/fa/ - Fashion

>>7825398
nice

>>7825418
thanks brah

these are dope what are they

>>7825398
Damn they look so nice , can you still buy them ?

>>7825824
boris

>>7825418
These are good, but college aged girls have pretty much ruined boots that go taller than the ankle. : /

>>7825398
Ann Demeulemeester FW10

No pic of my own, getting a topy put on atm.

>>7825398
noice w2c

>>7825989
don't

>>7826010
I could just send them to OSB and have them resole in Dainite for like $125 or something around that.

Is that really better?

Or should I just destroy the leather sole?

>>7826032
I love the way leather soles look personally. You can always have it resoled later if it wears down too much

>>7825870
>>7826002
ty. they dont make these anymore unless you can find them used or something. although dayton makes boots without the w+h fading

Does anyone know how tight regular Guidi backzips are in the ankle?

I have near Saint Laurent legs and am about to pull the trigger on either a pair of 788 Z soles or 988's

>>7826147
I believe the letters following the number denote thicker sole/wider calf.

Where you copping?

>>7826169
Yeah Im told s on the end of the number means slim shaft?

the only ones I can find are regular and I now have no idea if those will fit snug around my shin/ankle

Countless pictures of backzips posted here/tumblr/everywhere on the internet always look hella tight anyway, right?

Fuuuuuuuuck

I think I need ZS then but those are stocked nowhere and I really dont have the patience to wait a year for a custom order

>>7826147
>Does anyone know how tight regular Guidi backzips are in the ankle?

please respond
somebody p-please

>>7826228
depends how small ur ankles are

and what leather they are

if u have cankles theyll be tight

if u dont u might have a lil room to tuck

softer thinner leathers will stretch

>>7826234
They're horse so they won't stretch too much

I just need to know how tight the normal 788/988 backzips generally are

I'm skinny as fuck so I -want- them to be pretty much as tight as possible around the ankle/shin

>>7826254
yeah horse wont streach at all

and the z just means thicker heel btw

and yeah guidis are p tight idk where ud even look for something tighter. just buy them imo

>>7826263
and the s just means thick sole

idk what that guy was talking about

>>7825977
This looks really nice, can we get a full pic? Can't see much. I remeber you posting that skirt from a while back never though you wore it haha

>>7825418
I remember you were talking about buying these but never ended up seeing them, they look great. What have you been wearing as far as trousers go?

>>7826147
As far as I know there aren't slimmer versions of the same models usually, I think they're pretty standard. I tried on a pair in LA and fell in love, but way out of my pricerange. Good luck on the cop man, I'm sure they'll be great.

Hopefully they'll fit you as great as they do here.

>>7826362
I saw some this afternoon and they looked like gumboots swallowing up the persons jeans instead of the usual sock condom ting innit

got me freaked out

Vertices ivory ones look snug enough, mine should be the same, I think Im just being pedantic


#pre cop jitters

>>7826362
some 50" inseam julius jeans and some waxed drkshdw jeans, mostly. they go best with baggier pants tucked into them

>>7826362

hng

>>7826393
Got a pic of your julius jeans? Haven't seen those.

>>7826408
got these a couple weeks ago, very comfortable but I'm not that happy with how quick the sole is wearing

can u give us a fit pic w/ thm op

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJQTRd_qWbo

bitta molly son

>>7826429

>>7825398 yeah yours are pretty dope. These are mine

can anyone rec' black boots under $100? (that arent docs, I already have a pair) Ideally, 7-8 eyelets, with a low toe box, and pronounced sole.

>>7825870
1. buy dayton service boot in leather of your choice
2. tie a tennisball to the toe
3. throw in a washing machine
4. ???????
5. profit!

>>7827173
what boots are these?

>>7827411

look like iron rangers

>>7827429
don't think so
the stitching on the toecap seems different

>>7827429
looks like it but the stitching doesn't seem perfectly on if it is

I need some boots that will do well in bad weather. My university has endless puddles so I need something decently water proof.
I like the shape and wedge sole on these vibergs and I was also looking at these >>7825989
just with the wedge sole.
how would either of these hold up in bad weather?
I dont know if I can justify the price of either, but I do want something that will last me years. Any suggestions?

gots me some new yohjis last week

>>7825398

>>7829475
w2c

I have always wanted some Iron Ranger 8113

thinking about copping some chelsea's but i'm kinda curious about getting them in dark brown rather than black. thoughts? recs?

>>7826289
>haha

I like these a lot, what do yall think? they're starting to get some life

>>7829637
creased in all the wrong places. I like the color though.

aye

looking for some slim black boots
I have iron rangers and love them, just looking for, like I said, a slimmer boot, no contrast stitching or a anything. I love guidi 788s but that's way too much. Looking for <$400. thanks for any suggestions.

>>7829937

RM William Craftsman. I own a pair, very sleek and very comfy.

Anyone have experience with the Chevalier Captoe Chromexcel boot?

I was looking for something in the 200-300 range that had a slim profile, and this was in the mark.

Iron Rangers and Wolverines are too bulky for my tastes.

having these

>>7829937
I can vouch for these >>7829951

My brother owns a pair and swears by them. They look good, too.

6 eyelet Docs

>>7829959
it's too early for any detail review. I copped the massdrop this morning bc they were just too good to pass up and have the slim profile of viberg and osb that I really like. Did you get yours too? I trust that they're handmade with care and the brand looks really legit too. Guess I'll find out in 2 months.

>>7829951
would something like these look okay with a suit?

>>7830077

yeah if your trousers are well tapered

I generally wear em with black skinnies; they look a little goofy if your pants are goofy around the ankle.

>>7830063

I haven't copped yet. I was thinking of copping off this site http://hmuse.com/editor-s-pick/chevalier-chromexcel-captoe-boots.html because it's a lot cheaper. It costs 60 dollars for shipping to Australia (as opposed to about 20 on this site, and the boot itself is cheaper as well).

p0ost a fit pic op u faggit

>>7830079

a little loose around the ankle*

lol

any iron rangers ever tried to flatten the toe? I've seen pics but never knew how to go about it without damaging them

>>7830085
they look like a pretty accomplished brand in Indonesia already (3 stores) and other stores are carrying them too. I don't see any complaint about their shoes yet so it can't be too bad. You can't beat that price for quality leather and handmade.

can anyone ID these boots? they have the low profile of dayton service boots, but have a captoe.

from this film clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyp8yqSg17c

>>7830149

yeah, I just had to send them an email about the sizing.

I wear a UK7, but according to their size chart, that converts to a US5 or EU35, which doesn't seem right (all my UK7 shoes convert to US8 or EU41).

>>7830115
apparently you can just crush the toebox with your fingers until it softens up. you can get them to look like pic related.

i'm seriously considering forking out $500 form a pair of dayton service boots. i love the nubuck and the toebox, but if i can lower the profile on the iron rangers, i might consider doing that to a pair instead.

>>7830158
that size chart is fucked don't use it. But yeah, go true to size. I read that cxl stretches a lot.
This is chevalier's size chart.

>>7830206
If I could get them to actually look like that I would probably wear them. I under estimated the toebox and it took me by suprize. I'm probably going to sell them and get some expensive sneakers or soemthing

>>7830219

cheers m8

I'm just gonna wait for their reply for my own peace of mind. I'll probably cop them tomorrow.

hard to find decent boots with wide feet, just bought new fluffy insoles for these today

1460core

>>7830449

>>7830012
Thanks for the suggestion, just not exactly what I'm looking for...don't really know how to describe it, but like I said I love the guidi 788, but something like pic too would be amazing. I dress very edgy btw, not looking for anything remotely formal

>>7830421
wat r they

>>7830878
no fucking idea, no markings on them or anything

i picked them up from tk max at a good price, and they fit like a glove

>>7829332
What's the exact model of these shoes?

I was thinking about getting some Red Wings, should I get 1907s or Iron Rangers?

>>7830906
dam
how much u pay

>>7830999
about 45 GBP i think, if memory serves

>>7829332
prolly the only pair of white wedge soles i like. nice

>>7830006
no dnc those timbs
timbs are dead now saw upwards of 10 pairs on my way from the airport
dnc

Hello there

I don't have much clues about boots (or shoes and fashion in general for that matter), and I want a pair (gotta be a first time).
I'm looking for something solid, that will last for some time, resist rain and relative cold (but aiming at something I'd wear pretty often, even in summer), that will hold my feet good (allowing me to jump or run without trouble).
As for the looks, all black prefered, bron or grey are good too. I don't want to put a cent in some fancy decoration or having a big logo or other shit, just good quality shoe. I don't like when there is like one inch of sole around the shoe, especially in a different color, but as I said I don't care that much about the looks, just something classic and not shinycrap.
For the price, I'm not too limited, but still poorfag student, so converting it in $, I'd hardly go further than 130-150$ I think (70-100€ prefered if there is such a thing)
Currently going through the sticky's advices, but advices/examples of brands are very welcome.

Here's the ones I more or less like ITT:
>>7825398
>>7829530
>>7829637
>>7830206

>pic is my current shoes that are starting to get tired after ~10months of everyday or so use

>>7832163
Forgot one of the most important things: confortable to walk with even after several hours

>>7830449
>>7830462
Planning to cop a pair.

Should I get them glossy or matte?

Opinions?

R.M Williams are half the price of Iron Rangers in the downunderverse.

>>7832222
I'm not a fan of the nubuckish looking leather. Also those laces are something awful, but if you don't care then get them and swap out the laces for some darker ones.

>>7830462
>>7830449
Damn new docs look so not cool
can't wait till mine's fade a bit

>>7832211
I prefer the regular leather, the glossy patent leather just makes them too flashy.

Do I have /fa/'s approval?
I love my Clarks.

>>7834192
Why would you want /fa/'s approval?

>>7830999
very similar boots can be found in many fast fashion shop, i saw something similar in Bershka if i can remember well

>>7832149
pure luck we don't have an airport lel
i haven't seen these on many people, more precisely on nobody until now, maybe because i live in a smaller city
i often see the regular wheat timbs though

I need a tip for buying mine. What would be the best brand of a male pair with an average price of 50 euros?

>>7829332
Where can I get these? You said they're viberg, but I was unable to find them.

Always along with my flannel and wranglers.

>>7835366
Pls respond

>>7835865
look on the 3sixteen website, there's a pair in many sizes for about $700. Other than that I think Vibergs are rare and MTO so you probably can't get them easily. Prepare to pay a fuck lot too.

>>7835886
>>7835865
If only. Viberg no longer does MTM so even if you are willing to pay the $700 minimum, finding them will be hard.

>>7835886
I didn't ask for this feel /fa/

>>7826362
damn, those boots aren't flattering for his chicken ankles. I have the same problem, so I always wear slightly thicker boots. also,

>standing on top of your desk/bookshelf to take a pic

lol

>>7835366
Are there any other boots that are readily available with this type of sole?

>>7836028
the sole is Vibram Christy

>>7836028
oak street boot maker, dayton service boot
also search for my Chevalier boots thread in the catalog, there's another similar brand in that thread too.

>>7836048
>> 7836046
cheers

Anyone own the clark malis? Looking for a nice slim black boot to complement my IR's for under $400, these looks perfect though and are only fucking $100!

>>7836789

>>7836649
I've had mine for a bit over a year and they're pretty great. They are still in great condition, and I expect them to last for at least a couple of years before the sole goes to shit.

Personally I like their sleek and simple look. Cop.

>>7836789
>>7836790
Brand/name/price ?

>>7836802
there are no labels. I have absolutely no idea. They cost about 30-40$ tops.

>>7837128
woa. whats that?

>>7839299
Hand Sewn High Black

>>7837128
I like FEITs but they really don't seem like boots.

When I save up enough for a pair of nice black high-tops, it'll either be those or MMMs.

>>7830927
Viberg custom order scout boots
leather quarters
icy mocha chromexcel

Desert Boot or Bushacre?

They're roughly the same price in my size.

Desert boot on left, Bushacre on right. Help me out, /fa/.

>>7840655

i prefer the bushacre because of the manmade sole, which is harder and lasts longer

£49 brand new, cop?

>>7840715
do you know if the color on the beeswax desert boot or beeswax bushacre look the same in person?

>>7832163

red wing 875s.

quality, comfort and looks in one package. now unfortunately, you would hardly find them under $200. but buy it once, and you won't want to buy another pair. the crepe sole is softer underfoot than the iron rangers and more comfortable if you are walking more than a few hours at a time.

nevere cheap out on shoes. they are one of the things that you can't return once you've realized they're shit.

>>7840743

You're my hero, thank you

>>7840734

the bushacres are lighter when you purchase them. however, i gave them a coating of mink oil (which you should be doing anyways) and it turned into the colour of the original ones

>>7840747

just bought a pair of red wing 8875s (a deep red moc-toe from the asian market) for $160AUD shipped because they are 'new with defects'. it has this split. what should i use to fix this? should i take it to the cobbler?

>>7841460
You could probably fix that with a small amount of shoe goo.

>>7841476
i was hoping that'd be the case when i bought them. where do you buy the stuff? i'll assume i'm looking for leather specific glue?

>>7841460

a fairly minor flaw. the white stitching will keep it shut and waterproof

thoughts on these?

http://www.zappos.com/frye-dakota-mid-lace-dark-brown

Bought these a few months ago. Leather has more of a suede personality in person. So fucking comfy. Love these to bits.

>>7830206
Those are an old pair of Katahdin's, bro.

Also, that feel when you live half an hour away from Dayton. Fuck year. Considering investing in one of their custom last models, it's like 500 bucks but they'll make any pair custom for you with it.

>>7841838
In my opinion, although I have heard that Frye are actually good quality boots, they look like cheap plasticy fast fashion boots to me. For the price, you can find something better I am sure.

These bad boys, I love them.

>>7841476
shoe glued the bastard shut, and touched up a few other little imperfections.

>>7841791
definitely worth saving $200 odd for.

Canadian Armed Forces, mark III.
I got these from a milsurp store near me that has a giant bin full of them.
Not the prettiest but they are comfy and cheap.

>>7842084
So these are made in china RW's? Or what do you mean by asian market?

>>7842102
they're still made in the US, 8875 is just what they're sold as on the japanese market, apparently.

>>7842140
Im looking to buy some rw, what shoe size do you normally wear? since they run so large

>>7826289
I have this picture that shows the front of them and a bunch of skirt pics on Instagram but none of them really show how beautiful it is. I don't wear it much in the winter in Canada because tights ruin it.

>>7842152
i usually wear a UK 7-7.5. these are my chucks, which have about 1cm wiggle room in the toe.

i went a full size down, and i have room for a thick sock in these. with RWs, i believe it depends on which shoe you go for, but for these i'd recommend a full size down. you may want them to be a LITTLE snug, as the leather tends to adjust to your foot. or if you're like me and want them for the colder weather, allow enough room for delicious thick woolly socks.

Does anyone here have any experience with Dayton's quality? I'm curious about how they stack up to White's and Alden. Also, does anyone know if they do custom work with cxl?

>>7842000
yeah, i just stole the image from a styleforum thread about them as an example. i actually kind of want a pair though. they look better than iron rangers imo.

so jelly that you live so close to dayton. it's gonna cost me $60 to ship them here, as well as the pain of doing my sizing online. then it's just a 3-5 month wait...

>>7842240
dayton quality is amazing. ive had mine for about 4 years and i feel like i can still wear them for another 10

>>7842250
Haha, yeah. I'm not too far from Viberg, either. Luckily.

Get the Katahdins, I'm thinking of getting another pair myself because I used WAY too much mink oil on mine and now they shine blue and they're almost black. And God damn, they are a rugged fucking boot. And 200 bucks shipped? Fuck yeah.

Pic related

>>7842290
Notice the lines where I tie the laces behind
Fucking contrast

The trio

>>7836801
Thanks, I just ordered them. I've been looking for a slim black boot and honestly these are the only oens I could find, even with a budget of like $300.

did you size down?

>>7842290
god damn, australia has nothing. we have rugged bushman, how do we not have awesome boots to boot?

i just bought a pair of red wings (>>7841460) so maybe i'll give the iron rangers a miss. i saw a pair in my size on grailed for about $150 though. who ships katahdins internationally? i need a brown boot, and it's a toss up between them and clark's desert mali.

can someone who owns bushacres and Mali's tell me how I should size the Mali's based on the bushacres?

>>7842361
I'm not sure, you can check with LL Bean. They ship free to North America so I'm sure their international shipping is cheap.

Nice choice with the Redwings. I wish my Thorogoods were that colour. (and a little less chunky)

>>7842326
Nah, I have my own size. It fits well.

>>7842420
looks like LL Bean ships internationally, $45 for the katahdins.

yeah, i'm pretty stoked with my RWs. got very lucky with them. they're pretty chunky anyway, if that makes you feel any better.

>>7842447
Hahaha, it's fine. I'd buy them again in plain toe or 8-inch.
The sole is what gets me, it's just a hair too thick for the upper. Can't wear anything slim with it.

Thinking of ordering them Katahdins? I'd recommend it. Go down a half size and it still leaves room for wool socks.

Any opinions on these?

>>7842455
i reckon the moc toe thorogoods are much nicer than the plain toes, especially for canadian weather.

when pay day rolls around next week, i'm gonna buy footwear of some description. at this point i'm getting boots, and i'm tossing up between the dayton service boot, clarks desert mali, and the katahdins. only reason i'm not just going with the daytons is because it'll be most of my spare money gone instantly. thanks for the advice though, i'll keep that in mind. how well does the leather wear in?

>>7842488
Honestly there was some heel slippage for the first week, and I kept getting blisters because I didn't wear the right socks. But you're an Aussie, and you have Mongrel socks there, so you lucked out. Get their full wool socks, they stay cool in hot weather and vice-versa.

After the break-in, they get immensely more comfortable. Like seriously, god damn. If you don't like the colour of the rim where the upper is welted to the sole (it's orange), don't worry, it changes to dark brown with age. You'll love them. Use Obenauf's or some other heavy duty shit on them, no creams or oils, that's a waste. Glad I could help you, bud

And the moc toes are great, it's just a love-hate thing going on for me. I wore skinny jeans today and caught a glimpse of myself in the mirror- fucking clown feet.

>>7842511
it does kind of bother me how dependent the fit of a boot can be on socks. it's a hassle finding what works and what doesn't since you have to wear in boots for so long, and then they only feel just right with a certain thickness of sock.

the orange doesn't actually bother me. it's not as loud as the orange rim on chippewas, which would probably bother me. but i do love a boot that ages well. which reminds me to ask how long you've had your thorogoods. apparently they don't age too well.

as bulky as my new RWs are, having tiny feet has eliminated any chance of looking clown-footed. one of the many advantages of having disproportionately small feet. i can't wear skinnies either with my squat legs.

>>7842591
My thorogoods actually haven't seen a whole lot of use. Had them for a half year and I really only wear them when it rains or snows because they're amazing for that. They looked a lot better before I treated them. I kind of regret ever oiling them; the leather is soft as shit already and they no longer have a "shine."

I get strong clown feet sometimes because I like wearing tapered pants and I size up with my shoes instead of going E width, just in case the toe box looks weird. They also stretch on the sides a bit, considering starting to buy them wider but I'd have to find out in person whether they look worse.

>>7842434
hm, ok. Most people say they fit similarily to regular CDBs. I sized down a half size.

>>7842591
Anyway it's late, I gotta crash. Goodnight, bud. Good luck with ordering your next pair, keep us posted- there's always a boot thread

>>7842611
>>7842640
yeah dude, take it easy. thanks for the pointers. catcha in a boot thread sometime, man.

also how to fit skinny jeans tucked in boots, the end of the visible part of the jeans always tend to "stack" at the top of the boots and i can't get a clean tuck. send help [im using Dr. martens wallis boots]

>>7843006
just pinroll, niggah

>>7843054
they are kinda too high to pinroll in my opinion (above ankle)

pic related

>>7843091

My jeans always stack above boots when I tuck them in.

I'm assuming you're just going to basically need skin tight jeans if you want it to look completely straight.

>>7843094
i dunno it looks kinda...messy. i'll buy skinnier jeans soon (also because i'm losing weight so i kinda need em anyways). the stacks kinda "break" the whole style [very basic.Parka/greyish hoodie/black skinnies/boots]

>>7830293
>>7830219
>>7830158
>>7830149
>>7830085
>>7830063
>>7829959
>>7829959
I copped a pair of the non-cxl version a few weeks ago, made a thread about it here.

Overall, preddy good, though I copped the wrong size dammit. Dunno if I'm going to bother getting the cxl version/another pair.

They are nice boots, and I think the version with the better, cxl leather would be really good but there are some construction issues =.

They're not quality control issues, just a question of materials used.

They're a blake rapid construction, and, apparently, this means that the insole and midsole quality on such footwear matters a whole lot more than it does with say, GY welt etc.

Peeling back the footbed, the insole seems to consist of 2 layers of stacked foam insert. I don't know if the real leather insole is under that or if that is it.

I could have sworn that I read somewhere on reddit or wherever that someone had emailed the company about their insoles and that they had confirmed that they used real leather insoles and not just the foam. I can't find this correspondence anymore, and perhaps it had to do with another company.

Whatever. They're good boots, and have that alden/viberg captoe look without the price tag and are pretty good with qc and are very comfy (the little ankle pullloop is fucking useless tho).

If you can get them cheap, they'd be a servicable boot, but if you're looking for something with some longevity to it, and you're on a budget, then give them a pass as I think those are iffy.

I got them retail in asia on impulse; should've just ordered them from singapore hmuse to get my right size but whatever.

Anyone in Oz looking for a pair of 7UK/8US/41 sized ones I've got a pair. Some RW IR's in a 7.5 US that are too small for me too (fucking me and getting one size too small all the time all because of impatience - ffs)

>>7843170
Wow, thanks for the detailed review, really aprreciated it. Do you have anything else to comment about the boot? I'm planning to wear them about 2-3 times a week in good climate, how long do you think they will last? They are going to be my first boot so I dont know much about the construction like you described.

Proper boots are in ere mates:

Rough-a-rough.tumblr.com

>>7843170
How was the sizing? Thinking of making them my next pair.

Any thoughts on Wolverine 1000 Mile Courtlands?

>>7832163
THE SHOES YOU HAVE NOW
wtf are they? need those

>>7845025
I got mine about 2 weeks ago and I love them so much. I fully recommend them.

>>7843206
It's okay if they're your "first boots" but what I was trying to put forth in my post is that they shouldn't be your last.

Like, if you'd bought a pair of viberg/dayton service boots or alden captoes, whites, nicks, red wangs or rmw's. They're all 20(+) year boots, if proper care is exercised of course.

These boots don't give me that impression; they didn't before I took a peek at what was under the footbed and they certainly don't after that.

Perhaps I'm just over stressing it, and maybe there really is a proper insole/midsole in there (though for the price one would doubt it, heck even the wolverine 1000 mile doesn't have a real leather insole - fuckers cheaped out on that part).

They feel like sneakers than other boots I've owned and tried, and that's because of the cushioning, so if you're a sneakeronlyfag then these should be a good intro to boots and your pampered footsies won't get pounded by the rock hard (at first) leather insole of the more traditional makers.

Concering price: IIRC to get them shipped is expensive, particularly if you go through the manufacturer. IMO they are not worth 300USD if that's what you've gotta pay for them all up. If you can get for 240USD or less then they're a good deal. Anything above that and there are better made options with more tried and true reputations and construction, if not aesthetics.

300+ and you'd prolly be best off saving for better boots. 300USD is my cut-off, at least; your money though so do whatever.

>>7847035
oh,

>2-3 times a week
get a pair of shoe trees; don't wear them every day. They need to dry (your foot sweat). Doing so will significantly increase their longevity. This is pretty much a non-optional accessory IMO. Also, if your buying option doesn't have the vibram/rubber sole protector then get one put on.

Leather soles won't last as long before a potentially costly resole (and if these blake/rapids don't have the proper insole/midsole then they've really only got a limited number of resoles in them anyway - a topy will help to mitigate this)

Can't say how long they'll last with you, for all I know you may have really rank, acidic foot sweat that melts shoes and sends people running away bleeding from the orifices every time you take your shoes off. Or you may walk in a really fucked manner that wears a particular part of the sole more than any other part. They should last a couple of years at the very least if you tree and topy them.

>>7844986
I once ranted on why I don't like to give this generalised sizing info,but I can tell you what other shoes I can fit into:

42 CP's
8D RW IR's
8D Wolve 1k
8F Loake Captial/Mayfair/026 lasts
7.5-8G RMW craftsman last

A 42 size in chevalier's ankleboot last fits me. Unfortunately the store I tried them on in only had a 42 in the non-captoe variety that didn't interest me, so I got the 41 captoe which is slightly too short for my (larger) right foot. A 43 was too big.

If your cp size is 42 then you'll probably fit in these fine. Probably. (dont' take my word for it though)

>>7847077
>>7847077
Well I don't have tiny feet like you so I might be a little unlucky. I'll just gamble on it, and go half a size down. Thanks bro

Grenson 'mowhawks'. Mine are the only pair I've ever come across. They used to be smoother and darker so maybe some oil will get them back to how they were.

>>7847914
That's gangster. Is that nubuck? It looks like caked-on mud.

>>7847966
Nah just roughout

>cntrl+f "mali"
>everyone cops, no sizing info
What is the sizing of malis? Are they TTS? Should I go for EU 41 if I am US 8.5 in Vans?

>>7848275
probs the same size as cdb's unless you are teh cankle

>>7848350
Well, are cdbs TTS?