/fa/ - Fashion

Assuming that I sometimes need to wear polo shirts with some corporate design elements, and I don't like the default fotm shirts which the embrodering company uses, what plain polos could I use instead?

>>8321424
>plain polos
>ever
no

>>8321426
>wearing brandwhore polos
>ever

>>8321426
you didn't quite understand my post, did you?

I'm looking for better cut, higher quality plain polos to get our corporate design elements embroidered on.

>>8321437
Enjoy looking like a faggot waiter.

>>8321447
Or a beta autist "gamer"

Polos are simple. If it's not Express, Lacoste, Banana Republic, Ralph Lauren, or Vineyard Vines then don't buy it. Never wear plain polos. Never wear polos with HUEG logos either.

>>8321547
>Polos are simple. If it's not Express, Lacoste, Banana Republic, Ralph Lauren, or Vineyard Vines then don't buy it. Never wear plain polos. Never wear polos with HUEG logos either.

There's been a lot of fun and clever and silly and whatever posts, but this is probably the best I've read today. Thanks, anon.

>>8321552
wat

>>8321552
Only I'm not kidding. Plain polos and off brand polos make you look poor. Polos with huge logos are too tacky and make you look like a douchebag.

>>8321564
>Only I'm not kidding. Plain polos and off brand polos make you look poor. Polos with huge logos are too tacky and make you look like a douchebag.

I have to admire your tenacity and consistency.

>>8321565
>>8321552
Shut the fuck up

>>8321569
look at me i can afford middle class immigrant polos

>>8321547
>If it's not Express, Lacoste, Banana Republic, Ralph Lauren, or Vineyard Vines

this is an 18+ site only (Lacoste polos are alright, though)

>>8321575
Enjoy your poorfag polos.

Enjoy getting made fun of for being a faggot

>>8321564
>off brand polos
What exactly do you mean by this? You left out a lot of decent makers of polo shirts (Fred Perry, Sunspel, etc.).

>Express
>Banana Republic
>Vineyard Vines
Oh, you're trolling.

Just get a ralph lauren polo fuccboi

>>8321401

I wear Polos by Ralph Lauren to work because its casual there.

i see no problem with this.

ALL THIS POLO ON I GOT HORESEPOWER

>>8321585
>What exactly do you mean by this?
Well you obviously already know the answer to that question if you just listed some name brands. Stuff like Brooks Brothers and department store brands are what I consider to be off brands.

>>8321606

This is some serious dedication. If you manage to keep this up every time this topic comes up, people might (and that's a small "might") look at you the same way they look at Bandit/Bandido. Don't give up, though!

so is rl polo any good?

>>8321628

They offer a couple of different bodies, so it's definitely a matter of finding what works best for you. Other than that, the build is pretty standard and the only distinguishing feature really are their breadth of colorways and branding options.

>>8321628
too baggy imo

slim cuts with shorter sleeves are the only way to wear polo shirts

>>8321639
>too baggy

does that include their slim/custom fit polos?

>>8321639
>too baggy

how small are you?

>>8321624
Does anyone here even like you on this board?

>>8321601
POUND OF DIS COS 4 THOUSAND I MAKE IT RAYNE SHE WANT MO SHOWERS

>>8321643

No idea.

>>8321643
no

>>8321643
Yes

Though I would never dress like him #differentstrokes

I wear fred perry long sleeve polos a lot. I get them a one size up since they drape quite nicely

Don't really dig short sleeve much but I got a couple shirts somewhere

Whenever I see polos I think of ill fitting polos worn by "gangsters" (aka poor black people) when they try to "dress up" for something.

>>8321666
>>>/pol/

>>8321662
that looks both horrible and terrible

>>8321666
Nice trips

I think of indians at uni wearing the ugliest fucking polos rl sells

>>8321547

What about Penguin ?

>>8321662

Outside of highly stylized versions, I'm the opposite: always prefer a short-sleeve in a fitted polo.

>>8321703

Haven't handled that much of it myself, but the Ben Sherman Plectrum stuff has pretty solid styling and detailing for the price.

I wear jcrew polos. I like that they don't have logos.

>>8321700
Nah.

Only polos worth buying
Lacoste, Polo, Fred Perry laurel wreath
I'm taking the piss, but really, just pick the one with the fit you like the most
uniqlo polos are good, slightly cheaper alternative

i fucking love polos, they're my favorite garment of all time

>>8321703

Fair one man. Actually I was really tempted to get a new short polo after seeing a dude on the street wear this

I really liked my sports uniform polo in high school. It was made from a rougher sort of material and had a tapered cut to it.

Are most polos made from that rougher material, also what is that material?

>>8321762

It was likely made from cotton pique.

I greatly prefer henleys

>>8321703
Hey i've been meaning to buy one of these polos, do they run the same as regular fp polos or are they more slim fit?

Personally I only like long sleeve polos, preferably without an elastic cuff. I've only got one in my wardrobe at the time though, slightly loose fit, but right in the shoulders, for extra comfy.

>>8321746
I wear polos when I'm lazy and a plain shirt won't cut it although I'm currently transitioning into techwear. That guy in that pic just looks like an overgrown child though.

>>8323788
Those are the grossest and I only see minorities in them.

What is so good about logos in a Polo? It strikes me as bad taste. Having a fucking logo at full visibility in your clothers is just giving free publicity, and working the logo in the design looks horrible. Not to mention you'll look exactly the same as all the other thousands of people with the shirt no matter what you do.

>>8321447
You poor dumb fuck. Quality polos don't have a logo on them (see Cucinelli, Sunspel, etc.)

Polo horse = high school negro

>>8324345
nothing.
historically only slaves and servants would wear another man's crest.
it's like wearing your pants down around your ankles. if that's the style you like, fine, but understand that it means "i'm somebody's bitch".

>>8321725

Why not ? They look neat

>>8321585
>vineyard vines
Is vineyard vines a bad brand? I've got some stuff from there but I live in the south where there's a lot of that prep fashion

Well I guess this is dead

>>8325792
I like Penguin polos.

only ralph though

I own a Ralph Lauren Black Label polo. It's pretty nice.

>>8321401
Can anyone recommend a good form fitting polo?

>>8321401
polos are #dope

>>8325832
If by "bad brand" you mean a self-parodying fantasy of white privilege, then yes, it's a bad brand.

>>8326277
Which inner-city high school do you attend?

>>8326347
Orlebar Brown, Sunspel, Kent Wang, Massimo Dutti, Tom Ford

>>8325832
>Is vineyard vines a bad brand?
you tell me, Anon

I wear a white one under a sweater sometimes. Besides that, not really.

>>8327954

cool story bro

>>8327940
Ok yeah that picture looks like shit. I have a couple of button down shirts from them that actually fit me unlike that pic. They're really nice for casual stuff I have to dress up a little for.

>>8321401
polos look good but you have to be /fit/ for it. looks like shit on anything else. and completly buttoned looks like shit as well.

>>8328221
Damn his arms look small to me. Fuck /fit/ for giving me body dysmorphia

>>8328221
The sleeves are important. You don't have to have Daniel Craig's guns but the sleeves should be fitted and hemmed to mid bicep. Nothing makes a polo look more old mannish than elbow-length baggy sleeves.

>>8328273
see >>8326366

>>8328285
looks bad man

Tried on Fred Perry slim-fit in store. That fit is fucking awesome. Will cop some on sale.

>>8328221

^^ dis
polos are /fit/ territory.

Copped a sweet Mickey and Minnie polo shirt at a Thrift the other day along with a Long sleeve green corduroy polo shirt with contrast collar

>>8328706
>Copped a sweet Mickey and Minnie polo shirt at a Thrift the other day along with a Long sleeve green corduroy polo shirt with contrast collar

>>8328221
yeah, this

>>8328706
Let's see them then

>>8328285
Nah, man. That's something I can imagine Walter White would wear if you switch out the Chelseas for Wallabees and if that's the case then that's completely normcore. Nevermind the fabric.

>/fa/ is still working with absolutes

Keep being pleb, polos can work.

I only wear t-shirts because collars are for old people.

>>8328833

Tiny unusual polo dump?

>>8328865

>>8328833
that looks horrible. like fedora tier horrible

>>8328873

>>8328865
Good stuff, I was thinking of copping a Qlo polo but it probably won't be as unique.
Polos are nice as long as you avoid colours like blue and such.

>>8328881

I think the idea is good, but the styling is definitely wrong. An ankle boot or even a very clunky trainer would probably be better for the "twisted sporty" thing going on.

>>8328895

I've NEVER been that fond of them, but I consistently find Raf x FP styles that I know I would wear, even if I don't buy them myself. I still regret not grabbing anything from the metallic/mesh collection.

>>8328905

>>8328899
the polo itself is ok but the model and the rest is plain horrible. Skinny guys shouldnt wear shirts like this. Just like tanktops. it just looks ridiculous

>>8321401
fred perry polos are pretty decent

I wear polos to the office as a t shirt replacement because tees are considered unacceptable, except for on Fridays during the summer.

>>8326366
w2c?

i only wear polos unless at work (suit) or working out. every year at the start of spring i buy 6-7 polos from brooks brothers and they last me until it gets cold.

i'm an educated adult so the hipster shit kids are wearing these days doesn't appeal to me.

>>8328945

As per the filename, Kris Van Assche, spring/summer 2012.

>wearing a ralph polo right now
Yeah.

Im such a basic bitch, but I love polos.

I have a few basic Tommy Hilfiger ones. Fit is okay.

Fred Perry fit is top notch.
CDG fit is top notch.

I dont wear Lacoste because where I live its only for faggots.

>>8327940
>daddy's munny
>lel so frat

polos are shit unless you play polo
it's fratboy core