/fa/ - Fashion

>>7622531
Also, link:

http://www.mrporter.com/product/399228

that's dope, would cop/10

i look forward to their hawaiian collection

>>7622531
good to see theyre expanding their market

>made in china
are you fucking kidding me

>>7622678
where does it say that? lol

>>7622678
Wow it should be at least half the price

guy fieri/smashmouth tier

I don't think I'll be able to enjoy fashion if Walmart-core becomes a thing.

this is the future

>>7622531
a tribute to the early 2000s

>>7622678
does it say that anywhere? it however doesn't say made in italy under details & care, which it consistently says if it is. and consistently doesn't even mention where it's made if it's made in any cheap labor country.

>>7622531

I like all of my Givenchy sweaters.

until tisci embraces flames like a real man i won't respect him

>>7622743
>and consistently doesn't even mention where it's made if it's made in any cheap labor country.
if they don't give a specific location of manufacture, it pretty much always means that they're not necessarily proud of the location of manufacture.

Think about it, when shit's made in America, England, Japan or Italy, it says so somewhere in the marketing jazz for it.

when they say nothing it means that they don't want to talk about it

>>7622794
Why is that a thing.

>>7622803
Probably made in Portugal like most of everything they make. They do have made in China pieces though

>>7622811
I personally think it looks good.

>>7622794
heard you went rick fam

>>7622794
>>7622531
Are you fucking kidding me?

Is this some postmodern commentary on how you fags will eat up anything with a designer name on it? You know, like Rafdidas

>>7623288

>>7623672

took me way too long to notice

>>7622743
>>7622803
am i the only one whose noticed a lot of my made in a first world country stuff is at best comparable in build quality to my chinese built stuff? i genuinely believe chinese factory workers are some of the world's best seamstresses, easily better than the mexicans here in america.

There's some joker high up in their leadership that bet his colleagues he could sell the flame shirt to you fuccbois for thousands.

>>7623718

Chinese goods vary a lot - there's both artisans in China that make beautiful clothing and sweatshop workers that make subpar clothing

yung la flame

>>7623718
tbh, companies don't go to china anymore just because they have the cheapest workers (places like haiti, laos, and vietnam have that dubious honour). they usually go there because the chinese have a pretty good combination going of well developed supply chains, decently skilled labourers (although by no means comparable to real artisans), and favourable government.

if you move to somewhere like vietnam, it sure is cheaper to produce there, but getting stuff in and out of the country takes more time (problems with bureaucracy) and you spend a lot more money in the process (duties, paying for transportation in less developed arteries, and every once in a while bribes)

that's why companies who need absurd quantities of products produced and shipped really fast (e.g.: apple) pick china over other places. plus they also have better manufacturing facilities, but that usually only applies to industries who need this sort of thing (clean rooms for electronics, and so on)

>>7622531
>giving a shit about Givenchy

is it bad that i kind of like flame shirts unironically? i mean they still keep their "oh shit i remember those fucking things" factor kind of but whatever

considering copping one off etsy

So has Givenchy lost their touch this season?

Everything seems either bland or tryhard

>>7624330
i think they're tacky as fuck. basic designs, dumb graphics. sold out... can't blame em though. i'd run a hype brand if i could sell a crewneck for 1k.

>>7623775
That's incredibly bad

>>7624351

Yeah, but Tisci probably doesn't spend much, if any, time actually designing the graphics. Most of his time is spent on the real ready-to-wear and couture. Marcelo Burlon spun himself off from Givenchy specifically because he was one of the point men for the graphics work there.

>>7623775
this was one of the worst things I've ever read

>>7623772
>discussing a prominent fashion brand
>on a fashion board

I mean come on this is the laziest shit ever.

Literally just overlapped their best selling designs

boom, high fashion

fuck givenchy

>>7624484
also, glad they're pushing some boundaries by deciding to bring in some floral pattern shirts this season

definitely never been done

HI EVERYBODY, I'M GUY FIERI. WELCOME TO DINERS, DRIVE-IN'S AND DIVES! THIS WEEK WE'RE VISITING A CRAAAAAAZY FAMILY JOINT CALLED GEEVONCHIES, RUN BY THIS GUY RICARDO AND HIS 8 SISTER. WOULD YOU BELIEVE THAT? 8 SISTERS! TALK ABOUT BEING THE MAN OF THE HOUSE (HAHAHAHAHAHAHA).

HE'S SERVIN' UP A SIZZLIN' HOT, $1500 SWEATSHIRT FIT FOR THE KING HIMSELF (ME, HAHAHAHAHA). TUNE IN AFTER THE BREAK FOR MORE TRIPLE D WITH RICARDO TISCI.

>>7624507

>>7624450
But my god his couture collection though... I think its pretty amazing

>>7622717
those shades are pretty fa actually

>>7622954
it's all circular dude. that picture is like 2-3 years old. flame master is /fa/ again

save for the few timeless basics most of the stuff circlejerked over in /fa/ was laughed at few years ago. and will be laughed at in a few years again.

>>7624507
It's 1 am and my sides are lost

I don't know why I have this shirt

>>7626157
2/2

gotta go fast

>>7626160
Forgot pic

>>7623672
hahahaha oh god

give-en-chee
$1500

>>7627536

>>7624569
fuck, the senators have arrived on Coruscant an I'm not even in my formal Jedi robe yet

>>7626165

that's a wide shirt

>>7624569
this is so old..
man I missed givenchy couture this fall'13

>>7624569
this makes me sad tho..
his last couture till now
reminds me of mcqueens last
oh god I want to cry

The devil himself would not wear this shit

>>7623672
Brett Gud

>>7622531
LEL, w2c Dragon Beanie and Japanese symbols that say boshido??

>>7624330
>>7624351

say thanks to niggers like kanye to ruin it.

It's their new Guy Fieti collection

You should have it shipped over...

>>7627555
lol'd more than I should have

>>7628498

You aren't accounting for duties.

i'll probably buy it if zara does a knockoff

To be fair, the print worked way better on the scarves where the flames looked more abstract.

wow it's like it's on fire

>>7628915
make this ND youll probably make bank

>>7623718
probably because there's very little actual hand work and it's mostly machine made.
you can train a monkey to operate a machine like a drone

the only area where 1st worlders come up on top is QC, but that's usually only because firms don't pay their chinese parters for QC (if they've outsourced to china, they're not exactly committed to grade A goods; they're looking for cheap for them solutions).

However, when for example the japanese run a factory in china, you can pretty much be sure that shit is a-ok.

Depends on the firm in question.

Regarding knitwear and Made in China...

>>7632452
is there some .zip where I can get all those informational pics?

>>7632479
hehe

>>7632479

Sure thing:

http://www.mediafire.com/download/9b6qw0a7kb7f9hc

>>7632536
thanks bro

>>7632536
thanks

>$1500

is it encrusted with diamonds or some shit?

>>7632633
it's encrusted with Kanye's jizz

>>7622954
The bowl haircut guy actually has an awesome fit because it's so authentic.

>>7622531
Autismcore is a thing now.
Requesting the waywt of autismcore flame guy

>>7632669
i wouldnt doubt it

>>7623288
oh god why
I know at least 4 guys who dress like this
one of them has that hat and necklace
one of them has those shoes
2 of them spike their hair up with shit gel
can't take this anymore

>>7624507
9/10 would read again

Gevinchy has always been shit, you've only just now realized it.

>>7622531
Do they just add an extra zero to all their prices?