[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 2.72 MB, 4287x3215, smithspo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9418331 No.9418331 [Reply] [Original]

just copped some smiths
anyone got some inspo?

>> No.9418341

>>9418331
die.

>> No.9418345

>>9418331
inspo = any goddamn person wearing white shoes

white shoes are the easiest to pull off ffs

>> No.9418375
File: 3.45 MB, 2432x4320, IMG_20150205_195109030_HDR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9418375

kinda dirty but they look nice w/ grey socks imo

>> No.9418380

>>9418331

OP you are the cancer

>> No.9418385

>>9418375
don't.

>> No.9418389
File: 52 KB, 348x530, 7979878.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9418389

>> No.9418395

>>9418375
I like those pants

>> No.9418558

>>9418395
Levi's 510s (before they were shit) tucked under

>> No.9418578

>not getting the vintage ones
you don't know how to pick your items OP.

>> No.9418596

>>9418331
Dank meme shoes.

>> No.9418633
File: 34 KB, 600x600, converse-jack-purcell-classic-white-lace-head_LRG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9418633

Better than smiths

>> No.9418663
File: 46 KB, 525x540, 1419786837794.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9418663

>>9418331

Enjoy ur maymay shoes

>> No.9418670

>>9418633
ive been thinking about copping these..

they're cheaper here too ($80 for jack purcells vs. $100 stan smiths)

>> No.9418678

>>9418331
>SMITHSPO

oh my fucking god i am seething mad right now. What a stupid fucking title. Why are you buying SS in 2015? I'm not even doing that "op is a fag" meme when i say OP, you are the biggest fucking faggot on planet earth. Please kill yourself on livestream

>> No.9418690

>>9418678
>wants to see a person commit suicide
Damn.

Honestly man if you need to talk about something I can listen. My email is respawnpls at the gmail mail service. You can try to be strong all by yourself all you want, and hey, you made it this far, but maybe, JUST MAYBE, it would be easier on you to let off some steam.

I'm a great listener in person.

In case you need someone, I'm here.

Hope you feel better soon.

>> No.9418695

>>9418678
>>9418596
>>9418663
>>9418341
>>9418380
take a break, you'll feel better

>> No.9418769

>>9418678
>assblasted
lmao why so mad?

>> No.9418780

>>9418678
smithspo is the funniest thing ive seen on fa in a while

>> No.9418813

>>9418331
fuck off rhys

>> No.9418846

>>9418375
clean your fucking shoes

looking well worn and beat up is one thing
looking scuzzy like you walked thru vomit is another.

>> No.9418894

>>9418846
I know dude. Its been a long week. Haven't had time to be nitpicky and clean my shoes lmao

>> No.9418925

>>9418331
>just bought these shoes that are trendy
>realized I have no plans or ideas for how to wear them

should have decided whether they fit your wardrobe before you bought em

but anyway, they're super versatile
put on any outfit and put on the stans, then look in the mirror
It'll probably look decent

>> No.9419197
File: 574 KB, 655x573, http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2Fe4c5a12543d632f9c8031d909cd29f25%2Ftumblr_nfb0kmHQ591rsyaepo1_1280.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9419197

>> No.9419260

Is it worth it getting CP achilles or should I just get some stans for a fraction of the price?

>> No.9419286

>>9419260

Well do you want to look good or shit?

>> No.9419305
File: 40 KB, 500x336, $_12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9419305

this is INSPO

>> No.9419589

i feel bad for considering meme shoes but recently ive been wanting a pair, i was never rly interested before

i've already got mono white chucks, do u go for low AF1s or red Stans (fuck green)

AF1s have a more unique silhouette while Stans are relatively similar to what I already have w the Chucks, and i also dislike the tongue on Stans (and CPs)

but the red accents will add some color and variety bc I've already got completwly white shoes

what should i do???????

>> No.9419822 [DELETED] 

>>9418670
stan smiths are 75 on tres-bien

>> No.9419976

>>9419589
>what should i do???????
buy navy obviously

>> No.9419982

if you have to get SS shoes, you get the yurop vintage yellowed sole/suede heel in navy

green is fucking gross and goes with nothing, and red is way too loud

navy is where its at

>> No.9419984

>>9418633

these would be fine if not for the stupid fucking black line on the front of the toe box

not only that, but the toebox itself is way larger due to that one added bit of rubber. makes the whole thing look really chunky

>> No.9419990
File: 579 KB, 640x960, 1420424669503.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9419990

>>9419976
>>9419982
muh navybros

>> No.9419994

>tfw you honestly like the look of stan smiths more than CPs despite owning both

i dunno what it is

>> No.9420045

>>9418331
These are shit tier shoes in Britain.

>> No.9420068

>mfw i started the stans hate on here and it finally caught on
good

>> No.9420072
File: 119 KB, 650x1000, melgibson5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9420072

>>9420068
>mfw i first recommended stans on here and it finally caught on

>> No.9420079

>>9418633
hahaha grody dude i copped my stan smiths for $60 at an adidas outlet

>> No.9420082
File: 915 KB, 1596x2698, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9420082

Oc

>> No.9420086

>>9418894
do you live in the rainforest or something? I can't get my shoes that dirty in a whole month

>> No.9420103

>>9418558
How do make the tuck under stay? When I try it it comes undone after a few minutes of walking

>> No.9420384

>>9420082
you have a lovely home

well, your parents do

>> No.9420417

so played out

>> No.9420468

>>9420086
live in OR so yeah actually lol. grass is always muddy af

>>9420103
idk. mine just stay under. note that theres like 2 inches of fabric tucked underneath. if you only do a little it likely won't stay tucked.

>> No.9420478

>>9420086
get out of the house more often.

>> No.9420499

>>9418375
w2c socks

>> No.9420528

>>9420499
wrangler wool socks. don't know w2c but i would check out an outdoor apparel store or something. or the internet

>> No.9420549
File: 11 KB, 377x482, 44712724BX_12_f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9420549

What do you think of Rafs Smiths?

>> No.9420558

>>9418375
You just put me off stans, congrats

>> No.9420583

>>9420082
WTC a jacket like that

>> No.9420612

>>9420549
Overpriced.

>> No.9420652
File: 1.49 MB, 1937x3122, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9420652

>> No.9420712

>>9420417
the fuck
/fa/ calls everything played out now
next thing you know fuckin jeans will be played out too

>> No.9420718

>>9420712
They are.

>> No.9420724
File: 140 KB, 1000x786, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9420724

>>9419982
No, you get the original (and best) green.

>> No.9420737

>>9420549
If they were $100~ cheaper I would cop the pink ones.

>> No.9420850

>>9420652
I love every single fit this guy has.

>> No.9420854

>>9419197
cute.

>> No.9420883
File: 403 KB, 927x927, stan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9420883

thoughts??

>> No.9420978

>>9420850
Then you have shit taste m8 because literally every fit he has posted his just him wearing a jumper and jeans with pleb shoes.

>> No.9421009

>>9420724
looks like shi

>> No.9421016

>>9418331
Boring as fuck, would not wear.

>> No.9421124

>>9420883
bad

>> No.9421146

>>9420712
I'm sorry you bought into the hype.

>> No.9423561

Bumping

>> No.9423656
File: 332 KB, 472x450, Twill.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9423656

For a palewave fit involving this bomber, a light beige hoody and light denim jeans should I go for Stan Smiths? And if Smiths, which color?

>> No.9423678

>>9420712
they are. jeans are so 2012. wool pants are what in now.

>> No.9423717
File: 105 KB, 1200x675, dean.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9423717

>>9418633
>>9418633

>> No.9423721

>>9423717

also purcells or superga for more obscurity

>> No.9423726

>>9418813
hahahahhahahaha, not even me

>> No.9423736

>>9418813
fuck off james you turbo cunt i will murder you and steal your shitty nike x acg jacket

>> No.9423844

>>9423678

you're so 2014 now chinos are cool

>> No.9423910

Can someone post that pic of Raf wearing the dirty Stan smiths with shorts

>> No.9424182
File: 266 KB, 1200x1811, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424182

OG green are goat

>> No.9424198

>>9424182
horrendous

>> No.9424232
File: 340 KB, 857x595, 1421869917821.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424232

>> No.9424238
File: 1.23 MB, 3264x4928, 1422451929387.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424238

>> No.9424240
File: 1.67 MB, 3179x4928, 1421893076091.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424240

>> No.9424243
File: 431 KB, 646x756, 1421871871433.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424243

>> No.9424249
File: 68 KB, 615x481, 1414035344417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424249

>> No.9424254
File: 900 KB, 1725x2995, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424254

Comfy

>> No.9424436

>>9424240
where to cop smiths with the cream sole?

>> No.9424444

>>9424436
rubbing bleach on them can turn them cream/yellow

>> No.9424465

>>9424182
omg incredible pic of 2 gays fatherfucker

>> No.9424635
File: 1.15 MB, 2500x2500, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424635

>>9424436
Europe. They're the higher quality version. Cream sole, suede heel tab, buttery leather.

They're almost as good as Common Projects in terms of quality but look about 10 times better.

>> No.9424681
File: 66 KB, 508x449, 1418704202145.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424681

lacing them all the way up should be illegal

the shit americuck version should be even more illegal

>> No.9424719

>>9424635
>that whole post

mfw mfa


:DDDDDDDDDDD

>> No.9424748

>>9424681
How do you lace your shoes faggot?

>> No.9424757

>>9424635
Can you buy from adidas archive? Or is that just how they ship normal stans in europe?

>> No.9424763

>>9424757
Not sure. If you order them from places like Oi Polloi/End etc. You'll most likely get the good version.

>> No.9424765

>>9424240
w2c navy sweater like this? what are the most popular right now?

>> No.9424778

>>9418331
anyone got a pic of that dude taken in his room wearing a black parka, a norse sweater, black skinny sweatpants and stans?

>> No.9424783
File: 257 KB, 764x356, vzOXn3.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424783

>>9424635
>they're almost as good as C['s in terms of quality

I own those exact same ones (in 2 colorways) and have made it clear countless times why people should buy that version, but that's far from the truth.

CP's are much better quality, it's not "almost as good", and they definitely don't look better you sperg. If that's you in the fit, I know you want CP's instead of Stans don't even try to lie.

>> No.9424786

>>9424783
Whoops, apologies for potential misreading on my part, you meant the different versions of the Stans look better(?).

Still, argument on quality stands.

>> No.9424866

>>9424786
why are the creme soles higher quality?
White sole costs 90€ while creme sole cost 100€, but the description says nothing about their leather.

>> No.9424894
File: 1.17 MB, 3596x1572, image (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424894

>>9424866
They have a different tongue (thatched web stuff underneath), the leather is regarded as 'premium' and it does feel much better than the normal cheap ones (black in pic attached).

The leather is noticeably different to the touch, and when wearing the black pair for the first few times they hurt my ankles a lot but the premium version was fine even with thin socks, much comfier.

I don't wear these much anymore though, probably giving the greens away and I just use the navy's as beaters.

This link shows the premium version btw, has some details on it and you can see the webbing underneath the tongue: http://www.endclothing.co.uk/adidas-stan-smith-vintage.html?173=281&gclid=CLP7h7H50MMCFfHKtAodNj0AEg

>> No.9425522

I hate how stubby the toe box is on stans

>> No.9425701

>>9418690

Are you new to 4chan

>> No.9425716
File: 105 KB, 634x829, lennon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425716

>>9418389

ayy fa as fuck

>> No.9425728
File: 410 KB, 615x481, 1416292892728.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425728

>>9418375
shoes dont fit
tied like shit
socks too big and shitty pattern
>lil fag tryna sag but you floodin at the same time

wear black socks with black pants you fuck

>> No.9425752
File: 1.82 MB, 2448x3264, 2015-02-08 02.57.10 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425752

They're really easy to wear

>> No.9425760

>>9419990
>>9424232
>>9424238
>>9424240
>>9425752
honest question, why do people insist on wearing scuffed shoes with filthy laces? If you can afford the shoe surely you can afford to have them cleaned / buy replacement laces.

is hobocore back?

>> No.9425767
File: 306 KB, 720x1280, Snapchat--2938075127984939096.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425767

>>9425760
The shoes will just get beat up anyway
I don't see why it's really an issue

>> No.9425781

>>9425767

just think it's a shame to wear shoes that are so fucked up, completely defeats the point for me.

Why will they get beaten up anyway so frequently that you can't keep up with cleaning them? I know /fa/ doesn't actually play sports with their sneakers

>> No.9425797

>>9425716
woah
that's pretty ahead of time

>> No.9425801
File: 273 KB, 720x1280, Snapchat-446394014954472913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425801

>>9425781
A white shoe (particularly leather) is never going to stay looking like it did out the box, so people embrace the wear. I like it. No one has Stans beat quite like mine.

>> No.9425802

>>9425781
why would you want bright white totally clean sneakers? it makes it look like you don't live your life. they're not dress shoes... it's part of the aesthetic to let them age

>> No.9425811

>>9424635
>look about 10 times better.
Nope, they're still ugly as fuck

>> No.9425887
File: 13 KB, 500x500, w2c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425887

From this thread and others, I've learned that the standard american stan smiths are shit, and the main distinguishing characteristics (other than leather quality) are the suede heel and off-white base.
My question is: here can americans buy the better quality version in white/navy? American END has the quality but not in navy, and I don't see any european stores that carry it and will ship to the us.

>> No.9425901

>>9425887
I know for certain Tres Bien carries/carried the better ones

>> No.9425985
File: 251 KB, 400x246, 1422953172399.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425985

As a non /fa/ggot who's always wearing the same type of black shoes year after year would you guys recommend these shoes?

I never get white shoes but I feel like mixing it up a little and white goes with everything, so...

>> No.9425991

>>9425901
Not in navy :'(

>> No.9425993
File: 435 KB, 651x455, c95s3vV.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425993

>>9418633
converse are cringe

>> No.9425995

>>9425887

i ended up having to cop my suede navy smiths from the UK, in a womans sizing because mens were sold out

i think it was from footasylum, though id never order from there again. the whole ordering process was a fucking nightmare and it took 2 months for my package to get to me, and when it did the box was destroyed

>> No.9425999

>>9425985
nah white is gay

>> No.9426008
File: 307 KB, 2400x1800, 8MGbiBO.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9426008

>>9425985
Yep, you should! A few edgy people here like to hate on Stans or anything popular, but actually, they look good (which is why there are often threads about them). They're also quite popular IRL too so it's not some weird shoe like Geobaskets.

>> No.9426013

>>9424783

honestly CPs look way too long and only look decent on people with small feet

the actual opening for your foot is massive as well

>> No.9426018

>>9426008
Yeah, I notice some people on here are kind of outlandish when it comes to fashion but these don't seem too bad to me but what do I know

Anyway. Do you know anywhere you can buy the euro version in black or blue? I'm not liking the green too much.

>> No.9426021
File: 2.75 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9426021

oc pls gentle

>> No.9426028

>>9425985
This thread has discussed both sides and recommended some alternatives. I sifted through most posts so hopefully this will help you with your decision.

Posts in support of these shoes:
>>9418375
>>9418389
>>9418846
>>9418925
>>9419197
>>9419976
>>9419982
>>9419990
>>9420072
>>9420082
>>9420652
>>9420724
>>9420850
>>9424182
>>9424232
>>9424238
>>9424240
>>9424243
>>9424249
>>9424254
>>9424635
>>9425716
>>9425728
>>9425752
>>9425767

Posts against these shoes:
>>9418341
>>9418380
>>9418385
>>9418596
>>9418663
>>9419286
>>9420045
>>9420068
>>9420417
>>9420558
>>9421009
>>9421016
>>9424635
>>9424719
>>9425811

Recommended alternatives to these shoes:
>>9418633
>>9418670
>>9423721

Again, I hope this helps.

>> No.9426029

Are stans from Aliexpress legit? They seem to have the correct-looking suede tab and they are made of real leather, all for just 40-50 dollars

>> No.9426033

>>9425728
>shoes dont fit

how can you possibly tell from that picture that his shoes dont fit

>> No.9426036

>>9426029
Im almost certain they wouldn't be, although they would probably be decent fakes

>> No.9426037

>>9426021
>american stans

>> No.9426039

>>9426028
What the fuck is a meme shoe

>> No.9426052

>>9426029
No

>>9426018
I'm in Canada and stores like Footlocker and Sportchek all have the normal ones. They actually are good looking shoes and I would recommend them. Trust your own opinions ;)

What country are you in? I can suggest a couple sites

>>9426028
Fashion is subjective
It depends on your own opinions so there's really no point measuring what people think
And even if you do want to, people on /fa/ aren't a good sample of the actual population IRL

>> No.9426056

>>9426039
"Meme" means anything popular on /fa/

For example meme shoes: Common Projects, Geobaskets, Raf Simons x Adidas, New Balance, Nike Flyknits, White AF1s etc

Meme sweater: Raf Simons dip dye

and so on

Basically if it's too popular on /fa/ that people start calling it a meme, you can tell it looks really good and IRL people don't care about internet fashion memes anyways

>> No.9426062
File: 263 KB, 720x1280, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9426062

>>9426021
>>9426021

>> No.9426083

>>9418331
w2c similar looking shoes at similar price for wide-footed ppls?

>mfw converses, smiths, too fucking narrow

>> No.9426089

>>9426052
I'm in the US and I'd rather the euro version, not the normal ones
>>9426056
I see, so it's just people being dummies

Thanks

>> No.9426190

So any place to get the superior europe shoes in navy or anything other than green?

>> No.9426208

>>9420549
A textbook example of "paying for a brand" raf slaps his name on a pair of stans and charges 300 for them

>> No.9426274

>>9426190
END has red. As for navy, I'm looking too

>> No.9426798
File: 42 KB, 639x434, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9426798

Hey guys, Adidas have changed SS again this year (in Europe at least).

I went into Oi Polloi and they had the same shiny leather heel tab the Americuck version has but with the cream sole + better leather outer. It seems they've dropped the suede heel for this season of shoes.

I also checked on Oki-Ni and Mr Porter and it also looks like they don't stock the suede ones either.

Pic related, left ones are the suede version, right ones are the new version.

>> No.9426799

>>9426798
Also it says this in the description: "Unlike 2013’s version, these are made from thicker leather and have a darker green heel panel."

I think that must be a typo because they came out in 2014 not 2013.

>> No.9426802

>>9423717
rebel without a cause?

>> No.9426826

>>9426798
>Americuck

Is cuckold a meme or something? Or do you guys actually enjoy watching your girlfriend/wife get fucked by someone else?

>> No.9427101

>>9426056
>IRL people don't care about internet fashion memes anyways

This is not true

>> No.9427420
File: 1.40 MB, 3264x2448, 20150202_144534.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9427420

Pls b gentle

>> No.9427497

>>9427420
pinroll or hem that jeans, too much stacks at the ankle

>> No.9427734

>>9426798
So everything is better in the new shoe?

I kind of like the Suede leather tho

Hmm. Which to buy?

>> No.9427957

>>9424182
>orthodox jewcore

>> No.9428168

>>9426826
Both

>> No.9428173

>>9427497
>>9427420
Agree with anon

Other than that your fit is still shit

>> No.9428267

>>9425887
size? has them. That's where I got mine

>> No.9428280

>>9428267
in a few sizes at least. Keep in mind it's uk sizing not US.

>> No.9428300
File: 93 KB, 620x430, adidas-Originals-Blue-Stan-Smith-Update-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9428300

</3
I'd have to see what it looks like on feet, but right now it looks p. disappointing.

>> No.9428324
File: 37 KB, 630x420, barneys stan smith.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9428324

>>9418331
what do people think of the barneys stan smiths? they're all white and the tongue is thinner like the yuropoor version

>> No.9428376

>>9428324
those are p sick. i'm not sure if i would want to walk around with something that said "barneys new york" because that makes you look poor (buying barneys house brand? lol) but other than that those look gr8

>> No.9428754

Should I buy green, navy, or black smiths?

>> No.9428767

>>9428754
>Green, Navy
I assume you're talking about the tab color? If so I'd go for the navy.

But if you're talking about the full color of the shoe, I'd get the black ones.

>> No.9428774

>>9423656
that bomber is already not pale

your fit sounds like shit

>> No.9428805

>>9428767
Yeah, the tab colour. I sort of like the green one but I was wondering if that would make them less versatile

>> No.9428814

>>9428376
>because that makes you look poor (buying barneys house brand? lol)
yeah i think the same way. it's pretty understated when you look at the shoe being worn in real life, but that logo throws me off. like i am advertising to the world that i shop at barneys even though i'm wearing probably one of the cheapest pairs of shoes they sell

still kinda cool looking shoes though i agree

>> No.9428850
File: 282 KB, 1500x1586, agm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9428850

When i make my custom all white stans through mi adidas should I get the white sole or the cream sole? pic related

>> No.9428933
File: 154 KB, 1500x1586, agm (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9428933

>>9428850
cream
with horsehair black tab

why does the leather look so textured though? are the custom ones not smooth?

>> No.9429251

>>9419990
just copped a pair bro I'm stoked

>> No.9429908

>>9428933
No, the regular ones aren't smooth either. Even the European ones are made of the thinnest, cheapest leather available. It wrinkles easily, and you can feel how thin it is just by moving the leather with your fingers. But who cares? They're just cheap sneakers lol

>> No.9430125

>>9429908
how do they get away with that shit? on the website it says the upper is full grain leather. there has to be some sort of fcc violation for false advertising

>> No.9430152

>>9430125
I'm sure it qualifies as "full grain leather" somehow - it's just the worst kind you can get.

The shoes are only $100 after all, and they sell them at the mall (well in Europe), so you can't expect any sort of super duper quality.

I actually just bought a pair of the premium Stans today; I can take a picture later if I can find good enough lighting to see the leather close up.

>> No.9430799

>>9430152
premium stans??

>> No.9430808

>>9430799
off-white sole, light green suede
same as the "Euro" ones I think

this guy (>>9424635) is wrong because Common Projects have leather that feels a lot nicer to the touch and looks a bit less wrinkly
but it's not worth the extra $400 to me

>> No.9430813

>>9430808
they're next to my apartment door but i'm not going to bring shoes into my room to take a pic because i'm not american sorry

maybe if i feel like it tomorrow i'll see if i can add any more info

>> No.9430886
File: 1.13 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9430886

>>9430813
I got out of bed just for you guys :^)

These are Stans I tried on for all of 30 seconds at the store before buying them today. If I had a better camera, you could see the wrinkly leather even better, but this should do.

TBH I don't care that much like I said earlier, but it would be ridiculous to compare them to CPs.

CPs have some creases in the leather when they're brand new, but those will go away as you break them in. Obviously they don't have the gazillion tiny wrinkles like Adidas shoes do, just saying

I'm not saying Stan Smiths are bad - they're probably the same quality as the normal Nike or Adidas shoes you buy at Footlocker

and they look really good too, but you shouldn't expect some crazy top-notch /fa/ internet fashion crap out of them lol

>> No.9430899

>>9418331
>2015
>not copping the new 80s superstar clean whites

>> No.9430915

>>9425781
nice aspergers

>> No.9430923
File: 159 KB, 500x594, bb1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9430923

>>9430886

wow thanks for that.

>> No.9431191

>>9430899
fuuuuuuuuark, they look amazing

>> No.9431234

>>9430886
wow since when can shitposting newtrips make decent quality content?

>> No.9431273
File: 34 KB, 681x454, adidas-superstar-80s-clean-white-681x454.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9431273

>>9430899

Those look really nice.

>> No.9431299

>>9431273
Why did they have to put that ugly fucking toe cap on it? They've literally ruined it.

>> No.9431432

>>9431273

what stores are carrying these? they're not on the adidas website.

>> No.9431436
File: 64 KB, 640x426, adidas-stan-smith-triple-black-6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9431436

>>9431432
any black inspo
google is not helping

>> No.9432118

>>9428173
:(

>> No.9432139

>>9431273
theyre retailing at $200

might as well get meme projects

>> No.9432189

>>9431273
too self-consciously internet fashion

>> No.9432709

>>9431436

bump

>> No.9432725

>>9418375

those look like shit

PS fuck you all for thinking these shoes are any good. That green blocking is the ugliest fucking thing I've ever seen in my life second only to the silhouette of these shoes.

this is even worse than the roshe run meme

>> No.9432833

>>9427420
>9427420
thats what she said

>> No.9432872

>>9432725

this is the sort of comment that comes from someone who knew what CPs were before they knew what stan smiths were

>muh silhouette
>muh one color only

>> No.9433189

>>9431436
work shoes
just google McDonalds employees

>> No.9433196

>>9433189
i have a pair of all black stan smiths that i wore to work one day (i work in a restaurant)
a co-worker asked if they were "shoes for crews" brand

>> No.9433677

>>9420883
p nice, will be buying them with next paycheck

>> No.9433681

>>9430886
where did you get them?

i tried on same addidas neo's at DSW the other day, they look basically just like stan smiths, but without the branding... are they basically the same shoe?

>> No.9433726

>>9419305
http://www.dynamoshoes.com/
WHAT DID YOU LEAD ME TO?

>> No.9433744

>>9419305
also do actually own a pair of these because i found where to buy them and i was wondering the quality

>> No.9433768

>>9433681
I got mine from Gravitypope. It's a Canadian store.

>> No.9433771

>>9430923
>>9431234
samefag
it was already said ITT that they're nothing like CP's

Christ.

>> No.9433787

oi fellow stan smithers do you lads lace your shoes up the entire way?

>> No.9433817

>>9433768
damn. i want the off white soles. don't know where to get in US

thanks for the replies though

>> No.9433838

>>9433787
of course

>> No.9433909
File: 685 KB, 805x1336, 2015-02-09 23.13.09.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9433909

Literally anything can work with stans

>> No.9434415

>>9418331
OP you done fucked up. Just saw a picture of the s/s smiths coming out and they blow that homo ass green and white cocksucking shoe out of the water, atmosphere, milky way, milky way, and the universe straight into gods taint.

captcha: fabulous thwerer

>> No.9434973

>>9434415
pics?

>> No.9435043

>>9434415
pics?

>> No.9435079

>>9433787
of course

>> No.9435220
File: 78 KB, 640x853, IMG_3290.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9435220

>>9434973
>>9435043

guy on tumblr got his hands on a physical catalog.
only posted this little snippet.

>> No.9435283

>>9435220
ugly as shit.
they look bulkier too, like old man shoes.

>> No.9435457

>>9435283
GUM SOLE
GUM SOLE
GUM SOLE
GUM SOLE

>> No.9435621

>>9420652
Palewave standard issue uniform

>> No.9435632
File: 308 KB, 1920x1440, 2722128-p-4x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9435632

>>9435457
much better looking gum sole shoe
pic related

>> No.9435661
File: 32 KB, 207x138, JackPurcellWhite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9435661

Stan Smiths or these?

>> No.9435697
File: 180 KB, 960x640, John-Lofgren-Sneakers-6-960x640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9435697

>>9435661
say NO to stans

>> No.9435744

>>9435283
u wot m8 they look great

>> No.9435775
File: 50 KB, 484x461, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9435775

>>9435220
Gross as fuck

>> No.9435791

>>9435697
>John-Lofgren-Sneakers

Where can I pick these up?

>> No.9435794

>>9435791
local stockist if you're lucky, self edge otherwise
http://www.selfedge.com/john-lofgren-and-company

>> No.9435808

>>9418375

I like it op you're giving the idgaf vibes

>> No.9435811

>>9426802

*rebel with a cause

the cause is 4chan

>> No.9436693

>>9433909
except that pant

>> No.9437215

>>9435808
pic wasnt op. but glad you like it :^)

>> No.9437356

>>9419197
gay af

>> No.9437438
File: 93 KB, 600x450, meme smiths.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9437438

>>9426798

I saw both of them in Schuh this week too (Bongistan). I didn't realise the new version was a new version, I thought they were a defect because of the ratty-ass tongue and cream sole. Ended up buying the old ones.

>> No.9437499

Leather superga 2950 is much better

>> No.9438092

are stan smiths true to size? never owned a pair and i kinda want em now

>> No.9438109

>>9438092

I'm a size 7. I found them unbearably tight around the toes of my left foot, but fit the right one snug. I tried a size 8 and they were both sliding up as I walking. They don't do half-sizes from what I've seen. I'm going to try a heel grip and an insole and see if I can make them wearable because I want these shoes.

I live in Britain so a size 8 UK = 8 1/2 US.

>> No.9438370

>>9438109
when i was at the store the display shoe was like 8.5 or something so they do exist

>> No.9438411

>>9438109
>>9438370
just bought a pair in 9.5, half sizes do exist

>> No.9438418

the vice principal at school stopped me in the hallway and told me he had the same shoes when he was younger

>> No.9438713
File: 364 KB, 1280x960, .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9438713

Lol superstars will become the new meme shie in the coming months.

>> No.9438770

>>9428933
Jus a heads up, that's not going to be white in person, they custom upper is a weird grey color

>> No.9438777

>>9438092

i'm a 11.5, got size 12, fit perfectly.

>> No.9439370

>>9438713
saw 1 pair at school today

i don't think superstars will be popular

perahps all adidas shoes, but not only superstars

zx flux are getting popular too

>> No.9439421

>>9430886
is paying 99 for these worth it. im in the US ordering from the Canadian store you got it from.

>> No.9439452

>>9439421
You'd have to pay for shipping and duties though. I don't know any U.S. stores but hopefully someone else who bought Stans can help.

>> No.9439593
File: 1.14 MB, 2592x1936, IMG_1171.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9439593

>>9418331

here is a pic i took a while ago
i reckon they look p good w/ cropped shit aye

>> No.9440082
File: 113 KB, 1600x1600, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9440082

Here is how to avoid the American version.
White/Navy model number is D67362
White/Green model number is D67361

>> No.9440090

>>9440082
I should have said that those are the model numbers for the European version.

American model numbers start with M!

>> No.9440098

>>9439593

w2c dope speckled pants

>> No.9440128
File: 64 KB, 640x400, img59465393.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9440128

What are your opinions on the Stan Smith 2?
These Stans were available in about 2012/2013 before adidas remade them and hyped the fuck out of them.

>> No.9440140

>>9439593
How'd the birthday go?

>> No.9440160

>>9424894
What size? may be interested

>> No.9440331

>>9426798

Those are the pearlized leather version. They are supposed to be closer to the originals and are available in ameruca too.

>> No.9440903

>>9440082
is the only difference from the american version the heel tab being leather instead of suede?

also were to get cream/off white sole version in the US? (or a site that will ship to US)

>> No.9440923
File: 176 KB, 640x360, cody1215013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9440923

>>9438713

Superstars will never be memeshoes again anon. Not unless you're an escaped convict from METRO CITY.

The shelltops are ugly and they look 80s as fuck, and not in the ironic 80s-nostalgia-throwback way but the ugh-the-80s way.

Plus white adidas with stipes will make you look like a chav/slavchav in UK or eastern europe. Adidas as a brand has been fucked in Britain as hard as Burberry if you're not careful about how you wear it.

>> No.9440970

>>9438370
>>9438411

America or UK?

Adidas UK website don't list half-sizes either.

>> No.9441464

>>9439452
That's including shipping and all that. 99 total.

>> No.9441590

>>9440923
actually i've seen an insane resurgence in superstars where I live, you used to only see the occasional beaten shoe and now all the shops have sold out and fresh new superstars are everywhere on the streets.

>> No.9441594

>>9441464
that includes import duties too?
well sure then i guess

>> No.9441681

>>9441594
Yeah everything lol. how much did you get them for?

>> No.9441693
File: 1.07 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9441693

>>9441681
105 canadian dollars plus 13% sales tax

>> No.9441709

>>9441693
Oh canadian dollars... It's actually 125 canadian dollars for the shoes which equates to 99 usd.

>> No.9442036

>>9440970
i got the raf simons version from the y-3 store which is an american site i think?

>> No.9442407

>>9440098

http://www.april77.fr/en/all/1887-waits-reverb.html here u go brother

>>9440140

how r u? it went alright???

>> No.9442409

lucas puig stan smiths are the best imo

>> No.9443961

Thinking of getting a pair of these..
But deciding between navy or green tab.

Thoughts?

>> No.9444005

>>9443961
Get the original green ones

>> No.9444011

>>9444005
Thanks for the input!

>> No.9444023

>>9441693
is that from gravitypope?

>> No.9444029

>>9443961
original green sucks
navy is more versatile and less common

>> No.9444036

>>9443961
If you're from a pleb town in the midwest, who gives a fuck get either, though I prefer green. If you're from a place where stans are common get navy

>> No.9444156

>>9440082
is the 'neo white' on this model a bit greyish? some pics it looks like it but im not sure if it just looks like that against the off white sole.

>> No.9444176

>>9440128
those are the amerifat version
get the ones with suede heel tap and unpadded tongue with the yellowish sole

>> No.9444204

>>9440128
I just got a pair of the white/green ones nwt from goodwill for like 25 bucks so I'm sitting here wondering what's wrong with them

>> No.9444727

>>9444023
oui

>> No.9446984

>>9444176
>get the ones with suede heel tap and unpadded tongue with the yellowish sole
where to get in the US?
or where to get that will ship to the US?

>> No.9447052

>>9418633
ew

>> No.9448503

>>9446984
i'd like to know this too

>> No.9449205
File: 30 KB, 290x370, image1xl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9449205

aw man i thought these would be perfect alts until i saw they have some weird logo on the heel that totally ruins them

>> No.9449211
File: 33 KB, 979x651, shoes_21_043_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9449211

>>9449205

i mean you could probably fix it but come on

>> No.9449228

as somebody who has CPs and sold their stans a while ago, i still think stans are great

>> No.9449551

>>9449205
w2c pls

>> No.9449583

>>9449205
>>9449211

Bought a pair a few weeks ago, I really like them, simple, clean, decent quality. Personally the logo didn't bother me as it is such a minor detail in a place noone is likely to spot.

>>9449551

Shoe the Bear Houdini trainers. I got them off asos in the UK

http://www.asos.com/shoe-the-bear/shoe-the-bear-houdini-leather-trainers/prod/pgeproduct.aspx?iid=4754517&clr=White&SearchQuery=shoe+the+bear&pgesize=36&pge=1&totalstyles=74&gridsize=3&gridrow=3&gridcolumn=3

>> No.9449602

>>9449583
I'd rather just fork over the extra ~$100 and buy CP's.

>> No.9449628

>>9449602

Not sure about exchange rate but CPs will go for over double the price in the UK. I'm not convinced it's worth that for two very similar pairs of shoes.

I'd recommend these anyway, very happy with them for the price.

>> No.9449665

>>9423736
james has a nike x acg jacket?????

>> No.9449911
File: 260 KB, 940x626, adidas-originals-stan-smith-black-yellow-02 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9449911

These are goat

>> No.9450022

>>9449911
w2c that color way???

>> No.9450155

>>9449911
custom mi adidas smiths?

>> No.9450173
File: 44 KB, 990x661, Adidas_Lucas_Puig_Stan_Smith_Skate_Sneaker_Politics2_1024x1024[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9450173

no ugly toebox

>> No.9450184
File: 1.10 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9450184

Is Velcro core allowed?

>> No.9450185

>>9420583

http://www.gap.com/browse/product.do?cid=1027273&vid=1&pid=226169002

Similar.

>> No.9450261

>>9441693
I Got Stans for 55 canadian dollars ^_^

>> No.9450269

>>9450261
Nice, where?

>> No.9450290

>>9450269
Shoe store at the mall actually, wasn't really looking for Stans but they had a pair at the back for 50% off

>> No.9451281

>>9450022
>>9450155
http://caliroots.com/adidas-originals-stan-smith-m17164/p/36114

>> No.9452527

If anyone is a UK 11 cop these. I have them and they are very nice
http://www.size.co.uk/product/adidas-originals-rod-laver-vintage-tournament-edition/147131/

>> No.9452533
File: 35 KB, 620x518, adidassize.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9452533

>>9452527
And here is a pic

>> No.9452960
File: 8 KB, 224x225, abs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9452960

>>9439593
reminds me of this...

>> No.9454787

>>9452960

lmfao

>> No.9454948

>>9420079
>tfw looked at smiths in the outlet store and instantly thought meme shoes and walked away
feels bad now because they actually look good. ended up buying some kiels

>> No.9455215

>>9444176
No, the stan smith 2 are a different shoe altogether.
They were sold before adidas hyped stans and re-released the stan smith eu and us versions.