[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 649 KB, 1909x960, cp vs rs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8117381 No.8117381[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Common Project Derby
or
Raf Simons x Dr Marten 1461
Which one is better quality and looks nicer?

>> No.8117477

idk about the quality of the 2 but i like the common projects more b/c not stitching. plus no super shine gives more of a casual vibe. but both are quite nice

>> No.8117521

And I'd gone for second.
Cause actually I like shiny shoes (at least if you can maintain them so they are shiny with fingerpolish) and most of people hate Martens for its yellow stitching, while red IMO looks very cool.
Once again, common projects are fail-safe option, but I really don't like the way leather looks, kinda cheapish (of course it is not). But if you want something extraordinary, go for Raf.

>> No.8117578
File: 341 KB, 3456x2304, 5tpKc3Q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8117578

hey there was wondering where i could cop that second pair listed the raf x doc martens

>> No.8117605

>>8117521

Interesting story: My brother own's CP derbies( not the one in the pic) and brought them to a shoemaker to get them repaired ( seam at the top has torn apart). The guy told him that the overall quality of the shoe (and leather) is cheap and merely 100€ worth.

>> No.8117946

>>8117381
i was gonna buy lovely's raf x docs (white) but decided not 2
then when i wanted them he had already sold them ;__;
anyway where r u gonna cop? i saw a pair on grailed that were massively over priced
keep an eye on ur shekels anon

>> No.8117957

>>8117946
where is lovely ?

>> No.8117965

>>8117957
i dunno
last stuff he posted was that he copped prada creepers and was gonna change his style completely
then he vanished
~~~~~~~Sp00ky~~~~~~~~~

>> No.8117974

>>8117605
so pic related are a bad idea to ger for $700cad?

Does anyone know which derbies would have the highest quality possible?

>> No.8117980
File: 65 KB, 952x1428, 5435345345.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8117980

>>8117974

>> No.8117984
File: 63 KB, 620x413, 1397853431248.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8117984

have you seen the dr martens x sauvage?

It's really a shame that there aren't more simple shoes like these few.

>> No.8117996

oh, he does have a life tho

>>8117965
youtube.com/watch?v=-n25Jvp0zK8

tfw fuk is completely dead
tfw *chan is cancer until december
tfw HB has been cancerous too
tfw don't have to care anymore since there's aoe2 and swat4 B^)

CHEERS
X

>> No.8118025

>>8117381
cp's look good on photos, but pretty lame once your wearing them.

>> No.8118028

>>8117974
if you like that style then there are much better options for that kinda money

>> No.8118026

>>8117996
eh its not like the quality will drop drastically in summer
this place is still gonna b as stagnant as ever
hit me up on skype anyway
>basedyawn

>> No.8118052
File: 144 KB, 1000x1334, 4564254.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8118052

>>8118028
list some babie!?

>> No.8118096
File: 130 KB, 952x1428, 41418M049003_5_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8118096

>>8118052
Are these the patent version from this season? Love the shape of the SLPs, pic related.

>> No.8118113

>>8117974

Dunno, I really love those though and I would buy them If I had the money. I own a pair of white cps lows ( 5 years old) and they are still in great shape ( no holes, seam torn apart). Just keep in mind that the quality isn't that great.

>>8117980

Those are the derbies my brother owns.

>> No.8118120

get the sauvage doc martens

>> No.8118231

>>8118096
yeah that is what they are i think. too bad they cost so much :(

>> No.8118694

looked at red wing postman?

>> No.8119958

bumping

>> No.8119968

>>8117974
for around the same price as common projects derbies you could probably get something from Church's that will be much higher quality. check mrporter and see if you can't find anything

>> No.8120021

CPs will be much more formal while raf x docs can work for formal and casual

both are good shoes

>> No.8120141
File: 65 KB, 620x413, pretty_shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8120141

Yo honestly W2C these shoes or shoes similar to this one? I really like the white sole

>> No.8120145

>>8120141
can these be worn as dress shoes? or are they more of a casual shoe?

>> No.8120168

>>8120145
casual imo

>> No.8120253
File: 515 KB, 2413x1573, s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8120253

>>8120168
how about these?

>> No.8120282

>>8120253
way casual lmao

>> No.8120294

>>8120253
schoolshoes

u gotta watch it when you go to buy 1461s, make sure you dont get 8053s (the ones you posted) instead because they look fucking dumb

>> No.8120300

>>8120294
my bad, those are actually 9369s right? anyway, there you go, all the derby style docs are easy to get mixed up but 1461s are the only ones which really look good

>> No.8121575
File: 73 KB, 460x306, 1397922996077.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8121575

What about the Red Wing Postman

>> No.8121583
File: 174 KB, 1600x731, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8121583

Thoughts about the COS version?

Thinking of copping some for work shoes. Can't rationalise paying CP prices for work.

>> No.8121660

>>8121583
They're fine, but I'm guessing the soles/stitching will be gone in six months, and you've flushed £120 and will have to buy a new pair. Could be wrong, but COS in general is in an awkward middle ground in that it's not cheap enough for it's quality and not quality enough for it's price.

>> No.8121672

>>8121660
They have the same crepe sole as the CPs... They don't make different qualities of crepe. Crepe is crepe.

>> No.8121850

>>8120141
those are dr martens x sauvage
you can get them on ebay, those exact ones at 220 usd
no idea if he sold it

>> No.8121887

>>8121583

I tried them on in a COS, they seem just ok for the price. I probably would have copped them but they didn't have a UK7 (sold out on their website too). They look better in person than on that pic.

>> No.8121954

Can you wear these shoes with shorts and no socks? Is that /fa/? Maybe in a different colour like brown or oxblood?

>> No.8121958
File: 67 KB, 373x560, 1396380518080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8121958

>>8121954
yeah why not

>> No.8122203

>>8121850
can't find any my size, the ones on ebay are for people with huge feet