/fa/ - Fashion

We janoski now

>janoskies
this must be the non-highschoolgraduate edition

>>8100915
oh I guess this is the 13 year old skater edition then?

>>8100940
Post yours

>tfw size 13
>tfw geos only go to size 12

>>8100959
geos were not designed for niggers

the lack of AF1s in this thread is disturbing

me n buddy rite now
matchy

>>8100915
>>8100925
>>8100926
i think these might be the three ugliest shoes i've ever seen

>>8100959
they go up to EU46 don't they? isn't that size 13?

this thread is embarrassing

sage

>>8101010
idk. But I know the Rick x adidas only go to 12 so its prolly same

>>8101042
dude why are you showing me your fucking feet. i dont want to see your fucking feel. did you get in to the shower just to take that picture. if not, how are you browsing 4chan in the shower. what the fuck

fuck ur janoskis

>>8101042
pretty sure geobuckets go up to eu 46

check sneakerboy

i need new black converse and im wondering if i should go for the black trim this time

just copped. they look pretty dark in this pic tho.

>>8102094
they are sweaty as fuck dont do it

tfw no gravis

http://gravisfootwear.jp/item/tarmac-vulc-lx-2/

why are you posting disgusting damn shoes?

is this the ugly as fuck edition?

can any of you guys recommend me a chunky shoe but all black or charcoal and in suede?

Just copped, dig the inside.

>>8102887
what other shoes are similar to this one? plain leather black with a white shoe sole

prolly gon cop dis

OP just woke up

You haters make me laugh by shitposting text without a picture of shoes because you KNOW you look ridiculous and it hurts your feet yet live with it because some crooknosed designer made it, and another /fa/ggot actually pulled it off by wearing it and now you don't really know who you are anymore wearing those ridiculous clown shoes. So that.

>>8102920
>vans
Why? It's just the exact same shit in different colors with every fucking shoe

just bought these

http://www.cosstores.com/gb/Shop/Men/New/Contrast_leather_sneakers/51655-12091517.1#c-22755

cos now has cps so we never need to have another cps thread again

>>8103058
wow, cool

Fuck yeah

new dylan rieder huf shoe.

>buy shoes
>too small

that proxy feel...

>>8103058
ehh they dont look as slim and the contrast at the back looks wierd
they look more like stan smiths x cp's disabled child

kinda wanna post stan smiths, but don't wanna shit up thread/make people shitty in thread.

What's /fa/-s opinion on the new Adidas ZX-Flux ultra colorful edition ?

>>8103455
i'm literally considering buying a pair right this second

the shop down the road has some and i know if i go i will buy them

fuck

>>8103455
as long as they aren't ment for the circus/the local hipstercafe its ok

shoud I cop?

>>8103667
that's a very flattering angle. silhouette doesn't look like that on other photos.

>>8103687
i have heard this

that is why i am glad i could try them on first but i am thirsty for new shoes

>>8103701
i would cop af1 lows but i copped my af1 highs just over a month ago.. might cop a secondhand pair if i can though

not like that other dumb fuck anon on here that copped a fucking destroyed pair for $45 though jesus that guy fucked up
>muh muh muh yellow sole
>not realizing it yellows fairly quick if you just wear the damn shoes

>>8103677
i personally am not a fan

going to post some random shoe content

Poor mans new balance checking in

How old is too old for skinny jeans?

>>8103730
depends on how you carry yourself tbh

your pants would look much better with a proper pinroll instead of that cuff, i would suggest googling it

also gonna try to post shoe content that isn't posted here every other day

when i say 'stuff that isnt posted every other day' i dont mean like crazy obscure shoes

i just feel like i see a lot of the same images on /fa/ a lot

i was also wondering how op defines hipsterclown

>>8103763
lets see it from the back

but nah really how is the silhouette and are they comfy

>>8100959
t hey fit large. you'd fit into a size twelve

>>8103764
OP still here - doc martens and anything vaguely related

i feel like these had pretty good potential even if they werent that well received at first

just copped em a couple days ago

>>8103768
Silhouettes okay, not for everyone due to the toebox, but It doesn't phase me.

on the comfy scale, with a 1 being new doc martens and 10 being prestos, they're roughly a 7, kinda stiff to begin with, but will get better probably.

PS u can kinda see the back in this pic lmao

>>8103778
i will take a good look at the toebox before i buy then.. i do like the tabs on the heels on those though

i am going to stop posting so many damn images but i may return with a pic of my af1s and new stan smiths later

yes

actually just for OP i found a picture with my docs in it

lub yew

dont mind the awful off-colors

>>8103778
w2c? Paint splattered stan smiths?

are these still available anywhere?

>tfw they grew on me only after they sold out

probably the only nike-logo shoe I would ever buy tbh

>>8103807
most acceptable doc i've seen but still nothing I'd wear

>>8103808
>yfw

>>8103815
ebay

>>8103816
Adidas Originals x Bedwin & The Heartbreakers.

>>8103833
where did you actually buy them?

>>8102920
Those look fucking sick.

>>8103730
They're never acceptable unless you're an emo twink

>>8103837
http://www.adidas.com.au/bedwin-stan-smith-shoes/D65674_590.html

>>8103853
god dammit
now i have to choose between these or the normal ones

>>8100915
am i clown cos of size 15?

>>8103917
how is it even a choice?
the normal ones are always around these wont be.

Cop or not?
white sneakers.

>>8104696
what are they? I need to cop some white minimalistic lowtops for summer wear

>>8102094

the pure black on black on black screams try hard, or edgy autist who tried to pick the blackest shoes he could

>>8104714
Same boat m8
They are adidas Vulc low, incredibly cheap (50€), but I quite dislike the 3 bars on the back, don't know if it's noticeable IRL

>>8103448

is tucking jeans into shoes fa

tongue all stickin out?

>>8103742
Wow dude, thanks for you post, I always cuffed my pants loose and wondered why it looked shitty. Now I know how to do it properly.

>>8103763

are those fucking galaxy socks

I have $900 to spend on shoes and I'm buying 3 pair of af-1. What should I buy with the $600 left over?

>>8104806
geobaskets

>>8104806
don't spend 3 hunna on af1s, what colors/cuts were you looking at? you might not need both mids and highs if thats what you're thinking. or you could get a new pair or two, and get the third secondhand for cheap so you could have more to put toward your other shoes

other than that,
>$600 left over
i would get raf velcros or cps personally

>>8104806
CPs 4 sure

>>8103278
w2c?

what kind of shoes do you guys wear in the rain?

Anyone know of some good, cheap, close toed slip on shoes good to be worn without socks?

>>8103456
>What's /fa/-s
What in the ACTUAL fuck are you doing with that hyphen, anon? Use an apostrophe next time, that's how you make it possessive.

>/fa/-s

I really dig these for some reason, can see them fitting a lot of fits very easily.
Should I cop /fa/?

i got the stan smiths, went with the plain ones. the paintsplats are cool but i like how clean the white/fairway ones are

silhouette seems fine to me, though definitely bulkier than cps. i still didnt understand why people were complaining about the toebox so much. after some googling, i saw someone talking about how the indonesian stan smiths were better than the 'new' indian version. this was dated 2010. they were talking about a hard cardboard-like cap underneath the toebox that kept it more bulbous than usual

when i looked at mine (made in india) there was no cap in the toebox and it is pretty easy to push it in with your thumb, so i wonder if this is something that they've changed since then

also when i handed them to my roomate, who isnt completely clueless, he fucking bent the toe on the right shoe 90 degrees. what the fuck man? now i have one shoe with completely fucking retarded creases in it. it was literally two seconds after i got home

>>8103808
are those power corruption and lies vans?

>>8106401
don't matter much m8 if you're planning to wear it, creases are inevitable, you'll get them with the first few wear anyway

>>8106428
yes

they are starting to wear so i am wearing them less. same quality as any other sk8 hi pros. they are lasting pretty well, especially considering that i was wearing them fairly often at one point

>>8106464
unless he's one of those guys that walks around and is really careful not to bend the shoe when he walks. ever seen those kind of people? annoys the shit out of me for some reason

>>8106476
damn, that's cool as fuck

>>8106479
lel, never noticed anything like that, maybe old people, but i guess that's mainly because they can't walk properly anymore
is that even possible not to bend the shoe?

>>8106494
i don't think so, but I still see some people try every so often. just be on the look-out, you might start to notice them

>>8106494
nah, he just gave it a very virulent bend. outside of the range of normal motion. i think it's better just to walk normal. you can't avoid creases forever and if you walk weird they will crease weird

i cant sleep, here's my current shoe rotation. white balance a bit warm

docs are mie 1490s, af1s are white/reflective grey, slip ons are 8 years old, and the nikes are free 5.0s. i got them for running but i have found that i can wear them with some fits, and they're extremely comfortable. the vans started out as charcoal grey

anbody looking for af1 highs in all white should go to footlocker. when i got my stan smiths today they had the all white colorway in stock in all sizes, and the guy said they would be restocking all summer. i do not know if it is relevant, but the footlocker in question was a 'house of hoops' or some shit

>>8102903
Dunno If still here, but try Clae. They might have something still like that. I picked up a chukka style suede sneak with black upper and brown lower pretty cool. (Even if I never wear them I like having them)

>>8103768
Rick owens are overrated garbage.

what are these and where can i get them

>>8106748
can the 16 year old pov kids leave this board?

the shoes in this thread (save for a couple) are seriously disgusting. they aren't fashionable to anyone. if that's what you like, go ahead and wear them, but don't act under the pretense that anyone but yourself thinks they're good.

i'm not even in love with geoz, but you can't seriously stand behind any of these shoes and criticise anything done by RO.

>>8106973
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Vtg-80s-NIKE-Nylon-WAFFLE-Tennis-Shoes-SNEAKERS-Running-TRAINERS-Swoosh-Sz-8-/230823791098?pt=US_Women_s_Shoes&hash=item35be2b89fa#ht_3814wt_1392&clk_rvr_id=620269295492

Are these still available anywhere?

>>8106975
>you can't seriously stand behind any of these shoes and criticise anything done by RO
oh yes you can
you can stand behind the AF1 and the Stan Smith, rest is pretty much garbage tho, you're right
in RO's clown baskets you are just an out of place tryhard even in the most effay environment
maybe it look good on the runway, in wayvt threads or on tumblr, but it looks pretty stupid on the street

but it's just my opinion, maybe because my teen years are far gone by now

you'll eventually grow out of RO, if not, well, the more power to ya

Anyone know where to buy GATs?
>inb4 ebay.de
all the listings on grailed are sold out

>>8107023
>ebay.de
what the hell is your problem w/ ebay.de? you won't get better deals anywhere else

>>8106992
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/NEW-395-Blanc-Noir-White-Leather-High-Top-Sneakers-Common-Projects-Raf-Simons-/331154576722?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item4d1a59d552

>>8107065
>http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/NEW-395-Blanc-Noir-White-Leather-High-Top-Sneakers-Common-Projects-Raf-Simons-/331154576722?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item4d1a59d552
thanks mate, any idea how they fit? I wear 43 vans

>>8107106
Downsize 1 - so you should be good.

>>8107111
Thanks for being a bro

>>8106998
lol stop tripping as asokone

he is 19

>>8107115
Not a problem m8 ;)

>>8103677
Don't, I bought a pair in the americano colorway. Unless you're going to use them for skating like I do, its very uncomfortable.

>>8106352
Yes, I have a black pair and they are the most versatile shoes I have ever owned. They won't last long with skating though.

>>8107106

I own these, would recommend NOT sizing down 1. go your regular size

had to return an initial pair because I sized down and they were too small

>>8107119
im gay and I suck dick

should i size up or down if getting the flyknit chukkas?

>>8106401
>also when i handed them to my roomate, who isnt completely clueless, he fucking bent the toe on the right shoe 90 degrees. what the fuck man? now i have one shoe with completely fucking retarded creases in it. it was literally two seconds after i got home

>>8103764
I WANT THESE SO FUKING BAD

Can someone tell me if Keds are any good or are they just like vans but different logo?

>>8104902
coming out in the summer

>>8103815
I bought them at APC in LA. They are extra nice in person. The dark navy leather lining is buttery smooth and i copped instantly. Some guy stopped me on the street and asked if I bought the blazers when he saw my bag. He was mad jealous.

>>8107534
Yeah, I read that on sufu too. I can't cop these anyway cause shipping and customs will make them expensive as fuck (compared to what they should cost anyway). So yeah, if anyone knows if these are still available in size 43 in europe tell me pls.

>>8103046
>http://gravisfootwear.jp/item/tarmac-vulc-lx-2/
lacoste makes some ok shoes but damn that logo is ugly, I'd never wear them.

>>8108030
They're overpriced as fuck and not durable, Lacoste not even once

cop?

>>8108064
dnc imo

>>8106401

why are roommates always fucking stupid

>>8108064
almost every skateshop

Got them a couple of days ago.

>>8108545
>>8108545
look up the jd fisk antwerps

your picture are like the antwerps but uglier imo

>>8103778
got any inspo for these ?

GOAT

>>8108722

From the Lookbook
>>8099046

Fit Pic of them on me.
>>8107851

Hope thats okay.

>>8103778
w2c canada?

>>8106548
>having this much autism

>tfw size EU47
>forever ugly shoes

>>8108745
yeah it's fine, they look qt3.14

>>8106494
>>8106479

You don't know sneakerheads. My step brother has tried everything from walking funny, to leaving the cardboard in it to keep creases out. I've seen people iron the as well. If you wear forces you can get force shields. They protect the shoe from creasing but fuck up your feet.

>>8103448
>>8103448
what are those blue shoes pls
also w2c

>>8108816
dbss

>>8108816
marjella

>>8103853
that only ships to australia, what if you're in a different country?

>>8100915
About to cop these NS3s.

Not sure about sizing. How do they compare to vans and nike?

Will the black cp achilles with the white sole ever come back?

>>8108847
It should change the country you're in ?

>>8108855
nah it doesn't, and I can find the Bedwin Stan Smiths on the Canadian or American website

not copper?

>>8108833
>>8108821
instructions unclear: or i'm just inept and can't find a combination of those terms to find said shoe on google. link pls?

>>8108906
i think it's diet butcher slim skin

but the other guy said maison martin margiela

so idk

>>8108918
idk all the dbss' i'm finding don't look like that and just look fucking ridiculous and are equally ridiculously priced.

i just found them tho; they're margielas but theyre $800 so not in my price range.

anyone got any recs for other nice high tops with a similar aesthetic?

anyone have that pic with the allen edmond shoe tree in the crocs.

>>8108980
i would also like to see this

>>8108949
hmmmm

>>8108949
wtc scarf like this?

How do you buy DBSS?

like where do i find their collection? ive got nothing on google

>>8109107
ebay, rakuten, consignment places
pretty sure the only place to buy them new is in their store in japan but i could be completely wrong

anybody have any experience with cinzia araia?

love the minimal hightops

>>8109136
link

>>8109142
http://www.luisaviaroma.com/index.aspx?#ItemSrv.ashx|SeasonId=59I&CollectionId=AJQ&ItemId=5&VendorColorId=MDI1&SeasonMemoCode=actual&GenderMemoCode=men&CategoryId=&SubLineMemoCode=shoes

http://www.luisaviaroma.com/index.aspx?#ItemSrv.ashx|SeasonId=59I&CollectionId=AJQ&ItemId=7&VendorColorId=MDE1&SeasonMemoCode=actual&GenderMemoCode=men&Language=&CountryId=&SubLineMemoCode=shoes&CategoryId=0&ItemResponse=&MenuResponse=&SizeChart=false&ItemTag=true&NoContext=false

?

>>8108918
they're margielas

similar colorway:
http://www.forwardforward.com/fw/DisplayProduct.jsp?d=M&s=B&c=Maison+Martin+Margiela&code=MMAR-MZ54&mkwid=mucgqyPH|pcrid|23155052074

>>8101006
grats on the shoe collection. you've got some fuckin heat

>>8102065
I have these, and after a year they're ragged and look nice. Pretty good beaters, though.

>>8108816

they margielas

>>8100915
You mean lower middle class 16 year old skater who shops at zumiez edition?

>>8108998
These are horrible do not cop, don't just buy them cause they're cheap.

They are designed by MMM, but MADE by H&M, so if you've ever handled h&m footwear, you'll know not to go near these with a 10 foot pole

Thinking about getting some replica Red October Yeezy 2's. Anyone have any experience with replicas? They're too expensive to justify getting authentic but I still want a pair.

????? easy

>>8101010
>they go up to EU46 don't they? isn't that size 13?
nah its 12

been looking for these for ages.
Found one, in china,
>3 sizes to small

fuck being size 12

>>8112390

>>8107908
>cant tell if absolutely love or find disgusting
these intrigue me i wonder how they skate

>>8100915
my shoes, nice taste OP. Wanna get these for summer.

does anyone know how grenson mid boots fit?

Just waiting for weather to heat up so I can crack these open

want these so much

>this thread

oh yeah, THAT'S why I don't post here anymore!

>>8103730
saucony's are beautiful. How much did you pay for them?
>>8107908
strong dancing shoe vibe: http://www.oershang.com/images/1/324751-011.jpg

>>8108600
probably paid too much
>>8108866
wan't there a dude trying to sell these?
>>8112361
no.
>>8112656
dnc ugly silhouette
>>8112645
toms look great but overpriced...
>>8112536
nice. w2c

Just coped these the other day

>>8112671
bad cop

>>8112671
Did they fall apart yet?

I'm leaning towards cop

90's

>>8102920

w2c

>>8106401
>>8106401
update on this bullshit
>also when i handed them to my roomate, who isnt completely clueless, he fucking bent the toe on the right shoe 90 degrees. what the fuck man? now i have one shoe with completely fucking retarded creases in it. it was literally two seconds after i got home
i wore them once and it really pissed me off. i could keep them, but i notice the creases every time i look down and the shit drives me insane. the one day of wear made it blantantly obvious that i would not otherwise have creases there.. not that it wasn't obvious enough. your foot doesn't fucking bend that way. fuck my housemate.

anyway, i am going to scrub the soles clean and return them today... i am returning instead of exchanging to minimize chances of spaghetti spillage. i have looked online, and everything about the europe/worldwide stan smith model seems superior to the US model. anybody know where i could get the EU release in the US?

>>8112663
>tf

PSA: If you don't have enough good taste to make these decisions for yourself you are destined to be a fuccboi forever.

Which lacing looks better?

>>8107716
need an answer on this one since they don't sell in my country and i'm ordering

can't go wrong with black/predominately black shoes

did a photoshop of some nike premontreals with no swoosh... should i try to take off the swoosh of mine? do these look good

>>8113049
lacing them as non-autist looks best, so neither

>>8113342

The swoosh will leave holes and potential glue residue once you've taken it off. So I guess it won't be fully debranded.

>>8113342
hnnnnnnng

where to cop these?

>>8113049

Both look like shitty hobo shoes

>>8112843
do it.
I've been thinking about coping the red ones, but I'm leaning towards the flat blacks.

>>8113372
those are nike blazers. the black and white toning makes the stitching/paneling more noticeable. no idea what color those are.

>>8113361
it's stitched on with no glue below, i checked

>>8113342
this debranding mania is killing me, it's the same with autos, just because you remove the emblem from the front of your shitty Opel, it neither will become a Porsche suddenly nor less people will recognize it

leave it or buy some proper fucking shoes which don't have branding FFS

>>8108731
>Red-Wing-Postman-Oxfords-2[1].jpg
>Those shoes
>Oxfords

>>8113049
Criss-cross is the GOAT sneaker lacing method. Make sure the straight bar at the bottom is under the eyelets.

>>8113540
Maybe they do it because they like the look better without the obnoxious branding on them, not to make their shoes look more high end.

>>8102094
Can't decide between these or regular black vans sk8 hi's

>>8104736
idk man they're just black sneakers

>>8113624
I'd get the Vans. The black rubber on the Chucks just looks really cheap and it's the kind of shoe 14yo goth girls wear.

>>8113611
yea, maybe

but let's see this concrete shoe, i'm guessing it has the big swoosh originally, you can't remove the stitches from the nylon part w/o leaving any marks, it will just look worse than w/ the swoosh before

ordered these yesterday, dunno why but i love the gum and black combo with the bronze eyelets

>>8103776
These look like the shoes they make restaurant workers wear

Anybody know where to cop these in yurop?

new non-hipster cops

spezial>gazelle>samba

>>8114551
lel

>>8113964
Footlocker?

ZX Flux went TTS but shouldve sized half down

>>8114551

>>8104738
i think it adds a pinch of individuality, without being too loud, would definitely cop

Copped these the other days for Summer :-)

>>8116205
Dat feel when I passed on these when I had the brief opportunity

>>8116353
can't see those working unless you decide to go jogging with them

>>8116376
Do you mean for both pairs? I've already worn Infrared pair and am considering returning the other pair just for financial reasons though I do like them and will keep if ppl think they're ok. I have loads of trainers in Black/White/Grey + other 'safe' colourways so I thought I'd push the boat out a bit.

>>8116384
Personally, I like these >>8116205 among the colorful versions most. It comes down to personal preference, really. If you already neutrally colored pairs, you can keep the infrared ones imo. Generally depends on your outfit and how much it draws attention itself.

>>8116401
Yeah I like those the best too but sold out anywhere I look

I usually wear Black CPs, Black Trainerendors, Iguana/Sand Roshes or Grey ZX Flux for my normal everyday fits. When the weather's ncie I like incorporating some more colour into my fits so figured it'd be good for that

>>8112848
Air maxes are ugly as fuck, makes u look like you have bricks over your feet.

I need some boots for work. Many hours in a factory. I don't really care how they look, they just need to be comfy as hell, my cheap shit shoes are killing me. Pls recommend some work boots.

>>8103278

so fucking bad

ZX Flux or Roshes?

>>8116534
red wings are great for working. very comfortable.

expensive, but your ~$300-400 investment will last you 10+ years, especially if you don't care what they end up looking like.

>>8116567
ZX

>>8116572
And I'm not talking about their fashion oriented ones like Iron Rangers. Get some of the actual work boots, they're unreasonably comfortable.

>>8116567
ZX I would say. Roshes are like a plague now.

>>8116572

thanks for the rec. I don't really mind the price, anything to make 12 hours of standing around more tolerable makes me happy

>>8116567
i've just bought some zxes.
theyre sweet. :)
roshes seem p lame now tbh

>>8106548
nice collection m8

>>8103278
the ones he made with Gravis was so much better, this looks like a mix between techwear and prep. urk.

>"non-hipsterclown" means trendy high school-tier sneakers
My head hurts.

>>8116567
Roshe nm, only reason to get fluxes is if roshes are pop where you are and even then you're just being a contrarian faggot.

>>8116567

Nike free 5.0 master-race

get on my level

>>8117060
Wanna borrow some socks m8?

>tfw size 16 foot
>tfw I will never be able to wear these

Most recently copped.

They a little more compact than the original blazers, which I found to be too long and clownshoe-like.

cop or not?

if only they werent 900 dollars..

>>8103807
I've never really liked doc's but these ones look good as fuuuk, would go for black tho

do boat shoes count as business casual?

>>8117530

>>8117349
Get the Spezials in either blue or olive.

>>8116994

Does your head hurt from being a stupid shit by not realizing people have different styles other than you?

>>8117561
I'm not the one who can't handle people wearing "hipsterclown" shoes.

>>8117349
>>8114551
Sure man!
best shoes ever

>>8117566

>the city of you

>>8104050

>size 15

are you an alien

these are mine

>>8117518

Thats sexy, not gonna lie.

Bumping this thread

Should I cop? I'm gonna run in them, anybody got expirience with them?

Does anyone know where to find a cheaper but similar version of these?

http://store.tods.com/Tods/GB/categories/Shop-Man/Spring-Summer/Shoes/Loafers/Suede-Moccasins/p/XXM0LR00051RE0S800

i wish i was sexy :(

Birks doe

>>8118099
mini rafs

I actually skate daily

>>8102065
I skated through these really quickly, they were destroyed in 2 weeks. Vans have great soles but I prefer janoskis for the board feel, construction, and looks.

>>8102920
just vomited

>>8104806
6 more pairs of af1's

>>8113643
what are the ones in the bottom left

>>8104806

>owning 3 pairs of af1

why

>>8118160
trainerendor

>>8117020
This guy knows

w2c?

tfw going to buy dr martens for first time
>get to checkout $120(beauty bargain)
>add in shipping details choosing australia as country
>shipping costs $60
what the actual fuck dr martens? 60 bucks for fucking delivery get fucked cunt

orions?

>>8113595
yeah aren't these derbies?

i rly like these shoes.

>>8120303
>onions?

>>8104050
i feel your pain

>>8117935
those arent for fucking running

how fucked am i?

Anyone know what this type of shoe is specifically called? And is it effay?

>>8120756
I would by those so fast dude

>>8121279

plimsoll or did you want a more specific term?

>>8103815
u can borrow mine a day m8 B^)

Should I cop?

>>8121309
more specific, plimsoll gives me all kinds of results

>>8121322

Don't think it gets more specific than what >8121309 said.

Plus, if it weren't for the Fred Perry logo I would have though it was a cheap one from Target or something.

>>8116567
flux are just roshes with fucking hideous soles

All day, 'erry day.

>>8118107
stupid question but what is this thin fabric (cotton?) called and who sells similar pants for men?

>>8112664
Boat shoes are Sebago Docksides. Cop em from local sebago store/ department store or online. Shouldn't be hard to come by.

>>8121410
flux are just roshes without the fucking hideous lace bar and with a toe box that isn't a plastic bag

validate my cop, fellows

>>8121321
finishes on air max are disgusting, I mean it

>>8113019
taste isn't 100% a gift, it's built through growth, experimentation, and discovery

>>8122879
fucking hideous, shit taste.

>>8122993
>af1s
fuk u bitch

>>8109067