[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 13 KB, 400x308, puma.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7768625 No.7768625[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

can puma be /fa/?

>> No.7768647

hell fuckin yeah

>> No.7768660

>>7768647
just the shoes? or some of the jackets as well?

>> No.7768673

>>7768660
shoes are coming back i think
only if you do the full tracksuit, matching top/pants
and the more expensive model above slavs

>> No.7768693

>>7768673
some of the more colorful jackets work with jeans

>> No.7768687

>>7768625
I think – no. I've checked maybe 6 times puma shop and even sport gear looks awful, i'm not even talking about /fa/ thing.

>> No.7768851

>>7768625

I got a pair of black and white puma sneakers and if I saw another pair I'd cop em in a heartbeat.

>> No.7768864

i have some puma socks and they are sick af

>> No.7769417
File: 84 KB, 800x1065, 1392102238360.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769417

Sure. The Urban Mobility collection is pretty neat and not too expensive either. There are also a few collabs with a Japanese designer that slipped my memory which were quite nice. Their mainline stuff sucks though.

>> No.7769426

if you like techwear they have some good stuff

as far as footwear avoid everything but clydes and similar era stuff or newest tech releases

>> No.7769494

I really like Puma. Most of my underwear is Puma because fit & quality. Their sneakers fit me well and they have everything from simple designs to over the top ridic stuff.

>> No.7770111

The Hussein Chalayan collab was great.

>> No.7771137

puma suedes are dope

>> No.7771535
File: 13 KB, 419x382, 352670_07.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7771535

Acquired a brand new pair for $21
Try to contain all the jelly

>> No.7771777

Why don't I ever see people talking about Jespers? Am I wrong or are they totally awesome and crazylooking?

>> No.7771801
File: 26 KB, 500x375, 1392152498777.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7771801

>>7771777

>> No.7771819

>>7771777
They look weird on feet. Might work if you're a small girl but otherwise they're a pretty bad shoe. I do think they look good in stock photos like >>7771801 though.

>> No.7771830

>>7768625
spic tier

>> No.7772067
File: 170 KB, 630x420, 1392156039071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7772067

puma suedes are p sick

but then you get get shit like pic related too.

>> No.7772684

>>7772067
>implying those are bad
I'd take them over the disgusting geos

>> No.7772700

>>7771535
what model is this?

>> No.7772709

>>7771819
I actually think the look better on feet than in the photo. The back heel doesn't stick out nearly as much.

>> No.7772714

yes they can check out the BWGH x Puma - R698, the Sneakerfreaker x Puma - Blaze of Glory and the Puma xt1 plus

>> No.7772717

discs are sick mostly everything else is gash

>> No.7772723
File: 84 KB, 1000x1000, 1392163576900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7772723

yes

>> No.7772725

>>7768660
yeah for example the Puma x Pelé leather jacket

>> No.7772741

>>7771801
w2c?

>> No.7772774

>>7771535
where

>> No.7772997

>>7772723
those are ugly as shit. I would expect to see some middle schooler wearing those abominations

>> No.7774675

>>7772700
http://www.shop.puma.com/PUMA-SE-Vulcanized-Sneakers/pna352670,en_US,pd.html
Not where I purchased them but you can see the model number and anything else there.