress like that, i guarantee you

>>9759857
>saggy stripped shirt
>dark bland coat
>black short pants
>sneakers
>black socks

You can enjoy your normcore fetishe as much as you please. But yes, ordinary.

>>9759879
do you even know what normcore means

>>9759857
The only thing that might be unusual (as in not frequently seen) is the Qasas

>>9759882
Your childish answer lefts no room for a real reply.

>>9759879
>trying this hard to sound like you know what you're talking about but not even coming close

>>9759890
all you need to give is a yes or no.

i suggest you google it before you continue to embarrass yourself with your lack of fashion knowledge.

>>9759892
Explain what you are talking about, then?

Lecture me. Teach me a lesson. "Show them".

Also, I'm not trying hard at all. I don't even get why would you sense that I put any effort in it. Tsk. Are you that offended that you enjoy clothes that are reminescent of that basic stuff that was everywhere in the 90s, and some people now find it very ordinary, while you have a fantasy about it?

>>9759882
anon is right man, dont try that hard to be a good trip

>>9759897
>embarrass yourself with your lack of fashion knowledge.
Please.

It's almost embarassing to have any "fashion knowledge" on /int. It's full of insecure people that want to be told what they should be dressing, and would love a stylist.

>>9759904
>reminescent of that basic stuff that was everywhere in the 90s

lmao

how old were you in the 90s?

>>9759913
it's /fa/ by the way

welcome to the forums buddy, it's great to have you here. enjoy your stay and remember to read the sticky and lurk before posting

>>9759916
>how old were you in the 90s?

40s. Are you going to call me old to prove how "stylish" you are. and how much "fashion knowledge" you have?

To get back on topic, you can achieve the blurred background by using a 70/150/200 mm lens with an aperture of f5.6 or f2.8. Ree pls stop shitposting and offtopic rambling.

>>9759924
lmao so you;re like 60 years old

and you're on a forum where the average age is 16

how does it feel to be a fucking loser that you have to spend your free time virtually hanging out with children?

>>9759931
>>9759920
kek

>>9759931
How does it feel to be a fucking female loser that you have to spend your free time virtually shitposting and contributing nothing on a Vietnamese imageboard about Seppuku?

>>9759924
>40 in the 90s
>90s were a quarter century ago

o i am laffin

i don't want to even consider that this is obviously b8 because ahahahaha

pic related

its u

>>9759931
Probably better than being a vapid person that writes things like

>do you even know what normcore means
>embarrass yourself with your lack of fashion knowledge.

But dosen't write anything related to fashion in any reply, besides trying to personally offend, and general assumptions, about an anonymous person. Is /fa really the most uninsteresting board that is?

You are as imaginative as OP's picture.

>>9759931
Dude ur the definitive archetype of an edgy 16 yo tripcode who tries to hard being anybody in an anonymous anime board. Just your name have the most normie meme in all 4chan and oh, pic related, is you.

>>9759931
>projecting this hard

>>9759947
im actually not 60 years old, believe it or not

stop throwing buzzwords around

>>9759950
I was referring to the 3rd part of your shitpost hon.

>>9759942
>normie

hey you post on r9k too??? cool, can you share some cool frog memes with me

>>9759940
can you actually show me exactly what i said that you disagree with

instead of writing vague things like "being a vapid person" and "is /fa really the most uninsteresting board"

having a conversation with someone like you irl must be torture

>>9759976
I'm already not interest in conversation with you anymore, sorry.
Try someone else.

>>9759997
you're obviously interested enough to tell me you aren't interested

>>9759976
How's Rickie?

>>9759283
just look at the exif data

but if that reall is a 5D mkII body like the others are claiming, he has some reallllllllyyyyyyy shitty glass on it

like, he got some sigma EF-s mount for his full frame prosumer body

>>9760014
suprising how you call yourself a photography expert

but you have posted 0 fits in the course of 10 years

>>9760017
since when is knowing about the lens system to a line of camera's i own dating back to ~2004ish being a camera expert?

no im not saying my camera body is from 2004...saying i have EF lenses since then

>>9760014

>tfw you buy a 60D before understanding the implications of full/cropped frame sensors

>>9760032
man shut the fuck up. u dont know shit. sounding like a retard all the time