[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 36 KB, 640x360, Mr-Porter-Boots6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8464490 No.8464490 [Reply] [Original]

ITT: Fashion Boots

>w2c?
>Discuss favorite style
>Favorite heel
>Sidezip or Gusset
>Winklepickers
>Totally round toe or slight square(pic related)?
>best brands

>> No.8464504
File: 1.20 MB, 2432x4320, IMG_20140624_173002916_HDR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8464504

hey I have those
>tfw you bought some of those around-the-toe foam inserts and then a low profile memory foam insert for 99p and now they are the most comfy
thank you boots and home bargain

>tfw received a couple compliments too

>> No.8464546
File: 19 KB, 704x399, goldorsilver.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8464546

left or right
>typcailly wear black and white
Also, anybody know anything about Underground Shoes' sizing? I'm a 10.5UK(11.5US) and the only sizes available in silver is a UK 10(US11) and in Gold, UK 10(US11) or 11(US12).

Think I'd be safe copping a UK 10 if they're winklepickers?

>> No.8464920

>>8464504
i can't deal with brogue chelseas

it upsets me that i think they look fine

>>8464546
if purely black and white i'd say gold

>> No.8465813

>>8464920
sry m8

>> No.8465903

>>8464920
only problem is that I only have a belt with a silver buckle and my jacket has silver zips and shit

>> No.8466779
File: 100 KB, 500x682, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8466779

pls i need pic of girls using boots chealse
>healp
>pic relate

>> No.8466875
File: 632 KB, 1441x965, muh chelseas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8466875

>>8464490
r8 my boots;

1st one is a gusset with rubber sole but with wooden heel

2nd one is a sidezip high ankle with rubber sole and rubber heel, its was like $100 in a sale

3rd one is a sidezip dockers chelsea boot, my first pair, it was originally brown but i got bored of it so i dyed it black, leather sole and wooden heel, the sole is kind of peeling, wanting ot take them to the cobbler

go chelseas or go home

square toes look weird IMO, kind of fucks up the sillhouette in the feet area

>> No.8467581

>>8466875
That picture looks like you took it with a turnip

>> No.8467658

>>8466875
>can't see shit

>> No.8467664

>tfw finally leaving poorfag status
Could I get some Chelsea recs in the $200-$400 range?

>> No.8467692
File: 1.25 MB, 2376x2376, Chelsea-Choc-Suede03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8467692

>>8467664
>Casual or Dress?
If casual, Black Suede or Brown Suede
If Dress, Leather.
Leather can also work casually but it may elevate the look slightly to an inbetween depending on what it's paired with.

If you want the rocker chelsea(cuban heel, pointed toe, pointy is bad if you have MASSIVE feet) then go for SixtiesBeatWear.
>tfw gonna get a train to Liverpool one of these days and scope dat shop
pic related
They come in a different heel too if that's too much for you
>good for manlets as well but I am 6'0

>> No.8467709

geoBOOTS

>> No.8467711
File: 51 KB, 416x625, 803193.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8467711

I wish someone made slim simplistic mid-calf length boots for men.

>> No.8467716
File: 1.29 MB, 2244x2247, LowLennonTanSuedeHero.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8467716

>>8467711
Not sure if slim
Not sure if mid calf
but it is simple

>> No.8467718

>>8467692
Thanks man!
Thinking black leather worn casually but kept as an option for dressier fits
I'm 6'2 and EU 43 I think,haven't looked into heels and toes that much but I do know I want a slim profile, probably not that pointy a toe though

>> No.8467725

>>8467718
No problem dude. I would take a look through their store as they also cater to the more traditional chelsea boot too. I think you'll find that because they are a company that focuses on making that 60s Mod/Rocker type boot, that they will always retain a more pointed silhouette but still, take a look.

>> No.8467726

>>8467716
Honestly I'd wear them, but most people would see them as too effeminate.

>> No.8467731
File: 50 KB, 340x340, BW-36_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8467731

>>8467726
Can't live your life for other people. Personally, I don't like to wear my boots outside of my jeans/trousers anyway so I would cop this pair for novelty.

>> No.8467732

>>8467731
No, but I can influence other people to think of me in the way I want them to. Fashion is communication too, among other things.

>> No.8467735

>>8467732
True but personally I just wear what I think expresses myself the best and if people aren't okay with that then that's fine.

>> No.8467741

>>8467735
I'd certainly like it if I could afford the luxury of not giving a shit.

>> No.8467755

>>8467741
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwntaLUgu7w

>> No.8468354

>>8467664
Best chelseas for the money in that range are RM Williams from Australia.
If you go MTO there are too many possible combinations to list, but you'll find something of interest there.
Check the thread on SF for the whys, hows etc.

>> No.8468556

>>8467664
>>8467692
They're lovely boots but I'm not really into the stitching down the middle, I'd like them to be as plain as possible

>> No.8468586
File: 321 KB, 1599x1365, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8468586

>>8468556
I hear you. I'm scoping these out atm but
>$700
hopefully I get enough pounds for my bday lel

>> No.8468588

>>8468556
I agree on the stitching. So far the only chelseas I've seen that don't have it are RMWs and SLPs. Anyone have any more brands to look out for?

>> No.8468630
File: 64 KB, 350x350, 995boots.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8468630

guidi's boots are GOAT

>> No.8468652

>>8468630
The backzips look so dope. Not sure they'd work with my SLP style but I'm still interested. I heard Guidi fits are inconsistent and that fit like shit anyway. Is that true?
>that FUCKING feel when there isn't just a standardized foot mold for shoes and boots
I hate this sizing down, sizing up, breaking in, hurr durr no half sizes bullshit

>> No.8468709

anyone know w2c plain toe all-black combats, roughly 1460 height but with a thinner sole and slimmer toebox?

>> No.8468851

>>8468709
bump for interest

>> No.8468884

>>8466875
did you put lube on your camera?

>> No.8468893

>>8468709
DM 1460
the sole wears out and the toebox flattens a bit with use

>> No.8469010

Is there a specific name [or brands] for mens boots that have small heels, thin and flexible material and are not bulky like work boots. The only boots I can find in pleb places are construction-worker-greg-tier and i'm not pretentious enough to shop at high end places.


Looking for similar to >>8468630

>> No.8469036

>>8469010
Clarks desert boots in the "beeswax" leather?

>> No.8469387
File: 345 KB, 1600x1200, red_wing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8469387

>>8469036
More something like this.
Can anyone identify them?

>> No.8469397

>>8469387

These are pretty generic work boots, man.

>> No.8469411
File: 65 KB, 960x642, 61191_551678131512429_1142370433_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8469411

my most worn boots.

1/3

>> No.8469413
File: 89 KB, 800x800, 03-07-2012_woolrich_toecapboot_browngrainleather_d1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8469413

>>8469411
2/3

>> No.8469420
File: 82 KB, 900x1045, allsaints-mountain-detect-boot-product-8-4175867-570213034.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8469420

>>8469413
3/3

>> No.8469421
File: 203 KB, 1080x720, ujelly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8469421

uv active supersneaker, u jelly /fa/gs?

>> No.8469425

>>8469420

>Are those fake timberlands anon?

>> No.8469434
File: 116 KB, 940x624, DSC_0241-940x624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8469434

Comfy, rugged and reasonably priced.

>> No.8470500

>>8469411
w2c

>> No.8470526
File: 139 KB, 1500x1500, 5092-hr1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8470526

I've seen /fa/ recc rothco boots, but nobody actually seems to own them. Should I cop?

>> No.8470537
File: 56 KB, 600x399, Damir-Doma-Crepe-Soled-Boots.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8470537

aye find me something like this

>> No.8470550

I want a thin soled minimalist black boot that doesn't have autism-ankles.
Why doesn't this exist?

>> No.8470554

>>8469434
I like Solovair better,

>> No.8470587
File: 91 KB, 1000x1334, 10296866_1537343_1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8470587

>>8470537

That's a tough one. I looked for a long time, myself, and just wound up asking one of my designers to make me something, so I swapped the leather on this guy to a waxed, distressed nubuck. I feel like a lot of the Barny Nakhle stylse are similar, but nothing EXACTLY like those Damirs.

>> No.8470610

>>8469411
what boot is that

>> No.8470901
File: 1.58 MB, 2592x1456, WP_20140701_010.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8470901

>>8467581
>>8467658
>>8468884
nah i cropped it from pic related which looks kind of better, may take another pic just for you guise

>> No.8470904

>>8469421
>shitty colourway
>DC shoes

underage b&

>> No.8471911

hey fuccbois guidi makes the best boots ever

>> No.8472485

Are palladium boots worth buying these days?

>> No.8472523
File: 138 KB, 200x525, MPW_Cecile.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8472523

Help me out.

I am going to travel through asia in a few months and need sturdy durable boots. I hate hiking boots more than anything so i cant get those.

Does anybody here no some alternative boots i could use?

Pic is a weird one, but the boots aren't that chunky and a bit higher, they look decent, does anyone know where i can get something like that?

>> No.8472532

>>8472523
palladiums
docs

>> No.8473522

>>8472523
Jungle Boots, Combat Boots or even Mali Boots but make sure the sole ir made of rubber and thick, not creeper thick, just thick enough to not fuck up with the sillhouette

>> No.8474792

>>8472523
RW 2414

>> No.8474805

>>8472523

Military surplus.

>> No.8476616

>>8468652
i'm usually a 42, i've owned guidis in sizes 41, 43, and 44. never in 42. see if you can try them on irl before buying, or just ask for the sellers usual size.

>> No.8476638

>>8470901
blur/10