/fa/ - Fashion

i think they're much better looking than the other 2, and the sole makes it look vintage af

sick

>>9455239
can't change that shit silhouette.

meh/10 nothing special nothing bad

>>9455264
this so much. is adidas marketing to blame?

>>9455264
>>9455292
>shit silhouette

not slim enough for you semen demon?

>>9455239
nice

I'll definitely be picking a pair up. Especially at regular pricing

>>9455239
looks like absolute shit
and stans DON'T go with skinny jeans, their shape isn't sleek yet 90% of the people wearing stans treat them like a CP alternative

>>9455699
they go well with pinned jeans tho

can ppl stop wearing meme smiths already

>>9455699
what are you talking about??

>>9455800
>stop liking what i don't like!

>>9455699
>stans DON'T go with skinny jeans

>>9455819
those arent skinny jeans

>>9455311
toe box is stubby looking af.

How long before /fa/ goes crazy for those ugly old phatpharm shoes?

I hate the speckles

>>9455841
yeah they are, they're just not skin tight

What's with the stan smith love?
Sambas is clearly the better adidas.

>>9455916
as much as I hate stan smiths, sambas are far worse. and I'm talking about the originals, not the troll ones you posted

>>9455929
Those are the original sambas.

>>9455819
nice topman sweater

>>9455929
>>9455916
>>9455934
I actually really dig the white sambas

I bet theyre gonna be what adidas tries topush on the cool kids next year

>>9455819
>>9455803

Both of these look bad.

Smiths are ugly af, but they do look good on girls.

>>9455803
Sick fit m8

W2C sweater?

>>9455986
post something good then fuckboy, it looks like you're just shitting on the board to shit on the board.

>>9455986
they're just plain white shoes you dumb fucking autist

>>9455938
I thought it was gap

Also wtf is with those picture captchas

Saw these with vulc.. thoughts?

>>9455945
I've never seen white ones in real life, so I can't judge, but the black ones look hideous in my opinion.

>>9455934
Those are samba supers if I'm not mistaken

>>9456075
Fucking gross. Have they been shopped?

>>9456116

>>9455905
>not skin tight
>skin tight
>skin

anyway yes >>9455699 is true, ss look the best with standard/tapered fits. people who say otherwise are just delusional because some fits are matchy matchy or posted endlessly by retards

the new whites are a shame because its not the premium/european version and the gum soles is already prominent by itself, why speckles to make things more


>but its still skinny jeans

>>9456307
pictures like that are very flattering

>>9456323
and the "the cp alternative" fit

>>9455699
Stop splurting poop, stan smiths can look good with skinny jeans but there needs to be space between jeans and shoes, like a pinroll or tailored jeans + nice socks is great

>>9456300
Nope, I just saw them in the new spring/summer 2015 release

>>9456349

>>9455819
w2c coat

Are these the new or old pair? One has a suede green heel cap, one is shiny leather. One has a ratty tongue, one has padded. One has an off white sole. They're not worn yet so I'm deciding if I should keep them or exchange for the other version.

>>9456766
new pair

>>9456734
shh no1 tell this pleb

>>9456818
What pair is the best. New or old?

>Got a pair of Rafan Smithons coming soon, got them for free.

Feels good.

>>9455803
w2c skinny legs

why must i be cursed w/ hambeast thighs

i picked up a pair of white/white stans at a thrift store in rly good condition for 17 bucks; but, the sole is like pebbled. are these rly old editions or..?

>>9455264
>>9455292
>>9455699
>>9455844
>>9455929
>>9455986
Children.

>>9456734
Carhartt wip.
This was asked a hundred times.

>>9456956
here they are

>>9456766
hese are the new pair but the shit version

you want the "vintage" version, thin tongue, suede heel, yellow-ish sole.

i think the vintage version is eu only but i could be wrong, definitely exchange IF you can though.

gazelles are better

>>9456969

I live in the UK and I've seen both in store side by side. I saw the vintage pair. It had an off-white sole and a much thinner tongue. The tongue looked really rough, thin and uncomfortable. What makes it better quality? I may return it and exchange them.

>>9456983
They're not better quality, they just have a different look

>>9456983
Many people including me think it looks better with the differences.

I'm pretty sure I heard somewhere the vintage version is better quality but I haven't handled the regular version myself. you may need to do some research.

If you prefer the padded tongue then keep them man, don't let any one else decide for you. : )

>>9456998

I was just wondering if the leather was higher quality or something. Less prone to falling apart. I'll compare them again and see what i think. I like the all white sole and all white shoe myself.

W2C the new pair?

The official Adidas store doesn't have them.

shit
tfw just bought the old version a couple weeks ago

Adidas is for chavs and slavs. They are the official footwear of the dredges of British society, or the subhumans of eastern europe. Are you either one of these? If not, stay away. Go Nikes, go Asics, go Converse, go whatever, but stay away from these three stripe pieces of shit.

You will never find an adidas fit that doesn't make you look like a britkranian degenerate. Sambas, superstars, meme smiths, gazelles - it doesn't matter. All are equally gutter trash.

>>9457090
converse is for plebs
vans are basic
nikes are for minorities
asics are ok
new balance are for le "im just getting in to fashion xD"
adidas are for chavs
stan smiths/superstars/collabs are the best cheap sneakers
reebok is also good

>>9457090
nice meme

>>9457116
m8 i rather wear converse than wear ribok n nikes

>>9455239

crap

>>9456966
anyone

>>9457116

reebok is for britfags who don't care about how they look at all and want to grab the cheapest trainers they can

>>9457190
true but
>instapump
>garbstore collabs
>classic models in black or white

>>9457116
This.
Planning to buy pump furys when they restock in my country.

>>9457312
thats cool . if ur still 12

>>9457331
>furys
>not dope af

>>9456323
this looks wild good

>>9456964
>Carhartt wip.
http://shop.carhartt-wip.com/us/men/jackets/I013292/mosley-jacket

Should I cop?

>>9456427
I actually kinda like them with that toebox

thoughts on ZX mid flux nps

>>9457692
me too
are they leather tho? if so, anyone know where i can cop them in the US?

>>9455239
WHERE COP

>>9457692
I saw them at a Pacsun a few weeks ago, and I thought they looked horrible. They are wider than the original ones, In was tempted to cop because I want SS but after consideration I came to the conclusion that they were almost as wide as Air Forces

>>9455239
Why are they new? That's just a different color way, or is there something new in the design that I missed?

>>9457825
new because of the colourway, but if you are being pedantic the design has changed because there are small paint splatters on the sole.

>>9455239
I personally don't like gum soles but i think these shoes are ok

>>9455264
they did a sleek series (for girls)
>tfw mine are beaten and i can't find new ones