[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 50 KB, 230x230, 1382835180717.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292170 No.7292170[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>wearing full uniqlo and basic bitch shit like docs and cp's

basic bitch is the way to go

>> No.7292183
File: 24 KB, 700x700, 1379169175187.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292183

>> No.7292187

>wearing uniqlo
>with cps

it's like you spent all of your money on a single pair of shoes and then spent the last $50 in your bank account on the rest of your wardrobe

>> No.7292189

>>7292187
What's the problem with that?

Should I buy $300 monochrome tees as opposed to $10 ones?

>> No.7292190
File: 991 KB, 271x248, 1350333542298.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292190

>tfw poorfag
>can only basic mode it
>qts compliment me

>> No.7292192

>>7292187
autism

>> No.7292206

>>7292187
What's the problem with that? I'm wearing Visvim with Norse Projects and another basic shit. Of course, i can buy t-shirt made from JAPANESE COTON for 300 bucks, but i prefer some cheap quality stuff & that doesn't mean that i don't have money.

>> No.7292214

>>7292206
>Norse Projects
>$70 tees
>cheap

Yeah nah

that's nowhere near the realm of $10 uniqlo tees

>> No.7292215

>>7292187
this guy is everything that's wrong with /fa/ today

mindless brandwhoring and price tag flaunting

>> No.7292221

>>7292214
>>7292187
Post a $2500 fit then

>> No.7292225

>>7292214
autism

>> No.7292227
File: 28 KB, 390x310, 1310686794305.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292227

>>7292221
>>7292215
>>7292206
>>7292192
>>7292189

All of this mad

>> No.7292233

>wearing ultra cheap basics /w nice sneakers
:D
its the simple life n it feels so good
thanks muji thanks uniqlo :)

>> No.7292234

can someone post some basic low doc fits? ty

>> No.7292235

>>7292183
>>7292189
>>7292215
you can keep telling yourself that cheap basics look the same but your $10 shit will always look terrible. You won't have a flattering cut and the quality of the fabric IS noticeable. I'm not talking about $300 tees, but buying a $60 one is worth it, for example

>> No.7292244

>>7292235
autism

>> No.7292238

>>7292214
If there was Uniqlo, i would shop there for sure, but i'm not feeling ordering there online. Anyway i think that 10 blank tees with nice fit is better, then one for 100.

>> No.7292240
File: 1.44 MB, 300x208, nnn.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292240

>paying more than $100 for a single article of clothing

>> No.7292247

>>7292235
>muh fabric

>> No.7292249

>>7292215
lel

Have fun being the guy who's shoes cost more than the sum of the entire rest of his outfit + several other outfits

That's just unintelligent investing

>> No.7292253

uniqlo's $49 skinny jeans fit and look twice as good as the stupid acne ace cash shit /fa/ made me buy

>> No.7292258
File: 133 KB, 756x564, 1300572972451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292258

>>7292253
The problem there is you, not the pants kiddo

how's that delusion treating you

ps /fa/ didnt make you do anything, stop blaming the internet for your problems

>> No.7292262

>>7292249
fuck you people do you even listen to RICK OWENS
GRINGE FACE

>> No.7292261

>>7292249
That's the case for wearing full Rick too you stupid mong.

>rick tee $300
>drkshadow jeans 500
>geos $1200

>> No.7292266

>>7292261
Only idiots pay retail for geos you stupid mong.

>> No.7292277

>>7292253

i like their skinny jeans too, but they are starting to introduce retarded shit like "powder soft denim" that is like 40% polyester. are they trying to turn jeans into sweatpants or what? i know they are doing this so even fatties can wear them, after all uniqlo don't fuck with slim fits usually.

>> No.7292272

>>7292253
tfw have same problem :( aces look good but pretty average, some $50 jeans would do fine

>> No.7292273

>>7292266
only poor people bargain hunt and beg for beaters on ebay and sufu

>> No.7292280

>>7292253
r u talking about the "tapered skinny"?
those fit absolutely perfectly on me below the knees but the thighs were too roomy :(

>> No.7292283

>>7292273
then why are you complaining about prices then

>> No.7292285
File: 37 KB, 356x453, 996191_512896735444523_1937085452_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292285

>>7292273
Only autists convince themselves that paying full price for something classically overpriced makes them superior to intelligent opportunists.

>> No.7292287

being fashionable has nothing to do with labels, designers or pricetags.

it has nothing to do with quality either.

it's about expression. look at oldschool skinheads, their entire outfits probably cost $200 max and they're more /fa/ than any idiot on this board wearing 5 grand worth of rick to impress the internet.

>> No.7292302

>people arguing over clothes

>> No.7292313

>>7292287
>being fashionable has nothing to do with quality

Yeah, people look so fashionable walking around in sneakers with the soles half hanging off, tears in the armpits of their old shirts, and hoodies that shrunk too much on the first watch, warping the zipper and pilling up the fabric all because it was cheap shit

But whats important is that they are expressing themselves

Ps skinheads weren't that fashionable

>> No.7292326

>>7292313
Except clothes don't degrade as quickly as you're saying they do.

A Rick shirt made of cotton and a uniqlo shirt made of cotton are still both made of cotton.

A pair of Rick sneakers made of leather and a pair of vans made of leather are still leather.

>B-B-BUT RICK USES SUPER RARE ITALIAN COTTON AND LEATHER! IT'S ENGINEERED TO FIT YOU PERFECTLY AND NEVER FADE OR RIP OR ANYTHING!

Shut up.

>> No.7292335

>>7292326
cont'd

There are diminishing returns with the quality of clothing and you retards don't seem to understand that concept.

You want to rationalize and justify your overpriced /fa/core grails with MUH QUALITY AND MUH MATERIALS AND MUH FIT!

>> No.7292337

>>7292313

what you described can look good if they are going for a more decadent aesthetic

>> No.7292343

>>7292337
The only aesthetic he understands is "dressed by the internet fuccboi."

>> No.7292345

>>7292326
this.

If you wanna spend thousands of $$ on rick gear go for it. It does look awesome. But there's no need to shit on people who don't wanna spend that much on clothes.

>> No.7292347

>>7292326
When did I ever say clothes degrade quickly?

Your whole argument is banking on something that I didn't even say

>> No.7292354

>>7292345
>>7292326
>>7292343
I love how you guys think that just because I admonished uniqlo, I'm saying people should dress in Rick

I'm not even sure who brought rick up or why but it sure wasn't me

You're all strawmanning the shit out of this argument by somehow acting like it's a battle of quality when I never made a slight about uniqlo's quality to begin with, just it's price.

>>7292343
you're especially stupid though, you would never have heard about uniqlo if it weren't for /fa/, guaranteed. You're just as "dressed by the internet" as anyone else

>> No.7292350

>>7292347
>Yeah, people look so fashionable walking around in sneakers with the soles half hanging off, tears in the armpits of their old shirts, and hoodies that shrunk too much on the first watch, warping the zipper and pilling up the fabric all because it was cheap shit

>> No.7292357

>>7292347
you are the lowest common denominator of a fuccboi

why dont u post a fit of your high quality shit then matey?

>> No.7292363
File: 101 KB, 654x734, 1365680429047.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292363

>>7292354
Mods need to ban this kid for his own good.

>> No.7292364

>>7292350
Yes, I said that

Now where in there does it say that those clothes degrade >quickly<

"old tshirt" definitely doesnt mean quickly as far as I can tell

>> No.7292369

>>7292363
>uh oh, i have nothing left to go on
>better fall back on vague insults

>> No.7292372

>>7292369
how is that vague?

>> No.7292396

>>7292249
not really
shoes are the most important part

>> No.7292412

>>7292396

no, jeans are.

>> No.7292416
File: 18 KB, 140x239, 1370318247012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292416

>wear basic streetwear or workwear/mfa shit all the time
>get loadsa qt's and jelly guys mirin

>> No.7292417

>>7292416
post fit

>> No.7292432
File: 82 KB, 720x960, plebs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7292432

>>7292417

>> No.7292430

>>7292240
how the fuck do you even get sneakers then you idiot, and paying something like £180 which really isnt THAT much for a bit more premium brand jacket like carharrt or north face or cheap monday or something over gap/topman

>> No.7292436

>>7292430

cheap monday is crappy fast fashun quality with an edgy logo

>> No.7292445

>>7292436
They're noticably above fast fashion quality and the cut of their fits is a lot better than it is in most fast fashion shops. Their jeans are really good for the price they come at.

>> No.7292448

>>7292445
This, you >>7292436 have probably never seen Cheap Monday in person.

>> No.7292454

>>7292448
nigga i own a pair of their stretch skinnies in black and ive had them for like two years and they still look really good and have barely washed out, and i actually like their cut a lot more than the nudies and n&f skinnies i have.

>> No.7292455

>>7292448

ive worn CM. jacket's pocket came off in a week. the in-su jacket. fool me once...

>> No.7292464

>>7292454
Why are you calling them crappy fast fashun quality with an edgy logo then?

>> No.7292477

>>7292454
here
>>7292464
i completely read your post wrong i agree with you sorry

>> No.7292476

>>7292221
i'm not that guy but i just put all the most expensive pieces that i own together in an outfit and it came to $4090. i don't think it would look very good together but it is a nice feel :)

>> No.7292487

>>7292253
well, i guess it depends on your body type. there's bound to be some people that fit the uniqlos better. i own both and i think my acnes fit slightly better but the uniqlos fit nice too. the main difference, however, is how they wear over time. the acnes are looking better and better while the uniqlos aren't

>> No.7292493

>>7292244
>>7292247

Literal autism, you kids should leave the fashion board and go back to /v/ and /mu/

>> No.7292494

>>7292487

dose any1 know what cheap mondays fit like uniqlos skinnies?

>> No.7292521

>>7292363
Then what was the point in your post?

Just a shit post?
('shit post' in the sense that you're not really saying anything)

>> No.7292532

>>7292253
yeah the qlo jeans fit well and are stretchy enough for me to cycle in comfortably

>> No.7292544

>>7292227
nobody was mad
nobody is mad (except maybe you)

>> No.7292554

>>7292477
>i completely read your post wrong i agree with you sorry
No problem bb, that happens.

>> No.7294799

>>7292187
same with goofninjas lmao.
save up for geos
have nothing to wear them with