/fa/ - Fashion

>>8786873
collaboration wise, Adidas has been on point with their designer choices.

Nike has better shoe design wise.

>>8786873
have been getting sick of nike recently because it has really sprung up in sydney among the worst people. Not too great a fan of adidas rn apart from Y-3. Looking for someone to come out of nowhere but nb, puma, saucony and onitsuka are all p. shit

Nike. Cause I live in Nike town. Beaverton Oregon

Adidas, everything ive seen from nike has always been ridiculous and tacky rather than just being ridiculous, plus I like the shapes of adidas shoes more, everything nike makes now is just a basketball shoe with variations, adidas shoes actually look like a shoe, first and foremost.

getting some js wings when i get around to check more of them out but a lot of the js shoes look gross as well, the original js wings had the wings removeable while the 2.0's have the wings stitched on, not a fan of those.

>>8787202
js wings are rank

>>8787204

you're entitled to your opinion, im sure you think kanye is a great designer.

Asics for actual running and sports

Adidas for street

>>8787211
wtf u on about m8

Jeremy Scott is a shit designer. He is fashions retarded cousin

>>8787211
how did you make that link lol
i think they are both bad designers

Adidas

>>8787184
>green and yellow.
>everywhere.

>>8787215
FUCKING THIS. Nike design is abit more restrained which is great. Adidas is the most flamboyant shit.

Reebok

Nike for the shoes

Adidas. Nike is overhyped by PUSSY NIGGA fuccbois, and their prices have risen as a result. Can't beat $60 sambas and stan smiths.

Adidas. I didnt think i had a real opinion, but then i looked at my shoes and saw that i owned like 4 pairs of adidas trainers, or designers in collaboration with adidas.


Way better designs overall imo. The only nike thing i own are nike tech fleece pants, which are goat. The only shoes that interest me of theirs are the trainerendors and flyknit racers.

Nike.

Adidas makes good shit but a lot of their stuff is boring. They do have Y3 which is nice and zx fluxes are ok.
nike is just overhyped, they make some crap like jordans, but flyknits, trainerendors, and a few other shoes are pretty great for fitd

>>8787214
>Asics
>good for running

Nike because adidas overdoes it with the stripes on all their clothing.

Adidas. Nike is for niggers and Americans.

Really depends on what we're talking about. I think Nike kicks the shit out of Adidas clothes wise. Depending on what you're looking for shoe wise, it's really a toss up. Adidas is generally better, but I like some of the Nike shoes if I'm in the mood for something a little less plain (pic related). Also some of the Flyknit shoes are amazing. I think what I have is the Lunar One, and it's a great shoe.

>>8787811
Not all Jordans are bad. I liked the APC ones (this is assuming Air Max are Jordans)

lmao @ all of you who think adidas is even close to nike.

nike's profits are through the roof compared to adidas (which, by the way, fell behind fucking underarmor in the us in marketshare) albeit from selling their low end tacky crap to consumers but its to fund their more high end lines such as, lets count:
nsw, white label, tech, gyakusou, kiger, fragment, acg, htm,

adidas was never named most innovative company ever. nike has a slew of awards.

i'll be the first to admit that some stuff from y-3 is nice, or to appreciate some of adidas collabs with stella or raf. but i'd definitely side with nike if i had to choose.

>>8788062

> nike makes more money, so they're better

So?H&M probably sees more profit every month than Rick Owens or Raf Simons do in a year. All money proves is that a lot of people are buying it, which isnt exactly a recipe for fashion.

>>8786873
Nike

Adidas is for slavs and arabs.

>>8788102
they do just make better shit tho lol

>>8788102
they make more money because they're more successful business-wise, which allows them to funnel some of those funds into more creative, innovative projects and research.

H&M for example, is using their massive profits to slowly shift their clothing towards more sustainable practices and launch higher end lines such as COS to assert the scandinavian fashion scene on the map.
but i mean that's cool that rick keeps on draping and doing weird stuff with leather but he's never been my taste :^)

raf is cool imo.

>>8788170
cos is p dope
best shit at that low butt price range

>>8788102
Nike has much better designs across the board. Adidas clothing looks like shit and their shoes look like shit. They are consistently 5 years behind nike design wise. I don't count the outside designer collabs as adidas.

>>8786905
This, exactly. Nike is much better on every measure I can think of in terms of the products, but Adidas gets everyone except Jun.

(Which, Jun > any of the designers Adidas works with, but as much of a Junhead as I am, all the designers Adidas works with together > Jun.)

My guess? The cultural snob appeal of a European/German brand versus a bunch of Portlandites, possibly better company culture compatibility, geographic proximity to some of the designers, and that they don't straight fuck over their collaborators on production. (See: Kanye.)

>>8787402
>orange and black

For street and actual running

>>8787864
And Nike doesn't with the swoosh?

>>8789945
>new balance for running
Get the fuck out of here.

>>8789957
Bet you can't even run a few meters without heel support and cushioning because you're too scared of hurting your pussy feet.

>>8789967
>priding yourself on wearing meme shoes then pretending they have functionality when you're told you're running like a retard

Jesus christ.

My favorites from Nike: Air Jordan 1, Free Run 3.0, Flyknit Chukka, Trainerendor, Roshe Run.
Adidas: Zx Flux, Pureboost, SL Loop, Y3 Qasa High.

Overall Im happy with all these shoes and just have to say Adidas was shit until recently.

Adidas because Adirafs and Adiricks
Nike is shit ever since Yeezy left yo bitchass

Adidas.
>I like their classics
>I prefer the slik 3 stripes design over the nike logo.
>Stan Smiths
>It has more variety into the casual market
>Nike's running shoes are top tier. But I don't use them with other than short shorts and tanks. (Flux/boost/roshe/ are not running shoes)
>It's impact over the skate scene and urban culture is deeper and richer than Nike's
>Yes I use shoes based of what they mean, get over it.

sambas

>>8787184
>tfw used to drive by their world HQ pretty often
>neighbors often hooked me up with employee store passes
>those discounts
>tfw never copped the monochrome flyknits for $72 because my mom said I needed more color
>tfw flyknits are $100+ online

cop?

>>8790117
>get over it

no you get the fuck over yourself and get the fuck out of here.

>>8790164
Na m9

>>8790164
Are you black?
If not no

>>8790175
>Are you black?
Even that's not going to cut it.
To pull that shit off you really need to be an immigrant from the Congo.

>>8790164
man I love tiempo 94s but have way too many nike trainers as is

i really like these black "trainerendors" but i live in the US so i'd have to get that shit shipped overseas for 20 fuckin dollars. is it worth the expense & should i cop these motherfuckers?

(yes i know you can't buy them anywhere but there is supposed to be a restock some time this month soon... i wonder if the shoe will ever come to the united states and if i should just wait until then?)

>>8786873

nike because i'm not a slav

>>8786873
they are companies that sell products, stop being a consumerist whore and destroy this gay notion of brand loyalty.

Nike because I don't support the Nazi

>>8790244
restock is live at sole supplier

I prefer Nike shoes, from both a make and a design point of view.

Otherwise, Adidas has better colabs and nicer clothing.

>>8790322
Thanks man. I guess I will pick up a pair, they seem like they will go well with many outfits.

>>8790117
>energy boost 2 isn't running shoe
>roshe run are not running shoe

nike for sports
adidas for casual

>>8789957
>what is minimus
ur stupid mang

>>8787860
asics are toptier running

they put all their money into R&D whereas nike/adidas put all their money into advertising for mindless DYELs like you

>>8791555
This. You should choose asics or mizuno for running, other variants are pleb shit.

>>8787620
>Can't beat $60 sambas and stan smiths.

$60?

They cost double that here in Europe.

>>8791231
>narrow varsity jackets

Adidas.

A good piece isn't just aesthetically pleasing, it's almost poetic. Look at this ZX100 for example. It justifies its existence by telling a story.

An Adidas shoe tells you what it's about. A Nike shoe just is... in fact, that's almost literally their slogan. Lack of effort, lack of inspiration, lack of soul.

>>8791803
that green is horrid.

ESON SO REEBOK O SON NIKE

Adi for fashion/street/skate stuff
Nike for proper athletic equip etc their bball shoes are superior

>>8791594
saucony good for running too

>>8786873
Nike for running shoes. Adidas for sportswear

Nike shoes fit my feet well and offer good support for running. Adidas sports clothing is designed to fit a woman's body and isn't just a rescaled male pattern. They make better sports bras and Nike's equivalent to Climawarm is really subpar for winter running

>>8789957
you do realize they make shoes other than classics, right? have you been out in the real world lately?

Adidas because muh football team uses them for kits. Pretty solid quality though.

>>8791597
i dont know where the fuck you live in europe but in ireland sambas and stan smiths are never over 70 euros

its funny seeing all you yanks obsess over stan smiths because they're scumbag shoes

For me, I've always appreciated Nike from a fitness & technology standpoint.

In terms of everything else I'd definitely go w/ Adidas.

>>8787934

Air Max has nothing to do with Jordan.

>>8790232
>Trainers

Fag.

>>8792493
Are you a 12 year old chav? You probably pronounce Nike so it rhymes with bike.

>>8792493
That's pretty pathetic.

>>8793665
>>8793674
I use football shirts for running and exercise, and they're good quality. Is there a problem with that?

>Adidas
>muh originals

All they do is ride whatever nike is succeeding with, they will never be better. Puma and new balance are honestly better than adidas.

>>8790256
This. Buy what you like.

>>8793643
So you use your trainers for sneaking I suppose, and not training

>>8792515
Nobody cares what a rude potatonigger has to say

>>8793678
>good quality
>implying aliexpress copies aren't exactly the same quality at a fraction of the price.

>>8791226
have you ever tried to run in roshe runs?

they are shit mate

I like both. I like Nike's flyknits and Adidas' Y3 series, while I prefer adidas football shoes. Nike makes some great runner wear

>>8793702
I buy them at the end of the season.

>>8793710
Are you a pikey

>>8793702
It's obvious you've never played football or tried on different football shirts. The difference is quite obvious.

>>8793721
Not anymore they're not

>>8793713
No, just cheap.

>>8793727
They really are.

I prefer adidas and puma before they went to shit on the quality of the puma romas. Not hating on nike some of their designs are solid, but I've seen myself buying more Adidas/puma over the years.

>>8791848
I used to be an asics guy for actual running shoes. Now I'm a Saucony guy.

adi has consistently put out incredible collabs
nike a shit

>>8787211
anyone who think js is anything but trash would prolly hold ye in high regard

>>8786905
>>8788567
is the quality of adidas collabs questionable? i'm just about to cop some adirafs and would like that cleared up. design absolutely kills anything nike has ever put out, but is the quality worth the price?

I really, really fucking hate how adidas just have to print the model name on some of their shoes

Why are Huaraches not /fa/?

>>8786873
Adidas

>>8791555
I don't know man, I always ran in nikes/sauconies no problem. Got a pair of asics and messed my knee up to the point where I've been in physical therapy for 3 months. I'm writing this from there right now. Same thing happened to my best friend. So I don't trust asics

abibas

С У К А
У
К
А

>>8791231
>that picture
what the fuck

Adidas' designs are far less tacky than a lot of Nike's. It really depends on the shoe, though. I honestly prefer Adidas' high tops. Nike has some impressive shoes ( ie. Nike Flights, Janoskis), but Adidas is way better. And they have better colorways too. Nike is really pleb, but I like some of their shoes.

>>8786873
Nike, mainly because their cleats have lasted me for years whereas adidas last for months.

Design wise Adidas have some really nice clothing, but I always choose Nike shoes over Adidas.

I want to like adidas but I own way more nike. the 3.0 are the GOAT minimal running shoes. I own the black ones and they're the comfiest shoe I've owned

Prefer Nike atm but adidas have been really good lately.

>>8791803

>filename

huehuehue

>>8791231
Wouldn't count on it, man looks kinda bad imo

>>8796469
Those look comfy as fuck, w2c?

I like the way Adidas look on the shelf and in photos, but almost never like the way they look on my feet.

Nikes feel 100% better, too. Better on the whole than any other brand. I wish I could branch out a little and I get tired of all the branding sometimes, but nothing else is quite as comfy.

And fuck being uncomfortable if I'm gonna be on my feet all day.

I cant stand Adidas. period. maybe stan smith and pureboost line.

Nike, I like their shoes better

>>8793637
Tinker hatfield did designed the AirMax 90 at around the same time he designed the Jordan 3?

>>8795476

>>8788567
here.

I actually haven't fingerfucked any of the Adidas collabs - well actually some Y-3, but that's sort of its own thing.

I'd assume the quality is on par with typical luxury sneakers of the same price bracket and construction method. I actually don't know either of those for the Adirafs, just 'cuz I haven't looked into them at all. If they were poorly made forum bottomfeeders would've made sure we heard about it.

Also, don't go on geography unless you know the actual factory, that's all I'll say. Chinese immigrants staff Italian factories and their hands are no better or worse than Portuguese or Czech or Bangladeshi hands.

>>8797191
Also, when I meant "in terms of the products," I meant technology and in-house design. There's seldom a huge quality gap between brands in the same market segment in anything, and I haven't seen or felt anything to think this is different.

NONE ! BOTH ARE EXPENSIVE AND MADE IN CHINA

>>8797191
ty. I assumed as much but figured it would be worth asking.

Mizuno >:)

>>8797269
that is FUCKED UP

>>8786921

Nike has only sprung up recently?

It's like the most popular clothing brand in the world.

>>8797275

That's why it's so good. I applaud anyone who can pull that off. That's miles better than the circlejerking going on this board on the blandest safest shit out there, like Nike Roshes and all whiite CP Achilles.