/fa/ - Fashion

>>7921928
nice is that tad?

yeah, good eye

>>7921928
normally op should deliver some photos at least.

posted these in another thread. want to get but wouldn't wear for another 8 months now.

>>7921994
these would be better. unless you are black or something.

>>7922006
>>7922001
>>7921991
this is not techwear.
techwear consist of high quality fabrics/designs normally tactical/outdoor brand companies such as arcteryx, tad, northface, salomon, etc etc. not fucking robots. post shit you can actually fucking wear, not fucking gay drawings from deviantart.

also this just came the other day. looooove the way it looks, so glad i finally found one. don't like their current version as much although i'm glad they've decreased their pricing. there's no way i would have fronted $650 for this.

>>7922002
m8 those look like shit in comparison

>>7922015
not even the one that posted that photo, but you clearly dont understand techwear.
>choosing some gay studded jordans over murdered out salomons.
Salomons are one of the highest end hiking shoe you can get, special forces use them and they are indestructible and are of the highest quality. The design and lacing system is original and smart. just because its blacked out doesnt mean its tech wear >>7921994
those are ugly af and arent tech wear.

>>7922001
>>7922006
>>7922010
>>7922011
Not to say those are out of place in a techwear discussion, but I'd keep it to inspo threads.

>>7922036
>le 3pic techwear mastar!!!!!!!!11111

>>7922036

i prefer these ones

>>7922059
noooooice

bump.

I wish White Mountaineering would reboot their BLK line...

>>7922036
lol; what are you a salomon spokesmen or something? the gear is mid-tier (at best), and those light hikers leave something to be desired as far as quality/durability/functionality. not implying the nikes are better in-and-of-themselves, but ur 140$ salomons are hardly
>one of the highest end hiking shoe you can get

>>7921928
how well will that thing carry a 13" laptop?

>>7922015
w2c?

how do we into summer techwear? especially in southern california where its hot as satans scrotum

>>7921928
w2c backpack?

>>7922411
Triple aught design fast pack.

>>7922227
maybe something like this. unfortunately you can't get by wearing hardshells in sunny 80 degree weather

whoo techwear thread
remember guys techwear = anything black or grey

>>7922432
id want something I could wear in 100 degree weather, in heat like that you dont really want to be out long but I'd still like a tech aesthetic for when I do have to leave air conditioned safety

just found out about this korean brand called t-level. they make bags and apparel, pretty cheap too

>>7922442
maybe take a look at running/cycling fashion, they can have a tech aesthetic while still being designed for dealing with movement and heat

>>7922449
that looks pretty shit to be honest, i hate that gaudy pocket on the front, I prefer super sleek techwear

>>7922458
I've been looking at the gyasokou x Nike stuff for inspo so I'll probably wear that this summer, love those softshells

>>7922449
Too much gloss on it, sure it adds protection. But I'm willing to sacrifice style for utility.

r8 my fit

>>7922460
theyre mostly cycling oriented, that might explain some of their design details

>>7922211
isaora 3l shell, this one is from winter '12. they used to be very expensive but their new line is considerably cheaper. i imagine the quality is roughly the same, but the new jackets don't have as good of a hood/neck cover.

>>7922427
>$239

Yeah, no. Fuck that.

>>7922536
gotta pay for the good shit bro

>>7922132
right? just goes to show how much of a superior label they are. Pretty much renown for doing fucking crazy cool colors and working them into creative coordination, then they drop an all black line and it still looks dope.

>>7922543
You're largely paying for the name. TAD is top-tear, but other tactical brands like Blackhawk and even Condor have bags that are just as good for 99.99% of the population.
Also, have a stun jacket.

>>7922591
*tier, fuck me.

Should I cop these and get them tailored for a tighter fit below the calves? I want that Acronym-esque fit but I don't want to pay for Acronym.

>>7922628
get the black levis commuter pants and pay for the tailoring with the cash you save

>>7922591
man my ranger hoodie is way nicer than any condor ive encountered

>>7922645
>>7922628
What would you tell the tailor? To taper them?

>>7922596
source on that jacket?

>>7922011

>>7922645

I got those already but I don't know if it's worth getting them tapered. I don't really like the fit on the seat / butt area. And it would be easier to get different pants instead of tailoring all that.

Plus I'm gonna have a ton of money because I'll probably return the outlier climbers on the right. for me the fit always seems pretty frumpy on outlier stuff.

>>7922011
this is a techwear general thread, inspiration counts. fuck off.

>>7922675

I go to the tailor with dimensioned isometric drawings and masking tape already on the pants so I don't have to tell them anything

>>7922738
Well, I am a n00b to tailoring. What should I go about doing?

>>7922726

stop being an autist. these look good,if that is actually you/

>>7922011
lol u fucking sperg. real men can make due with shitty old levi's and a parka. even the crappiest adidas track jacket is "Tech" compared to that. northface is cheap plastic shit itself, inflated by its brand so get off your high horse and let people post their inspo

>>7922726
Fuck they look tight dude.
also, how much are they in murika? wanna send me some to Aus?

>>7922744

they'll ask you to try them on and they'll pin the legs so you can just bring a picture of how you want them to fit and that should be enough. personally I'd rather just work out the dimensions on my own because otherwise you're relying on the tailor to actually give a shit. read the google reviews.

>>7922747

what do you think about the ones on the right?

>>7922757

They've been sold out on the levi's site for a while but you can find them on ebay for $65. I don't know how much international shipping is.

Also sometimes they're miscategorized as straight fit or whatever but there's only one commuter cargo style. I think the butt area and calves aren't great fit wise but otherwise I like them. I know twerk or somebody hates them though.

what do you guys think?

http://www.isaora.com/collections/technical-shell/products/isaora-io-3l-shell-grey

http://www.isaora.com/collections/windbreakers/products/ultralight-windbreaker-grey

>>7923076

>Semi-automatic zipper system

damn, seemed like only yesterday they were still working on the one-handed ones

>>7923129
>http://www.isaora.com/collections/technical-shell/products/isaora-io-3l-shell-grey
isn't that just a YKK zipper where the zipper locks and won't move when the zipper pull is in the downward position?

>>7923142

you're probably right, I'm holding out until they invent the fully automatic ones that don't move regardless of the zipper pull position

>>7923076
do your research pls! isaora is nice sometimes but their sizing and quality is spotty. i have an anorak of theirs and thankfully i didn't pay anything close to retail because i would have been extremely disappointed.

Has anyone ever owned any Outlier trousers? The OG and Climbers seem to be popular and I'm looking for something water resistant and flexible.

>>7922536
>>7922180
Check you the 5.11 Rush 12/24/72
Similar style, a lot cheaper

I have the 12 and it fits my 13" rMBP perfectly in the padded back pocket

>>7923171
i have nyco slims, they're great but not flexible whatsoever so don't get those if you're looking for a pair of pants with stretch

>>7923171
i have the climbers. one of my favorite pairs of pants. just washed em yesterday and low ironed em and they were water resistant too. slim but very comfortable because of the 4 way stretch.
outlier has some stitching problems though. i was disappointed with loose threads on many belt loops and on the inseams and outseams. i took a razor and cut them off.
search the urban techwear and outlier threads on superfuture. people review them in decent detail.

£160, might cop in black when my student loan comes in. I'm not sure though, its expensive. And I don't really like velcro or big plastic clips.

>>7922449
I want this so bad but it is sold out

Also fuck Nike hard for making the new Vapor flash have a stupid fucking neon green zipper
Jesus it looks like shit

Fuck everything godamn it

>>7923211
fat dude in my class has this. it looks pretty lame tbh. i hate these trendy knapsacks everyone is using and this just reminds me of shitty hershel bags with fraying bonded leather straps. but this is what i notice on a college campus. do w/e idc

>>7923211
I wouldn't, they look odd as daypacks. It's like wearing a motorbike drybag.

>>7923222
>>7923231
God yes, please talk me out of it
Also suggest an alternative

Thinking of DIYing my own acronym style jacket sling

>>7923236
Goruck SD25?

It's water resistant, lifetime guarantee, decent capacity whilst still being compact and it's $70 despite being made by a company renowned for overpricing.

>>7923255
That's ugly

>>7923236
bro i'd go with the sanction. i personally think it looks way better

>>7923259
You're ugly

>>7923236

>>7923280
oh got this stupid shit..>>7923222

>>7923255
w2c for $70?

>>7923292
http://www.goruck.com/en/sd25#.Ux7AhPl_t8E

>>7923171

I've tried both, for me the new OGs fit horribly. It flared out near the pockets. Probably because I have wide hips. I wouldn't recommend them though,

Climbers are here (right)

>>7922726

I'm not sure what to think of them yet, obviously they dont look anything like the stock photo. The material is great but I'm not sure about the fit.

>>7923326
ya i think it's velcro

>>7923298
>http://www.goruck.com/en/sd25#.Ux7AhPl_t8E
Thanks. Is the patch removable?

hey lads.
im looking to make a 'hooligan' sorta look.
i think some tech pieces can fit this aesthetic.
any recommendation for shells that make you look like this style?

I think nike acg has some good stuff, will dump a bit

>>7923383

>>7923387

>>7923387
I've had this for almost 2 years and it still looks as new. I do a lot of cycling and jogging in the rain and carry a laptop. A drop of water has never gone in. Probably one of my best purchases. Got it off yoox for $110.

>>7923392
Well have to go

>>7923255
>dat murrica

HUF - HR1's
Not a fan of HUF usually but these things look mad as fuck.

>>7923464
front.

>>7923464
post fit

>>7923473
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XsvyvX5ZOU

Can't find a fit, I don't own them yet either.
A review w/ on feet will do.

>>7923392
speaking of acg
these just came in the mail

>>7923540
used? looks so worn already...

>>7923545
Yeah. Fucker on ebay advertised as new. Still gonna keep though, they're in pretty good nick except from a few wrinkles

>>7923551
yea, will look like that after 10 or 20 wears anyway. grats on ur purchase

>>7922471
I wanted a trenchcoat so fucking badly after playing this game. A really shitty looking one, too....

I looked homeless during high school....

Fucking RE4 is great. I'm emulating it in 1080p because I'm a /g/ like that.

>>7923551
Paypal dispute it. Paypal will side with you, especially if he advertised it as new.

>>7923582
What will happen? Cause I still want to keep them

>>7923540
damn how much
would love some trainerendors but I cant afford

>>7923585
Well my dad got something that was advertised as new and was clearly used, and he opened a dispute so the seller sent him a partial refund as a discount.

this stuff looks so cool I really wanna try to incorporate some of this stuff into my fits

what is the appeal of it though do you guys like looking futuristic or something

>>7923749
I like clothes that I don't have to wash

>>7923749
it's more utility

>>7923754
seriously? effay is all about having more pockets?

>>7923763
yeah that and having waterproof, weather-proof, clothing

>>7923727
Kickass.
>>7923763
where else are you gonna keep your book, passport, and sandwich

just to anyone considering buying mission workshop i'll let you know I forked out the cash, beat the shit out of it and it still looks great and are as good a quality as they lead you to believe.

I got the 36L fitzroy FYI.

>>7921945
w2c wallet?

>>7923780
Hm, I do need a new backpack.

This shit is absurdly expensive to get in the United Kingdom though. Shipping + 20% VAT + Handling fee horseshit.

>>7923255
Nice. Might cop.

>>7923643
I just coped for 200 usd (but that was about 45usd for int shipping)
the black lows are only going to get more expensive as time passes

>>7923259
Well if you prefer some MOLLE for your ULTRA TACTICOOL URBAN OPERATIN' then there's this.

http://www.goruck.com/en/gr1#.Ux8ymfldW0o

Personally, I prefer the MOLLE one too. I bet you could sew some webbing on the SD though.

>>7924513
>$300

>>7924513
I like how with the release of the Shadow series they're outright admitting that they're charging you $230 for the MOLLE strips.

>>7924630
And the laptop pouch, don't forget that.

LOL

>>7924648
That's probably the other hundred dollars

>>7921994
they look like they are trying too hard to be techwear and as a result look cheap.

>>7922211
theres a M on Grailed right now for like 350 i think

>>7924899
>>7922211
*250

>>7922011
Lol lokk at this cool cat

Who makes decent pants? I want to start wearing something besides jeans.

>>7923749

>what is the appeal of it though do you guys like looking futuristic or something

If it was just about utility then you could just wear untailored hiking stuff all the time (I know a guy who does this, he's cool as fuck but not fa at all) but it's not, there's definitely an aesthetic to it.

For me it's because I've always been into the whole scifi / cyberpunk thing in books, movies, video games, whatever, so it's part of the same thing and it's just a more personal style for me. So yeah the focus on functionality is important, but it's more because it's cool and not really because I "need" it. Like, I don't need waterproof pants any more than I need high end graphics cards, but it's part of the same thing.

So that advertising on Outlier or Acronym or other fashion/techwear stuff, take it with a grain of salt-ish,. For me it's part practical but mostly "brah check out my fucking ono sendai"

I could get more into techwear, consumerism, books, whatever, but don't nobody wanna hear about that. The bottom line is, for me, functional aesthetic > actual functionality. Not to imply that it's not functional, but more that it's something you associate with because of what it represents or because you think it's cool.

w2c a nice white or light grey windbreaker/shell?

Pretty comfy, but 2 stupid logos, the north face one i can deal with.

>>7923253
hey me too

I don't know how I'll go about it

>>7923253
>>7925187
Isn't there a guide for it somewhere?
If so, link?

>>7925100

Outlier. I recommend the dungarees or the OGs.

http://outlier.cc/

>>7925421
Looks nice, thanks

>>7925429
take advantage of their great return policy if you must. they have stitching problems. just a heads up.

pretty disappointing though for all the money you drop for something 'made in ny' and it's a piece of shit. gj america.

>>7922726
i think those look p tite
are they not comfortable then?

>>7925421
Is it just me or did the OG's disappear off the site since about ten minutes ago

>>7925443
>>7925421
ProofNY and Makers and Riders also make weather resistant flexible trousers in the same vein

w2c tech backpack msotly for uni that is <150 yuros and isn't too big

>>7925523
North Face, seriously they make some of the most useful and comfortable backpacks around. The Osprey City/Trail series is nice too, the Daylite 13 is probably one of the nicest cheap packs around.

>>7925158
anyone know something about this?

>>7925547
thanks for the advice.
at first i wanted meuse for c&c but i saw how bulky it is when loaded and doesn't look good. is this backpack any good, i know it's nike but i kinda like the design

>>7925547
Got myself a osprey pack earlier today, pretty nice actually

>>7923727
I got £25 off it
thanks anon

What sorts of clothes/fabrics don't pick up lint or cat hair?

>>7923800
Well, I am dumb and should have used google just as I have seen that pic.

Anyway, should I cop this nice thingy to use it as wallet?
I have a lot of fucking change, and also caring plastic cards, so thin wallets are not for me, I'd rather have a porte-monnai.

http://lbxtactical.com/products/3-pocket-side-sleeve

c/n?

>>7925828


buy this >>7925576

any thought on this one?

might end up copping this one...but im suspicious about the way it opens.

>>7925828
I know its nike sb but i cant find this specific model, w2c?

selling this.

>>7926144
Give you 60 euros for it

>>7925894
hideous

>>7923464
>>7923469

horrendous

>>7925674
Yay

I really like the look of the Makers and Riders Epodic trousers

>>7928983
Any photos of the fit?

>>7926341
naw m8

>>7926182
how about 59,99eur?

>>7926144
I'll take it you're in the EU?

>>7930846
sure

>>7922075

w2c shoes?

Dang, I cant decide on this bag
In some pics it looks amazing and in others it looks shit

>>7930867
yup. shoot me an email.

>>7930961
vans breton i believe

Are flyknits good running shoes?