/fa/ - Fashion

>>7373392
tape ur phone to ur wrist

>>7373408
he speaks of the truth you know

Help a brutha out

Give me some good brands to google at least. Humble budget of around 100 bucks.

>>7373457
I'll help you out, just give me what you are looking for in a watch.0
Do you want analog or digital?
Do you want something minimalist like in your pic?
Just give us some info.

Timex Weekender? There is a nylon strap, metal strap, and "sport" one with tachometer

>>7373480
Cheers.
Analog but i'm open to be swayed.
Minimal. My uniform is black.
It has to keep time.

those random casio digital ones are actually pretty cool in an ironic way

Black Seiko 5, nigga.

About $100

Not necessarily all black

this will do it for you. i always get compliments. I also have a Rolex Submariner I got at my 1 year work anniversary. Both solid watches for different occasions
http://www.amazon.com/Casio-MQ24-7E-Classic-Analog-Watch/dp/B00065FWR0/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1386377584&sr=8-5&keywords=casio+analog+watch

>>7373544
Price of this is certainly appealing.
Would prefer a metal case over a plastic one though.

>>7373586
its all good bra, once you feel how light this thing is, you cant go wrong. I always just buy a new one when the battery runs out. I only where mine when i travel tho because i dont like travelling with my submariner

>>7373544
also look up watches on american apparels website. they always have nice shit for cheap

Check out Skagen. They're basic, light, and pretty cheap, although some are a bit over the price range you mentioned. I've had mine for a few years and never looked back. Hope that helps OP

>>7373608
>>7373612
Thx for da tip

>>7373586
i have this, i like it a lot and it usually goes well with whatever i'm wearing

for work i'd recommend a cheapo 15 dollar casio. You won't care if it gets damaged and chances are you'll be able to go swimming with it and other activities.

then save your pennies up for when you get a real watch

>>7373723
>>7373736
Okay then I may buy this one and change out the strap.

>minimalistic watches

I think there is a line where they become too minimalistic.

>tfw girly stick wrists so can't wear watches

>exercize arshmxek

fuck you captcha, i'm working on it.

>>7373483
not OP but funny that you mention these, I was just browsing a site that sells them. they look pretty cool.

only thing I can't stand though is the 13 14 15.... numerals in the inner ring right next to the normal ones. completely unnecessary. I'm more of a roman numerals fan.

>>7373457
I love ugly watches, go for it, they're cheap uniform wares basically

>>7373457
Name

where can i buy fake watches?

i would love to have a watch like that guy from drive

i think its a patek

>>7376122
>where can i buy fake watches?

literally everywhere. amazon, ebay and so forth.

>>7373392
>>Finally have a practical reason to buy a watch
you are pathetic

Swatch Once Again.

>>7376122
go and join rwg forums and they'll tell ya which watches to buy & collect.
http://www.rwg.bz/board/index.php?app=core&module=global&section=register

thread: Gosling lookalike watch from Drive.
http://www.rwg.bz/board/index.php?showtopic=22361

here's some look-a-likes that match the drive watch.
http://www.silix-prime.so/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=116_261&products_id=5442
http://www.silix-prime.so/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=116_271&products_id=3364
http://www.silix-prime.so/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=116_271&products_id=4382
http://www.silix-prime.so/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=116_271&products_id=4956

I've bought from them an Omega Aqua Terra two years ago and I think they're trust-able but not so sure now-a-days. I gave it away but it looked really nice.

>>7376198

thank you for your help man

what watch does this guy have?

>>7373653
Piece of chinese shit.
Rather buy Seiko/Citizen or even fucking Casio than Skagen.
You guys keep telling shit about Fossil but praise Skagen as god of cheaper watches but it's really even worse quality/value than Fossil.
I am butthurt about Skagen because mine fell apart after few months of regular use, whole crystal fell off and nobody can fucking repair it cause these jews don't send parts to anyone.
It's designed in USA by danish faggots and made in China, but advertises as made in Denmark or whatever. They're even bigger jews than Daniel Wellingon.

>>7376198
Would it be correct to assume the movements in all of these ("Asian" or "Japanese") are unreliable and trash?

>>7376279
Panerai

>>7376279
panerai

>>7376386
everybody who's into watches knows most chinese watches are shit. I wear a chinese mechanical watch at the moment since I'm poor but you see, what baffles me is that those cheap ass chinese watches all have pretty solid design. and then I see watches from Festina (or Lotus), Citizen or Fossil and they mostly look like shit design wise or really boring. I don't think it's just related to taste.

>>7376398
Japanese watches like Seiko and Casio are fine. they made themselves a name world-wide. pure chinese watches can be utter garbage. I had watches stop working really fast after just arriving in the mail. and some are thrown together really fast and look a bit displaced in some areas but might still work fine. that doesn't mean they are necessarily unreliable. you can't go wrong with anything quartz.

>>7376463
that watch face is way too big for that guy

>>7376398
It's unreliable & low quality but they're there to market to plebs who need a luxury fake or homage who pay real money, I've learn't that costly lesson when I bought a Breitling automatic fake from a legit pawn shop for $130 and then the Omega AT from silixprime in China for $60 or so.

I gave the middle watch away and trashed the navitimer fake watch into pieces. It looked good but I wasn't happy with it after owning it for that long. The AT bracelet was of good quality. The dial was not. I'm happy with the Invicta 9402s quality but they've ripped off the watches from Rolex.

Some Seikos & Citizens are hit and miss in quality. I'm currently looking to buy a Pulsar PU2071X1 rally chronograph and have worn that in the shopping mall. I reckon it's really nicely made as a quartz watch up close but it's pricy b/c it's over the $200 mark and you could get two chronographs from Seiko I think. Buy the watch that makes you happy.

>>7376513
>I'm happy with the Invicta 9402s quality
>Some Seikos & Citizens are hit and miss in quality

I think you mistook Invicta for Seiko. I'm surprised you even had a good experience with Invicta, I bought an automatic and a quartz from them and they both fell apart within the year. I admit I am a bit rough and active, but I've worn cheaper Pulsars for much longer.

>>7376513
What's that watch in the middle? I can't see from the glare.

~100$ on amazon

>>7376554
I'd never recommend fakes but it's this exact one from the same seller in China.

http://www.silix-prime.so/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=116_231&products_id=2257

>>7376568
How's the quality of your fake? I cannot expect it to be on par with the original, but is it at least up to Seiko standards?

I want a stand-in watch for my Speedmaster. I can't be wearing that thing around every day, so I'd like to have a fake stand-in.

Just got this. Great little watch but was thinking about getting a leather strap too.

Thought?

>>7376602
Yeah get a leather strap or an actual NATO. The strap on that is canvas, which means it's gonna start smelling weird soon.

Protip: Take a look at the NATOs here, I'm partial to the leather ones.
>http://www.crownandbuckle.com/

>>7376602
can't stand that badge they stick in them.
sweater looks cozy, though

Anyone have experience buying an authentic Raketa watch?

>>7376602
yes, leather strap looks more elegant is more comfortable anyway than what you have.

since this is a thread about cheap chinese garbage. pic related, I bought this one recently and I'm surprisingly happy with since I can't buy expensive skeleton watches that I'd like anyway. it was 30 euros. what do you guys think?

>>7376593
I can recall in my memory that the logo was unsightly when looking really close. That the blue sunburst dial was easy to scratch b/c it's like a hologram sticker. The triangle/stick markers looked the part, as was the crystal because they looked really luxurious when viewed from the side.

To recap. I wasn't happy with the logo, printed details such as the words, the date wheel and the caseback. I'd only test the waters of a fake watch if it's your first one. It was great to wear for the first year but it isn't worth it because if I had the money for the real one I'd have that one and not a Chinese auto ticker.

>>7376614
Yeah, what do you want to know?

I will give you one solid piece of advice:

***Be suspicious.***

Most Raketa watches will come from Eastern Europe, and most sellers from over there have a poor command of the English language. This means that they cannot give true 100% disclosure on the condition of the watch, specifications, etc. There are also some sellers that are just dishonest.

When you buy a vintage Raketa, operate on the assumption that there is something wrong with it. I would only recommend Raketa if you have experience in watchmaking. Most pieces that you buy on eBay will need some minor servicing. You may also find some "frankenwatches"-- a watch slapped together with pieces from other watches.

I bought a Copernicus from eBay, it seemed authentic enough, but when I opened it I found a Seiko automatic movement. Seiko movements aren't bad at all, but I was expecting a vintage Russian hand-wind movement. I was lucky, though, whoever made this franken did a quality job retrofitting a Seiko movement into this old watch.

So yeah, be careful out there.

>>7376627
Thanks for the response, m8.

As a second thought, I am going to get a Seiko Chrono. It will never be an Omega, but it is an honest watch nonetheless.

>>7376637
I was going to ask about the chances of buying a 100% Raketa watch, but since they seem so slow I'll probably go with something more safe.

>>7376647
Don't be discouraged, though. I own a few. Raketa has a few cool designs that you can't miss.

Find a Raketa that you like and buy it. In the process, you may learn a thing or two about watchmaking.

I'm getting this very soon.
Look up Rosendahl watches, might fit what you're looking for!

Weekender

>>7376662
this is the "picto" isn't it? how does the dot for the hours even move? my guess is it doesn't.

Muji, middle one is so sex

>>7376737

>>7373785

What's this watch with the gold hands called?

>>7376616

I like skeleton watches. I don't like all the embellishing on this one. All the unnecessary curlicues make it look either like it's trying too hard or cheap. I wish I could find a nice industrial design skeleton for under $100, but it seems unlikely.

>>7376752
it's one of the Classic Analogue variants

>>7376614
Ebay seller Samun.

Is it worth paying 450$~ for a watch that is gold plated? I've heard it will fade off with time, so is it worth it? How long does it usually manage to stay on before it starts to wear off?

Pic related.

>>7376513
>>7376568
>>7376627
Thanks for the Caramella Koalas, btw. I had a couple and I was fine but I gave one to a friend and he threw up three times. Oh well.

>>7377653
the embellishment is the best part about it imo and I don't think it's too pompous or try-hard at all but it's just different tastes I guess. if you like working on watches you can remove that little plate with the curls on it if you want to. that's no problem. that company also had a few without them.

>>7377897
>I don't think it's too pompous or try-hard at all
Oh but it is. The best way to appreciate a mechanical is its sweep second hand, not a bunch of gaudy gears all over the face.

>job serving in a restaurant
jelly as fuck
I have an ugly face so it's even pointless to apply for the position, I'll just scare away the customers.

>>7377917
look, you've only seen a closeup pic of the face where the lights light up those curls and not a photo on a wrist from another perspective. you wouldn't even notice.

If you have "some" money... Panerai is your watch.

are these cool

>>7377960
I remember always wanting to have that normal, more simple casio one since they are thin and all but then again I don't like square designs all that much.

>>7376737
>tfw they don't ship to your country

>>7377944
A photo doesn't change the fact that it is always a skeleton watch with poor visibility to boot.

what abou this one?

>>7377709
more info on this please. Price, model, w2c?

>>7378544
It's a Raketa Zero, also known as "Big Zero".

As for price, you can see these things for $40 to $120. You should only pay up to $60 for these.

OP here good to see thread still alive because i'm close to buying this. Thoughts?

>>7377929
Don't be jelly man it sucks. When it's busy it's hectic and when it's quiet it's droning. This for 10 hours every day sucks. I just got my first pay a few hours ago and my boss short changed me a fuck ton. I'm walking out if she doesn't pay me more.

>>7379408

Mondaine imitator, just get the real version. I like the style though, and you could get a quartz one for $175, maybe less.

rolling with this Timex Intelligent Quartz Flyback Chronograph

Perfectly practical yet nice looking and simple watch with a leather band.

Even though it's a Timex that I purchased for $40, it's lasted me for over 4 years and will likely keep functioning for much longer still.

>>7379457
A titanium imitation though. It is half the price and has only good reviews of the maker. I'm still unsure right now though.

>>7376678
The hours hand is actually a spinning disk with a dot. So the whole disk spins to move the dot.

>>7379468
this image is idiotic

>>7379468
That is actually full retard without an ounce of humour.

>>7377769
you finally got them. yw~

Rose gold; Rose gold?

>>7379719
I sent an email saying that I got it but I suspect you only made that as a temporary one.

>>7380014
I forgot all about it. I'll have a look right now.

>>7380014
Oh you can keep it. It's broken sorry that I haven't mentioned it. I nearly forgot what email it was after I typed it in the address bar.

I'm glad you have it now.

>>7378017
Too much going on I'd say.

99% of people have no need to a tachymeter and a chronograph.

>>7379479
>>7378017
I kind of like these. They'd probably be great beater and every day wear sort of watches.

>>7373392
>>7373493
bro, rodina

>>7380984
available in black, blue or white
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Affordable-Rodina-Automatic-Mechanical-Wrist-Watches-Sea-Gull-ST17-Movement-/231108075529?pt=Wristwatches&var=530289280140&hash=item35cf1d6009

>>7380984
Looks nice but bit skeptical of the build.

this is from a porn video of a guy with a suit and he has this watch on it looked so good with the suit.

Does anybody know what watch this is or could be?


i dont know if i can link the video here

>>7381248
looks like a mondaine... who uses the Swiss Railway Clock (that's the design the watch is influenced by)

what do you guys think of this watch?

http://www.amazon.de/Daniel-Wellington-Herren-Armbanduhr-Classic-Sheffield/dp/B00BKQT5X6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1386506650&sr=8-1&keywords=daniel+wellington+herren
http://www.amazon.de/Daniel-Wellington-Herren-Armbanduhr-Classic-0210DW/dp/B00BKQT91O/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1386506650&sr=8-2&keywords=daniel+wellington+herren

>>7373392
I think you'd like BrAun watches.

>>7380984
There's one thing I've been wondering about with that watch.
Is it possible to buy separate dials for it? Like I buy a blue one and then purchase a white/cream dial and swap them out depending on my fits?

>>7381413
Great idea but a modular watch has a few technical difficulties. Start saving and collecting watches

>>7381432
Yeah I'll probably just buy the blue one and then get the cream one later.

>>7381433
buy a completely different watch. Your tastes will change.

>>7379479
Very nice watch, price?

>>7381543
according to ebay.. 120 bucks, that's pretty damn good and I like the look of the watch too... though the chronograph function is rubbish... but it's more for show.

>>7381603
Not bad, perhaps a bit overloaded, but it's nice in anycase.

am I a pleb for liking this techy watch?

is this one efey?

>>7382385
totes, brah.

You'd look uber classy.

>>7382390

are you sarcastic ? i dont wanna look classy or tip my fedora just have a watch that dosent attract attention

>>7382462
Don't get the DW. Those watches are way too overpriced for what they are--Timex-level. The watch looks very nice, I admit, but inside is just a $5 movement that you can find in most Wal-Mart brand watches.

DW is just an exercise in great packaging. They put these cheap watches in pretty boxes and they throw in a cheap strap removal tool.

is Mougin & Piquard a good brand?

is spending over 400€ to much for a quartz

>>7383216
>is spending over 400€ to much for a quartz
Yes

>>7376602
I have the same one, different colour (pic related). Had it a while now, love it. Gonna change the strap but I haven't looked into it too much, I don't even mind the one that's on it though. The balance makes a really sweet sound, too.

>>7383216
>paying more than $100 for a quartz movement

>>7384616
>>7383385

okay so how much should a automatic cost?

i can drop 2k but i dont know anything about watches

what is good value for the price and shit

>>7384830
You can get a decent mechanical for ~$80 and spend up to as much as you can imagine. You're really better off looking around yourself and finding one you like. No point in rushing your purchase.

>>7384868

so a quartz runs with a battery and a automatic runs with what?

is my watch /fa?

>>7373392
My watch and strap collection.

>>7384881
magic.

a mechanical (spring? I'm not sure) that winds with motion from your body as you go about your day.

You can also get solar powered watches, which are more accurate, but there's something nice about having a fuckload of moving parts on your wrist.

>>7384892
hah, no. Fashion watches suck dick. Get a watch from an actual watch manufacturer.

>>7384881
It's stores its charge in a spring. Before they were manually winded every 2 days or so by hand (manual) but now they have weights like pic related, that spin when you move your arm which charges the spring automatically (hence the name).

So basically, no battery, just a spring and a weight. They're really interesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_watch

whats a good brand for an automatic i dont wanna have a watch that looks like a wanna be rolex

>>7379468
I've got a Casio that I paid $25 for in a random gas station and a gold and leather Movado. Where does that put me? Also have a black stainless steel digital Nixon.

>>7384901
>Seagull 1963
Aw fuck I am jelly. Aren't they really loud though? What's it like in person?

>>7376602
I like this watch, and I see that a lot of /fa/ is buying them for good reason, but I just can't stand that the hour numbers are smaller and closer to the center than the minutes. I know, pretty disagreeable reasoning.

But are there any similarly priced and sized automatics that have the same clean-causal look, just with the numbers arranged like any normal wathc?

:3

>>7384971
>Loud

The Seagull is basically silent compared to the Timex next to it.

I feel like it's a bit too fragile to wear as an everyday but I still love it. ie. I knocked it and now I have to go get the minute hand retightened as it's loose.

>>7385001
Oh right, it was just the impression I got of it in some random youtube video. Kind of a shame it's fragile like that, you'd think it would be built like a tank since it's a pilot watch. Still want one though. Do you prefer manual watches?

so what is a good beginners automatic watch?

seiko
timex
citizen

are the only brands i know that are not luxury

Gotta get dat leather band for this babe. Such vintage.

>>7385046

why do omega watches look like shit?

>>7385027
I might just have been unlucky with it's manufacture where it wasn't tightened properly. Have to see if it reoccurs after I get it done.

Sure I like the nostalgia of having to wind it every day or two and knowing I'm wearing something clockwork on my wrist.

>>7384966
puts you in the good start pile

>>7385046

leather gets smelly, isn't easily cleaned and doesn't slip on and off easily.

As a practical everyday watch for a person who likes functionality, that one's pretty solid.

If you're looking for an beginner's entry level dress watch, it wouldn't hurt to check out Christopher Ward watches. They're london based last time i checked
They usually fall around the $200-300 range.

I like this one particularly , it's called a Malvern Chronograph
Yes it's a quartz movement, but when you buy a watch, you're not buying just the movement, you're buying design and elegance. Appreciate it as a whole, not by the sum of its parts.

There's also NOMOS, which make great entry level luxury watches. Get one after your first few paychecks They're based in Glashutte, you might have heard of that place, since Glashutte is where A Lange and Sohne are based.

Of course, if you're

>>7385068

That sir is a VINTAGE Omega. And it's not shit. Respect the tech.

>>7386513
>Of course, if you're
Please finish the sentence.

>>7386513
Jesus man you sound like an advertisement.

Also
>Buying a $200 quartz watch simply for "elegance"

>>7386540

oops meant to complete that. I meant to say, if you're not exactly loaded, or you're starting out collecting watches, obviously Seiko and citizens are your best bet, and no im not bashing them, they are legit good watches, just look up Springdrive watches.

>>7386552

I'm not a shill, cross my heart. I frequently check watchuseek, hodinkee and ablogtowatch, and live close to two jewelers and a watch repair shop, so the whole watch craze thing has sort of bled onto me i guess

Also
>Buying a $200 quartz watch simply for "elegance"

Despite what you may think of automatic watches, quartz movements are actually the MOST accurate movements. But of course, there so commonplace, and because it's 'basic' engienering, it dosent quite have the charm of a jewel based mechanical movement. It's also piss easy to fix. But like I said, you judge a watch as a whole, never as a sum of its parts.

btw that malvern comes in automatic movement but its going to set you back $100 more.

Check out Victorinox too, their watches may be ETA based, but the design is decent. They're not just good for knives.

>>7386523
vintage omega's are pieces of shit bro

there is a reason you can get them for $50-100 on craigslist

and vintage rolex > new rolex

>>7386588

And that reason is because those "Omega's" you are referring to are fake. A real Omega keeps more than 50% of its value, even if it's highly dated and that patina is growing on the dial. You'd have to be mentally insane to just chuck out an omega for $100, even if it looks like shit, or is broken, you can bring up its value dramatically by getting it serviced.

>>7386588

Also, I would like to add:

Craiglist? Seriously?

>>7386616

protip: always ignore sieg, he's retarded.

>>7386603
not fake, not "valuable"

actually alot of guys on WUS are pissed they're not valuable.

but omega was not a "luxury" end brand until about 2001+ where they retooled the brand with swiss eta movts. they dubbed the "omega co-axial" or "omega 1120"

>Omega's popular Seamaster line of watches currently use an embellished version of the ETA 2892.A2, which is known as the Omega 1120. As an adjunct, some versions of the Omega watches may be fitted with the proprietary Co-axial escapement invented by George Daniels, an English horologist, and exclusively marketed by Omega, a sister company of ETA. The movement with the co-axial escapement is known as the Omega 2500 series and is derived from the ETA 2892.

>>7386630
what i say is fact about the vintage watch collecting community

i was in it deeply for nearly 5 years buying and selling

http://www.ablogtowatch.com/collecting-vintage-omega-watches/

>>7386581
>>7386513
>>7385068
>>7386668
>>7384939
>7
>>7384901
>>7384892
>>7384868
>>7384830
>>7382385
>>7381543


YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF VIRGINS. THERE IS ONLY ONE WATCH IN THE WORLD THATS WORTHY OF BEING CALLED A WATCH AND THAT IS

*GASP*

A PATEK PHILLIPE

>>7386739
go to bed Archie, you're fat.

>>7386739

you don't own a jager le coultre? please rexamine your life

>>7386668

Only if we're talking about the Omegas from 1970-1980. Basically your issue with Omega can be applied to any old watch that's not a Patek or an Audemars Piguet, that came out during the quartz revolution.

>>7386739
I'd like to see yours.

>>7386745

I wasn't the only one thinking abotu archieluxury holy shit

>>7386761
too bad my other watches from longines, to cartier from the 80's had no problem selling for more

there were some sad points where i considered giving up watches with a fucking omega seamaster deville in my hand

>>7386769

I WILL NEVER SHOW YOU MY 5004 TITANIUM. YOU COMMONERS DON'T EVEN DESERVE TO SEE THE MARVEL THAT IS A GENUINE PATEK PHILLIPE.

>>7386773
Longines and Cartier selling for more? Which models?

>>7379512
Shit I have that kind of watch going on 3 years now still working
really reliable watch

I have two days to decide.

>>7376616
These are on ebay for 14 USD. Less if you find an auction with free shipping.

>>7387074
The memento mori watch. Thought it was pretty cool until I saw the price. I'm at the point where I could probably mod something to look the same.

>>7376662
>>7373392
Impractical hipster shit.
>>7373514
This is the most faggot watch I have ever seen.
>>7373544
>>7373586
Casio is the shit.
>>7377960
I've got this. Dirt cheap, practical and as simple as it gets. It's a solid watch, comfortable, but at the same time feels cheap as you would expect. If they made a stainless steel version of this watch, it would be just about perfect. The square design works good, and the watch is on the smaller, less bulky side [40 x 30mm] face.
>>7383463
Sweet military theme going on.

Picture one of the best looking watches from a few threads ago.

Thinking of buying pic related and putting a leather band on it. I already have a black diver.

>>7385039
Seiko 5 are great Automatics for the price and there's lots of variety

>>7386739
Archie Luxury detected

>>7387338
>Sweet military theme going on.
Thanks mang

>>7386745
>>7386770
>>7388253
u mad poorfags? I'll be driving to the bank in my 7 year old Alfa Romeo with my paypal donations lining the cup holder

>>7388267
Never heard of him until now and you'd think someone who knows so much about luxury would be able to afford a decent mic.

Just join a Replica Watch forum and spend around 300-500 on a very nice replica Rolex or Omega.

Pic related, its a replica ~250$ about two years ago.

>>7388293
Looks fake as shit
>fake Rolex
>AmEx platinum
Confirmed for sandnigger living in NYC

>>7388278
One of his videos recently, he was complaining (what a surprise) about Ukrainian ebay sellers selling pocket watch movements in oversized cases. He said
>I'm of Ukrainian descent
>I hate Ukraine
>I hate Ukrainians
>How do you tell if a Ukrainian is lying? His lips are moving
The ironing
Also mentioned something about Russians being drunk

>>7388299
lol I knew some idiot would make a comment like that, thats why i posted a picture of a real datejust and said it was a replica.

>>7388320
>HAHAH I was only acting retarded guys hahaha!!!
>G-guys?

>>7388347
Face it, he got you. Especially since you explicitly said "looks fake as shit".

>>7388319
The guy is just lame as hell, and this goes past his unattractiveness.

I mean, he is making videos of luxury lifestyle on Youtube. He is a lame fuck acting all pretentious.

>>7388320
>real datejust
>wrong hands, wrong hour markings, wrong perimeter, crown spikes too close together
Good one