/fa/ - Fashion

no
fuck you

im going to cry

kek

>>7221738
>no
Why not?

:^)

i wear leggings all the time idek why i havent gotten some in fit i have a fit w/ thigh highs tho

>>7221759
far right arent leggings wtf is w/ that phone

>>7222182
Lol just realized that. He has a phone cord plugged into his Iphone HOLY SHIT WHAT THE FUCK WHY?

>>7222182

This isn't doing anything for me. It's just a bunch of Rick put together and...that's it.

>>7222182
How are you so oblivious to how gay this looks? Christ.

>>7222223
shit good catch im sure hell buy n&f raws and red wings now and start reading artofmanliness

>>7222242
He's wearing thigh highs and a skirt, man....

>>7222252
whoosh

>>7222223
he is gay

>>7222223
u almost got the sexts
not quite tho

>>7222263
Well duh, but that's no excuse to dress like a trap from the waist down.

>>7222199
no i don't.

>>7222203
you're missing out on a great pair of shoes beneath the counter. regardless, the fit works for me and that's kind of what matters, isn't it?

>>7222223
"gay" isn't quite the right terminology here.

>>7222277
whole fit tbh
i mean i know rick made it ok for bois 2 wear chiffon tshirts but its still p feminine in this context

>>7222598

>>7222614
wearing it again today with bare legs and stag wedges
no pics

>>7222598
>regardless, the fit works for me and that's kind of what matters, isn't it?

I'm not discouraging you from wearing it; I'm just saying that it always looks like you put on a bunch of Rick pieces hoping they're magically become more interesting together just because they're Rick.

>>7222598
twerk what do you think of crop tops over a long tank and some short shorts?

I'm having trouble finding pics of this (on dudes)

>>7222634
that's totally inaccurate and honestly kind of a stupid thing to say. i buy rick because i like it and wear it together because it's available to me. the fit isn't thoughtless, but i'm not sure what you have pictured in terms of premeditation here.

>>7222639
that's actually a pretty vague question because i don't know what these things specifically look like and you can have a lot of variance with a crop top, a tank, and a pair of shorts.

>>7222634
> it always looks like you put on a bunch of Rick pieces hoping they're magically become more interesting together just because they're Rick.

yeah because a dude in a skirt, leggings, and heels is totally boring and uninteresting right? you must see that kind of shit every day

>>7222677
no piece of that fit compliments any other piece, and it just doesn't flow.

>>7222695
those socks/thighs doe

>>7222661
> i buy rick because i like it and wear it together because it's available to me
There's your problem. It's cool if you like it, but don't just wear it "because it is available". Put some thought into your outfit. The pieces just don't mesh well together. But as you said, if you like it, then you shouldn't bother trying to defend your fit. In the end that's all that matters anyways.

>>7222677
You're missing the point. It's interesting, but his pieces don't go well with each other.

>>7222661

Am I "missing out" on a lot because it's not visible or because it's just not there? It's a tee, some Lotus shorts, and a beanie. Okay. The Lotus aren't any more interesting than any other folded/draped short and the tee is loose and languid, but doesn't really drape over the lotus and doesn't have any other layers to contrast against. And the beanie's a beanie.

I give everyone the benefit of the doubt, but I think it's pretty clear that it's a bunch of expensive stuff worn together for nought.

this is what happens to fits w/ no shoes!

>>7221742
>Pokemon exhausted
>finally make it through Rock Tunnel
>you see these shitheads waiting for you outside
>wake up in a Cerulean city pokecenter

>>7222695
>>7222720
say that in the first place instead of calling it uninteresting then

>>7222720
you misunderstood me. i buy rick owens because he matches up very well with my personal aesthetic vision and everything is exceptional as a design object. i don't need to reconcile my purchases with any deeper meaning, even if i can, because i love it on a very visceral level.

>>7222723
>The Lotus aren't any more interesting than any other folded/draped short

actually, it's bias cut throughout and utilizes clever paneling in order to maintain on grain seaming and prevent excessive waste while being folded first into two layers, then into four, and given a kangaroo pocket to boot. i get it, you're a buyer, this is a commodity to you and the craft is totally lost to your eyes because for some reason you've never taken it upon yourself to develop a little bit of an education in this field even though the information should be especially available to you.

and by the way, it's not "a tee, some lotus shorts, and a beanie"; it's a cement slab set into a foundation marbled by weather perched atop a pair of black columnar plinths and wreathed in fungal browns. the outfit was totally thoughtful, what was thoughtless was this trite criticism you vomited forth from that distended anal gape where your mouth ought to be. why is someone apparently so passionate about fashion bleating such clinical nonsense and trying to pass it off as critique? was there any point to your rant except to imply that i'm somehow consuming a product incorrectly? is the irony that all of your fits can be similarly reduced to "tshirt, some jeans, and some boots" lost on you?

normally i just don't listen to the nonsense you post when you try to tackle fashion from a design perspective, always with this amorphous language because you don't have the vocabulary to flesh out your thoughts, but i'm running out of patience with you. in short: blow it out your ass.

>>7223373
ok but post fits w/ shoes pls

>>7223382
sure, it's partially my fault; the resolution is very poor and half the fit is missing. that's a salient piece of criticism and one that was levied at me by people who actually have opinions that i respect; this nonsense about "flow" would be just as pointless even if the picture was very good, though.

>>7221736
Those calves will haunt my dreams.

Actually I will sleep no more, forever.

>>7223403
You entertain me. I would do what you do ironically if I was spooky.

>>7223435
be fierce? dress like a slut?

>>7223448
Dress hilarious

Effeminate and edgy all day

I own a tracksuit ironically

I wear shields, a chain, a wifebeater, and spike my hair when I wear it

I like to mock people by imitating them.

Makes me laff

I used to dress like the scene kids in hs and make fun of them to their faces

>>7223476
a woman struck up casual conversation with me at the butcher counter, and another commented on the liquor i was buying, i can't be that edgy.

>>7223403
what are they making?

>>7223483
You have a sweet face and you're small.

You just look cute for trying to be edgy when you look so small.

Like a 4 year old with a mohawk but funnier because he's in a dress.

Is entertaining to me to imagine you walking about like that

>>7222182
This is the whole fit, yeah?

>>7223502
>You just look cute for trying to be edgy when you look so small.
twerk just looks cute period okay

>>7223516
That's what's funny. He's basically the edgy girl at the coffee house but if she was a boy.

>>7223522
why are you bringing edgy into this?

can we talk about swants

>>7223373

>and by the way, it's not "a tee, some lotus shorts, and a beanie"; it's a cement slab set into a foundation marbled by weather perched atop a pair of black columnar plinths and wreathed in fungal browns. the outfit was totally thoughtful, what was thoughtless was this trite criticism you vomited forth from that distended anal gape where your mouth ought to be. why is someone apparently so passionate about fashion bleating such clinical nonsense and trying to pass it off as critique? was there any point to your rant except to imply that i'm somehow consuming a product incorrectly? is the irony that all of your fits can be similarly reduced to "tshirt, some jeans, and some boots" lost on you?

Its hilarious how little are you actually saying, and how cynical you act when fascist is totally correct.

>>7223534
Monochrome is edgy.

>>7223512
different tshirt, plus that pic is so distorted; irl the shoulders are much narrower and the boots actually a bit heavier, more imposing.

>>7223534
narrative

>>7223536
okay, so you can demonstrate how little is being said and you can demonstrate /fa/scist's correctness, instead of just stating them, right?

>>7223491
sorry; it's some kind of heat shield

>>7223502
what's the correct way 4 qties like me 2 dress btw?

>>7223373
> i don't need to reconcile my purchases with any deeper meaning, even if i can, because i love it on a very visceral level.

not that guy but i don't understand what you're saying here. what does viscera mean here? it sounds like you love everything you buy on a inner/deep level and you don't need to justify it but you can if you want to. am i getting the right meaning out of your sentence?

/fa/scist has a public trip and it's been that way for a while. what made you think he was credible before?

>>7223606
price point aside - and that's something that will change when i begin my career - rick's work just makes a lot of sense for me and my lifestyle. it doesn't need to be complicated; i don't need a manifesto to justify what i wear. i'm sure the response is, "but that's not what i meant!", but this:

>but I think it's pretty clear that it's a bunch of expensive stuff worn together for nought.
and this:
>I'm just saying that it always looks like you put on a bunch of Rick pieces hoping they're magically become more interesting together just because they're Rick.

is exactly what he's saying, and it's offensively stupid.

>>7223629
the original gangster still uses it. and he does have worthwhile input, when he's talking about the retail and buying sides of the industry, he just consistently trips over his own feet when he wants to touch on design aspects, and this insinuation that i'm some kind of victimized brandwhore was the last straw. bitch dont no me

>>7223603
I'm not saying you can't be edgy. I'm just saying it's hilarious.

I wear compression pants when I run and it's cold out.
D-does that count?
How do I implement them into more fits or do I disregard that idea completely?

>>7223715
Follow your dreams

Why do you seek approval from the hive mind

>>7223720
Habit I suppose
I only have shitty under armor ones though

>>7223698
i really don't kno where ur gettin "edgy" tho

>>7223715
layer under qt boo-t shawts

>>7222723

hahaha fucking on point

i mean i disagree with the 'expensive stuff for nought' part but at the end of the day twerk doesn't really know how to dress himself. yah sure he'll argue something about '2deep4u', 'blurring gender lines' blah blah blah but each fit is a mess

that's not to discount all the knowledge he has about the industry and certain brands, which i've found quite useful. but i'll never take any of his fit pics seriously

>>7223744
can you give me a reason why i should listen to you instead of all of the people who like the way i dress, including myself?

can you even quantify what is, quote-unquote, wrong with my fits?

>>7222723
It's not even clear it's expensive
It looks like a middle schooler on opposite sex day. What a gayboy from the suburbs looks like after his first dive in his out of date sister's closet
It looks like shit

>>7223748
Monochrome is edgy

Dressing effeminatly as a man is edgy

>all these people misgendering twerk

She gave you her pronouns, people. Would a little respect kill you?

>>7223448
You don't look fierce, you don't even look like a slut. You look like a sloppily put together joke

>>7223754

i mean it's not godawful because each piece individually is interesting. but to me the overall product has no consistency - its waking up and throwing stuff on but with a really awkward disjointed result

if it weren't for the playful / likeable persona you present on here you wouldn't get any ppl who like the way you dress tbh

that said I wish you'd give us a nice photo with good lighting and a full profile so we could judge with more finality

i really liked that pic you had with the big flowing robe though

>>7223791
>but to me the overall product has no consistency

expand on this

>>7223782
lmao

>>7223791
>but to me the overall product has no consistency - its waking up and throwing stuff on but with a really awkward disjointed result

thats ur opinion

and

its not a very good 1

its not even like hes wearing allen edmonds with givenchy or some shit, rick with more rick is uncohesive? come on

>>7223799
There's 2 kinds of edgy
The kind that pisses off the left
And the kind that pisses off the right

A swastika shirt is right edgy
A skirt on a man is left edgy

You're playing for reactions either way and it's a joke.

Monochrome is obviously edgy and always had been.

>>7223814
rofl

monochrome is the most inoffensive colour combination

>>7223822
Sure thing, count dracula.

>>7223798

take a proper photo, not a selfie in a dingy bathroom and i will expand. from what I can make out in >>7222182 though it just looks to me like costuming for pricilla queen of the desert: rick owens edition
intended for comic effect or s/t

>>7223801

inconsistency doesn't just mean you've clashed different brands

i don't really take your input seriously anyway though

>>7223834
u do realize monochrome and all black are 2 completely different things right?

>>7223835
You know I'm talking about black and greys, mr reaper. U r 2 spooky.

>>7223836
you fronted an opinion but you can't expand on it, yet you're also willing to state that people wouldn't like my fits if they didn't like me? do you see why i'm not willing to take your criticism very seriously?

>>7223848

i don't see the problem with what I said given its accurate

you also haven't given us anything to go on

>>7223853
you seem a little confused. we're not discussing *my* opinion of the fit, we're discussing your opinion of the fit, and really, i'm only doing it to demonstrate why i don't really care about it and why i don't take waywt criticism very seriously, and why i don't really engage in it myself.

>>7223875
Mfw 6 comments of hate when I post in waywt bcuz better body than them

>>7223552
>>7223782
>>7223814
>>7223822
>>7223840

jesus. finally. this>>7223835.
normally i dnt care abt this sort of shit. but seriously. monochromatic. is.not.=. acrhomatic. grey/white/black = the latter. this shouldn't get me so much but goddamnit it does. call it the right fucking thing. shit, how hard is this? .. if there is no colour it is achromatic, 'mono' is one. 'a' is without.

>>7223888
>get two rows of hate comments on a fit few weeks ago in waywt
>get mad compliments irl

>>7224157
compliments irl may feel good but dont mean shit, they dont even necessarily mean the person even liked ur outfit

>>7224172
Yeah but I still know it's a good fit.

You out of all people should know getting negged/flamed online B^). doesn't mean anything. Yeah compliments are nice but idk about opinions tbh

>>7224172
most ppl i see compliment my shoes or shirt or one item, but not the rest. I can only imagine they'd go so far to compliment the 1 thing because it actually looks good as a whole cohesive fit, but ur rite. a compliment kinda falls flat when somebody tells me my shoes are nice, i fucking know, i bought them didn't i..?

>>7224208
*most ppl that compliment
sozy bb

>>7223754
i think your outfit is really good looking. it doesnt lack any kind of flow at all. just these plebs getting insecure about you "breaking norms". you rock <3

bump

>>7222797
this made me laugh and i never have playd pokemon

>>7222797
kek

>>7223373

I feel like there was an opening for respectful discussion but you got ultra bitchy and defensive when fascist said he didn't like your fit

>>7227287
that opening was here:
>>7222661
to which he responded with more noise.

>>7221759
Wait, lenny krawitz is wearin sum undercover ain't he?

>>7227312
is that a poet pic? your expanding ur image folder?
very nice

>>7227331
I'm 99% sure the pants are UC.

>>7221736
lmao.

Yeah, if you're like the guy in the pic and have woman-legs.

>>7221759
Ow, mine sides.

trunks is based prophet's new trip right? god what a faggot.

>>7222661
w2c fit drawings