/fa/ - Fashion

>>8342066
Is that all Zara? Those shorts are dope

>>8342069

Yeah, the pics from their website. You can buy all the stuff there

Say what you will, they know how to dress their models

How are their jeans? Better than h&m or Levi's?

>>8342066
I was thinking about copping one too. I found one fit pic which looked terrible and completely changed my mind. I'll try to find it for you

>>8342080
Found them. Will cop on pay day. I'm sure the quality isnt any worse than mall stuff, and the silhouette is awesome.

>>8342066
lol

>>8342099
link please! :-)

>>8342107
:+)
http://www.zara.com/us/en/man/bermudas/cotton-bermuda-shorts-c381001p1836549.html

>>8342096

Tried the shirt but it looks really weird, tank version is better imo.

its just mall-tier avant garde

copped a pair of those tapered cotton trouser sweatpants

fit really well but they just felt lumpy as shit, had loose seams all over them

just not very nice quality what so ever

got some basic tees from them as well. look pretty nice and are really slim fit, but are really thin and feel as though theyre just going to fall apart or rip all over constantly

>>8342066
Those shoes are just replicas of Damir Doma Flautims tho

That shirt looks gross. It's like they couldn't even make cheap draped shirts with rayon so they took a shitty cotton poly blend and sewed a piece of fabric to it.

>>8342165

>like

thats exactly what they did

>>8342091
more effay than both. better quality than hand but not by much.

It doesn't even look appealing in the editorial
what is with you thirsty ass kids

lmao wow thats fucking gay

also lmao at people thinking rick owens et al is ""avant garde"" holy shit just leave

>>8342120
u need a large

how are the chinos and trousers from there?

>>8342066
The shirt is shit. I passed it in the store a couple of times and it looks more like an apron than anything, plus shit materials.

I actually ended up buying the tapered sweat though since I couldn't find a better alternative.

When you shop at Zara just remember the rule, the more sophisticated the construction of the piece, the worse it will be.

>>8342224
lmao so gay

>>8342164
fuck those are nice shoes

the replicas aren't as good but still kind of tempting
http://www.zara.com/us/en/man/shoes/leather-blucher-with-concealed-laces-c358057p1754599.html

>>8342066
>General Zara thread

>>8342521
ikr, like a tech-y version of RW postman or someshit. so gorgeous. dat pricetag tho :(

>General Zara thread.
jesus christ

is this what /fa/ has become??!??

are we being raided by mfa again??

>>8342555
what do you think of zara's version?

>general zara thread
no chill

raf simons, rick owens usually what im dressed in, you guys are killing fashion and children with sweatshop tier rag shit

>>8342542
>>8342556
>>8342562
okay we get it you circlejerking tryhards

>>8342569
>circlejerking

Reddit detected. Fuck off.

>>8342559
doesn't look as impressive that's for sure. would be a good alternative if Zara's shoe quality wasn't so shit

>>8342609
no u

>>8342569
circlejerking? for not supporting shitty fast fashion knockoffs made in bangladesh by child amputees? for discussing actual fashion instead of whatever flavor of the month zara uses?

yeah fuck off m8, you sound like a real cunt
discuss authentic brands or go back to reddit

>>8342120

What size is that? Anyone know

>>8342224
lol nice! what colour flyknit you gonna cop brooo

women's shoes look great af online

but really tho Zara is crap

shop at cos instead

>>8342120
tried on the tee once when they dropped their streetgoth trill load, it's literally just a black tee with the front of a tank top sewn on the top with the other strap inverted to give the front flap a little drape

It's still out of some cotton polyester bullshit they use for everything else as opposed to rayon or silky cotton and doesnt look anywhere near what you guys think it'll look like irl

I dont even know what kinda aesthetic it's trying to ape

>>8342990
yeah that looks pretty bad

i've bought 3 or 4 things from zara and can attest that the shit does literally fall apart. loose seams fucking everywhere.

>>8342984
did you find out who this is ripped off from yet
>>8342990
good clench

>>8343010
thanks mate

probably raf dior opr jil, stopped looking or caring
should I send zara an email to ask? lol

>>8343013
yesss
please do it, an make a thread about it

>>8342120
Awful

>>8342983
all blvck >:)

>>8342990
worst tee I've ever seen. goddamn thats ugly

i dont see why youd buy from zara except for some cheap statement pieces. like, you already have a decent wardrobe but you want a thin sweater you can shred or you want a quick cardigan to wear for a season. like if you want a fast piece to change your wardrobe.
even then, i'd just buy secondhand
plus the womens wear is leagues beyond their men's stuff

>>8342188
liar

>>8343509
is cheap statement piece an euphenism for flavor of the month shit garment you buy and throw away just to be in the loop for a bit

that's the whole point of zara

>>8343636
as in, that's exactly what they are trying to do

quality is shit, thin as fuck, wears out quickly and rips/shreds easily.

I have a few tees and shirts from zara, and I am not happy with the quality.
The shirts are OK, hot as fuck tho and a bit small in sizing, but the fit is proper compared to most shirts in the same price-class.
The shirts I've bought from zara have been used a few times and that's it.
It's fast fashion mall tier and not for long-term use or for incoorporating into your every-day wardrobe.
4/10 would do again if I need something new for a specific pleb occasion

I have a £50 voucher for Zara but I can't decide what to buy. I'm thinking probably some tshirts because I go on holiday next month so I might aswell get some free holiday clothes from here.

Which two tshirts shall I cop? these seem to be the only half decent ones they sell right now.

>>8343705
1 or 5 and 2

>>8343705
3 is the best choice

>>8343705
2 or 3, they are most subtle.

have you guys seen the CP knockoffs

>>8343840

more like slp knockoffs

>dat stitching

>>8343849
yeah, SLP nvm

also look at these, woah

are there any other sandals that have the sawtooth sole like these?

>>8343840
>>8343849
they're Stan Smith copies, faggots

>>8343861

Dries did some.

Someone post a fit with their jeans

>>8343874
ripping off visvim, bravo adidas.

>>8343840
>>8343874
it's a bastardization of CPs and stan smiths. they probably lurk here for trends, not even kidding, and noticed a lot of people like both shoes

>>8344934
dont get ur hopes up. theres probably a bunch of fashion forums they'd lurk before here.

>>8344929
2/10

>>8342556

they don't like zara b/c most of them can't fit into their clothes

zara does 0 billboards/commercials etc and is known for having shit customer service, snobby sales associates and bad quality clothes. how are they so successful

>>8345080
It's the easiest way to buy ripoffs of good stuff without having to buy from like taobao or sth

>>8345080

A lot of people buy zara whether they wanna admit it or not. Basically every casual I know thinks zara is too expensive

>>8345080
ive been to the zara in the houston galleria like 20 times and actually all the guys there are pretty cool/nice, one of them even started a convo with me about street fashion and complimented my outfit. The manager guy almost let me return a sweater that i bought months ago cause it shrunk when i finally washed it, but i had cut the barcode tag off thats sown on.
The girls workers there are the snobby ones imo.
The online ordering and shipping are very good though , theyre fast with returns and shipping.

I have a two year old pair of fleece drop crotch sweat pants that I wear pretty regularly at home. They were $20 and still good. No pilling, which I find really strange coming from Zara.

>>8345080
Inditex is the number one fashion retailer in the entire world. Their supply chain is infamous for being able to copy an idea from a runway or look book, have their designers mock up their own version, then have it produced by contract manufacturers and shipped into retail stores within two weeks. By making different designs in limited quantities with high inventory turn over and new products being added two times a week and combining that with no advertising and regular sales, they pull consumers into the retail stores, where they are more likely to purchase something once there. It's their business model not to advertise. And it works very well. The only reason they started having an online catalog and e-commerce is because they absolutely had to.

>>8345203

Interesting, also this:

>How about advertising? Basically, Zara doesn't do it. There is no ad budget. Instead, the company spends ungodly amounts of money buying storefronts next to luxury brands to own the label of affordable luxury: "The retail strategy for luxury brands is to try to keep as far away from the likes of Zara. Zara's strategy is to get as close to them as possible."

I have pic related and it's not too bad. I like the raw hem and it fits well. Quality is obviously not great but it doesn't feel like it's going to fall apart in my hands or anything.