/fa/ - Fashion

>>8105372
cdg x converse lmao

>>8105372
man this silhouette is so much better than the stan smiths they're based on it's not even funny. normally i hate shit like mmm gats that are just a lazy "reinterpretation" of an established piece, but these are real nice. still wouldn't pay 600 for them though.

>>8105582
OP here, yeah I agree. Those are just really nice shoes, but like you I can't justify dropping the cash on them.

I really just want simple white leather shoes and it seems impossible to find them without spending a small fortune.

>>8105613

leather jack purcells are $60

>>8105372
white cps dumbo

Get these bro. They'll go with a lot.

http://m.asos.com/mt/us.asos.com/Jack-Jones-Brooklyn-Sneakers/127xbo/?iid=3646326&cid=17110&Rf900=4444&sh=0&pge=0&pgesize=50&sort=3&clr=White&mporgp=L0phY2stSm9uZXMvSmFjay1Kb25lcy1Ccm9va2x5bi1UcmFpbmVycy9Qcm9kLw....

>>8105650
I recomended these cause leather can be a bit overkill in the summer. Especially when you're doing touristy stuff. Canvas is the way to go. If you don't like these soulland has some all white canvas on eBay. They're the only shoes that are soulland on eBay.

>>8105633
and ugly too!
what a deal

>>8105633
not my kind of thing at all
>>8105650
I'll consider canvas, though I'm not particularly fond of those. Thanks for the help!
>>8105635
CPs are nice. I'm considering them. Just not sure they're worth $400. I want to see what my options are, y'know?

>>8105696

CPs are worth $150 at the most

>>8105696

Check out fyre if you're still in to leather.

The construction is shit on the low tops but they're strong enough to last the summer.

http://mobile.yoox.com/us/44573923UW/item?dept=men#sts=SearchResult&cod10=44573923UW&sizeId=15

http://www.revolveclothing.com/gram-383g-in-white/dp/GRAM-MZ55/?d=Mens

thoughts on these?

>>8105714
eh, not terrible
>>8105750
I don't like these.

Continued thanks for recommendations, really is very helpful

There's plenty of options OP

check out these:

http://www.zara.com/us/en/man/shoes/sneakers/soft-leather-sneaker-c358062p1668907.html#sharedProduct

http://www.menlook.com/us/sneakers/edition-3-white-leather-sneakers-national-standard-90740.html

http://us.topman.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?beginIndex=0&viewAllFlag=&catalogId=33059&storeId=13051&productId=12442363&langId=-1&categoryId=&parent_category_rn=&searchTerm=TM97U07GWHT&resultCount=1&geoip=home

http://www.asos.com/Selected/Selected-Homme-Steven-Trainers/Prod/pgeproduct.aspx?iid=3684843&cid=4209&Rf-200=5&Rf911=2244&sh=0&pge=0&pgesize=36&sort=-1&clr=White&xr=1&mk=VOID&r=3&r=2

>>8106099
Thanks dude. Great recs. I actually really like the Zara ones, but I think I've heard bad things about their quality in the past..can anyone vouch?

>>8106123
Well I don't know about those but I copped national standards and i'm really happy with them. If you're not sure about those zara ones you can get them for $88, if you use a promo code, they sldo offer free shipping & returns so you have nothing to lose.

>>8106150
Do national standards run big?

stan smiths are definitely worth looking into, i honestly think the 'muh silhouette' highly depends on your foot shape

other than that,
>I need shoes to wear with shorts this summer
do they have to be white leather sneakers? what kind of shorts do you wear? if you are going for vacation and you will be doing a lot of walking it may be worth it to get something like a roshe or free or flyknit, but you have to select carefully because a lot of that shit is ugly. the breathability would be a nice bonus

my experiences generally seemed to indicate that 'fashion sneakers' that aren't from a legitimate established designer have iffy quality. nike/adidas have better access to decent factories for less money

http://www.littleburgundyshoes.com/ca-eng/men/shoes/sneakers/98966902-hammaker/36

Im going to the mall this weekend to get these
>inb4 vans suck

>>8106249
>vans

>>8106235
I'm open to nikes/adidas, they just have to not look bad. I'm only carrying 2 pairs of shoes, one for going to dinner and one for everything else, so I need them to be good looking and versatile.

I'm gonna say stan smiths lol sorry

>>8107851
Reverse search doesn't return any results. Is there a specific name for these Stan Smiths (with the spots)?

>>8105372

There are some nice white yet affordable sneakers out there.

1) Adidas NEO Vulc Low in white. Cheap as fuck, clean design and all you have to do is take a seamripper to tongue's branding.

2) Pony Topstar Ox in white leather. Cheap as fuck as well but the branding is somewhat less lowkey than say CP's.

Both are <100$.
Do the googling yourself.

>>8107928
Thanks for the recs, will check out.

>>8107915
Bedwin & The Heartbreakers x adidas Originals stan smith

>>8105633
where? not in EU ffs

>>8105372
zara has similiar looking for 50€

>>8107915
oops sorry, that was my own pic

>>8107952

>>8105696
>not sure they're worth $400
they arent

Got some light khaki and dark khaki chinos, first two pair. Will get desert boots later, but wondering if I should cop cons or vans. Going light gray or gray if possible.

Any advice?

just copped
zara £29.99
http://www.zara.com/uk/en/man/shoes/retro-sneaker-c564561p1728549.html

>>8108136
You got them actually? I would like to see how they fit IRL
I'm tempted between your zara rippof and those adidas

>>8108168
ordered online today
they feature them in this look
http://www.zara.com/uk/en/man/trousers/slim-stretch-cotton-trousers-c358056p1927508.html
pic related

>>8108181
Only sideview though.
On the presentation pcitures, the top views make the shoe look really wide, and a bit too big

Not OP, but I needed some sneakers for the summer and ended up ordering a pair of GATs. Did I do good?

>>8107851
>>8107952
w2c in Europe pls

>>8108192
Oh man, I can’t wait for them to arrive

>>8108217
>>8108192
only the MMM ones look good.

>>8105372
H&M has shoes like that if it wasn't mentioned already - $20 in their store

Why has nobody suggested Superga 1705 yet? Great silhouette, canvas so perfect for Spring/Summer and they're cheap.

>>8108196
http://www.uptherestore.com/product/stan-smith-x-bedwin-heartbreakers

>>8108236
that doesn't look good.

>>8105372
White low top pf flyers.

>>8108236
Your arms are falling m8

>>8108250
imagine this guy in a short sleeve shirt

>>8107928
Haha sounds like me, the both I was looking at actually
And including the Zara one.
But just ordered the Vulc Low, will get back to /fa/ when they arrive.

Tfw own flyknits, mmm gats, common projects and our legacy sneakers

summer just isn't long enough to wear all of them

>>8108239
thanks but shipping+taxes from australia would fuck me

>>8108295
why not sell one of the last 3?

>>8108168
i have the vulc mids, and yeah they feel cheap but to anybody passing you on the street they look like decent, plain white mids. get a lot of wear out of them.

also COS now do a plain white sneaker for 75 euros and it'll definitely be better quality than zara

>>8108611
I just checked adidas website and it said coming soon, still not sure whether to wait for them or just cop the stan smiths in some colourway.

>>8108680
COS always manages to fuck up somehow.

>>8108707
up to you really. I personally like the all white style on mine rather than the weird light grey upper on the vanilla stan smiths.

>>8108725
I think that looks good, I also saw them at the store today and the quality looked alright.

>>8108725
I reckon you could easily remove that with a seam ripper

>>8108737
get out zidf

>>8106099
how would those leather sneakers do if you wore them without socks?

>>8108964
Taste is subjective, I'm also rocking Stan Smiths this season.

>>8109020
Just buy some no-shows.

cool thread, bump for white sneaks

just get some cps or those slps

you're right about them not being worth retail, but only retards pay retail. just keep looking and you'll find them cheap.

>>8111209
What would you consider cheap in this situation?

I've seen CPs in my size for $250ish, but that's still enough to make me think twice.

Erik Schedin

>>8109034
are all white ones ever coming out?

>>8107851
the 'original by bedwin' thing at the back looks fucking awful though.

>>8112229
disgusting isnt it.

>>8113198
imo thats nitpicking, I'm not really a fan of it either but It doesn't ruin the shoe.

the new cos shoes r pretty good for the price

>>8113229
>>8108725

>>8113229
how are they? is the grey bad?

Those cos sneakers look nice, in glad they put that silver shit on too

>>8113270
no

laces r kinda thick but decent for price.

These would've been perfect for me. Too bad they're sold out worldwide.

They were extremely cheap too, like $30

>>8113319
Shit forgot pic

Anyone remember someone posted the shoes that seemed to have inspired Common Projects? It was some kid's thesis project or something back in 2000 and he made super simple white leather shoes. There is a web store and I recall they're cheaper than CP's, but I can't remember the name.

>>8107928
>>8108168
Adidas neo is dope. Will cop.

opinion on kent wangs?

>>8105713
b-b-but they have stitched sole... and they will last you 10 years, t-too!

>>8107851
>dat MMM rip off

>>8105633
I have a pair of these, bought them online and I have never seen an uglier toe box in my entire life. Havent seen them since i got my cps, theyre truly an eye-sore.

I got these y3 last spring and I really like them for streetwear

why cop stan smiths when these are superior, stan smiths have an ugly as fuck toebox

>>8107957
Mr Porter, well to UK at least

>>8108217
what shoes are these?

>>8114049
Nazi Sneakers

>>8114064
no really man, what brand what model

>>8114071
German Army Trainers

>>8114077
thanks dude

I didnt know that the converse x margiela were actually just painted. it's kind of a cool concept, that they change with time.

>>8113865
definitely not

>>8113865

Kent Wangs don't look like complete shit until you compare them with CP's

what are some nice looking cheap white sneakers that you can afford to wreck when you go to clubs or whatever

>>8114132

They're both shit.

>>8114114
>just painted
>$200

>>8113229
what backpack is that?

>>8114146
the paint contains some of his cum

>>8108192
if they german surplus ones you dun goofed, they fit like shit and are really uncomfortable. Most german soldiers would sub them out for their other sports trainers.

>>8108192
why do the soles on this one look like poop?
>>8108217
where did u cop them at?

>>8114146
I ball so hard motherfuckers wanna fine me
but first niggas gotta find me
what's 50 grand to a motherfucka like me
pls remind me
ball so hard
this shit cray

>>8114202
He's not been involved with MMM for years now

>>8113229
how easy do you think it would be to remove the suede without fucking anything up?

>>8114582
bump

>>8105372
https://www.jcrew.com/mens_category/shoes/sneakers/PRDOVR~50304/50304.jsp
its an almost completely white sneaker and not too expensive, seems to fit what you're looking for pretty well

>>8114541
>expecting people on /fa/ to know that

they probably think helmut lang clothes are still designed by lang himself

>>8116643

Not OP but that's sold out, on that site at least.

>>8116650
one of the biggest fa memes is how they only like og helmut land
lurk more u fuckin fag

>>8106099
The selected trainers are the best.
I might cop tbh

>>8120109
They're out of stock unless you're size 13

does anyone on /fa/ have orions?

>>8108136
these have the potential to be too fly if worn with with the right outfit